the relation of embeddability between uncountable torsion
play

The relation of embeddability between uncountable torsion-free - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The relation of embeddability between uncountable torsion-free abelian groups Filippo Calderoni University of Turin March 14, 2017 1/22 Borel reducibility In the framework of (classical) Borel reducibility, relations are defined over Polish


  1. The relation of embeddability between uncountable torsion-free abelian groups Filippo Calderoni University of Turin March 14, 2017 1/22

  2. Borel reducibility In the framework of (classical) Borel reducibility, relations are defined over Polish or standard Borel spaces. 2/22

  3. Borel reducibility In the framework of (classical) Borel reducibility, relations are defined over Polish or standard Borel spaces. Definition Let P and Q be quasi-orders X and Y , respectively. We say that P Borel reduces to Q (or P ≤ B Q ) if and only if there is a Borel f : X → Y function such that x 1 P x 2 ⇔ f ( x 1 ) Q f ( x 2 ) . 2/22

  4. Borel reducibility In the framework of (classical) Borel reducibility, relations are defined over Polish or standard Borel spaces. Definition Let P and Q be quasi-orders X and Y , respectively. We say that P Borel reduces to Q (or P ≤ B Q ) if and only if there is a Borel f : X → Y function such that x 1 P x 2 ⇔ f ( x 1 ) Q f ( x 2 ) . If E , F are equivalence relation and E ≤ B F we say roughly that E is not more complicated than F . 2/22

  5. Analytic equivalence relations E Σ 1 • 1 • E ℓ ∞ • E G ∞ • E 1 • E S ∞ • id 2 <ω 1 • E ctble Polish group actions • E ∞ classifiable by N -structures countable Borel • E 0 • id R Σ 1 1 equivalence relation 3/22

  6. Analytic equivalence relations E Σ 1 • 1 E Σ 1 1 is defined as the • E ℓ ∞ ≤ B -maximum and called the complete Σ 1 1 equiv- • E G ∞ • E 1 alence relation . • E S ∞ • id 2 <ω 1 • E ctble • E ∞ • E 0 • id R Σ 1 1 equivalence relation 3/22

  7. Complete Σ 1 1 quasi-orders Definition Q is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order if and only if Q is Σ 1 1 and P ≤ B Q , for every Σ 1 1 quasi-order P . 4/22

  8. Complete Σ 1 1 quasi-orders Definition Q is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order if and only if Q is Σ 1 1 and P ≤ B Q , for every Σ 1 1 quasi-order P . 1 quasi-order, then E Q := Q ∩ Q − 1 is a If Q is a complete Σ 1 complete Σ 1 1 equivalence relation. 4/22

  9. Complete Σ 1 1 quasi-orders Definition Q is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order if and only if Q is Σ 1 1 and P ≤ B Q , for every Σ 1 1 quasi-order P . 1 quasi-order, then E Q := Q ∩ Q − 1 is a If Q is a complete Σ 1 complete Σ 1 1 equivalence relation. Theorem (Louveau-Rosendal 2005) The relation of embeddability between countable graphs ⊑ GRAPHS is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. Thus the bi-embeddability ≡ GRAPHS is a complete Σ 1 1 equivalence relation. 4/22

  10. Embeddability between coutable structures Definition Denote by X GRAPHS the space of countable (undirected) graphs with domain N . It is a closed subset of 2 N 2 , thus a Polish space. 5/22

  11. Embeddability between coutable structures Definition Denote by X GRAPHS the space of countable (undirected) graphs with domain N . It is a closed subset of 2 N 2 , thus a Polish space. def ∃ h : N 1 − 1 T ⊑ GRAPHS V ⇐ ⇒ − − → N h is an isomorphism from T to V ↾ Im ( h ). 5/22

  12. Embeddability between coutable structures Definition Denote by X GRAPHS the space of countable (undirected) graphs with domain N . It is a closed subset of 2 N 2 , thus a Polish space. def ∃ h : N 1 − 1 T ⊑ GRAPHS V ⇐ ⇒ − − → N h is an isomorphism from T to V ↾ Im ( h ). ⊑ GRAPHS is a Σ 1 1 quasi-order. we can consider the relation of embeddability on any space of countable structures (graphs, groups, etc...); 5/22

  13. Embeddability of countable groups Theorem (Williams 2014) The embeddability between countable groups ⊑ GROUPS is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. Williams defines a reduction from ⊑ GRAPHS to ⊑ GROUPS . 6/22

  14. Embeddability of countable groups Theorem (Williams 2014) The embeddability between countable groups ⊑ GROUPS is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. Williams defines a reduction from ⊑ GRAPHS to ⊑ GROUPS . The groups Williams builds to reduce ⊑ GRAPHS to ⊑ GROUPS are nonabelian. 6/22

  15. Embeddability on abelian groups Question How about the embeddability between countable abelian groups? 7/22

  16. Embeddability on abelian groups Question How about the embeddability between countable abelian groups? And the more challenging... Question How about the embeddability between countable torsion-free abelian groups? Is it a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order? 7/22

  17. What I’m not talking about today A few weeks ago... Theorem (C.-Thomas) The relation of embeddability ⊑ TFA between countable torsion-free abelian groups is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. An old problem Is the isomorphism between countable torsion-free abelian groups S ∞ -complete (Borel complete)? 8/22

  18. The “generalized” result A few more weeks ago... Theorem (C.) If κ is uncountable such that κ <κ = κ , then the relation ⊑ κ TFA of embeddability between TFA groups of size κ is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. 9/22

  19. The “generalized” result A few more weeks ago... Theorem (C.) If κ is uncountable such that κ <κ = κ , then the relation ⊑ κ TFA of embeddability between TFA groups of size κ is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. Generalized Descriptive Set Theory is not the mere generalization of Classical Descriptive Set Theory. 9/22

  20. The “generalized” result A few more weeks ago... Theorem (C.) If κ is uncountable such that κ <κ = κ , then the relation ⊑ κ TFA of embeddability between TFA groups of size κ is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. Generalized Descriptive Set Theory is not the mere generalization of Classical Descriptive Set Theory. The proof relies on the existence of an almost-full embedding G : Graphs → Ab (Prze´ zdziecki 2014). 9/22

  21. Generalied Descriptive Set Theory Let κ be an uncountable cardinal. Definition The generalized Baire space on κ is κ κ := { x | x : κ → κ } endowed with the ( bounded ) topology , i.e. the one generated by the sets of the form N s := { x ∈ κ κ | x ⊇ s } , where s ∈ <κ κ . 10/22

  22. Generalied Descriptive Set Theory Let κ be an uncountable cardinal. Definition The generalized Baire space on κ is κ κ := { x | x : κ → κ } endowed with the ( bounded ) topology , i.e. the one generated by the sets of the form N s := { x ∈ κ κ | x ⊇ s } , where s ∈ <κ κ . The generalized Cantor space is the closed subspace κ 2 of κ κ consisting of the binary sequences. 10/22

  23. Generalied Descriptive Set Theory Let κ be an uncountable cardinal. Definition The generalized Baire space on κ is κ κ := { x | x : κ → κ } endowed with the ( bounded ) topology , i.e. the one generated by the sets of the form N s := { x ∈ κ κ | x ⊇ s } , where s ∈ <κ κ . The generalized Cantor space is the closed subspace κ 2 of κ κ consisting of the binary sequences. They are not metrizable (unless cof ( κ ) = ω ), and their density character is κ <κ and 2 <κ . 10/22

  24. The most common approach We assume κ <κ = κ κ κ is a κ -space (i.e., it has a base of size κ ). κ + - Borel sets are the closure under complements and ≤ κ -unions of the basic open sets. They form a proper subset of P ( κ κ ) that can be stratified in a hierarchy with exactly κ + -many levels (the Σ 0 α ’s and Π 0 α ’s). A κ -space is standard Borel if it is κ + -Borel isomorphic to a κ + -Borel subset of κ κ . Let X be standard Borel. Then a set A ⊆ X is ( κ -) analytic or Σ 1 1 if it is a projection of a closed subset of κ κ × X . 11/22

  25. Generalized Borel reducibility We denote by X κ GRAPHS , X κ TFA the standard Borel κ -spaces of the respective structures over κ . TFA the Σ 1 We denote by ⊑ κ GRAPHS , ⊑ κ 1 quasi-orders of embeddability on the respective spaces. 12/22

  26. Generalized Borel reducibility We denote by X κ GRAPHS , X κ TFA the standard Borel κ -spaces of the respective structures over κ . TFA the Σ 1 We denote by ⊑ κ GRAPHS , ⊑ κ 1 quasi-orders of embeddability on the respective spaces. Definition Let X and Y be standard Borel κ -space, and P , Q be binary relations over X and Y , respectively. We say that P Borel reduces to Q (or P ≤ B Q ) if and only if there is a κ + -Borel f : X → Y such that x 1 P x 2 ⇔ f ( x 1 ) Q f ( x 2 ) . The definition of Σ 1 1 -completeness is translated verbatim. 12/22

  27. Generalized Louveau-Rosendal Theorem Theorem (Motto Ros 2013) GRAPHS is a complete Σ 1 If κ is weakly compact, then ⊑ κ 1 quasi-order. 13/22

  28. Generalized Louveau-Rosendal Theorem Theorem (Motto Ros 2013) GRAPHS is a complete Σ 1 If κ is weakly compact, then ⊑ κ 1 quasi-order. Theorem (Mildenberger-Motto Ros) If κ is uncountable such that κ <κ = κ , then ⊑ κ GRAPHS is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. 13/22

  29. Theorem (C.) If κ is uncountable such that κ <κ = κ , then the relation ⊑ κ TFA of embeddability between TFA groups of size κ is a complete Σ 1 1 quasi-order. Proof (sketch) It suffices to show that ⊑ κ GRAPHS ≤ B ⊑ κ TFA . Let Γ be a skeleton of the category Graph ctble Suppose that every graph in Γ has some subset of N as vertex set. Let W κ be a universal graph of size κ . I.e. every graph of size κ embeds into it. If T is a graph, then let [ T ] <ω 1 be the poset of countable induced subgraphs of T ordered by inclusion. 14/22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend