European Department
THE REFUGEE SURGE IN EUROPE: ECONOMIC CHALLENGES Bergljot Bjrnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THE REFUGEE SURGE IN EUROPE: ECONOMIC CHALLENGES Bergljot Bjrnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THE REFUGEE SURGE IN EUROPE: ECONOMIC CHALLENGES Bergljot Bjrnson Barkbu European Investment Bank Institute February 16, 2016 European Department CONTENTS Facts Numbers in Perspective Institutional Framework Economic Impact
European Department
CONTENTS
Facts
- Numbers in Perspective
- Institutional Framework
Economic Impact
- Labor Market
- Fiscal Effects
- GDP Growth
- Age-Related Spending
Policies
- Labor Markets
- Product Markets
- Housing and Mobility
- Fiscal Policy
2
European Department
CONTENTS
Facts
- Numbers in Perspective
- Institutional Framework
3
European Department
REFUGEE SURGE IN PERSPECTIVE
- Worldwide refugees: 14.4 million in 2014 (up 25 percent
from 2013)
- Inflow of first-time asylum seekers to the EU has
increased dramatically:
- Through November 2015 the inflow was 1,140,000, up 128%
- ver the same period in 2014.
- In Q3 2015 the inflow was 415,000, up 153% over Q3 2014.
- More could come:
- 8 million displaced people in Syria
- 4.3 million having fled to neighboring countries
- Ongoing conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Eritrea
- Network effects
4
European Department
ASYLUM APPLICATIONS IN THE EU OVER TIME
FACTS
5
200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014* 2015*
EU-28: Asylum Applications
(Thousands)
Sources: Eurostat. *Data is through November.
End of the Cold War Civil war in Syria Bosnia and Kosovo Wars
European Department
SURGE IN MID-2015
Source: Eurostat.
6
10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2013 2014 2015
First-Time Asylum Applicants
(Thousands)
European Department
UNEVEN IMPACT ACROSS EU COUNTRIES
Source: Eurostat
7
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 EU-28 DEU HUN SWE ITA AUT FIN DNK GRC MLT
Total applicants, thousands Applicants per 1,000 inhabitants (RHS)
Selected Asylum Seekers' Destinations in the EU-28
(December2014 to November 2015)
100 200 300 400 Syria Afghanistan Kosovo Eritrea Serbia
First-Time Asylum Applicants in the EU by Major Countries of Origin
(Thousands of Applications)
2014 2014M1-M11 2015M1-M11
European Department
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK - I
UN
- 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol
Common European Asylum System
- The 2013 Dublin Regulation
- Standards on asylum procedures
Countries
- Many other asylum rules are national, including when/on what
grounds residency is granted
8
European Department
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK - II
Consensus that the current EU system is not working
- Few countries are fully respecting the minimum standards
- Scope for returns under the Dublin system is limited
- Lack of resources. Gateway countries are overwhelmed
- Asylum seekers want to apply for asylum in their favored destination
Temporary (partial) solution
- In the fall of 2015, EU countries agreed to:
- “Hot spots” in gateway countries where asylum seekers can be
registered, identify people in clear need of international protection
- Relocation of 160,000 asylum seekers from Greece and Italy on an
ad hoc basis over the next two years
- Stepped up border enforcement
- Humanitarian help for Turkey
9
European Department
CONTENTS
Economic Impact
- Labor Market
- Fiscal Effects
- GDP Growth
- Age-Related Spending
10
European Department
LABOR MARKET AND INTEGRATION
- How do migrants perform in the labor
market?
- Which policies facilitate the entry of
immigrants in the labor market?
- What is the economic impact of immigrants
- n natives?
11
European Department
REFUGEES INTEGRATE SLOWLY *
- 0.25
- 0.2
- 0.15
- 0.1
- 0.05
<6 6-10 11-20 >20
Employment relative to native workers
(Share)
Other immigrants: Role of language skills Other immigrants: Conditional gap Refugee: Role of language skills Refugee: Conditional gap
Years since arrival in country Additional share with respect to natives
- We proxy the refugee experience using that of immigrants from refugee-sending countries
12
European Department
LARGE WAGE GAPS
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
- 90%
- 80%
- 70%
- 60%
- 50%
- 40%
- 30%
- 20%
- 10%
0% Number of estimates Wage gap
Source: IMF Staff Estimates Note: Histogram of migrant wage gap, conditional on observables, based on 75 estimates across 9 studies on earnings assimilation of immigrants in the US, Canada and Europe.
Immigrant Wage Gap: Distribution of Estimates in Select Studies
13
European Department
HIGHER RELIANCE ON SOCIAL BENEFITS
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 <6 6-10 11-20 >20
Social Benefits: Main Source of Income
(Share)
Other immigrants: Role of language skills Other immigrants: Conditional gap Refugee: Role of language skills Refugee: Conditional gap
Years since arrival in country Additional share with respect to natives
14
European Department
INTEGRATION POLICIES: STRONG EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
Policy Measure Evidence Active Labor Market Policies Wage subsidies Denmark, Germany Training / skill provision Germany, Denmark, Israel Access to temporary employment agencies Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden
15
European Department
INTEGRATION POLICIES: SOME EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
Policy Measure Evidence Overall labor regulation Lower entry wages / limited exception from minimum wages Cross-country Lower employment protection Reduce taxes and social security contributions for low-wage workers to address “inactivity traps” Product market regulation Lower barriers to self-employment Cross-country
16
European Department
EFFECTS ON NATIVES
- Migrants do not steal natives’ jobs
- Numerous studies have documented only small and short-lived
effects
- Why?
- Migrants’ skills often complementary to those of natives
- Demand effects of large population outweigh any substitution
effects
- Natives upgrade their skills
17
European Department
CONTENTS
Economic Impact
- Labor Market
- Fiscal Effects
- GDP Growth
- Age-Related Spending
18
European Department
SMALL POSITIVE IMPACT ON PUBLIC FINANCES
- 1.5
- 1.0
- 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
- 1.5
- 1.0
- 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 LUX CHE GRC ITA ISL SVN BEL ESP PRT EST GBR NOR NLD SWE FIN AUT DNK HUN USA AUS CZE SVK CAN IRL POL FRA DEU
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact of Stock of Immigrants, 2007-09 Average (% GDP)
Source: OECD, International Migration Outlook 2013.
Average
19
European Department
DEMOGRAPHICS MATTER
- 300
- 200
- 100
100 200 300 400 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Age
Natives Migrants
Germany: Present Value of Expected Future Net Fiscal Contributions, By Age Group
(Thousands of euro, generational account approach, base year=2012)
Source: Bonin (2014).
20
European Department
ESTIMATED SHORT-TERM FISCAL EFFECT OF CURRENT REFUGEE WAVE
Fiscal Cost of Asylum Seekers, 2014-16
(Percent of GDP) 2014 2015 2016 Austria 0.08 0.16 0.31 France 0.05 0.05 0.06 Germany 0.08 0.20 0.35 Hungary 0.0 0.1 0.0 Italy 0.17 0.20 0.24 Spain 0.01 0.01 0.03 Sweden 0.3 0.5 1.0 GDP-weighted average 0.08 0.13 0.19
Source: IMF staff estimates based on authorities' information and/or other sources.
21
European Department
CONTENTS
Economic Impact
- Labor Market
- Fiscal Effects
- GDP Growth
- Age-Related Spending
22
European Department
GROWTH SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS
- Asylum Applicants:
1.3 million annually during 2015-17; falling off sharply subsequently
- Approval and transition to labor market :
40 percent rejection rate Become eligible to work within up to two years of application
- Labor market integration:
Scenario 1: lower participation and higher unemployment rates than natives—but gap declining over time Scenario 2: “Slow integration scenario”: unemployment gap doubles
- Fiscal costs:
12,000 euro per year before becoming eligible to work; same amount for rejected applicants for one year
- Model: EUROMOD semi-structural global models; country-specific
calibrations
23
European Department
GROWTH EFFECT POSITIVE, BUT UNEVEN
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Output Level
(Percent) EU scenario 1 EU scenario 2 DEU scenario 1 DEU scenario 2
Impact of Refugee Inflows
(Deviation from baseline scenario)
Sources: IMF staff estimates.
- 0.2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Government Debt/GDP
(Percentage point) EU scenario 1 EU scenario 2 DEU scenario 1 DEU scenario 2 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Unemployment Rate
(Percentage point) EU scenario 1 EU scenario 2 DEU scenario 1 DEU scenario 2
24
European Department
CONTENTS
Economic Impact
- Labor Market
- Fiscal Effects
- GDP Growth
- Age-Related Spending
25
European Department
MIGRATION KEY FOR POPULATION GROWTH
- 1
- 0.5
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Natural change Net migration
EU28: Population Changes
(Millions)
26
European Department
PENSION EFFECT LIKELY POSITIVE
- Refugees younger than the average EU citizen
- Quantification: assume same inflow as in scenario 1
- Pension expenditure would be lower than in the baseline EC Aging
Report scenario by some ¼ percent of EU GDP by 2030
- Effects on health spending also favorable
- Heterogeneity across countries reflecting refugee distribution
27
European Department
LABOR MARKET PULL, NOT AGING
BEL BUL CZE DNK DEU EST IRL GRC ESP FRA HRV ITA CYP LTA LTU LUX HUN MLT NLD AUT POL PRT ROM SVN SVK FIN SWE GBR NOR
5 10 15 20 25 30 25 35 45 55 Unemployment rate (Q3 2015) 2030 old-age dependency ratio
Size of Bubble = Asylum Seekers per 1,000 Inhabitants
(2013-15 average)
BEL BUL CZE DNK DEU EST IRL GRC ESP FRA HRV ITA CYP LTA LTU LUX HUN MLT NLD AUT POL PRT ROM SVN SVK FIN SWE GBR NOR
5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 Unemployment rate (Q3 2015) 2050 old-age dependency ratio
Size of Bubble = Asylum Seekers per 1,000 Inhabitants
(2013-15 average)
Source: Eurostat (‘no migration’ scenario).
28
European Department
CONTENTS
Policies
- Labor Markets
- Product Markets
- Housing and Mobility
- Fiscal Policy
29
European Department
LABOR MARKETS
- Reduce restrictions to work for asylum seekers
- Ensure early language/tailored skill training
- Provide targeted and temporary
- Wage subsidies
- Exemptions from some labor market regulations?
- Strengthen active labor market policies
Prompt integration of refugees into labor markets is key to favorable economic impact
30
European Department
PRODUCT MARKETS
- Simplify regulatory and administrative procedures for
new firms
- Provide start-up support
- Accelerate skill recognition; targeted training
Ease avenues to self-employment and facilitate skill recognition
31
European Department
HOUSING AND MOBILITY
- Tackle construction bottlenecks (e.g., land use
regulation, permissions, rent control)
- Financial incentives to build social housing
- Full geographical mobility of accepted asylum seekers,
within and between countries?
Mobility to high-labor-demand areas requires affordable housing
32
European Department
FISCAL POLICY
- Many EU countries have limited fiscal space but…
- Most countries should be able to absorb the immediate
fiscal cost within their SGP targets
- SGP flexibility for non-recurrent expenditures.
Caveat: There are major operational issues
How should the short-term fiscal costs related to refugees be handled?
33
European Department
SUMMARY
- Flows of displaced people are large by historical standards and
may persist
- The economic implications are notable, but not major:
- The international experience is that the impact on native
workers is likely limited
- Faster labor market integration lowers costs and raises gains
- Policies help, especially ALMP and labor and product market
reforms
- Fiscal costs are limited. Immigration can help reduce population
ageing pressures but will not solve the problem
34