The political economy of water security, ecosystem services and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the political economy of water security ecosystem
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The political economy of water security, ecosystem services and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The political economy of water security, ecosystem services and livelihoods in the western Himalayas ESPA 2013 PROJECT, REFERENCE NE/ L001365/ 1 Project team University of Cambridge Bhaskar Vira Centre for Development and Research


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The political economy of water security, ecosystem services and livelihoods in the western Himalayas

ESPA 2013 PROJECT, REFERENCE NE/ L001365/ 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 University of Cambridge

 Bhaskar Vira

 Centre for Development and Research (CEDAR), India

 Dr Rajesh Thadani  Chetan Agarwal  Professor S P Singh  Dr Vishal Singh  Dr Devendra Chauhan  Dr Ajay Saxena

 Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies (SIAS), Nepal

 Dr Hemant Ojha  Dr Ngamindra Dahal  Dr Kamal Devkota

Project team

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project focus: small towns

 Growing populations in small towns –

neglected urbanisation?

 For every large urban settlement,

estimated to be ten small towns

 Rapid growth, expected to double in

number and size every 15 years (Pilgrim et

  • al. 2007)

 Specific focus – Indian state of Himachal

Pradesh and Uttarakhand, and Nepal

 Of the estimated 8.3 million residents in

the region, 46% live in small towns (below 100,000 people)

 Key characteristics

 Continued dependence on surrounding ecosystem

for water – usually surface water sources

 Wider relationship with natural ecosystems and

surrounding catchments, despite urbanisation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Historically contested environments in the Western Himalayas

 Hydrological connections between the forested Himalayas

and downstream communities

 ‘Dessicationist’ discourses of the 19th century, to the

‘theory of Himalayan degradation’ of the mid-1970s

 Continued lack of detailed empirical or theoretical

consensus on the forest-hydrology relationship

 Forests and rainfall  Forests and evapo-transpiration  Forests and stream flow

 Widespread belief in hydrological relationships

 Conservation of the Shimla Water Catchment since the 19th c.  Continued focus on links between Himalayan land-use change and

hydrological flows in the northern/eastern plains

slide-5
SLIDE 5

‘New ecologies’ of risk and vulnerability

 Demands for ecosystem

services from downstream beneficiaries

 Human vulnerability to disaster

and exposure to risk

 Trade-offs between ecological

protection and developmental pressures

 Drivers of change: dam building,

deforestation, roads, pilgrim tourism, extreme weather events (climate change?)

 Settlement patterns along road

and trade networks, spontaneous and unplanned urbanisation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Previous ESPA-funded research (2011- 13)

 Palampur town, 1219 m., at the foothills of

the Dhauladhar range, Himachal Pradesh

 ‘Small town’ – estimated population

46,224

 Av. rainfall 250 cm p.a., 80% in the

monsoon months (June-Aug)

 Dependent on the streams from upper

catchments for drinking water and irrigation

 PES negotiated to reduce upstream

pressure on infiltration zone and protect forests

 Post agreement political economy of

access, use and control

 Need to understand needs and

perspectives of upstream/downstream stakeholders, and recognise trade-offs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Role of landuse planning and zoning

 Important for securing water supplies in mountain

regions, and reducing risk and vulnerability

 Need to understand the full range of ecosystem services

in the landscape, and how these are accessed by both rural and urban stakeholders

 Trade-offs and choices in these contexts

 How is water used and allocated?  Who benefits from enhanced infiltration and recharge?  How is the well-being of the (rural and urban) poor impacted

by changes in landuse, and improvements in aggregate water availability?

 What impacts are there on other ecosystem services?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project aims

 To understand negotiation processes between different stakeholders

(both rural and urban) over landuse and zoning strategies that influence access to water and other ecosystem services in selected catchments surrounding small towns in the Western Himalayan region;

 To identify the critical synergies and trade-offs associated with

alternative zoning and landuse management strategies, and their likely impacts on different stakeholders;

 To investigate the contrasting political, governance and institutional

arrangements which frame the context for these negotiations, focusing on two case studies each across three different jurisdictions – Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Nepal;

 To work with local planning authorities and decision makers to

explore the potential for landuse planning and zoning to address the water security needs of the region.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Specific research questions

 RQ1: From what sources do the selected small towns derive

their water supply, and what is the current state of knowledge about the condition of these sources and threats to their sustainability?

 RQ2: What are the specific areas in the surrounding and

source watersheds that are critical to the long term sustainability of these water supply sources (‘critical water zones’)?

 RQ3: What are the other ecosystem services that flow from

these critical water zones, and what is the current state of knowledge about their condition and trends?

 RQ4: Who are the stakeholders that depend on the flows of

water, and other ecosystem services, from these critical water zones, and what are their current livelihood strategies (and their poverty status)?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Specific research questions

 RQ5: Who are the key decision makers in these landscapes,

and what are their specific institutional and resource interests in relation to flows of water, and other ecosystem services?

 RQ6: What are the synergies and trade-offs between (a)

ecosystem services; and (b) stakeholders in these landscapes?

 RQ7: What is the potential for stakeholder engagement and

negotiation in order to develop interventions that secure water supplies, other ecosystem services and promote sustainable livelihoods and poverty alleviation in these landscapes?

 RQ8: What are the implications of these findings for

knowledge about the institutional and governance contexts in which ecosystem-based interventions can provide pro-poor strategies for water supply and other ecosystem services in low income (mountain) regions?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Impact and Research into Use strategy

 Identifying local ‘policy champions’ in case study towns

and surrounding villages

 Engaging local stakeholders and building capacity  Targeted meetings with key decision makers  Flexibility – looking for windows of opportunity  Working with civil society and local NGOs  Use of new media to disseminate early insights, including

visual/documentary/film/blogs/podcasts

 Academic project partners and advisory groups  Close liaison with DFID South Asia Research Hub and

RCUK offices in the region