The Perceptions Of Farmers To Afforestation In Ireland Tom Kent 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the perceptions of farmers to afforestation in ireland
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Perceptions Of Farmers To Afforestation In Ireland Tom Kent 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Perceptions Of Farmers To Afforestation In Ireland Tom Kent 1 & Ian Short 2 1 Waterford Institute of Technology 2 Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Research Centre Background PAMUCEAF - Poplar - a multiple use crop for European arable farmers EU


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Perceptions Of Farmers To Afforestation In Ireland

Tom Kent1 & Ian Short2

1Waterford Institute of Technology 2Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Research Centre

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

PAMUCEAF - Poplar - a multiple use crop for European arable farmers EU FAIR-funded project 1999 - 2002 Project Objectives:

 to determine potential for poplar on surplus

agricultural land

 to assess attitudes of farmers and public to this  to examine demand level & markets for poplar

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Forestry in Ireland

 Forest Area in Ireland is 9% of total land area  c. 95% plantation, 5% natural / semi-natural  84% conifer, 16% broadleaf  National Forest Policy is to increase area to 17%  Land base for further afforestation is private  Primarily farmers diversifying from agriculture  Supported by subsidies on establishment and

income substitution

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Annual Afforestation in Ireland (1932 - 1998)

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 1 9 3 2 1 9 3 6 1 9 4 1 9 4 4 1 9 4 8 1 9 5 2 1 9 5 6 1 9 6 1 9 6 4 1 9 6 8 1 9 7 2 1 9 7 6 1 9 8 1 9 8 4 1 9 8 8 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 6 Public Private

Source: Redrawn from Bulfin, 1999.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Private afforestation in Ireland, 1990 - 1998.

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Year Area (ha) Total private afforestation Afforestation by full time farmers Afforestation by part-time farmers Afforestation by non- farmers

Source: Coggins 1999.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Objectives of Study

 Characterise the respondent & the farm type  Determine current land uses including forestry  Analyse farmers' perceptions of farm forestry  Assess farmers' willingness to further afforest

480 questionnaires posted to IFA arable farmers 44 responses collated and analysed This was an 8.8% response rate

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Age distribution of respondents

How old a re you?

Under 30 30-45 46-60 Ov er 60

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Distribution of farm size

Farm s ize

5 10 15 20 25 30 < 25 25-50 50-75 75-100 100-125 125-150 150-175 175-200 > 200 Area(H a.) Re sponse rate (%)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

On-farm land-use

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Spring-sown oilseed rape Fruit crops Set-aside Waste (hedges etc) Flower bulbs Winter-sown oilseed rape Maize/sweet corn Unspecified Fodder maize Leased out Field vegetables Beet Legumes (e.g. peas, beans) Potatoes Short-term grass leys Woodland/farm forestry Sugar beet Winter-sown cereals Permanent grass/long leys Spring-sown cereals Average area (ha) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Frequency Average area Frequency

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Presence of woodland/forestry on the farm

Woodland or forestry present on the farm. 37% 63% Yes No

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Composition of afforestation

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Noble fir Oak Douglas fir Beech Sycamore Poplar Larch Norway spruce Ash Sitka Average area (Ha) Frequency

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Land-use prior to afforestation

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 All Most Some Re sp

  • n

se rat e (% ) Arable crop production Grassland Woodland/forestry

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Non timber production uses of woodland

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Other Livestock grazing Protection of water-course or drinking water supply Public access for recreation or sport Shelter Shooting or hunting Wildlife conservation Proportion of responses (%)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Perceived landscape value of land-uses

10 20 30 40 50 60 Arable crops Lowland grassland Conifers Poplars Mixed broadleaves Short rotation coppice Pro por tio n (%) Very low Low Medium High Very high Don't know

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Perceived wildlife value of land-uses

10 20 30 40 50 60 Arable crops Lowland grassland Conifers Poplars Mixed broadleaves Short rotation coppice Pro por tio n (%) Very low Low Medium High Very high Don't know

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Perceived economic value of land-uses

10 20 30 40 50 60 Arable crops Lowland grassland Conifers Poplars Mixed broadleaves Short rotation coppice Pr

  • p
  • rt

ion (% ) Very low Low Medium High Very high Don't know

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Perceptions on land-uses - summary

Land-use Modal response Landscape Wildlife Economics Arable crops Medium Low Medium Lowland grassland High Medium Medium Conifers High High Medium Mixed broadleaves Very high Very high Low Poplars High High Don’t know Short rotation coppice Don’t know Don’t know Don’t know

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Attitudes towards farm forestry

5 10 15 20 25 30 I would like to grow trees as an alternative farm crop I might like to grow trees, but need more information I have actively considered farm forestry, but it was not for me I have no interest in farm forestry Proportion of responses (%)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

 Many arable farmers already engaged in farm forestry  Variety of tree species grown conifer & broadleaf  Most farmers had multiple objectives for their farm

forests

 Perception is farm forestry will increase in future  Main reason is due to uncertainties in farming.  Majority willing to consider forestry as an enterprise  Perception that afforestation reduces value of land