The Partners For Kids Journey OSU HSMP Management Institute - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
the partners for kids journey
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Partners For Kids Journey OSU HSMP Management Institute - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 17, 2023 264 likes •652 views

The Partners For Kids Journey OSU HSMP Management Institute October 28, 2016

slide-1
SLIDE 1

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The Partners For Kids Journey

OSU HSMP Management Institute October 28, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Presentation Objectives

  • What is Partners For Kids?
  • Why was Partners For Kids created?
  • What are Partners For Kids’ goals?
  • How is Partners For Kids structured?
  • How does funds flow work?
  • What have we learned?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

What is Partners For Kids?

  • Physician-Hospital Organization
  • Accountable Care Organization (with a

twist)

– Member lives attributed to PFK based on the member’s:

  • Participation in a managed Medicaid plan
  • Age
  • County of residency

– Physician’s contract status with PFK is not a factor

slide-4
SLIDE 4

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

By The Numbers…

  • Network

– 100 NCH-employed and 200 community PCP’s – 700 NCH-employed and 50 community specialists – 1 hospital (Nationwide Children’s Hospital)

  • Members

– 330,000 children

slide-5
SLIDE 5

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

By The Numbers…

  • Health Plans

– 5 managed Medicaid plans in Ohio (full-risk capitation, delegated credentialing, delegated care coordination) – 9 commercial plans (fee-for-service, delegated credentialing)

  • Service area

– 34 counties

slide-6
SLIDE 6

By The Numbers…

slide-7
SLIDE 7

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Why Was Partners For Kids Created?

  • Managed Medicaid
slide-8
SLIDE 8

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Why Was Partners For Kids Created?

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Thousands of Members

Patient Membership

Contracting Strategy Managed Care Strategy Accountable Care Org. (Population Health)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Value Cost

Quality Delivery Safety

Value is Driving New Business Models and Partnership Strategies

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Shared Savings / ACO

Value is Driving New Business Models and Partnership Strategies

P4P FFS

Incentive based FFS

COM PFK

FFS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

What Are Partners For Kids’ Goals?

Primary:

  • Improving the health of children through

high-quality, efficient and innovative care and community partnerships Secondary:

  • Demonstrate that a pediatric ACO is viable

model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PFK Population vs. Total Population

County PFK Members Ages 0-17* Total 0-17 Population ** % of Total Population = PFK VINTON 1,764 2,735 64.5% MEIGS 2,791 4,567 61.1% PIKE 3,625 6,003 60.4% SCIOTO 10,195 17,380 58.7% FAYETTE 3,534 6,148 57.5% MARION 7,643 13,694 55.8% JACKSON 3,987 7,347 54.3% HOCKING 3,382 6,243 54.2% JEFFERSON 7,213 13,456 53.6% LAWRENCE 7,338 13,768 53.3% MORGAN 1,471 2,769 53.1% MUSKINGUM 10,957 20,720 52.9% GALLIA 3,843 7,302 52.6% ROSS 8,633 16,662 51.8% CRAWFORD 4,760 9,472 50.3% COSHOCTON 3,735 7,717 48.4% PERRY 4,496 9,395 47.9% FRANKLIN 143,772 302,857 47.5% GUERNSEY 4,266 9,035 47.2% ATHENS 5,372 11,454 46.9% NOBLE 904 1,968 45.9% MONROE 1,310 2,887 45.4% HARRISON 1,430 3,217 44.5% WASHINGTON 5,449 12,365 44.1% BELMONT 5,598 12,745 43.9% MORROW 2,703 6,158 43.9% PICKAWAY 4,584 11,613 39.5% LICKING 13,277 35,606 37.3% KNOX 5,036 13,874 36.3% LOGAN 4,185 11,722 35.7% FAIRFIELD 11,380 32,476 35.0% MADISON 3,649 11,559 31.6% UNION 2,746 10,499 26.2% DELAWARE 5,888 51,635 11.4% PFK Counties 310,916 707,048 44.0% PFK Members within County Population

slide-13
SLIDE 13

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

How Is Partners For Kids Structured?

  • Formed as a joint venture (PHO) between Nationwide

Children’s Hospital, NCH- employed physicians and contracted, community physicians in 1994

  • 501(c)(3) as of January 2016
  • The Ohio Department of Insurance considers PFK to be an

“intermediary organization” – accepts financial risk, but not a health plan; required to maintain reserves and stop loss coverage

slide-14
SLIDE 14

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Governance

  • Board of Directors comprised of 17 individuals
  • 9 appointed by Nationwide Children’s Hospital (including

1 parent of a child enrolled in Medicaid)

  • 8 elected from PFK provider network (3 primary care at

least one from a community practice; 2 medical specialists, 2 surgical specialist, 1 hospital-based specialty)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Out of Network Providers Providers Directly Contracted with Payors PFK Member Community Physicians NCH and NCH- Employed Physicians

Provider Network and Member Access

slide-16
SLIDE 16

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Division of Responsibilities

* Delegated for 3 of 5 health plans

slide-17
SLIDE 17

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Partners For Kids Departments

Care Navigation Community Wellness Data Resource Center Office of the Medical Director Operations and Network Development Payor Relations

slide-18
SLIDE 18

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Flow of Funds

PFK receives capitated payments for each child in the program and pays for their medical costs across the care spectrum

slide-19
SLIDE 19

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Pay for Performance Top to Bottom Alignment

ODM

  • State targets measures

Health Plans

  • Health Plans incentivized

PFK

  • PFK engaged in performance based contract

Doctors • Physician incentives on HEDIS and Quality

slide-20
SLIDE 20

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Provider Incentive Plan Summary

  • Metrics adjusted annually by Incentive

Committee (includes provider representation)

  • Incentives paid quarterly
  • Continues to shift to outcomes-based

measures

slide-21
SLIDE 21

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Provider Incentive Sample

Quality – Health Supervision Visits

  • Members = 12-18 years old
  • For patients who were eligible and were non-complaint in the

prior year preceding the qualifying visit $155.07 per successful patient Quality – Health Supervision Visits

  • Members = 15 months old
  • Members = 3-6 years old

$47.86 per successful patient Pharmacy Shared Savings

  • For practices which meet or exceed the established

benchmark, receive a portion of the dollars saved through improvements in prescribing patterns 25% (paid semi- annually; paid per practice) Meeting with Provider Relations Rep to review current year incentive plan by April 30 Must complete to be eligible for any incentive payouts

slide-22
SLIDE 22

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

  • There are advantages in being a provider-

based ACO.

What Have We Learned?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What Have We Learned?

PFK Leadership NCH Leadership Director of Care Coordination PFK Care Coordination

NCH “Global” Care Coordination

NCH Inpatient Care Coordination

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Quality Initiatives in the NICU

Parent engagement, Feeding enhancement, and readmissions Conservative PDA Management and Decreased Ligations Prevention

  • f

necrotizing enterocolitis

Decreased LOS for NAS Patients

Decrease utilization of inhaled nitric

  • xide

Decreased LOS for Gastroschisis Patients

IPAC initiative

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Complex Care Cohort Utilization

Census Patient Days per 100 Feeding Tube Patients

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Preventing Antibiotic Resistance

slide-27
SLIDE 27

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

  • Accurate, timely and reliable data is

essential.

What Have We Learned?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Data Acquisition and Use

slide-29
SLIDE 29

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Comparative Analysis

Ophthalmic Antihistamines

  • Identification:

– PFK identified variation in drug utilization by plan

  • Intervention

– Working with plans to focus on NCH developed guidelines

Medication Relative Cost Plan 1 Utilization Plan 2 Utilization Plan 3 Utilization Ketotifen and its forms $9-11 6% 3% 81% Patanol and its forms $71-130 94% 97% 19%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

  • The organization must be prepared to

invest in infrastructure – some of which may not have an immediate ROI.

What Have We Learned?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

On-Site QI Training

slide-32
SLIDE 32

PROJECT SELECTION AMONG PRACTICES PARTICIPATING IN THE PFK QI/PRACTICE FACILITATION PROGRAM

Practice Program Start Date* Asthma Immunizations

Health Supervision Visits

Antibiotic Stewardship Fluoride Varnish ED Avoidance Depression Screening

Practice A 8/14/2014

X X

Practice B 8/19/2014

X

Practice C 9/5/2014

X X

Practice D 9/17/2014

X X

Practice E 11/12/2014

X X

Practice F 12/11/2014

X X

Practice G 12/11/2014

X

Practice H 2/16/2015

X X

Practice I 3/12/2015

X X

Practice J 4/21/2015

X X

Practice K 5/7/2015

X X

Practice L 6/2/2015

X X

Practice M 6/4/2015

X X

Practice N 9/9/2015

X X

Practice O 10/23/2015

X X

Practice P 10/28/2015

X X

Practice Q 1/27/2016

X X

*Date of Feedback Meeting

slide-33
SLIDE 33

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

  • We can effectively manage expenses and

lower the rate of expense growth.

What Have We Learned?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

What Have We Learned?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

  • There are value propositions for all

stakeholders.

What Have We Learned?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

What Have We Learned?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Questions?

Visit us at www.PartnersForKids.org