The Natural Catch Tobias Praamstra MSc Consultant In situ soil - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Natural Catch Tobias Praamstra MSc Consultant In situ soil - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Natural Catch Tobias Praamstra MSc Consultant In situ soil remediation Tauw Netherlands Case landfill Kanaalpolder Philippine 1967- 1977 500.000 m Chemical waste On sand What is the problem? Large plume
Case landfill Kanaalpolder
- Philippine
- 1967- 1977
- 500.000 m³
- Chemical waste
- On sand
What is the problem?
1 2 5 8 7 4 3
B08
6
10
16 15 12 13 105 9 106 11 104
1 2 5 8 7 4 3
B08
6
10
16 15 12 13 105 9 106 11 104
- Large plume
- Seapage water on surface level
- Bad smell
- Risks
- Benzene
- Ethylbenzene
- Monochlorobenzene
- Vinylchloride
- Chloroethane
- Dichloroethane
- Range: 100 – 10.000 µg/l
Nature as mentor
Two chemical landfills, two green principles
Volgermeerpolder within a peat land Stededijkpolder with circular ditch
What’s the basic idea of the concept?
- Non-conventional approach: use and optimize natural
attenuation processes for a finite solution by
- Using the landfill and part of soil as (bio)chemical reactor
- Drainage of migrating contaminants (catch 1), and
- Adsorption by (local) natural (rest) products (catch 2)
- Aerobic and photochemical degradation (catch 3)
Combination: Natural Catch
Discharge purified water Drainage Landfill Percolate Adsorption Biological & photochemical degradation Liner or clay Peat filter O2 / UV Soil passage Discharge purified water Drainage Landfill Percolate Adsorption Biological & photochemical degradation Liner or clay Peat filter O2 / UV Soil passage
Nature does the work 1 Rainwater leaching 2 anaerobic biodegradation 3 filtering during soil passage 4 adsorption in peat filter 5 aerobic and photochemical (bio)degradation in circular canal
Preconditions natural catch
- Contaminants which can be adsorbed and/or degraded
(biological or photochemical)
- Enough space for implementation
- Conductive and ‘inert’ adsorption medium
- Right dimensions of circular ditch and extraction rate
drainage and hydraulic residence time
Laboratory tests
Closed water reservoir Continuous water head Test material Glass pearls Flow measurement Cap with hole
Conductivity and adsorption
The field pilots
Dimensioning:
- Hydrology
- Residence time
- Flow
- Layer thickness
Implementation:
- 2 pilots
Period:
Nov 2009-Jul 2011 Green compost Peat
Pilot phase 1: physical feasibility
Phase 1
- Extraction flow rate
- Draining function
- Adsorption medium
- Water quality
Conclusions:
- Both ditches drained
- Green compost degrades
- Flow 2-4 m3/d
Pilot phase 2: processes qualified
Phase 2
- Adsorption in peat: contaminants build up gradually
- Aerobic biological degradation: DNA analyses
(coding genes enzymes)
- Oxygen detection surface water: 10 mg/l
Vinylchloride Dichloroethane
Pilot phase 3: processes quantified
Phase 3
- Final samples of surface- and groundwater
- Evaporation measurements
- Mass balances: insight in contribution NA-mechanisms
Groundwater upstream
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 14-10-2009 22-1-2010 2-5-2010 10-8-2010 18-11-2010 26-2-2011 6-6-2011 14-9-2011
Time (date) Concentration (ug/l)
1,1-Dichloorethaan Monochloorethaan Vinylchloride
Natural catch surface water
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 14-10-2009 22-1-2010 2-5-2010 10-8-2010 18-11-2010 26-2-2011 6-6-2011 14-9-2011
Time (date) Concentration (ug/l)
1,1-Dichloroethane Monochloroethane Vinylchloride
93 – 100 % efficiency
Pilot phase 3 (2)
Lindvall method
Pilot phase 3 (3)
Mass balance (fluxes)
Q groundwater – Q ditch water = Q sink Q sink = Q degradation + Q evaporation
Component Sink flux measured (g/d) Aerobic degradation flux calc lit (g/d) Evaporation flux calculated (g/d) Evaporation flux measured (g/d) Benzene 0,41 0,44
- 0,03
0,0006 1,1-DCA 4,0 3,72 0,28 0,0023 Monochlorobenzene 4,4 4,35 0,05 0,0026 Monochloroethane 52 50,35 1,65 2,65 Vinylchloride 0,12 0,12 <0,0016
+ Q adsorption
Conclusions pilot research
The natural catch works, if well dimensioned 1 Rainwater leaching 2 anaerobic biodegradation 3 filtering during soil passage 4 adsorption in peat filter 5 aerobic and photochemical (bio)degradation in circular canal 93 to 100% purification anaerobic leachate (4 & 5)
Inspired by
Discharge purified water Drainage Landfill Percolate Adsorption Biological & photochemical degradation Liner or clay Peat filter O2 / UV Soil passage Discharge purified water Drainage Landfill Percolate Adsorption Biological & photochemical degradation Liner or clay Peat filter O2 / UV Soil passage
Advantages of peat filter within concept
- Adsorption and preventing shock loads (buffering)
- Creating a habitat for hydrocarbon degrading micro-
- rganisms and eventually for water vegetation
- Smaller carbon footprint in relation to activated carbon filter
(production, transport)
- (Experimental: purification possibility of loaded, contaminated
peat with e.g. white-rot fungus)
Inspired by
Advantage of total concept Natural Catch
Landfill Impermeable layer Sheet piles Extraction Landfill Impermeable layer Sheet piles Extraction
No ‘intensive care’ No more non-durable top sealing on, or sheet piling around, chemical landfills, and/or energy consuming pump & treat A finite solution for chemical landfills Landfill as a reactor, not as a sarcophagus
Inspired by
Prospects
- Feasible for landfills and remote contaminated areas
(limited maintenance, one pump on wind or solar energy). Winner Nicole Technology Award
- Use of ‘inert’ local and natural adsorption material
(modified peat, crushed coffee/cacao been shells, crushed moringa seeds, etc)
- Use in hybrid for purification hospital wastewater
(instead of high tech purification plant). Winner Award Watership Vallei&Veluwe
Acknowledgements Kanaalpolder
Sponsored by Pilot management:
Erik Labee, Tessa Verschoor, Paul Stook & Tobias Praamstra
Initiators:
Thanks to colleagues of Tauw & Witteveen & Bos