the michigan trauma quality improvement program
play

The Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program Ypsilanti, MI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program Ypsilanti, MI February 12, 2019 Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program (MTQIP) Collaborative Meeting Feb 2019 Lecture(s): 2018 Hospital Scoring Index Results 2018 VBR Results Mark Hemmila,


  1. M e e tin g P a rtic ip a tio n 8 3 9 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 8 1 0 T ra u m a C e n te r 2 9 1 3 2 2 6 3 2 2 4 1 6 2 0 2 2 1 4 1 5 2 1 7 2 5 1 9 3 0 2 7 2 8 4 6 3 1 1 7 0 5 0 1 P o in ts

  2. A c c u ra c y o f D a ta 8 9 5 1 2 2 3 1 8 1 0 2 9 1 3 T ra u m a C e n te r 2 4 1 6 2 2 1 4 2 1 7 1 7 2 5 1 9 2 7 4 2 2 0 6 2 6 1 5 3 1 1 1 2 8 0 5 1 0 P o in ts

  3. #4 VTE Prophylaxis Initiated ≤ 48 hrs  Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Initiated Within 48 Hours of Arrival in Trauma Service Admits with > 2 Day Length of Stay (18 Mo’s: 1/1/17-6/30/18)

  4. V T E P ro p h y la x is T im in g < = 4 8 h rs C o h o rt 2 - A d m it to T ra u m a 1 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 31/33 Centers ≥ 50% (+4) 3 3 3 0 3 1 2 0 28/33 Centers ≥ 55% (+5) 3 2 3 1 9 4 2 6 1/1/18 to 6/30/18 2 9 T ra u m a C e n te r 5 AL 55% 1 6 2 7 TB 73% 1 2 7 MK 63% 1 8 2 5 1 5 1 0 1 1 2 8 ■ ≥ 55% 1 2 2 ■ ≥ 50% 2 1 1 3 ■ ≥ 40% 6 2 3 2 9 ■ < 40% 1 7 2 4 1 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 1 % 1/1/17-6/30/18 Pg. 43

  5. #4 VTE Prophylaxis Initiated ≤ 48 hrs  Hospital Target ≥ 55% = 10 points  CQI Target 75% of hospitals ≥ 55%  25/33 hospitals  May 2014: 7 > 50 % R a te o f V T E P ro p h y la x is b y 4 8 h rs U M  Jan 2015: 31 > 50% S G S P J O P O B F H F W B H U T ra u m a C e n te r M C D R O W M M S J C O S M S H M G G H B O B M O S M U H M M L S O 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 P e rc e n t

  6. T im e ly V T E P ro p h y la x is 3 1 8 9 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 8 1 0 T ra u m a C e n te r 2 9 1 3 2 2 6 3 2 2 4 1 6 2 2 1 4 6 1 5 2 1 7 1 7 2 5 3 0 2 7 2 8 4 3 1 9 2 0 0 5 1 0 P o in ts

  7. #5 VTE Prophylaxis with LMWH  Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Use in Trauma Service Admits (18 Mo’s: 1/1/17-6/30/18)

  8. V T E P ro p h y la x is T y p e - L M W H C o h o rt 2 - A d m it to T ra u m a 1 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 17/33 Centers ≥ 50% (+1) 3 3 3 0 3 1 1 3 2 3 4 2 2 2 8 2 9 9 1/1/18 to 6/30/18 3 2 0 T ra u m a C e n te r MK 39% 1 3 1 7 AL 45% 4 1 6 2 3 TB 48% 2 5 8 7 2 1 1 0 5 2 6 1 5 2 7 1 1 2 1 9 2 4 6 1 2 1 8 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 1 % 1/1/17-6/30/18 Pg. 43

  9. L M W H 8 5 1 2 1 1 1 8 1 0 2 2 6 2 4 1 4 T ra u m a C e n te r 6 1 5 2 1 7 2 5 1 9 2 7 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 2 1 6 2 0 1 7 3 0 4 3 9 2 9 2 2 2 8 1 0 5 1 0 P o in ts

  10. V T E E v e n t 5 A d ju s te d 4 U n a d ju s te d 3 % 2 1 0 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Y e a r

  11. #6 Red Blood Cell to Plasma Ratio  Red blood cell to plasma ratio (weighted mean points) of patients transfused ≥5 units in first 4 hours (18 Mo’s: 1/1/17-6/30/18)

  12. B lo o d P ro d u c t R a tio in firs t 4 h rs if >= 5 u P R B C s C o h o rt 1 - M T Q IP A ll 1 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 2 8 2 9 3 3 1 8 1 6 1 3 2 4 2 5 8 3 4 6 1 2 T ra u m a C e n te r 3 7 1 5 1 4 1 0 9 1 1 2 6 5 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 4 2 3 2 7 3 2 1 7 1 9 3 0 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 R a tio o f P R B C /F F P Pg. 44

  13. P R B C to P la s m a R a tio 8 9 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 6 2 4 1 6 6 2 5 T ra u m a C e n te r 1 8 1 4 1 0 1 5 7 5 3 2 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 9 2 7 4 1 7 3 1 3 0 2 1 0 5 1 0 P o in ts

  14. #7 Serious Complications  Serious Complication Rate-Trauma Service Admits (3 years: 7/1/15-6/30/18)

  15. Z-score  Measure of trend in outcome over time  Hospital specific  Compared to yourself  Standard deviation  > 1 getting worse  1 to -1 flat  < -1 getting better

  16. #7 Serious Complication Rate (Z-score) Z -s c o re - S e rio u s C o m p lic a tio n R a te C o h o rt 2 - A d m it to T ra u m a 7 /1 /1 5 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 1 0 5 Z -s c o re 0 -5 -1 0 0 6 2 3 6 1 5 8 7 7 2 6 3 1 4 7 1 3 3 4 9 8 0 2 9 8 9 5 2 5 4 4 1 0 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 T ra u m a C e n te r Pg. 45

  17. C o m p lic a tio n R a te : Z -s c o re 8 5 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 6 1 6 6 2 1 T ra u m a C e n te r 7 3 0 2 7 3 1 3 9 1 8 2 9 1 3 3 2 2 4 2 0 2 2 1 4 1 7 2 5 1 9 2 8 4 1 1 0 1 5 0 5 1 0 P o in ts

  18. #8 Mortality  Mortality Rate-Trauma Service Admits (3 years: 7/1/15-6/30/18)

  19. # 8 Mortality Rate (Z-score) Z -s c o re - M o rta lity R a te C o h o rt 2 - A d m it to T ra u m a 7 /1 /1 5 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 2 1 Z -s c o re 0 -1 -2 -3 7 1 0 1 3 5 4 5 6 2 2 2 3 1 9 8 7 5 9 0 4 8 3 9 0 1 4 4 6 8 6 3 2 7 1 3 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 3 1 T ra u m a C e n te r Pg. 45

  20. M o rta lity R a te : Z -S c o re 3 1 5 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 6 1 5 7 3 0 4 T ra u m a C e n te r 8 9 1 1 8 1 0 2 9 1 3 2 2 6 2 4 2 0 2 2 1 4 6 2 1 2 5 1 9 2 7 2 8 3 3 2 1 7 0 5 1 0 P o in ts

  21. #9 Open Fracture Antibiotic Usage  Type of antibiotic administered along with date and time for open fracture of femur or tibia  Presence of acute open femur or tibia fracture based on AIS or ICD10 codes (See list)  Cohort = Cohort 1 (All)  Exclude direct admissions and transfer in  No Signs of Life = Exclude DOAs  Transfers Out = Include Transfers Out  Time Period = 7/1/17 to 6/30/18

  22. #9 Open Fracture Antibiotic Usage  Measure = % of patients with antibiotic type, date, time recorded  ACS-COT Orange Book – VRC resources  Administration within 60 minutes  ACS OTA Ortho Update  ACS TQIP Best Practices Orthopedics

  23. O p e n F ra c tu re - A b x T y p e , D a te , T im e C o h o rt 1 - M T Q IP A ll 7 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 3 1 2 9 2 7 2 6 2 5 2 2 1 9 1 6 1 3 9 8 T ra u m a C e n te r 7 1 4 2 8 2 2 4 2 0 3 1 0 4 5 1 1 8 1 7 1 5 2 1 26/33 Centers ≥ 90% (+4) 6 2 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 5 0 1 % 88%

  24. O p e n F ra c tu re A n tib io tic 3 1 8 3 9 5 1 1 8 1 0 2 9 1 3 T ra u m a C e n te r 2 2 6 2 4 1 6 2 0 2 2 1 4 1 5 2 1 7 1 7 2 5 1 9 2 7 2 8 4 1 1 2 3 6 1 2 3 2 3 0 0 5 0 1 P o in ts

  25. O p e n F ra c tu re - T im e to A b x ≤ 1 2 0 m in C o h o rt 1 - M T Q IP A ll 7 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 2 8 3 4 1 6 2 0 7 2 9 2 2 2 7 1 9 3 2 5 8 T ra u m a C e n te r 1 0 3 2 1 5 5 1 1 3 2 3 2 1 2 4 1 2 9 4 1 7 1 4 2 6 6 1 1 2 1 8 3 1 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 5 0 1 7 8% %

  26. #10 Head CT Scan in ED on patient taking anticoagulation medication with TBI  Head CT date and time from procedures  Presence of prehospital anticoagulation or anti- platelet use  TBI (AIS Head, excluding NFS, scalp, neck, hypoxia)  Cohort1, Blunt mechanism  Exclude direct admissions and transfer in  No Signs of Life = Exclude DOAs  Transfers Out = Include Transfers Out  Time Period = 7/1/17 to 6/30/18

  27. #10 Head CT  Measure = % of patients with Head CT, date, and time  Timing  Treatment  2018 Data

  28. H e a d In ju ry a n d A n tic o a g u la tio n - H e a d C T D a te /T im e C o h o rt 1 - M T Q IP A ll 7 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 3 1 2 9 2 7 2 6 2 5 2 2 1 9 1 6 1 3 9 8 T ra u m a C e n te r 7 3 1 0 1 1 7 2 3 1 2 3 0 1 4 5 2 1 4 1 8 1 1 2 8 2 0 1 5 3 2 30/33 Centers ≥ 90% (+2) 6 2 2 4 3 3 0 5 0 1 0 0 % 94%

  29. H e a d C T T im e w ith A n tic o a g u la n t 3 1 8 3 9 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 8 T ra u m a C e n te r 1 0 2 9 1 3 2 6 3 2 1 6 2 0 2 2 1 4 6 1 5 2 1 7 1 7 2 5 1 9 3 0 2 7 2 8 4 2 2 4 0 5 0 1 P o in ts

  30. H e a d In ju ry a n d A n tic o a g u la tio n - H e a d C T < 4 h rs C o h o rt 1 - M T Q IP A ll 7 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 2 5 7 3 2 1 2 9 3 1 8 2 2 2 3 1 8 2 9 T ra u m a C e n te r 1 9 3 0 5 3 1 4 2 1 1 6 1 3 1 7 4 2 8 1 1 2 7 1 3 4 1 0 2 0 2 6 6 1 5 2 2 4 0 5 0 1 0 0 % 94%

  31. H e a d In ju ry a n d A n tic o a g u la tio n - H e a d C T < 1 h r C o h o rt 1 - M T Q IP A ll 7 /1 /1 7 - 6 /3 0 /1 8 3 2 8 2 2 3 0 7 1 3 2 9 1 6 3 4 4 1 7 T ra u m a C e n te r 1 4 2 0 2 7 2 6 2 5 3 1 8 1 5 3 1 9 2 3 2 1 1 1 2 8 1 9 6 1 0 2 4 1 5 2 1 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 % 52 %

  32. 2 0 1 8 C Q I S c o re 7 5 8 1 6 2 1 1 2 2 7 2 3 2 5 1 8 T ra u m a C e n te r 1 4 2 6 1 3 6 1 0 1 9 9 2 9 87.9% 1 1 2 2 3 1 99 – 69% 2 1 5 2 4 3 0 4 3 2 1 7 2 0 2 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 1 P o in ts

  33. 2018 Value Based Reimbursement Results

  34. Value Based Reimbursement  Physician Organization > PGIP (Physician Group Incentive Plan)  Surgeon = VBR  3 Measures  VTE Timing ≥ 55%  VTE Type ≥ 50% (LMWH)  PRBC to Plasma ratio > 7.0 points  Scoring as a group practice  Need to qualify with at least 2 of 3 measure met  End result: Surgeon VBR in 2019

  35. Value Based Reimbursement  25/32 Surgeon Groups (Hospital)  187/250 Surgeons qualified  63 Surgeons did not  3% increase in BCBSM payments for specialty in 2019  Operation  E&M  General Surgery

  36. 2019 Hospital Scoring Index and VBR Judy Mikhail, PhD RN

  37. 2019 Performance Index Changes #9 Open fracture antibiotics • 2018 Documentation (type, date, time recorded) • 2019 Timeliness (within 120 mins)

  38. Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program (MTQIP) 2019 Performance Index January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 Measure Weight Measure Description Points #1 10 Data Submission (Partial/Incomplete Submissions No Points) On time and complete 3 of 3 times 10 PARTICIPATION (30%) On time and complete 2 of 3 times 5 On time and complete 1 of 3 times 0 Meeting Participation All Disciplines *Surgeon represents 1 hospital only #2 10 0-10 Surgeon and (TPM and/or MCR) participate in 3 of 3 Collaborative meetings (9 pt) Surgeon and (TPM and/or MCR) participate in 2 of 3 Collaborative meetings (6 pt) Surgeon and (TPM and/or MCR) participate in 1 of 3 Collaborative meetings (3 pt) Surgeon and (TPM and/or MCR) participate in 0 of 3 Collaborative meetings (0 pt) Registrar and/or MCR participate in the Annual June Data Abstractor meeting (1 pt) #3 10 Data Accuracy Error Rate 5 Star Validation 0-4.0% 10 8 4 Star Validation 4.1-5.0% Any center not 5 3 Star Validation 5.1-6.0% selected for audit 3 2 Star Validation 6.1-7.0% gets full 10 pts 0 1 Star Validation > 7.0%

  39. #4 10 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Timeliness (< 48 Hr of Arrival) in Trauma Service Admits with > 2 Day Length of Stay (18 mo: 1/1/18-6/30/19) ≥ 55% 10 ≥ 50% 8 ≥ 40% 5 < 40% 0 #5 10 Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Use in Trauma Service Admits (18 mo: 1/1/18-6/30/19) ≥ 50% 10 37-49% 7 25-36% 5 20-24% 3 < 20% 0 #6 10 Red Blood Cell to Plasma Ratio (Weighted Mean Points) of Patients Transfused > 5 0-10 PERFORMANCE (70%) Units in 1st 4 Hr (18 mo: 1/1/18-6/30/19) (See calculation info on page 2) #7 10 Serious Complication Rate-Trauma Service Admits (3 yr: 7/1/16-6/30/19) Z-score: < -1 (major improvement) 10 Z-score: -1 to 1 or serious complications low-outlier (average or better rate) 7 Z-score: > 1 (rates of serious complications increased) 5 #8 10 Mortality Rate-Trauma Service Admits (3 yr: 7/1/16-6/30/19) Z-score: < -1 (major improvement) 10 Z-score: -1 to 1 or mortality low-outlier (average or better rate) 7 Z-score: > 1 (rates of mortality increased) 5 #9 10 Open Fracture-Antibiotic Timeliness from ED Arrival (12 mo: 7/1/18-6/30/19) ≥ 90% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 120 min) 10 ≥ 80% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 120 min) 7 ≥ 70% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 120 min) 5 < 70% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 120 min) 0 #10 10 ED Head CT Scan Performed in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients On Anticoagulation (12 mo: 7/1/18-6/30/19) ≥ 90% patients (Head CT scan in ED with date and time recorded) 10 ≥ 80% patients (Head CT scan in ED with date and time recorded) 7 ≥ 70% patients (Head CT scan in ED with date and time recorded) 5 < 70% patients (Head CT scan in ED with date and time recorded) 0 Total (Max Points) = 100

  40. Value Based Reimbursement (VBR) MTQIP Opportunity for 2020 Aligning Incentives Trauma Surgeon Center

  41. 2020 VB VBR • 2020 Measurement period: 1/1/19 to 12/31/19 • Eligible: General Surgeons enrolled in PGIP and nominated by PO • MTQIP Trauma Surgeon NPI numbers • We estimate ~ 80% MTQIP surgeons currently eligible • Surgeon restricted to 1 Trauma Center only • Surgeon reimbursed for 1 CQI only (if in multiple) • Surgeon scored by trauma center results • Must meet 2 of 3 measures • Reward: 3% increase over standard fee schedule (trauma & EGS)

  42. 2020 VBR Measures (Repeat from 2019) 1. Increase LMWH VTE prophylaxis use in trauma service admits. 2. Increase VTE prophylaxis timeliness (<48 hrs) in trauma >2 day LOS 3. MTP RBC:Plasma Ratio (weighted mean pts) >5 u in first 4 hr

  43. Future 2020 Measures

  44. Proposed 2020 Performance Index Changes Collapse #4 and #5 VTE measures together Weight Measure Points 10 LMWH VTE Prophylaxis Timeliness (<48 hrs of arrival) in Trauma Service Admits with >2 day LOS (18 mo) >55% 10 >50% 8 >40% 5 <40% 0

  45. Proposed 2020 Performance Index Changes • Change #9 Open Fracture Antibiotic Timeliness from 120 min to 60 min #9 10 Open Fracture-Antibiotic Timeliness from ED Arrival (12 mo data): ≥ 90% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 60 min) 10 ≥ 80% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 60 min) 7 ≥ 70% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 60 min) 5 < 70% patients (Antibiotic type, date, time recorded, and administered < 60 min) 0

  46. New Measures Discussion • Suggestions?

  47. Sharing of CQI Data Project (ASPIRE) MTQIP Research Update Jill Jakubus, PA-C

  48. Greater Returns, Less Burden

  49. Capture Missing Variables Anesthesia

  50. Guidelines – ACS Geriatric Hip Fractures • Peri-operative regional anesthesia reduces pain and might reduce delirium and cardiac events in the postoperative period (pg. 21). Peri-Operative Anesthetic

  51. AAOS Recommendations Geriatric Hip Fractures Peri-Operative Care

  52. ACS • The best evidence currently available suggestions similar clinical outcomes for patients undergoing general or spinal anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. As a results one modality is not recommended over the other and patient-specific factors and preferences should be considered. It may be beneficial for individual hospitals to standardize the approach to anesthesia for geriatric hip fractures in order to streamline care (pg. 23). AAOS • The work group recognizes that anesthetic techniques described in several of these articles which were published decades ago may have changed when compared with modern methods. In addition, there was significant heterogeneity in the patient populations studied, including multiple studies in which patients were not randomized. Anesthesia Type

  53. Solution

  54. MTQIP & ASPIRE Centers 1.Beaumont Health System – Dearborn 2.Beaumont Health System – Farmington Hills 3.Beaumont Health System – Royal Oak 4.Beaumont Health System – Trenton 5.Beaumont Health System – Troy 6.Bronson Healthcare – Kalamazoo 7.Henry Ford Health System – Detroit 8. Mercy Muskegon 9.Michigan Medicine 10.St. Joseph Mercy – Ann Arbor 11.St. Joseph Mercy – Oakland 12.St. Mary Mercy – Livonia 13.Sparrow Hospital

  55. Next Steps • MTQIP email • Sign DUA Attachment B • MTQIP/ASPIRE report feedback • Questions

  56. Research in Progress

  57. Outcomes in operative fixation of rib fractures • Center: Spectrum Health • PI: Chapman • Phase: Propensity analysis

  58. Burn decontamination survey • Center: Bronson • PI: Davidson • Phase: Publications Committee Approved, awaiting completion of DUA

  59. Resource, outcomes, and care variation in IHF • Center: Michigan Medicine • PI: Goulet • Phase: Methods

  60. Association of mortality among trauma patients taking pre-injury direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists • Center: St. Joseph Mercy • PI: Hecht • Phase: • Presenting Central Surgical (Mar 2019) • Accepted publication Surg rgery ry

  61. VTE type for trauma patients • Center: St. Joseph Mercy • PI: Hecht • Phase: Analysis

  62. Optimal timing head CT’s for geriatric falls • Center: Providence Hospital, Spectrum Health, St. Joseph Mercy, Michigan Medicine • PI: Iskander, Lopez, Jakubus, Wahl • Phase: Analysis

  63. EMS vs. private car effect on outcomes • Center: Henry Ford • PI: Johnson • Phase: Publications Committee Approved, awaiting completion of DUA

  64. ACS-COT verification level affects trauma center management of pelvic ring injuries and patient mortality • Center: Detroit Receiving • PI: Oliphant • Phase: • Presented American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (Sept 2018) • Published Journal of Trauma and Acute te Care re Surg rgery ry (Jan 2019)

  65. Not further specified: unclassified orthopedic injuries in trauma registries, cause for concern? • Center: Detroit Receiving • PI: Oliphant • Phase: • Presented Academic Surgical Congress (Feb 2019) • Manuscript in progress

  66. Have an idea on improving care? Data Request IRB Processing Proposal Publications

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend