the low mass dwarfs of
play

The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update Michelle Collins - University of Surrey


  1. Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update

  2. Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update

  3. Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The unfinished works of @michelle_lmc Michelle Collins

  4. The best stuff comes from my students Alexandra Gregory Janet Preston

  5. Back in 2013/2014… • Measuring masses of all (known) Andromeda dwarf galaxies from spectra of Mass within half-light radius (Msun) red giant branch stars • Comparing with the Milky Way population • Identified a few low-mass outliers Galaxies being stripped? Extreme feedback? Just small number statistics? Or something else?!? Half-light radius (pc) More spectroscopy with Keck in 2012-2015 to answer these questions… Collins 2013, 2014, Tollerud 2012

  6. 
 So, where are the results? Data in hand, but life gets in the way • Two transatlantic moves • Exciting new projects with Janet and Alexandra • And exciting new projects with others! (PAndAS, Justin Read, Geraint Lewis, Ekta Patel, Erik Tollerud, Dave Sand, Duncan Forbes…) • Bad at saying no to panels… • Teaching and teaching and teaching… 
 All takes a little adjusting to. Michelle 2014 Michelle 2019

  7. But, now almost ready to publish! Or, at least, ready for an update And XIX (Collins+ submitted) And XXI (Collins, Read+ in prep) And XXV (results from an undergrad) 126 member stars 77 member stars 55 member stars

  8. And XIX - a Local Smudge Bate et al. 2013 Effective radius (kpc) Stream Tidally stripped? Ultra-diffuse analogue? Low mass? Surface brightness (mag per sq. arcsec)

  9. And XIX - a Local Smudge Velocity dispersion increased: σ v , 2013 = 4.7 +1.6 − 1.4 km/s σ v , 2019 = 7.8 +1.7 − 1.5 km/s Sample increased from 24 to 126 probable members

  10. Why such a change? 2013 sample Possible substructure?

  11. What does this mean for the mass? M31 dSph MW dSph Isolated dIrr Ultra diffuse Mass within half-light radius (Msun) Density within r_half Antlia 2 Antlia 2

  12. Antlia 2 and And XIX Similar in size, stellar mass, and central density Torrealba et al. 2019 σ v = 7.8 +1.7 σ v = 5.7 ± 1.1 km/s − 1.5 km/s And XIX Antlia 2 M * = 1.1 × 10 6 M ⊙ M * = 0.88 × 10 6 M ⊙ r h = 2920 ± 311 pc r h = 3065 +955 − 1065 pc

  13. Antlia 2 - hard to understand without feedback +tides The low density, and large half light radius make it difficult/impossible to understand without DM heating through feedback, combined with tidal stripping (Torrealba et al. 2019). Based on Erkal+19, has very close pericentre passage with Milky Way (~26 kpc) What about And XIX? Bate et al. 2013 • Also extremely large, and low density • (Tentative) velocity gradient • Evidence of irregular kinematics Stream • But, stream is not associated Paper 2: Dynamical modelling (heads up, Justin)

  14. And XXI - still low mass Velocity dispersion: σ v , 2014 = 5.4 ± 0.9 km/s Sample increased from 32 to 77 likely members σ v , 2019 = 6.1 +1.0 − 0.9 km/s Collins, Read + in prep.

  15. Remains a low mass & low density outlier Mass within r_half (Msun) Circular velocity (km/s) Density within r_half Half-light radius (pc) Half-light radius (pc) Half-light radius (pc) • Lower than expected density • Still consistent with low mass halo Collins, Read + in prep. • Can this be done with feedback? • GravSphere modelling with Justin Read

  16. GravSphere Modelling 10 9 ❖ Jeans modelling of density profile 9.9 10 9 ❖ Use CoreNFW profile to fit data (surface 9.7 9.3 9.6 9.0 brightness profile + kinematics) 9.5 10 8 10 ρ [M � kpc � 3 ] 10 8 8.9 ❖ And XXI consistent with cored profile 5 ρ DM (150 pc) 8.9 10 7 Tides 2 ❖ Would need to form stars for almost a Hubble 0.5 time to explain density 10 6 10 7 ❖ HST imaging shows no stars younger than 3-5 10 5 Gyr (Martin et al. 2017) No stellar mass loss Stellar mass loss 10 4 ❖ Tides..? And XXI 10 � 1 10 0 10 1 10 6 10 − 3 r [kpc] Read, Walker and Steger (2018), Read et al. 2019, Read & Erkal 2019 M ∗ /M 200 Collins, Read et al. in prep.

  17. And XXV - hot off the UG press Preliminary - Still working on membership Work by Emily Charles Velocity dispersion: σ v , 2013 = 3.0 +1.2 − 1.1 km/s σ v , 2019 = 5.8 +1.1 − 1.0 km/s From 25 to 52 stars

  18. Still a bit of an outlier, but less extreme Mass within half-light radius (Msun) Density within r_half Next up - Working with Emily to refine analysis

  19. Conclusions ❖ Increased membership in 3 ‘low mass’ dwarf galaxies ❖ And XIX - mass has gone up, but still quite low density ❖ And XXI - remains a low mass outlier - feedback plus tides? ❖ And XXV - mass has increased, more from Emily soon

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend