The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the low mass dwarfs of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update Michelle Collins - University of Surrey The low mass dwarfs of @michelle_lmc Andromeda - an update Michelle Collins - University of Surrey


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Michelle Collins - University of Surrey

The low mass dwarfs of Andromeda - an update

@michelle_lmc

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Michelle Collins - University of Surrey

The low mass dwarfs of Andromeda - an update

@michelle_lmc

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Michelle Collins - University of Surrey

The unfinished works of Michelle Collins

@michelle_lmc

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The best stuff comes from my students

Alexandra Gregory Janet Preston

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Back in 2013/2014…

Collins 2013, 2014, Tollerud 2012

  • Measuring masses of all (known)

Andromeda dwarf galaxies from spectra of red giant branch stars

  • Comparing with the Milky Way population
  • Identified a few low-mass outliers

Galaxies being stripped? Extreme feedback? Just small number statistics? Or something else?!?

More spectroscopy with Keck in 2012-2015 to answer these questions… Mass within half-light radius (Msun) Half-light radius (pc)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

So, where are the results?

Data in hand, but life gets in the way

  • Two transatlantic moves
  • Exciting new projects with Janet and Alexandra
  • And exciting new projects with others! (PAndAS, Justin

Read, Geraint Lewis, Ekta Patel, Erik Tollerud, Dave Sand, Duncan Forbes…)

  • Bad at saying no to panels…
  • Teaching and teaching and teaching…



 All takes a little adjusting to. Michelle 2014 Michelle 2019

slide-7
SLIDE 7

But, now almost ready to publish!

Or, at least, ready for an update

And XIX (Collins+ submitted) And XXI (Collins, Read+ in prep) And XXV (results from an undergrad)

126 member stars 77 member stars 55 member stars

slide-8
SLIDE 8

And XIX - a Local Smudge

Bate et al. 2013

Stream

Tidally stripped? Ultra-diffuse analogue? Low mass?

Effective radius (kpc) Surface brightness (mag per sq. arcsec)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

And XIX - a Local Smudge

Velocity dispersion increased: σv, 2013 = 4.7+1.6

−1.4 km/s

σv, 2019 = 7.8+1.7

−1.5 km/s

Sample increased from 24 to 126 probable members

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why such a change?

2013 sample

Possible substructure?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What does this mean for the mass?

Antlia 2 M31 dSph MW dSph Isolated dIrr Ultra diffuse Antlia 2 Mass within half-light radius (Msun) Density within r_half

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Antlia 2 and And XIX

Similar in size, stellar mass, and central density

Torrealba et al. 2019 σv = 7.8+1.7

−1.5 km/s

σv = 5.7 ± 1.1 km/s M* = 1.1 × 106M⊙ M* = 0.88 × 106M⊙ rh = 3065+955

−1065 pc

rh = 2920 ± 311 pc And XIX Antlia 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Antlia 2 - hard to understand without feedback +tides

The low density, and large half light radius make it difficult/impossible to understand without DM heating through feedback, combined with tidal stripping (Torrealba et al. 2019). Based on Erkal+19, has very close pericentre passage with Milky Way (~26 kpc)

What about And XIX?

Bate et al. 2013

Stream

  • Also extremely large, and low density
  • (Tentative) velocity gradient
  • Evidence of irregular kinematics
  • But, stream is not associated

Paper 2: Dynamical modelling (heads up, Justin)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

And XXI - still low mass

Velocity dispersion: σv, 2014 = 5.4 ± 0.9 km/s σv, 2019 = 6.1+1.0

−0.9 km/s

Sample increased from 32 to 77 likely members Collins, Read + in prep.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Remains a low mass & low density outlier

  • Lower than expected density
  • Still consistent with low mass halo
  • Can this be done with feedback?
  • GravSphere modelling with Justin Read

Collins, Read + in prep. Mass within r_half (Msun) Density within r_half

Half-light radius (pc) Half-light radius (pc) Half-light radius (pc)

Circular velocity (km/s)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

101 100 101 r [kpc] 104 105 106 107 108 109 ρ [M kpc3]

GravSphere Modelling

❖ Jeans modelling of density profile ❖ Use CoreNFW profile to fit data (surface

brightness profile + kinematics)

❖ And XXI consistent with cored profile ❖ Would need to form stars for almost a Hubble

time to explain density

❖ HST imaging shows no stars younger than 3-5

Gyr (Martin et al. 2017)

❖ Tides..?

8.9 9.5 8.9 9.6 9.0 9.7 9.3 9.9 Tides

10−3 M∗/M200 106 107 108 109 ρDM(150 pc)

0.5 2 5 10 No stellar mass loss Stellar mass loss And XXI

Read, Walker and Steger (2018), Read et al. 2019, Read & Erkal 2019 Collins, Read et al. in prep.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

And XXV - hot off the UG press

Work by Emily Charles From 25 to 52 stars Velocity dispersion: σv, 2013 = 3.0+1.2

−1.1 km/s

σv, 2019 = 5.8+1.1

−1.0 km/s

Preliminary - Still working on membership

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Still a bit of an outlier, but less extreme

Next up - Working with Emily to refine analysis Mass within half-light radius (Msun) Density within r_half

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

❖ Increased membership in 3 ‘low mass’ dwarf galaxies ❖ And XIX - mass has gone up, but still quite low density ❖ And XXI - remains a low mass outlier - feedback plus tides? ❖ And XXV - mass has increased, more from Emily soon