The JLab BoNuS Experiment: measurement of the free neutron structure - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the jlab bonus experiment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The JLab BoNuS Experiment: measurement of the free neutron structure - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The JLab BoNuS Experiment: measurement of the free neutron structure function at large x and nuclear effects in deuterium via spectator tagging. M. Eric Christy Hampton University n p For the CLAS Collaboration NuInt12 Workshop - Rio de


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The JLab BoNuS Experiment:

measurement of the free neutron structure function at large x and nuclear effects in deuterium via spectator tagging.

  • M. Eric Christy

Hampton University

NuInt12 Workshop - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil October 23, 2012

p n

For the CLAS Collaboration

slide-2
SLIDE 2

More than 40 years after discovery of the partonic substructure of nucleons, the neutron structure at large-x is still not well determined. In addition, we would like to understand how the simplest nucleus, the deuteron, is built from a proton and neutron.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 3

Why study large- Why study large-x x structure functions? structure functions?

  • Study pQCD DGLAP evolution
  • Separation of parton distributions, e.g.,
  • Precise PDFs needed to constrain limits on new physics at

LHC and Tevatron

  • Separation and study of perturbative / non-perturbative physics
  • d/u for x  1,
  • singlet / non-singlet (valence/non-valence) separation.
  • Higher-twist operators (parton-parton correlations)
  • Study quark-hadron duality
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 4

 Need proton and neutron targets to pin down u/d PDFs from DIS

Much can be learned about pQCD from DIS on a neutron target

At Leading order At large x proton dominated by u(x) neutron by d(x) due to charge weighting.

F2

p = x[4/9u(x) + 1/9d(x)]

F2

n = x[4/9d(x) + 1/9u(x)]

→ u quark is well determined from proton data → Free neutron target would provide comparable information on d quark

Problem: no high density neutron target exists!

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 5

PDF’s least well known at large x

Gluon comparable in size to dv at x~0.3 not well known here.

*Proton + neutron data provides way to separate valence cleanly.

u(x) d(x)

PDFs Uncertainties PDFs Uncertainties

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 6

Even F Even F2

2 n n

not not well known for x > 0.6 well known for x > 0.6

  • J. Arrington et al. arXiv:1110.3362

SU(6) spin-flavor Hard gluon exchange S=0 diquark dominance

Non-pertabative models

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 7

What about current state-of-the-art What about current state-of-the-art PDF fits including deuterium nuclear PDF fits including deuterium nuclear corrections? corrections?

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 8

New CJ PDF fits include Large-x + deuterium New CJ PDF fits include Large-x + deuterium

including nuclear corrections on D2 !

Slide from Alberto Accardi

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 9

Nuclear uncertainties results from CJ11 Nuclear uncertainties results from CJ11

Off-shell model spread Nuclear Wave-Fn spread

Still significant uncertainties from nuclear models at large-x

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 10

Free neutron targets would provide solution Free neutron targets would provide solution

→ No high density neutron targets exist → Use deuterium and assure that scattering took Place from a 'nearly' on-shell effectively free neutron

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 11

Method of Spectator Tagging

ν=E −E' α=( E s− ps

z)/ M

Q 2=4 EE 'sin 2θ 2

The spectator proton’s four momentum:

pμ = -(Es – MD, p ps)

Hadronic W (x) of debris:

With S(αs, PT ) the nucleon spectral function in the deuteron and F2

the effective off-shell neutron structure function

R=σL/σT Tag spectator proton in scattering

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 12

For free neutron structure must kinematically For free neutron structure must kinematically select to minimize: select to minimize:

  • 1. Off-shell effects
  • 2. Final state interactions
  • 3. Target fragmentation enhancement to proton yield
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 13

Off-Shell Structure Functions

Melnitchouk et al, PLB335(94)11 Liuti & Gross PLB356(95)157

0.80 0.93 0.965 0.985

  • Rn decreases with ps or αs
  • At x*=0.5 and ps=400 MeV/c, Rn

deviates from unity by 7-20% in these models BoNuS ps detection range

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 14

Final State Interactions

(ν,q)

  • Several groups have calculated

FSIs

  • Θpq > 110o and ps<100 MeV/c

greatly reduces FSIs

k

Palli et al, PRC80(09)054610

ps

  • Struck neutron can interact with the

spectator proton

  • Proton momentum is enhanced
  • FSIs are small at low ps and large Θpq

Θpq

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 15

Target Fragmentation

Enhancement in proton Yield Over PWIA negible for backward protons!

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 16 June 3 2008

Experimental Setup I: CLAS Spectrometer

Beam

  • Detect electrons in CLAS spectrometer
  • Detect slow protons in radial time

projection chamber (RTPC)

  • Moller electrons bottled up by Solenoid field

around target

  • Solenoid field allows momentum determination
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 17 June 3 2008

Helium/DME at 80/20 ratio

beam

140 µm

Experimental Setup II: BoNuS RTPC

Fit RTPC points to determine helix of proton trajectory. Momentum determined from track curvature in solenoid field. dE/dx along track in RTPC also provides momentum information.

Gas Target BoNuS RTPC Moller Catcher

To BoNuS RTPC to CLAS

p n

  • H. Fenker et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 592, 273 (2008)
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 18

RTPC Performance

σ=8mm

σ=1.4º σ=4o

ΔΘ Δz ΔΦ zBoNuS vs zCLAS

  • Upper left: dE/dx vs. p/Z for He target
  • Lower left: dE/dx vs. p for deuterium target
  • Below RTPC+CLAS resolution for common e-

events

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 19

Kinematic Coverage

E = 5.262 GeV E = 4.223 GeV

W (GeV) W (GeV) Q2 (GeV2) Q2 (GeV2) cos(θpq) p spec (MeV) VIPs

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 20

Kinematic reconstruction with tagged protons

W2 = (pn+ q)2 = pn

µ p nµ + 2([MD-Es]ν – pn . q) – Q2

≈ M*2 +2Mν(2- αs ) - Q2 W2 = M2 +2Mν - Q2

PWIA: → Backward P is spectator

→ Neutron is offshell

→ → p pn = -p p p => correct for neutron momentum

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 21

Ratio Method

Ntagged is yield with VIP after accidental subtraction passing: Ps < 100 MeV/c, θp > 110 Ae : electron acceptance in CLAS (mostly cancels!)

First make experimental ratio: In terms of structure function ratio:

Ap : tagged proton Efficiency * Acceptance → Integral Ivip is largely independent of W* (x*) and Q2 → Determined from Rexp at x=0.3, where nuclear effects are small using F2

n / F2 d from CJ PDF fit.

IVIP

Then F2

n = F2 d * Rexp* Ivip

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 22

Resonance F2

n results

→ Clear neutron resonant structure → Compares reasonably well to Bosted-Christy fits to p, d,

(extracts neutron using PWIA + Paris potential)

→ Studies of duality in F2

n being

finalized now.

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 23

Results on F2

n/ F2 p

→ F2n/F2p = F2n/F2d * F2d/F2p with F2d/F2p from

Bosted/Christy fits PRC77(08)065206,

PRC81(10)055213

→ Trend in x consistent with CJ11. → Below normalization point Q2 less than CJ scale point. → Lower W* cuts reduce stat. uncertainty, but increase resonant contribution at x >0.6

Normalization point

[Accardi, et al., PRD 84(11)014008]

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 24

Nuclear effects Studies

with BoNuS

Can test

  • spectator model assumptions and
  • nuclear effect models

Using full kinematics coverage for tagged protons. Analysis of S. Tkachenko.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Spectator model test:

Data/MC cosθ distributions

  • Analysis of S. Tkachenko

utilizes larger kinematic coverage to test spectator model.

  • At low ps the data agree with

the spectator model quite well.

  • At higher ps the distributions

deviate significantly from unity, indicating that VIP particles should have ps<100 MeV/c.

Tkachenko et al.

P r e l i m i n a r y

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 26

With n+p and deuterium Structure functions in hand... Study of EMC effect in the deuteron is currently in progress

slide-27
SLIDE 27

E12-06-113 E12-06-113

BoNuS Plans for 12 GeV

Data taking: – 35 days on D2 – 5 days on H2 – L = 2 x 1034 cm-2 sec-1 DIS region: – Q2 > 1 GeV2 – W* > 2 GeV – ps < 100 MeV/c – θpq > 110° – x*max = 0.80 W* > 1.8 GeV: x*max = 0.83

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 28

BONUS @ 12 GeV Jlab (BONUS12)

d/u

F2n

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 29 29

∆ transition form factor from neutron with Bonus12

Estimated BONUS12 coverage and uncertainties

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 30

Summary

→ Spectator tagging method demonstrated to allow Extraction of free neutron structure. → Allows significant reduction in nuclear model uncertainties On d-quark distribution at x > 0.6. → First look at EMC effect extracted for deuterium. → BONUS data allow study of nuclear effects. → Upcoming 12 GeV BONUS will provide F2

n precision

Comparable to proton data up to x ~ 0.8.

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 31

Much More to come Thank You!

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 32 June 3 2008 32

Backup Slides

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 33 33

PDF’s least well known at large x

Gluon comparable in size to dv at x~0.3 not well known here.

*Proton + neutron data provides way to separate valence cleanly.

u(x) d(x)

PDFs Uncertainties PDFs Uncertainties

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 34

Photoproduction (Q2 = 0)

Resonance Proton fit (M.E. Christy)

Kinematic range of fit: 0 < Q2 < 8 and Wπ thresh < W < 3

  • reproduces cross section data to ~3%
slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 35 35

Fit compared to deuteron data

SLAC E133 published Hall C I. Niculescu published Hall C Spring'03 (S. Malace Thesis) Hall B published 2006 Hall C Jan05 prelim Hall C I. Niculescu (published) Hall C Spring'03 prelim. Hall B published 2006

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 36 BCDMS BCDMS EMC EMC SLAC SLAC

EMC EMC

Anti- Anti- shadowing shadowing shadowing shadowing Fermi Fermi motion motion

The EMC Effect The EMC Effect

  • Effects such as binding, off-shell,

and final state interactions have largest impact on classic EMC region

  • Need to get a handle on these

to study more exotic effects.

Hard to imagine understanding the EMC effect without a firm grasp of nuclear effects in the deuteron

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 37

Inclusive Neutron Resonance Electroproduction

  • Neutron structure functions

in the deuteron have contributions from binding, fermi motion, nucleon off-shell effects, final state interactions (FSI), etc.

  • We would like to know the

free neutron structure to learn about:

  • moments of the neutron structure

function (and non-singlet)

  • neutron (transition) form factors
  • quark-hadron duality for the neutron
slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 38

d(e,e’ps)X

ps before (ν,q) after

  • Plane-wave impulse approximation
  • Backward-emitted p is a spectator
  • Struck neutron is off-shell
  • ps and pn are equal and opposite
  • Lorentz invariants are corrected for

initial neutron 4-momentum

k neutron spectator k′

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 39

PWIA Spectator Formalism

Light Cone Cross Section Off-Shell F2 Spectral Function Nonrelativistic w.f. R=σL/σT

slide-40
SLIDE 40

1

slide-41
SLIDE 41

More than 40 years after discovery of the partonic substructure of nucleons, the neutron structure at large-x is still not well determined. In addition, we would like to understand how the simplest nucleus, the deuteron, is built from a proton and neutron.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

3

slide-43
SLIDE 43

4

slide-44
SLIDE 44

5

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 6

Even F Even F2

2 n n

not not well known for x > 0.6 well known for x > 0.6

  • J. Arrington et al. arXiv:1110.3362

SU(6) spin-flavor Hard gluon exchange S=0 diquark dominance

Non-pertabative models

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 7

What about current state-of-the-art What about current state-of-the-art PDF fits including deuterium nuclear PDF fits including deuterium nuclear corrections? corrections?

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 8

New CJ PDF fits include Large-x + deuterium New CJ PDF fits include Large-x + deuterium

including nuclear corrections on D2 !

Slide from Alberto Accardi

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 9

Nuclear uncertainties results from CJ11 Nuclear uncertainties results from CJ11

Off-shell model spread Nuclear Wave-Fn spread

Still significant uncertainties from nuclear models at large-x

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 10

Free neutron targets would provide solution Free neutron targets would provide solution

→ No high density neutron targets exist → Use deuterium and assure that scattering took Place from a 'nearly' on-shell effectively free neutron

slide-50
SLIDE 50

11 11 alpha – analogous to x for the nucleus s – deuteron spectral function – proportional to the deuteron wave function

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 12

For free neutron structure must kinematically For free neutron structure must kinematically select to minimize: select to minimize:

  • 1. Off-shell effects
  • 2. Final state interactions
  • 3. Target fragmentation enhancement to proton yield
slide-52
SLIDE 52
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 13

Off-Shell Structure Functions

Melnitchouk et al, PLB335(94)11 Liuti & Gross PLB356(95)157

0.80 0.93 0.965 0.985

  • Rn decreases with ps or αs
  • At x*=0.5 and ps=400 MeV/c, Rn

deviates from unity by 7-20% in these models BoNuS ps detection range

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 14

Final State Interactions

(ν,q)

  • Several groups have calculated

FSIs

  • Θpq > 110o and ps<100 MeV/c

greatly reduces FSIs

k

Palli et al, PRC80(09)054610

ps

  • Struck neutron can interact with the

spectator proton

  • Proton momentum is enhanced
  • FSIs are small at low ps and large Θpq

Θpq

slide-54
SLIDE 54

15

  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 15

Target Fragmentation

Enhancement in proton Yield Over PWIA negible for backward protons!

slide-55
SLIDE 55

16

slide-56
SLIDE 56

17

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 18

RTPC Performance

σ=8mm

σ=1.4º σ=4o

ΔΘ Δz ΔΦ zBoNuS vs zCLAS

  • Upper left: dE/dx vs. p/Z for He target
  • Lower left: dE/dx vs. p for deuterium target
  • Below RTPC+CLAS resolution for common e-

events

slide-58
SLIDE 58

19 19

slide-59
SLIDE 59

20 20

slide-60
SLIDE 60

21

  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 21

Ratio Method

Ntagged is yield with VIP after accidental subtraction passing: Ps < 100 MeV/c, θp > 110 Ae : electron acceptance in CLAS (mostly cancels!)

First make experimental ratio: In terms of structure function ratio:

Ap : tagged proton Efficiency * Acceptance → Integral Ivip is largely independent of W* (x*) and Q2 → Determined from Rexp at x=0.3, where nuclear effects are small using F2

n / F2 d from CJ PDF fit.

IVIP

Then F2

n = F2 d * Rexp* Ivip

slide-61
SLIDE 61

22

  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 22

Resonance F2

n results

→ Clear neutron resonant structure → Compares reasonably well to Bosted-Christy fits to p, d,

(extracts neutron using PWIA + Paris potential)

→ Studies of duality in F2

n being

finalized now.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

23

  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 23

Results on F2

n/ F2 p

→ F2n/F2p = F2n/F2d * F2d/F2p with F2d/F2p from

Bosted/Christy fits PRC77(08)065206,

PRC81(10)055213

→ Trend in x consistent with CJ11. → Below normalization point Q2 less than CJ scale point. → Lower W* cuts reduce stat. uncertainty, but increase resonant contribution at x >0.6

Normalization point

[Accardi, et al., PRD 84(11)014008]

slide-63
SLIDE 63

24 24

slide-64
SLIDE 64

25

Spectator model test:

Data/MC cosθ distributions

  • Analysis of S. Tkachenko

utilizes larger kinematic coverage to test spectator model.

  • At low ps the data agree with

the spectator model quite well.

  • At higher ps the distributions

deviate significantly from unity, indicating that VIP particles should have ps<100 MeV/c.

Tkachenko et al.

P r e l i m i n a r y

slide-65
SLIDE 65

26

  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 26

With n+p and deuterium Structure functions in hand... Study of EMC effect in the deuteron is currently in progress

slide-66
SLIDE 66

E12-06-113 E12-06-113

BoNuS Plans for 12 GeV

Data taking: – 35 days on D2 – 5 days on H2 – L = 2 x 1034 cm-2 sec-1 DIS region: – Q2 > 1 GeV2 – W* > 2 GeV – ps < 100 MeV/c – θpq > 110° – x*max = 0.80 W* > 1.8 GeV: x*max = 0.83

slide-67
SLIDE 67

28

slide-68
SLIDE 68
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 29 29

∆ transition form factor from neutron with Bonus12

Estimated BONUS12 coverage and uncertainties

slide-69
SLIDE 69
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 30

Summary

→ Spectator tagging method demonstrated to allow Extraction of free neutron structure. → Allows significant reduction in nuclear model uncertainties On d-quark distribution at x > 0.6. → First look at EMC effect extracted for deuterium. → BONUS data allow study of nuclear effects. → Upcoming 12 GeV BONUS will provide F2

n precision

Comparable to proton data up to x ~ 0.8.

slide-70
SLIDE 70
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 31

Much More to come Thank You!

slide-71
SLIDE 71

32

slide-72
SLIDE 72

33

slide-73
SLIDE 73

34

slide-74
SLIDE 74

35

slide-75
SLIDE 75

36

slide-76
SLIDE 76

37

37

point out that resonance structure of proton is obvious, neutron resonance must be extracted from deuterium data – fermi motion of the nucleus washes out the peaks. we need a free neutron target

slide-77
SLIDE 77
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 38

d(e,e’ps)X

ps before (ν,q) after

  • Plane-wave impulse approximation
  • Backward-emitted p is a spectator
  • Struck neutron is off-shell
  • ps and pn are equal and opposite
  • Lorentz invariants are corrected for

initial neutron 4-momentum

k neutron spectator k′

slide-78
SLIDE 78
  • Oct. 23, 2012

M.E. Christy - NuInt12 39

PWIA Spectator Formalism

Light Cone Cross Section Off-Shell F2 Spectral Function Nonrelativistic w.f. R=σL/σT