The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the hype and reality of electrical energy s torage brett
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman S enior Fellow Agenda for today Promise of Energy Storage Current Energy S torage Market S ize Energy S torage Technology Overview Business cases for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman S enior Fellow

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda for today

Promise of Energy Storage

Current Energy S torage Market S ize

Energy S torage Technology Overview

Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives

Competitive landscape

What’s next?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Bret t A. Perlman Bio and Research Int erest s

Current Activities:

 Non-Resident Fellow, BU Inst it ut e for S

ust ainable Energy. Fellow, Harvard Advanced Leadership Init iative.

 President, Vect or Advisors. Current act ivities on providing

management consult ing services t o energy client s

 Board of Direct ors, Just Energy. NYS

E/ TS X t raded ret ailer of gas and elect ricit y in 17 deregulated Nort h American market s, UK and Germany Professional Background:

 Commissioner, Public Ut ilit y Commission of Texas (1999 t o

2003): Responsible for t he successful rest ruct uring of Texas’ $17 billion elect ric ut ilit y indust ry and $4 billion t elecommunicat ions indust ry.

 Management consult ant : Houst on office of McKinsey &

Company, wit h focus on developing business st rat egy for t elecommunicat ions and elect ric ut ilit y client s Education:

 MP

A, Harvard Kennedy S chool

 JD, Universit y of Texas Law S

chool

 BA, Nort hwest ern Universit y 3  Energy S

t orage

− Proj ect Acorn: Working wit h Mike Aziz

(Harvard S EAS ) on organic flow bat t ery t echnology

 Energy Technology Commercialization − Mat erials Translat ional Init iat ive:

Working wit h Ramana Nanda (HBS ) and S adas S hankar (Harvard S EAS ) on new business model t o commercialize energy t ech.

 Elect ricity Market S

t ruct ures

− HBS

Case S t udy (2017): Mexican Power Market wit h HBS

  • Prof. Dick Viet or

− Upcoming S

ummit on Nort h American Energy S ecurit y wit h former Mexican Deput y Energy S ecret ary and MIT Fellow Lourdes Melgar

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

ALMOS T 150 years aft er phot ovolt aic cells and wind t urbines were invent ed, t hey st ill generate

  • nly 7%
  • f t he world’s elect ricity.

Y et somet hing remarkable is happening. From being peripheral t o t he energy syst em j ust over a decade ago, t hey are now growing fast er t han any ot her energy source and t heir falling cost s are making t hem compet it ive wit h fossil fuels. Y et green energy has a dirt y secret . The more it is deployed, t he more it lowers t he price of power from any source. That makes it hard t o manage t he t ransit ion t o a carbon-free fut ure, during which many generating t echnologies, clean and dirt y, need t o remain profit able if t he light s are t o st ay on. The good news is that new technology can help fix the problem. Digitalisation, smart meters and batteries are enabling companies and households to smooth out their demand — by doing some energy-intensive work at night, for example. The bigger task is to redesign power markets to reflect the new need for flexible supply and demand.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Vision for Role of Energy S torage

5  Calif. GHG and renewable

policies…

50 percent of electricity from renewable sources by 2030

GHG reductions to 1990 levels

1.5 MM zero emission vehicles by 2025  Creating grid reliability issues..

Overgeneration during peaks

S teep, sharp ramping after peaks

Frequency issues since renewables aren’ t dispatchable  …

driving the need for flexible resources, such as energy storage

Could soak up “ excess” on-peak renewables

Provide rapid dispatch to meet ramping requirements and frequency issue

California ISO’s “Duck Curve,” caused by high renewables penetration and GHG reduction goals… . … . is creating the need for more flexible resources, and perhaps a role for energy storage

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Much Hype Around Energy S torage

6 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E Utility Non-residential Residential Annual deployments cross 1GW mark in 2019

1,662 U.S. Energy Storage Deployment by Segment (MV)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Agenda for today

Promise of Energy S torage

Current Energy Storage Market Size

Energy S torage Technology Overview

Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives

Competitive landscape

What’s next?

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Global Installed Generation and S torage Base: January 2016

S

  • urce: “ The Fut ure of t he Elect ric Grid and t he Role of Energy S

t orage” Elect ric Power Research Inst it ut e, May 24, 2016

8

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000

>6000

144 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 <0.1

GW Storage < 2% of power generation capacity Pumped-hydro represents 99% of storage

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Energy storage heavily focused in California due to regulatory incentives

Total U.S . Energy S torage Installed BTM S torage Installed BTM Battery S torage Proj ects Installed

S

  • urce: Enovat ion Part ners analysis from variet y of sources (primarily S

GIP dat a for California proj ect s and DOE Global Energy S t orage Dat abase for ot her st at es)

Total= 81 MW

BTM Battery Storage by State

Utility- connected S torage Thermal storage proj ects

177 67 110 29 81 US Energy Storage Capacity – Q3, 2016 (MW)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Agenda for today

Promise of Energy S torage

Current Energy S torage Market S ize

Energy Storage Technology Overview

Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives

Competitive landscape

What’s next?

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Advanced Energy S torage Technologies

11

Mechanical Elect rochemical Thermal Elect rical Chemical (hydrogen)

Pimped Hydro (conventional storage) Lead acid, lithium Ion, S

  • dium S

ulfur, and S

  • dium

Nickel Chloride S ensible-Molten salt, chilled water S upercapacitors Power-to-Power (fuel cells, etc.) CAES (Compressed Air Energy S torage) Flow batteries – Vanadium redox, Zinc-bromine Latent – Ice storage, Phase change materials S MES (S uper- conducting Magnetic Energy S torage) Power-to-Gas Flywheel Thermo- chemical storage

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Different S torage Technologies for Different Applications

S

  • urce: Environment al and Energy S

t udy Inst it ut e, Issue Brief, August 2013 Dat a source: S andia Nat ional Laborat ories

12

More “energy” More “power”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Comparison of Alternative Battery Chemistries for Grid S torage

13

S

  • urce: “ Beyond Four Hours” , ES

S whit e paper, 2016

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Continued Dramatic Cost Declines In S torage Over the Next 5 Y ears

14 Flow Battery

Lead

Capital Cost ($/KWh)

Zinc Lithium Flywheel

S low Median Fast CAGR

  • 3%
  • 9%
  • 16%

5 Y ear

  • 14%
  • 38%
  • 58%

CAGR

  • 1%
  • 2%
  • 12%

5 Y ear

  • 5%
  • 10%
  • 47%

CAGR

  • 1%
  • 5%
  • 16%

5 Y ear

  • 5%
  • 24%
  • 58%

CAGR

  • 2%
  • 12%
  • 13%

5 Y ear

  • 10%
  • 47%
  • 50%

CAGR 0%

  • 1%
  • 7%

5 Y ear 0%

  • 5%
  • 30%
  • Designing out high cost materials, and scale
  • Improved manufacturing and design will improve

performance – S ize/ thickness reduces current flow

  • Integration time for manufacturing
  • Reducing required high cost materials
  • Improving control and response time to increase

usable range of operation

  • Improvements in operation sustainability – ability

to remove heat, higher efficiency motor/ generator

  • Improvements in competitive cost position from

increases in capability / performance

  • Material additives such as carbon is increasing the

usable energy and capability envelope

  • Design changes to reduce lead requirement
  • S

cale manufacturing lowering cost (Gigafactory)

  • Design improvements reducing needed materials
  • Chemistry improvements increasing capability of

battery, increases usable energy and range of

  • peration
  • Cost reduction depends on manufacturing at scale
  • Design improvement to reduce high cost sub-

components

  • Chemistry improvements will increase lifespan and

range of operation

S

  • urce: Enovat ion Part ners, Lazard LCOS

survey

Technology Trends and Opportunities

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proj ect Acorn –Aziz Energy Group Aqueous, Organic, Neut ral pH Flow Bat t ery

Market-driven approach to engineer a storage system that meets market needs

 3rd iteration of an aqueous flow battery using organic active materials 

Low Cost

 Chemicals become a small fraction of system cost  New chemistry enables use of cheaper ion exchange membranes

  • Good performance

 High capacity  Long cycle lifetimes 

S afe & environmentally friendly

 Aqueous  Neutral pH

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Li-Ion Batteries Dominating Recent Additions to Grid

16

S

  • urce: GTM Research/ ES

A, US Energy S t orage Monit or (3Q 2016)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

$1370/ kw or $685/ kWh*

17

* Assumes a 2 hour syst em

Will LION Rule the Energy S torage Market?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Agenda for today

Promise of Energy S torage

Current Energy S torage Market S ize

Energy S torage Technology Overview

Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives

Competitive landscape

What’s next?

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lots of “ Use-Cases” for S torage…

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

… But only 5 ways to monetize

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Grid S t orage Cost s Oft en Great er Than Any One Value S t ream

S

  • urce: Lazard “ Levelized Cost of S

t orage V2.0” , December 2016

21

“Stacking” of value streams generally required for economic viability at current storage costs

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Regulatory support for Energy S torage will be key to market growth, though probably insufficient for the development of a sustainably viable market

22 Hawaii:

  • 1 MW pilot program between HECO and S

tem

  • PV net metering limitations – self-service only, no exports
  • 100%

RPS by 2045 New York:

  • PS

C supporting DER integration

  • REV “ opening markets to enhance

system value”

  • NY-BES

T

  • ConEd BQDM program
  • NYFD fire code revision to

accommodate Li-ion batteries California:

  • AB 2514: 1.3 GW by 2020 by IOUs

– S

CE 580 MW (85 MW BTM)

– PG&E 580 MW (85 MW BTM) – S

DG&E 165 MW (30 MW BTM)

  • S

GIP $1.80/ watt incentive for storage

  • L.A. Basin resource supply challenges

– S

ONGS and fossil plant retirements  local capacity resource procurement

– Aliso Canyon  insufficient gas deliverability for peaking generation

  • DRAM pilot program
  • S

B 350: 50% RPS by 2030 Massachusetts:

  • S

ept 2016 “ S tate of Charge” report indicates 1.8 GW of economically-viable storage (200 MW BTM)

  • Establishment of storage mandates

underway

  • $10 million grant funding in

demonstration proj ects

Recent Energy Storage Initiatives

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Incentives critical for storage economics

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 <30% 30-35% 35-40% 40-45% 45-50% 50-55% 55-60% 60-65% >65%

SGIP Incentive as % of Total Project Cost – C&I BTM storage project

BTM SGIP Incentive Recipient Projects (number) 555 projects total

S

  • urce: EP analysis of California S

GIP dat a (Dec. 26, 2016)

~60%

  • f California

C&I BTM storage projects in SGIP program receive incentives >50%

  • f total project

cost

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Agenda for today

Promise of Energy S torage

Current Energy S torage Market S ize

Energy S torage Technology Overview

Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives

Competitive landscape

Conclusions

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Companies in Overall S tationary Energy S torage Ecosystem

S

  • urce: GTM Research

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Four integrators are currently key players in energy storage markets

Integrator Overview

  • Polit ically well-connected in California, t heir primary market (especially S
  • Cal)
  • S

t rat egy: secure cont ract for large volumes of st orage w/ ut ilit y (e.g., S CE), t hen fulfill via BTM deployment s wit h C&I cust omers

  • Half of each deployed BTM syst em is cont ract ed t o ut ilit y, half t o cust omer
  • Relat ively few proj ect s complet ed, st rengt hening int ernal fulfillment capabilit ies aft er

bankrupt cy of S unEdison (former channel part ner)

  • S

t rong reliance on Tesla as bat t ery supplier

  • S

t art ed by bundling st orage wit h EV charging for C&I, now heavily focused on bundling st orage wit h PV

  • Key differentiating fact or: shared savings cont ract in which GCN keeps 60-75%
  • f savings
  • Balance sheet st rengt h: 80%
  • wned by Engie
  • Int egrating sales force wit h Engie, likely will increasingly focus on Engie cust omers
  • S

t andardized small-scale product line, focused exclusively on C&I cust omers

  • Migrat ing from hardware orient at ion t o great er dept h in soft ware; probable leader in st orage

fleet aggregation and ut ility int erface

  • Equipment usually sold t o S

PV , which t hen leases syst em t o cust omer

  • S

ignificant capit al resources, especially proj ect finance ($350 million)

  • Pot ent ially facing increasing compet it ion from key supplier (Tesla)
  • Originally a bat t ery supplier t o ot her proj ect developers, now becoming more act ive in

development via acquisit ion of S

  • lar Cit y
  • Vert ically-int egrated: bat t ery, invert er, soft ware, sales, inst allat ion, service
  • Preference for selling equipment rat her t han long-t erm cont ract
  • Diversified: residential BTM, C&I BTM, ut ility BTM, ut ility IFM

Source Enovation Partners

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conclusions

27

To date, very little energy storage has been deployed on electricity grids worldwide, due to unfavorable economics

The relatively few storage deployments (outside of pumped hydro) to date have been mainly in the U.S . and have been both grid-focused and customer-focused

Although different technologies may be most attractive for the various market segments of grid-based energy storage, lithium-ion batteries are now dominating grid energy storage markets, and this dominance is expected to continue

As costs have declined, energy storage has gotten closer to viability in an increasing number of applications on the grid, each with different required performance/ operational characteristics

S ignificant cost reductions in energy storage systems are generally anticipated, and consequently market growth is expected to be robust (>30% CAGR)

In addition to cost, the complexity of the marketplace – the dearth of fully- integrated providers and the need to “ stack” value streams – is also a constraint to growth

There is a large and growing “ eco-system” of companies interested in the energy storage market