The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Hype and Reality of Electrical Energy S torage Brett A. Perlman S enior Fellow Agenda for today Promise of Energy Storage Current Energy S torage Market S ize Energy S torage Technology Overview Business cases for
Agenda for today
Promise of Energy Storage
Current Energy S torage Market S ize
Energy S torage Technology Overview
Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives
Competitive landscape
What’s next?
2
Bret t A. Perlman Bio and Research Int erest s
Current Activities:
Non-Resident Fellow, BU Inst it ut e for S
ust ainable Energy. Fellow, Harvard Advanced Leadership Init iative.
President, Vect or Advisors. Current act ivities on providing
management consult ing services t o energy client s
Board of Direct ors, Just Energy. NYS
E/ TS X t raded ret ailer of gas and elect ricit y in 17 deregulated Nort h American market s, UK and Germany Professional Background:
Commissioner, Public Ut ilit y Commission of Texas (1999 t o
2003): Responsible for t he successful rest ruct uring of Texas’ $17 billion elect ric ut ilit y indust ry and $4 billion t elecommunicat ions indust ry.
Management consult ant : Houst on office of McKinsey &
Company, wit h focus on developing business st rat egy for t elecommunicat ions and elect ric ut ilit y client s Education:
MP
A, Harvard Kennedy S chool
JD, Universit y of Texas Law S
chool
BA, Nort hwest ern Universit y 3 Energy S
t orage
− Proj ect Acorn: Working wit h Mike Aziz
(Harvard S EAS ) on organic flow bat t ery t echnology
Energy Technology Commercialization − Mat erials Translat ional Init iat ive:
Working wit h Ramana Nanda (HBS ) and S adas S hankar (Harvard S EAS ) on new business model t o commercialize energy t ech.
Elect ricity Market S
t ruct ures
− HBS
Case S t udy (2017): Mexican Power Market wit h HBS
- Prof. Dick Viet or
− Upcoming S
ummit on Nort h American Energy S ecurit y wit h former Mexican Deput y Energy S ecret ary and MIT Fellow Lourdes Melgar
4
ALMOS T 150 years aft er phot ovolt aic cells and wind t urbines were invent ed, t hey st ill generate
- nly 7%
- f t he world’s elect ricity.
Y et somet hing remarkable is happening. From being peripheral t o t he energy syst em j ust over a decade ago, t hey are now growing fast er t han any ot her energy source and t heir falling cost s are making t hem compet it ive wit h fossil fuels. Y et green energy has a dirt y secret . The more it is deployed, t he more it lowers t he price of power from any source. That makes it hard t o manage t he t ransit ion t o a carbon-free fut ure, during which many generating t echnologies, clean and dirt y, need t o remain profit able if t he light s are t o st ay on. The good news is that new technology can help fix the problem. Digitalisation, smart meters and batteries are enabling companies and households to smooth out their demand — by doing some energy-intensive work at night, for example. The bigger task is to redesign power markets to reflect the new need for flexible supply and demand.
Vision for Role of Energy S torage
5 Calif. GHG and renewable
policies…
−
50 percent of electricity from renewable sources by 2030
−
GHG reductions to 1990 levels
−
1.5 MM zero emission vehicles by 2025 Creating grid reliability issues..
−
Overgeneration during peaks
−
S teep, sharp ramping after peaks
−
Frequency issues since renewables aren’ t dispatchable …
driving the need for flexible resources, such as energy storage
−
Could soak up “ excess” on-peak renewables
−
Provide rapid dispatch to meet ramping requirements and frequency issue
California ISO’s “Duck Curve,” caused by high renewables penetration and GHG reduction goals… . … . is creating the need for more flexible resources, and perhaps a role for energy storage
Much Hype Around Energy S torage
6 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E Utility Non-residential Residential Annual deployments cross 1GW mark in 2019
1,662 U.S. Energy Storage Deployment by Segment (MV)
Agenda for today
Promise of Energy S torage
Current Energy Storage Market Size
Energy S torage Technology Overview
Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives
Competitive landscape
What’s next?
7
Global Installed Generation and S torage Base: January 2016
S
- urce: “ The Fut ure of t he Elect ric Grid and t he Role of Energy S
t orage” Elect ric Power Research Inst it ut e, May 24, 2016
8
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
>6000
144 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 <0.1
GW Storage < 2% of power generation capacity Pumped-hydro represents 99% of storage
Energy storage heavily focused in California due to regulatory incentives
Total U.S . Energy S torage Installed BTM S torage Installed BTM Battery S torage Proj ects Installed
S
- urce: Enovat ion Part ners analysis from variet y of sources (primarily S
GIP dat a for California proj ect s and DOE Global Energy S t orage Dat abase for ot her st at es)
Total= 81 MW
BTM Battery Storage by State
Utility- connected S torage Thermal storage proj ects
177 67 110 29 81 US Energy Storage Capacity – Q3, 2016 (MW)
9
Agenda for today
Promise of Energy S torage
Current Energy S torage Market S ize
Energy Storage Technology Overview
Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives
Competitive landscape
What’s next?
10
Advanced Energy S torage Technologies
11
Mechanical Elect rochemical Thermal Elect rical Chemical (hydrogen)
Pimped Hydro (conventional storage) Lead acid, lithium Ion, S
- dium S
ulfur, and S
- dium
Nickel Chloride S ensible-Molten salt, chilled water S upercapacitors Power-to-Power (fuel cells, etc.) CAES (Compressed Air Energy S torage) Flow batteries – Vanadium redox, Zinc-bromine Latent – Ice storage, Phase change materials S MES (S uper- conducting Magnetic Energy S torage) Power-to-Gas Flywheel Thermo- chemical storage
Different S torage Technologies for Different Applications
S
- urce: Environment al and Energy S
t udy Inst it ut e, Issue Brief, August 2013 Dat a source: S andia Nat ional Laborat ories
12
More “energy” More “power”
Comparison of Alternative Battery Chemistries for Grid S torage
13
S
- urce: “ Beyond Four Hours” , ES
S whit e paper, 2016
Continued Dramatic Cost Declines In S torage Over the Next 5 Y ears
14 Flow Battery
Lead
Capital Cost ($/KWh)
Zinc Lithium Flywheel
S low Median Fast CAGR
- 3%
- 9%
- 16%
5 Y ear
- 14%
- 38%
- 58%
CAGR
- 1%
- 2%
- 12%
5 Y ear
- 5%
- 10%
- 47%
CAGR
- 1%
- 5%
- 16%
5 Y ear
- 5%
- 24%
- 58%
CAGR
- 2%
- 12%
- 13%
5 Y ear
- 10%
- 47%
- 50%
CAGR 0%
- 1%
- 7%
5 Y ear 0%
- 5%
- 30%
- Designing out high cost materials, and scale
- Improved manufacturing and design will improve
performance – S ize/ thickness reduces current flow
- Integration time for manufacturing
- Reducing required high cost materials
- Improving control and response time to increase
usable range of operation
- Improvements in operation sustainability – ability
to remove heat, higher efficiency motor/ generator
- Improvements in competitive cost position from
increases in capability / performance
- Material additives such as carbon is increasing the
usable energy and capability envelope
- Design changes to reduce lead requirement
- S
cale manufacturing lowering cost (Gigafactory)
- Design improvements reducing needed materials
- Chemistry improvements increasing capability of
battery, increases usable energy and range of
- peration
- Cost reduction depends on manufacturing at scale
- Design improvement to reduce high cost sub-
components
- Chemistry improvements will increase lifespan and
range of operation
S
- urce: Enovat ion Part ners, Lazard LCOS
survey
Technology Trends and Opportunities
Proj ect Acorn –Aziz Energy Group Aqueous, Organic, Neut ral pH Flow Bat t ery
Market-driven approach to engineer a storage system that meets market needs
3rd iteration of an aqueous flow battery using organic active materials
Low Cost
Chemicals become a small fraction of system cost New chemistry enables use of cheaper ion exchange membranes
- Good performance
High capacity Long cycle lifetimes
S afe & environmentally friendly
Aqueous Neutral pH
Li-Ion Batteries Dominating Recent Additions to Grid
16
S
- urce: GTM Research/ ES
A, US Energy S t orage Monit or (3Q 2016)
$1370/ kw or $685/ kWh*
17
* Assumes a 2 hour syst em
Will LION Rule the Energy S torage Market?
Agenda for today
Promise of Energy S torage
Current Energy S torage Market S ize
Energy S torage Technology Overview
Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives
Competitive landscape
What’s next?
18
Lots of “ Use-Cases” for S torage…
19
… But only 5 ways to monetize
20
Grid S t orage Cost s Oft en Great er Than Any One Value S t ream
S
- urce: Lazard “ Levelized Cost of S
t orage V2.0” , December 2016
21
“Stacking” of value streams generally required for economic viability at current storage costs
Regulatory support for Energy S torage will be key to market growth, though probably insufficient for the development of a sustainably viable market
22 Hawaii:
- 1 MW pilot program between HECO and S
tem
- PV net metering limitations – self-service only, no exports
- 100%
RPS by 2045 New York:
- PS
C supporting DER integration
- REV “ opening markets to enhance
system value”
- NY-BES
T
- ConEd BQDM program
- NYFD fire code revision to
accommodate Li-ion batteries California:
- AB 2514: 1.3 GW by 2020 by IOUs
– S
CE 580 MW (85 MW BTM)
– PG&E 580 MW (85 MW BTM) – S
DG&E 165 MW (30 MW BTM)
- S
GIP $1.80/ watt incentive for storage
- L.A. Basin resource supply challenges
– S
ONGS and fossil plant retirements local capacity resource procurement
– Aliso Canyon insufficient gas deliverability for peaking generation
- DRAM pilot program
- S
B 350: 50% RPS by 2030 Massachusetts:
- S
ept 2016 “ S tate of Charge” report indicates 1.8 GW of economically-viable storage (200 MW BTM)
- Establishment of storage mandates
underway
- $10 million grant funding in
demonstration proj ects
Recent Energy Storage Initiatives
23
Incentives critical for storage economics
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 <30% 30-35% 35-40% 40-45% 45-50% 50-55% 55-60% 60-65% >65%
SGIP Incentive as % of Total Project Cost – C&I BTM storage project
BTM SGIP Incentive Recipient Projects (number) 555 projects total
S
- urce: EP analysis of California S
GIP dat a (Dec. 26, 2016)
~60%
- f California
C&I BTM storage projects in SGIP program receive incentives >50%
- f total project
cost
Agenda for today
Promise of Energy S torage
Current Energy S torage Market S ize
Energy S torage Technology Overview
Business cases for energy storage and the importance of regulatory incentives
Competitive landscape
Conclusions
24
Companies in Overall S tationary Energy S torage Ecosystem
S
- urce: GTM Research
25
Four integrators are currently key players in energy storage markets
Integrator Overview
- Polit ically well-connected in California, t heir primary market (especially S
- Cal)
- S
t rat egy: secure cont ract for large volumes of st orage w/ ut ilit y (e.g., S CE), t hen fulfill via BTM deployment s wit h C&I cust omers
- Half of each deployed BTM syst em is cont ract ed t o ut ilit y, half t o cust omer
- Relat ively few proj ect s complet ed, st rengt hening int ernal fulfillment capabilit ies aft er
bankrupt cy of S unEdison (former channel part ner)
- S
t rong reliance on Tesla as bat t ery supplier
- S
t art ed by bundling st orage wit h EV charging for C&I, now heavily focused on bundling st orage wit h PV
- Key differentiating fact or: shared savings cont ract in which GCN keeps 60-75%
- f savings
- Balance sheet st rengt h: 80%
- wned by Engie
- Int egrating sales force wit h Engie, likely will increasingly focus on Engie cust omers
- S
t andardized small-scale product line, focused exclusively on C&I cust omers
- Migrat ing from hardware orient at ion t o great er dept h in soft ware; probable leader in st orage
fleet aggregation and ut ility int erface
- Equipment usually sold t o S
PV , which t hen leases syst em t o cust omer
- S
ignificant capit al resources, especially proj ect finance ($350 million)
- Pot ent ially facing increasing compet it ion from key supplier (Tesla)
- Originally a bat t ery supplier t o ot her proj ect developers, now becoming more act ive in
development via acquisit ion of S
- lar Cit y
- Vert ically-int egrated: bat t ery, invert er, soft ware, sales, inst allat ion, service
- Preference for selling equipment rat her t han long-t erm cont ract
- Diversified: residential BTM, C&I BTM, ut ility BTM, ut ility IFM
Source Enovation Partners
Conclusions
27