THE GROSVENOR EXPERIENCE January 2016 INTERNAL Background & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the grosvenor experience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

THE GROSVENOR EXPERIENCE January 2016 INTERNAL Background & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE GROSVENOR EXPERIENCE January 2016 INTERNAL Background & Expected Conditions Our Experiences Major Review Future Works 2 INTERNAL GROSVENOR Mine Specifications 7 Mtpa Longwall coal operation Situated between


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE GROSVENOR EXPERIENCE

January 2016

INTERNAL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 INTERNAL

  • Background & Expected Conditions
  • Our Experiences
  • Major Review
  • Future Works
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 INTERNAL

GROSVENOR

Mine Specifications

  • 7 Mtpa Longwall coal operation
  • Situated between existing Moranbah North mine & Moranbah South Project
  • Goonyella Middle (GM) Seam in Moranbah Coal Measures
  • Development achieved 26 km in 2015 with:

– 3 x ED25 – 2 x 12CM12

  • Longwall mining to commence May 2016
  • Designed on the back of mining experiences with

similar environments

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 INTERNAL

GROSVENOR

Geology and Geotechnical Environment

166 168 170

1 2 3 4A 4B 5T 5B

166 168 170

5.2m 1.2m 2.1m 0.8m 0.7m

Tonstein Band Ply 2 Band Ply 1 Band Seam Roof Seam Floor

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 INTERNAL

  • Background & Expected Conditions
  • Our Experiences
  • Major Review
  • Future Works
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 INTERNAL

OUR EXPERIENCES

  • Not a typical coal beam as seen in Moranbah North (MNC)
  • Grosvenor Ply 1 classed as transitional from coal to the overlying carbonaceous mudstone above
  • Geotechnically low strength coal roof – is transitional by nature containing multiple bands

Density plots of GRO and MNC outside split zone, highlighting difference of transitional coal roof

Inexistence of a Coal Roof “Beam”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 INTERNAL

OUR EXPERIENCES

  • Roof

– Immediate roof strength impacted by seam split – Split zone interburden low strength (<10 MPa), thinly bedded, carbonaceous and/or tuffaceous claystone unit – Highly carbonaceous mudstones with sheared & polished bedding planes continues above/below ply 1

Low Strength Roof Environment

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 INTERNAL

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

DoC (m) Max Displacement (mm) Cut Through

DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCE

Max Displacement per CT - TG101

90° Break – travel to belt rd Fenoflex Trial Truss Support Reasonably benign conditions < 220m DOC. No major Issues

Split Zone Begins

MW10 Trial Floor Cut to Increase Coal Beam MW10 Trial MW10’s Truss Support New Support Rules

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 8 CT

  • DoC 220m
  • Driven 90° - Prove driving into principal stress improves productivity (unsuccessful)

– Cleat direction within 15° of roadway (triggered TARP to elevate support) – Roof Displacement thought to be due to Cut Through (CT) orientation

  • Support: 6 x 1.8m bolt per m and 2 x 6.2m Megabolt (MW9) every 2m
  • 50mm trigger: 1 x 8.2m Centreline (C/L) Megabolt (MW9) every 2m
  • Maximum Total Displacement (MTD) 70mm

90° Breakaway – Stress Orientation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 10 CT

  • DoC 245m
  • Changed primary support - 8 bolt pattern (inbye 9 CT)
  • Megabolts in belt road intersection grouted prior to breakoff (previously grouting TARP driven)
  • TARP revision for CT’s:

– 30mm Trigger to grout Megabolt (MW9) – 50mm Trigger install 1 x 8.2m C/L Megabolt (MW9) – All CT’s driven with 2 x 8.2m Megabolt (MW9) per m at minimum

  • Displacement > 70mm resulted in Fenoflex to be injected belt road side of CT (unsuccessful)
  • MTD 96mm

Fenoflex – Arrest Roof Displacement

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 13 CT

  • DoC 280m
  • Primary support 8 bolt pattern with 2 x 8.2m Megabolt (MW9) per m
  • Megabolts grouted at 30mm, completed CT, tell-tales stable at 40mm
  • During 14CT driveage, roof reactivated, installed C/L Megabolts (MW9)
  • After second surge CT stabilised
  • MTD 72mm

First CT Driven in Split Zone

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 14 CT

  • DoC 290m
  • High rate of displacement (40mm in 24 hours) – no sign of arresting
  • At 50mm displacement installed 8.2m C/L Megabolts (MW9)
  • To pre-empt 80mm displacement Trusses installed at 2m spacing (successful)
  • MTD 84mm

Trusses Installed – Arrest Roof Displacement

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 15 CT

  • DoC 300m
  • Trial of higher capacity Megabolt (69t MW10 compared to 60t MW9)
  • MW10

– 2 x1000mm resins – Unbonded section of ~3.5m – 2m grout tubes installed

  • Least amount of movement of a CT in the split zone (inconclusive due to sandstone in Megabolt

horizon)

  • MTD 18mm

First Trial MW10 Megabolt – Minimise Displacement

Minimal fracturing/shearing

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 16 CT

  • DoC 310m
  • Cut on floor to increase coal beam thickness by 300mm
  • Significant bagging & C/L cracking observed – comparable to outbye C/T’s
  • At 50mm movement, 1 week after driveage installed C/L Megabolt (MW9)
  • Trial of full column grouting of Megabolts (MW9) every window – no sign of arresting displacement
  • Observed shearing at 2 - 4m roof horizon
  • Cut on floor with MW9s (unsuccessful)
  • MTD 71mm

Cut on Floor - Increase Coal Beam

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 18 CT

  • DoC 320m
  • Continued to cut on floor with retrial MW10’s
  • First sign of floor heave

– Generally in isolated areas (10-15m in length, CT’s more susceptible) – Difficult to quantify – estimated 300mm – Developed site specific floor heave potential index

  • MTD 28mm

Second Trial MW10 Megabolt – Minimise Displacement

Floor heave identified in TG101 18 C/T – floor simply ‘popped up’ during inspection

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 20 CT

  • DoC 350m
  • Cut 400mm into floor to increase coal beam thickness by 700mm (C 19-20 & 20 CT) (unsuccessful)
  • High rate of displacement (>30mm in 12 hours) – no sign of arresting
  • Excessive rib spalls >0.5m due to Tonstein higher in ribs
  • Slippery stone floor, blocky when broken
  • At 115mm displacement installed Trusses
  • MTD 131mm

Cut into floor - Increase Coal Beam

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 INTERNAL

200 400

50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425

TG101 22 CT

  • DoC 360m
  • First CT driven with revised support rules and TARPs – fundamental changes
  • MW10s grouted every window
  • To pre-empt 100mm displacement C/L Megabolts (MW10) installed at 90mm (2m spacing)
  • High displacement triggers allowed completion of CT before C/L’s

– C/L support taken offline, no delays (successful)

  • MTD 122mm

Revised Support Rules

+34m +17m +17m

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 INTERNAL

  • Background & Expected Conditions
  • Our Experiences
  • Major Review
  • Future Works
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 INTERNAL

MAJOR REVIEW

  • Grosvenor geotechnically characterised as a low strength roof environment (CMRR ranges 30-35)
  • Conditions have been managed successfully to date

– Current market dictates need to drive efficiency into strata management

  • Grosvenor’s low strength roof:

– Accept the roof displacement (plastic deformation) process and design accordingly

  • Major review undertaken by external consultants about key strategies to follow

– In conjunction with numerous trials have resulted in our current support rules and TARP’s – Moved towards higher capacity Megabolt support with un-bonded section (MW10)

TG101 UCS Plot

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 INTERNAL

MAJOR REVIEW

  • No coal beam thickness trigger – Grosvenor does not have a coal beam
  • Strategy based around moving towards a suspension type model
  • Increased telltale triggers
  • Relaxed centreline crack trigger - > 50mm cracking in addition to other deformation signs results in

moving up a support level

  • Post groutable un-bonded Megabolt (MW10) with routine grouting every 24 hours, unless specified by

displacement trigger (> 50mm in 12 hours)

Key Changes to MMSR and TARP Triggers

LOCATION SUPPORT DENISTY TELLTALE TRIGGER Gateroad Cut Throughs and Intersections 2 x 8.2m long cable per 1m <100mm As above + 1 x C/L 8.2m Megabolt per 1m 100mm – 130mm As above + 10m Trusses every 2m 130mm – 150mm Gateroads Headings 2 x 8.2m Megabolt per 4m <40mm 2 x 8.2m Megabolt per 2m 40mm – 60mm As above + C/L 8.2m Megabolt per 2m 60mm – 80mm

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21 INTERNAL

  • Background & Expected Conditions
  • Our Experiences
  • Major Review
  • Future Works
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22 INTERNAL

WHERE ARE WE GOING?

  • Number of key areas we are investigating

– Bolt length review: Would moving to a 2.1m bolt make a difference? – High capacity point anchored bolts: Could this be the answer to eventually reducing Megabolt density? – Analytical rating specific to Grosvenor that can be linked to required support density – Further development of ground deformation curves for weak roof environment: How much movement will happen regardless of support density? – New roof mesh trial – very high MPa and lightweight steel

  • Act as a strap across the roadway to combat

centreline sag

  • Address tearing issue in heavily deformed cut

throughs

Trials and Future Works

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23 INTERNAL

WHERE ARE WE GOING?

  • Depth of cover increasing to deepest in QLD (currently mining MG102 to 480m)
  • Bottom rib bolt issues – spalling lower rib
  • High gas content inbye LW102
  • LW startup early May – mine optimised for LW retreat, however what conditions will we encounter?

Future Challenges Expected

slide-24
SLIDE 24

THANK YOU

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25 INTERNAL

APPENDICIES

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26 INTERNAL

TG101 LITHOLOGY SUMMARY

14ct 9ct 10ct 11ct 8ct 12ct 13ct 16ct 17ct 19ct 16ct to 21ct based on cutting on the floor profile 21ct 25ct-26ct 29ct

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27 INTERNAL

GROSVENOR STRESS MAP

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28 INTERNAL

OUR EXPERIENCES

Telltale Movement CT vs Hdgs

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

DoC (m) Max Displacement (mm) Heading

Max Displacement per Heading - TG101

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DoC (m) Max Displacement (mm) Cut Through

Max Displacement per CT - TG101

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29 INTERNAL

CENTRELINE CRACK INVESTIGATION

Centreline cracking and Roof Bagging

  • Investigation into vertical extents of

significant centreline crack – had 42mm holes drilled inside the cracks and inspected with borescope camera

  • Most notable observation: significant

cracking >50mm extended ~200-300mm into the roof and appeared to stop out at a bedding plane

LOCATION HEIGHT OF FRACTURING OBSERVED MG102 6CT 0.6m MG101 7CT 0.6m MG101 11CT 1.2m TG101 8CT 0.5m TG101 14CT 0.5m TG101 17CT 0.7m

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30 INTERNAL

SEAM ROOF IN SPLIT ZONE

  • When the interburden between the ply 1 and ply 2 is greater than 200mm the GM seam roof is taken from the

top of the ply 2 band

  • Shows immediate 3m of roof above Ply 2 (cut horizon) has Sonic Derived UCS ~10 MPa.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

31 INTERNAL

GROSVENOR - ACTUAL SEAM SECTION

  • Penny Band almost invisible.
  • Clearly marked Ply2-Ply3 Band (Marker band for

development roof).

  • Tonstein band clearly identifiable
  • In ideal situation, Coal roof beam about 1.3m.