the great pacific war
play

THE GREAT PACIFIC WAR: U.S. v. JAPAN, 1940-1945 24 SEPTEMBER 2020: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE GREAT PACIFIC WAR: U.S. v. JAPAN, 1940-1945 24 SEPTEMBER 2020: RISING EXPECTATIONS DENIED Dr. Joe Fitzharris Professor Emeritus of History The University of St. Thomas RISING EXPECTATIONS DENIED 24 Sept. Rising Expectations


  1. THE GREAT PACIFIC WAR: U.S. v. JAPAN, 1940-1945 24 SEPTEMBER 2020: RISING EXPECTATIONS DENIED Dr. Joe Fitzharris Professor Emeritus of History The University of St. Thomas

  2. RISING EXPECTATIONS DENIED – 24 Sept. • Rising Expectations • Rising Expectations Denied • Japanese Expansionism / Imperialism • American Responses • Japanese Quandary and Yamamoto’s Solution • Unanticipated Consequences of the Attack on Pearl Harbor • Conspiracy Theories

  3. THEORETICAL: E RISING x EXPECTATIONS p e c t Gap a t i Reality o n s Time Popularized by the “Kerner Commission on Civil Disorder” after the 1968 Riots 4 √

  4. JAPAN’S E RISING x EXPECTATIONS p e c t Rise as a Major • a Regional Power t i Rising Urban • Reality o n Incomes and Well- s being Time Japan expected greater respect as a major power. The Japanese people came to expect better times. 3 √

  5. Japan as a Major Regional Power • Acquiring colonies: Korea, Taiwan • Role in Boxer Rebellion • Russo-Japanese War(1904-1905) • Naval Alliance with Britain (1902-1921) • Involvement in World War I and Economic Growth • 1920s Expanded Trade and industrialization

  6. RISING EXPECTATIONS DENIED E x Paris Peace • p Conference e c Naval Disarmament • t Gap a Treaties t i Immigration • Reality o Restrictions n s The Showa (Great) • Time Depression, 1930- 1931

  7. Japanese Delegation at the Paris Peace Conference Billie Hughes W. Bigot Wilson Racial Equality Clause Progressive Racism (for Member Nations only)

  8. Naval Disarmament • RATIONALE: primary way of projecting national power was naval – especially battleships • Washington Naval Agreement, 1920: 5:5:3 ratio (US:UK:JP), recognized as power, • Japanese view ratio as insult • Geneva and London Naval Conferences, 1927-1936 • World Disarmament Conference in Geneva, 1932 Mutsu , 1920-1943 • Japan actually GAINED by these disarmament agreements – but they did not see it that way!

  9. ANTI-JAPANESE CRUSADE IN 1920s • Typical Immigrants • 1924 Immigration Act • Ended Asian Immigration • Severely Limited Immigration from South & Central Europe • (Based in Eugenics - Margaret Sanger & PP) • West Coast Prejudice and Bigotry (hence 1942 removal of Japanese) Tacoma News Tribune , 27 July 1920

  10. Japanese Economic Situation ● No Resources – except people − Despite stereotype, highly capable, imaginative (not inventive), driven, dedicated, indoctrinated, unified, militaristic. Bushido Code ● Export Goods all luxury – Income Elastic ● Need to Import Resources, Oil

  11. Trends and Break in Prices Japanese Economy: Urban-Industrial Recovery, Worsening Rural Depression

  12. RISING EXPECTATIONS DENIED after 1930 E • Rural areas hardest hit, limited x recovery more people, no land p e • Few migrated to urban areas c and got jobs - discrimination t Gap a • IJ Army recruits heavily from t rural areas i Reality o • IJ Navy draws from urban areas n s • IJA operates in Manchuria & Time China supported by IJN airpower (lots of opportunity for Japanese in colonial areas) 3 √

  13. JAPANESE EXPANSIONISM OR IMPERIALISM • Manchuria (1931) and China - “Marco Polo Bridge” 1937 • “Rape of Nanking” in 1937 -1938 • Seizure of Hainan Island, 1939 • Seizure of bases in Indi-China from Vichy France Sept. 1940 • Desire access to resources in Dutch East Indies (Indonesia) and Malaya “Delicacies Of The Season - Yellow Bread” French Cartoon ~ 1941 on Japanese Imperialism

  14. lron, Coal, Land, JOBS Manchuria, 1931 Army Insubordination an Issue

  15. Rape of Nanking Nationalist capitol

  16. Rape of Nanking, 13 December 1937-30 January 1938 See: Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking (1997)

  17. Despite Denials, the Japanese Knew An article on the "Contest to kill 100 people using a sword" published in the Tokyo Nichi Nichi Shimbun . The headline reads, "'Incredible Record' (in the Contest to Cut Down 100 People) – Mukai 106 – 105 Noda – Both 2nd Lieutenants Go into Extra Innings"

  18. The Nanking Blunder • Prince Asaka Yasuhiko, GOC Nanking, Royal Family • Taking Nanking did not end Chinese resistance. lt effected Japan’s relations with China - and still does. • Tarnished Japan’s reputation throughout Asia • Volume of killing led Adm. Harry Yarnell, CO USN Asia Fleet, to forecast millions killed in Sino-Japanese War

  19. Hainan, Indo-China, the Dutch 1939-1940 – threatens PI East Indies, and Malaya

  20. Resource Needs

  21. Resource Needs

  22. Dependence of Japanese Economy on Foreign Imports Other Than Oil in 1941 [t-4]

  23. US RESPONSE: Economic Sanctions • Japanese gain concessions and bases in French Indo-China in 1940 • US closed Panama Canal to Japanese shipping • Embargoed scrap metal sales • 74% of scrap from US • 93% of copper from US • Spring 1941 occupies all of Indo- China • Summer 1941: Japanese assets in US frozen, Sale of oil and gasoline embargoed

  24. JAPAN’S QUANDRY AND YAMAMOTO’S SOLUTION: The Problems: • Unwilling to give up gains in China or Indo-China • Sanctions meant 2 years of oil in stock for IJN • JPN economy needed East Asian and Malayan resources • Diplomatic Question: • Will US support UK? Dutch? • Desirability of US in PI

  25. Japan’s Situation 1940-1941 • Unwilling to end war in China and give back territories seized • Unable to defeat guerrillas in China or control army units taking extra territory • War in Europe opened new opportunities for conquest • Need for tin, rubber, petroleum (from DEI and Malaya) • 2 July 41 Imperial Conference - press on southward! • Co-Prosperity Sphere

  26. SEA LANES AND STRATEGY • South China Sea Shipping Threatened by US Navy and B-17 Operational Range AAF heavy Bombers • NEED East Indies Resources • Eliminate Singapore (Defenses Strongest to Seaward, IJA plans to attack from land) Straits of • Ignore US or not? Malacca • Fear US come to aid of UK • Economic Warfare Underway • Maximum 2 years of supplies

  27. YAMAMOTO’S Much more than Pearl Harbor SOLUTION

  28. JAPAN ASSUMED: • US and Japanese interests in the Pacific were asymmetric • Acquiring resource rich regions ensures Japanese economy would be self-sufficient • US would be unwilling to pay a very high price to defeat Japan if the costs were raised by: • quickly acquiring and fortifying Central and SW Pac • forcing US to advance by a deadly island-by-island slog that would exhaust US will to fight

  29. WAR PLANS and WAR GAMES • US WAR PLANS (Joint Army-Navy): • War Plan ORANGE: IJ surprise attack PI; island bases; rescue PI, decisive battle with IJN, blockade Japanese Home Islands. RAINBOW plans built on • IJN WAR PLANS (IJA not involved) • KANTAI KESSEN (Decisive Battle): seize PI, USN drive across PAC to rescue; severely attrit USN in transit; superior skill and quality overcome numeric inferiority, • YAMAMOTO’S Plan: Shatter US morale by massive offensive on US fleet at PH, resulting negotiated peace • WAR GAMES: IN COMMON – IJN attack on Pearl Harbor alone or as part of an attack on the US West Coast

  30. L.A. Examiner, 7 Nov 1937

  31. DAWN, HAWAII, 7 DECEMBER 1941 • NO clear warning from Washington • Lot of Intell, none specific to PH • Expected strikes in East Indias, PI (PH too far) • No real defensive preparations • Prepared for sabotage in PI and PH - planes wing tip • Normal Sunday shore liberty in PH • No torpedo nets, AAA not manned, ammo lacked • Carriers out delivering plans to Midway and Wake

  32. JAPANESE ATTACK ON US BASES ON OAHU, English explanations added in original HAWAII

  33. USS Ward, DD 139: Forward 5” gun (at State Capitol) Minnesota Naval Reservists

  34. ANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES • Severely damage US “will to fight” and public morale by destroying US Pacific Fleet offensive punch (BBs) • Buy time to build a fortress so strong the US would chose to negotiate rather than fight • Open protected sea lanes to resources • Yamamoto warned that attacking the US was not a really good option, but his plan was the best of the Japanese plans

  35. RESULTS OF THE ATTACK • Damage to USN negligible in longer-run - minor damage to shore establishment, no loss of oil stocks, only 2 BBs lost, no carriers attacked. • Galvanized US public opinion behind a “total war” effort to destroy Japan (raising tolerance of war costs dramaticaly). • Terminated the “Isolationist” opposition to FDR’s interventionist foreign policy. • Japan did not eliminate USN, only partially fortified the island barriers, and created conditions in which they could achieve their preferred “death before dishonor” on a national scale.

  36. UNANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES • Public united in fight against Japan (Germany no so much) • Business saw the “hand - writing” and was supportive (except Henry Ford) • Unleashed savage warfare across the Pacific and Asia • Ended Japanese imperialism – and European imperialism too’ • Japan became the “victim” of the evil US war machine

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend