the future of travel demand
play

The Future of Travel Demand Susan Handy Presentation given at the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Future of Travel Demand Susan Handy Presentation given at the USC Sol Price School of Public Policy September 16, 2015 Soaring Global Demand for Vehicles 3.0 Number of Motor Vehicles (Billions) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Source:


  1. The Future of Travel Demand Susan Handy Presentation given at the USC Sol Price School of Public Policy September 16, 2015

  2. Soaring Global Demand for Vehicles 3.0 Number of Motor Vehicles (Billions) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Source: Sperlingand Gordon (2009), based on DOE, JAMA, other

  3. Why worry about this? Transportation accounts Transportation accounts for ¼ of CO 2 emissions in for 2/3 of oil in US and ½ in world world Source: EIA, 2006

  4. Why worry about this? Congestion Pollution Resiliency Sprawl Equity Safety

  5. What to do about it? Reduce the impact of driving Infrastructure design Vehicle and fuel technology

  6. AND get people to do something other than drive…

  7. Annual VMT per Capita in U.S. 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 - 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Census

  8. Peak in VMT per capita by state Source: Garceau et. al., 2014

  9. Commuting by car Source: http://www.census.gov/hhes/commuting/files/2014/acs-32.pdf

  10. Registered vehicles per capita 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics, Tables 4-11 and 4-12

  11. Why? Will it last?

  12. It’s the economy, right? VMT vs. GDP 14,000 60,000 12,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 8,000 30,000 6,000 20,000 4,000 VMT per capita 10,000 GDP per capita ($2009) 2,000 - 0 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 Source: Garceau et. al., 2014

  13. Or other factors? • Income • Fuel prices • Traffic congestion • Aging population • Regional migration • Back-to-the city • Smartphones • Others

  14. Another way to look at it… How do we as individuals and households make choices about travel? How and why are these choices changing?

  15. Nested choices Long-term rm Mid-term rm Choices Short rt-term rm Choices Lifestyle Choices Driver’s license Residential Trip frequency Auto ownership Location Trip destination Mode choice

  16. Choice process Set of Qualities of Value placed choices choices on different available available qualities Drive alone Cost Cost Shared ride Time vs. Bus Comfort Time Rail Safety vs. Bicycle Comfort Walk vs. Skateboard Safety Needs, Knowledge, perceptions Constraints

  17. Changes in all cells Choice ce Choice ce Value of Sets Qualities Qualities Long-term rm Choice ces Mid-term rm Choices Short rt-term rm Choices

  18. Changes in all cells Choice ce Choice ce Value of Sets Qualities Qualities Long-term rm Choice ces Mid-term rm Choices Short rt-term rm Choices

  19. Expanding Traveler Choice B Bike Sharing

  20. Bike sharing 45 operations in the U.S. as of Jan 2015 Transit complement or substitute? Equity of access?

  21. Micro-transit on demand e.g Bridj, Chariot, Leap Competing with public transit? Getting people out of their cars? http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2015/03/leap-transit-commuter-bus-san-francisco-loup.html

  22. Car access without ownership Car-sharing – Transportation Network Companies Owners getting rid of cars? Non- owners driving when they otherwise wouldn’t?

  23. Car access without ownership Ride-sharing – Transportation Network Companies Sequential sharing – one at a time? Concurrent rides – shared rides?

  24. Individually owned cars? Shared cars individually used? Shared cars with shared rides?

  25. Changes in all cells Choice ce Choice ce Value of Sets Qualities Qualities Long-term rm Choice ces Mid-term rm Choices Short rt-term rm Choices

  26. Are the “Millennials” different? Example 1: Allison Example 2: Hannah

  27. Driver’s License Trends Difference in licensing between 1995 and 2011 by age Source: Steve Polzin , presentation for “Shifts in Travel Behavior: Where are We Going and How Do we Know? Tenth Annual Travel Data User Forum” Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  28. Driver’s License by Generation Got license within 1 year of eligible age 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Baby Boomers (50-68) Gen Exers (34-49) Millennials (<34) Source: Thigpen and Handy, Driver’s Licensing Delay: A Retrospective Study to Explain Intergenerational Differences, submitted to the Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  29. Driving License: Role of Attitudes “Driving was the coolest way to get to school” 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Baby Boomers (50 to 68) Gen Xers (34-49) Millennials (<34) Source: Thigpen and Handy, Driver’s Licensing Delay: A Retrospective Study to Explain Intergenerational Differences, submitted to the Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  30. Driver’s License: Role of Parents “My parents were happy to drive me places” 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Baby Boomers (50 to 68) Gen Xers (34-49) Millennials (<34) Source: Thigpen and Handy, Driver’s Licensing Delay: A Retrospective Study to Explain Intergenerational Differences, submitted to the Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  31. Driver’s License Effect of age after controlling for other factors Source: Thigpen and Handy, Driver’s Licensing Delay: A Retrospective Study to Explain Intergenerational Differences, submitted to the Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  32. Driver’s License for HS students Odds of getting license on time 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% -50% -100% Like riding Can rely on Driving is Lots of stuff After school Own a the bus parents to coolest way to carry activities smartphone drive Source: Brown and Handy, Factors Associated with High School Students’ Delayed Acquisition of Driver’s License: Insights from Three Northern California Schools, Transportation Research Record, forthcoming.

  33. What else do we know… http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/03/07/millennials-in-adulthood/

  34. http://nitc.trec.pdx.edu/news/millenials-favor-walkable-communities-says-poll-national-association-realtors-and-trec

  35. http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/pages/millennials/

  36. Ride Sharing Has used Über, Lyft, or other service 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Baby Boomers (50 to 68) Gen Xers (34-49) Millennials (<34) Source: Alemi, Pike, Palm, and Handy, forthcoming analysis of 2014 San Francisco Voter Survey

  37. Bicycling culture http://www.nytimes.com/2 013/10/12/nyregion/in- http://www.nytimes.com/2013 sickness-and-in-health- /08/22/fashion/riding-away- long-after-the-bike-is-due- from-a-bar-crawl-with-citi- back.html bikes.html Riding away from a bar crawl In Sickness and in Health, Long After the Bike Is Due Back

  38. Percent Biking Last Week vs. “I like riding a bike” 90 80 70 60 Percent 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly disagree neutral agree strongly agree disagree Source: Xing, Buehler, and Handy, 2008; see other UC Davis bicycling studies

  39. E-Bikes and Parents “I love my bike. It’s my car!” See: Thomas, A. More Sustainable Minivan? An Exploratory Study Of Electric Bicycle Use By San Francisco Bay Area Families, submitted to the Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  40. Smartphones and Flexibility in travel activities Flexibility in travel Productive travel time

  41. Millennials Survey launching this week?

  42. Driver’s License Trends Difference in licensing between 1995 and 2011 by age Source: Steve Polzin , presentation for “Shifts in Travel Behavior: Where are We Going and How Do we Know? Tenth Annual Travel Data User Forum” Transportation Research Board, 2015.

  43. Choice Choice Quality Sets Qualities Value Long-term rm Choices Mid-term rm Choices Short rt-term rm Choices Implications for VMT?

  44. How do choices stack-up?

  45. What substitutes for what?

  46. Will new options generate new travel?

  47. VMT in the future? “The aggregate trends discussed do not allow us to forecast with any certainty the car use that we can expect in the future.” – Goodwin and Van Dender, 2013 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 ? 4,000 2,000 - 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012

  48. Things we can influence Set of Qualities of Value placed choices choices on different available available qualities

  49. By the tens of thousands, Portlanders preview their new car-free bridge 8/9/15 “With walkers and in strollers, on hopalongs and (in the case of quite a few happily panting dogs) on leashes, Portlanders packed a series of previews Sunday of Tilikum Crossing, the first bridge in the United States to carry buses, bikes, trains, streetcars and people walking but no private cars .” http://bikeportland.org/2015/08/09/tens-thousands-portlanders-preview-new-car-free-bridge-photos-155021

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend