The friction measuring tire / road surface space interface David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the friction measuring tire
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The friction measuring tire / road surface space interface David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The friction measuring tire / road surface space interface David Woodward, Phillip Millar and Chris Tierney, Ulster University Owen Ardill, Highways England Ramesh Perera, AECOM Enveloping - Hamet and Klein (2000) Enveloping - ROSANNE project


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The friction measuring tire / road surface space interface

David Woodward, Phillip Millar and Chris Tierney, Ulster University Owen Ardill, Highways England Ramesh Perera, AECOM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Enveloping - Hamet and Klein (2000)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Enveloping - ROSANNE project (2016)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Enveloping of the tire / asphalt interface shown by paint removal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Paint removal during Friction after Polishing (Dunford, 2013)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Paint removal during PSV (Woodward et al, 2016)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pendulum value v. % contact area

y = -0.1257x + 59.053 R² = 0.1183 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 50 100 Pendulum tester used for PSV Contact area with no paint (%) Study 1 Study 2 Study 3

slide-8
SLIDE 8 mm 0.0 0.50 1.0 1.5 2.0

3d modelling

  • f paint loss
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Selected aggregates – paint loss occurs to a depth of about 0.3 to 0.4 mm

NM

0.300 mm

Number of islands 4 Threshold 0.300 mm Parameters Stat. Value Unit Area Sum 30.6 mm² Volume Sum 4.63 mm³ NM 0.377 mm

Number of islands 8 Threshold 0.377 mm Parameters Stat. Value Unit Area Sum 56.3 mm² Volume Sum 7.90 mm³

NM

0.328 mm

Number of islands 1 Threshold 0.328 mm Parameters Stat. Value Unit Area Sum 33.5 mm² Volume Sum 4.45 mm³

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Important tires

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Time for a rolling tire to move 10 mm

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TEA MK1 and MK2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Measuring the contact patch using pressure mapping

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Z-axis pressure distribution within contact patches

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tire deforming into the space

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Gap width – HRA and 10mm SMA

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TEA MK1 - nearly new tire, 20 psi, 233.4 N load, measured in central position, straight edge profile

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TEA MK2 - comparison of tires for gap spacings up to 60 mm at similar vertical loads

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • The TEA MK1 and MK2 test apparatus offer a simple means of investigating

the principle of enveloping.

  • The laboratory investigations considered factors that can be controlled and

thought to influence the envelope space.

  • Under static conditions and for all of the test conditions investigated, the

main factor relating to tire embedment is gap width.

  • Amount of tire embedment decreases until a critical gap space is reached

and then remains fairly constant as gap space is further decreased.

  • Data can be used to supplement other studies into the tire / surface

interface relating to skid resistance, noise and rolling resistance.