The Family Office Exclusion from the Definition of Investment Adviser: The SEC Adopts a Final Rule
On June 22, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted new Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 (the “Rule”) to define the term “family office” for purposes of excluding such
- ffices from the definition of an “investment adviser” under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended (the “Advisers Act”).1 The Rule provides three basic conditions for a qualifying family office, each of which is described in greater detail below:
- 1. The family office must provide investment advice only to “family clients” (as defined in the Rule);
- 2. Family clients must wholly-own the family office and Family Members and/or Family Entities
(each as defined below) must exclusively control the family office; and
- 3. The family office must not hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser.
The Rule also provides “grandfathering” relief for unregistered family offices that provide certain services prior to January 1, 2010. A family office that currently is unregistered in reliance on the former private advisers exemption of Section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act and Rule 203(b)(3)-1 thereunder (the “Private Adviser Exemption”),2 but which does not meet the definition of “family
- ffice” as adopted in the Rule, must restructure to satisfy the definition, register as an investment
adviser by March 30, 2012, or seek an exemptive order from the SEC staff.3
Background
The term “family office” generally refers to entities formed by high net worth families to provide a range of services to family members, including wealth and investment management, accounting, tax, and other services. Family offices generally meet the definition of “investment adviser” under the Advisers Act because the variety of services they provide often include providing securities advice to
- thers for compensation. Traditionally, family offices have operated without registering as investment
advisers in reliance on the Private Adviser Exemption. Some family offices that could not, or did not wish to, abide by the limitations of the Private Adviser Exemption applied for and received exemptive relief from the SEC declaring that they were not a person within the intent of the Advisers Act. The SEC has granted thirteen of these orders since 1940. Exemptive orders have distinguished between
1 Family Offices, Adopting Release, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 3220 (June 22, 2011), available here. The rule
- riginally was proposed on October 12, 2010. Family offices that qualify for exemption from registration and regulation
under the Rule also are exempt from state investment adviser registration, as are their representatives.
2 The private adviser exemption exempted an adviser that: (a) during any rolling 12-month period had fewer than 15
clients, (b) does not serve as an adviser to a registered investment company or business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and (c) does not hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser.
3 The SEC has determined not to rescind existing family office exemptive orders, which may be broader than the Rule in
some respects and narrower in others. The SEC points out in the release adopting the Rule that only family offices with exemptive orders can rely on such orders.
July 19, 2011
Practice Groups: Investment Management Hedge Funds and Venture Funds Financial Services Reform