The extent of match fixing in German soccer
- Dr. Werner Pitsch
The extent of match fixing in German soccer Results of an online - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The extent of match fixing in German soccer Results of an online survey with honest answers to embarrassing questions Dr. Werner Pitsch Saarland University Institute for Sport Sciences Match Fixing as a subject of scientific research
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 2
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 3
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 4
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 5
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 6
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 7
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 8
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 9
honest 'yes'
22.7 14.8 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Have you ever experienced …? Did you experience … in the 2010/2011 season?
honest 'yes'
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 10 22.7 14.8 44.2 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Have you ever experienced …? Did you experience … in the 2010/2011 season?
cheaters honest 'yes'
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 11 22.7 14.8 44.2 41 77.3 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Have you ever experienced …? Did you experience … in the 2010/2011 season?
honest 'no' cheaters honest 'yes'
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 12 14.8 1.4 18.5 37.6 80.1 47.6 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Were you ever involved …? Were you involved … in the 2010/2011 season?
honest 'no' cheaters honest 'yes'
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 13
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 14
04.10.2011 Match Fixing in German soccer 15
Hill, D. (2008) The Fix: Soccer and Organized Crime. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. Boeri, T, Severgini, B. (2008) The Italian Job: Match Rigging, Career Concerns and Media Concentration in Serie A (IZA Discussion Paper Series 3745). Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit. Clark, S. J., Desharnais, R. A. (1998). Honest Answers to Embarrassing Questions: Detecting Cheating in the Randomized Response Model. Psychological Methods, 3, 160-168. Coutts, E., & Jann, B. (2008). Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT) [Electronic Version]. ETH Zurich Sociology Working Paper, 3. Retrieved 17.07.2009 from http://ideas.repec.org/p/ets/wpaper/3.html Esser, H. (1986). Können Befragte lügen? Zum Konzept des "wahren Wertes" im Rahmen der handlungstheoretischen Erklärung von Situationseinflüssen bei der Befragung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 38, 314-336. Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hox, J. J., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Maas, C. J. M. (2005). Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research. Thirty-Five Years of Validation. Sociological Methods and Research, 33, 315-348. Locander, W., Sudman, S., Badburn, N. (1976). An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976, 269-275. Pitsch, W., Emrich, E., & Klein, M. (2005). Zur Häufigkeit des Dopings im Leistungssport. Ergebnisse eines www-Surveys. Leipziger Sportwissenschaftliche Beiträge, 46(2), 63-77. Pitsch, W., Emrich, E., & Klein, M. (2007). Doping in elite sports in Germany: results of a www survey. European Journal of Sport and Society, 4(2), 89-102. Shimizu, I. M., Bonham, G. S. (1978). Randomized Response Techniques in a National Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 35-39. Tracy, P. E., Fox, J. A. (1981). The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements. American Sociological Review, 46, 187-200.