the exponential homomorphism in non commutative
play

The exponential homomorphism in non-commutative probability Michael - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The exponential homomorphism in non-commutative probability Michael Anshelevich (joint work with Octavio Arizmendi) Texas A&M University March 25, 2016 Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism Classical convolutions. Additive:


  1. The exponential homomorphism in non-commutative probability Michael Anshelevich (joint work with Octavio Arizmendi) Texas A&M University March 25, 2016 Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  2. Classical convolutions. Additive: ➺ ➺ ➺ f ♣ z q d ♣ µ 1 ✝ µ 2 q♣ z q ✏ f ♣ x � y q dµ 1 ♣ x q dµ 2 ♣ y q . R R R Multiplicative: ➺ ➺ ➺ f ♣ z q d ♣ ν 1 ❢ ν 2 q♣ z q ✏ f ♣ zw q dν 1 ♣ z q dν 2 ♣ w q . T T T The wrapping map W : P ♣ R q Ñ P ♣ T q is ➳ d ♣ W ♣ µ qq♣ e ✁ ix q ✏ dµ ♣ x � 2 πn q . n P Z Clearly W ♣ µ 1 ✝ µ 2 q ✏ W ♣ µ 1 q ❢ W ♣ µ 2 q . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  3. Non-commutative independence. Non-commutative convolutions: based on different independence rules. ✏ x 2 ✘ ✏ y 2 ✘ Tensor/classical E r xyxy s ✏ E E . E r y s 2 � E r x s 2 E ✁ E r x s 2 E r y s 2 . ✏ x 2 ✘ ✏ y 2 ✘ Free E r xyxy s ✏ E Boolean E r xyxy s ✏ E r x s 2 E r y s 2 . E r y s 2 . ✏ x 2 ✘ Monotone E r xyxy s ✏ E Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  4. Convolutions. Additive convolutions: for measures µ 1 , µ 2 P P ♣ R q . Classical µ 1 ✝ µ 2 , free µ 1 ❵ µ 2 , Boolean µ 1 ❩ µ 2 , monotone µ 1 ⊲ µ 2 . Multiplicative convolutions: for measures ν 1 , ν 2 P P ♣ T q . Classical ν 1 ❢ ν 2 , free ν 1 ❜ ν 2 , Boolean ν 1 ✂ ❨ ν 2 , monotone ν 1 ÷ ν 2 . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  5. Transforms. The F -transform: ➺ 1 1 µ P P ♣ R q , G µ ♣ z q ✏ z ✁ x dµ ♣ x q , F µ ♣ z q ✏ G µ ♣ z q . R F µ : C � Ñ C � , lim y Ò✽ ℑ F µ ♣ iy q ✏ 1 . iy The η -transform: ψ ν ♣ z q ➺ zζ ν P P ♣ T q , ψ ν ♣ z q ✏ 1 ✁ zζ dν ♣ ζ q , η ν ♣ z q ✏ 1 � ψ ν ♣ z q . T η ν : D Ñ D , η ν ♣ 0 q ✏ 0 . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  6. Convolutions in non-commutative probability. Additive convolutions: F ✁ 1 µ ❵ ν ♣ z q ✁ z ✏ ♣ F ✁ 1 µ ♣ z q ✁ z q � ♣ F ✁ 1 ν ♣ z q ✁ z q , Free µ ❵ ν : Boolean µ ❩ ν : F µ ❩ ν ♣ z q ✁ z ✏ ♣ F µ ♣ z q ✁ z q � ♣ F ν ♣ z q ✁ z q , Monotone µ ⊲ ν : F µ ⊲ ν ♣ z q ✏ F µ ♣ F ν ♣ z qq . Multiplicative convolutions: η ✁ 1 ✏ η ✁ 1 η ✁ 1 µ ❜ ν ♣ z q µ ♣ z q ν ♣ z q Free µ ❜ ν : , z z z η µ x ❨ ν ♣ z q ✏ η µ ♣ z q η ν ♣ z q Boolean µ ✂ ❨ ν : , z z z Monotone µ ÷ ν : η µ ÷ ν ♣ z q ✏ η µ ✆ η ν ♣ z q . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  7. Homomorphisms. W is certainly not a homomorphism between free additive and multiplicative convolutions. Example. Let µ ✏ 1 2 ♣ δ ✁ 2 π � δ 2 π q be a Bernoulli distribution. Then W ♣ µ q ✏ δ 1 . Also, it is well-known that µ ❵ µ is an arcsine dis- tribution, while δ 1 ❜ δ 1 ✏ δ 1 . Thus W ♣ µ ❵ µ q ✘ W ♣ µ q ❜ W ♣ µ q . Successful homomorphisms between ❵ and ❜ on the level of power series: (Mastnak, Nica 2010), (Friedrich, McKay 2012, 2013). A homomorphism between ❵ and ❜ infinitely divisible distributions: (Cebron 2014). Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  8. Homomorphisms II. Define an implicit relation between µ P P ♣ R q and ν P P ♣ T q by exp ♣ iF µ ♣ z qq ✏ η ν ♣ e iz q . Then “obviously” µ 1 ❵ µ 2 Ø ν 1 ❜ ν 2 , µ 1 ❩ µ 2 Ø ν 1 ✂ ❨ ν 2 , µ 1 ⊲ µ 2 Ø ν 1 ÷ ν 2 . In fact also µ ❩ t Ø ν µ ❵ t Ø ν ❜ t , ❨ t , x µ 1 ✐ µ 2 Ø ν 1 ✪ ν 2 . (here F µ 1 ❵ µ 2 ✏ F µ 2 ✆ F µ 1 ✐ µ 2 , η ν 1 ❜ ν 2 ✏ η ν 2 ✆ η ν 1 ✪ ν 2 ). µ ⊲ t Ø ν ÷ t ? Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  9. Identities. Easily obtain multiplicative identities from additive ones, for example of µ ✏ µ ❵ t ⊲ µ ❩♣ 1 ✁ t q and B t ♣ τ ✐ ν q ✏ τ ✐ ♣ ν ❵ τ ❵ t q (particular case obtained in Zhong 2014). M t ✏ multiplicative version of the Belinschi-Nica transformation B t . Use these to define multiplicative and additive free divisibility indicators. Proposition. For µ P L , the additive divisibility indicator of µ is equal to the multiplicative divisibility indicator of W ♣ µ q . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  10. Class L . exp ♣ iF µ ♣ z qq ✏ η ν ♣ e iz q . Domain: t µ P P ♣ R q : F µ ♣ z � 2 π q ✏ F µ ♣ z q � 2 π ✉ ✏ L . Range: ν P P ♣ T q : η ✶ ❨ ✥ ✭ x ν ♣ 0 q ✘ 0 , and η ν ♣ z q ✏ 0 ô z ✏ 0 ✏ ID ✝ . ❨ t exists for t ➙ 0 , ν ✘ Lebesgue ❨ ✥ ✭ x x ID ✝ ✏ ν P P ♣ T q : ν . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  11. The wrapping homomorphism. Theorem. (A, Arizmendi 2015) When restricted to L , the wrapping map W satisfies exp ♣ iF µ ♣ z qq ✏ η W ♣ µ q ♣ e iz q . Therefore this restriction is a homomorphism for all four addi- tive convolutions, and has the additional properties mentioned ❨ above. The pre-image of each ν P ID x ✝ is an equivalence class modulo the relation mod δ 2 π , where any of the four convolu- tions with δ 2 π is used. Proof of the Theorem. Poisson summation. Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  12. Domain. Proposition. L is closed under the three additive convolution operations ❩ , ❵ , ⊲ , under the subordination operation ✐ , under Boolean and free (whenever defined) additive convolution powers, and under the Belinschi-Nica transformation B t . If µ P L ❳ ID ⊲ , then µ ⊲ t P L for all t → 0 . All the elements in L which are not point masses are in the classical, Boolean, free, and monotone (strict) domains of attraction of the Cauchy law. The Bercovici-Pata bijections between P ✏ ID ❩ , ID ⊲ , and ID ❵ restrict to bijections between L , L ❳ ID ⊲ and L ❳ ID ❵ . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  13. Range. Proposition. ❨ x ✝ is closed under the three multiplicative convolution ID ✪ , operations ✂ ❨ , ❜ , ÷ , under the subordination operation and under Boolean and free (whenever defined) multiplicative convolution powers. ❨ ✝ contains ID ❜ ✝ and ID ÷ x ✝ . ID ✝ , then every element of W ✁ 1 ♣ ν q is in ID ❵ ❳ L . If ν P ID ❜ If ν P ID ÷ ✝ , then there is µ P ID ⊲ ✝ ❳ L such that W ♣ µ q ✏ ν . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  14. Example of µ P L I. Cauchy distribution µ ✏ 1 a ♣ x ✁ b q 2 � a 2 dx. π Wrapped Cauchy distribution 1 ✁ e ✁ 2 a W ♣ µ q ✏ 1 1 � e ✁ 2 a ✁ 2 e ✁ a cos ♣ θ ✁ b q dθ. 2 π Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  15. Example of µ P L II. Pre-image of the multiplicative Boolean Gaussian. ➳ µ ✏ α k δ x k , where x k ✏ cot x k ✁ π 2 � πk, π ✁ ✠ 2 , x i P 2 � πk and 1 α k ✏ . 3 2 � 1 2 x 2 k A similar formula for the pre-image of multiplicative Boolean compound Poisson. Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  16. Unimodality. Proposition. The only unimodal measures in L are delta measures and Cauchy distributions. This provides many examples of measures µ with connected support such that µ ❵ t is never unimodal, answering a question of Hasebe and Sakuma. Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  17. Relation to C´ ebron’s map I. In (C´ ebron 2014), he defined a homomorphism e ❵ : ID ❵ Ñ ID ❜ which satisfies W ✏ BP ❜ Ñ❢ ✆ e ❵ ✆ BP ✝Ñ ❵ . He also proved that ✠ ❜ n ✁ W ♣ µ ❵ 1 n q e ❵ ♣ µ q ✏ lim . n Ñ✽ Thus on ID ❵ ❳ L , e ❵ ✏ W . He also observed that W (roughly speaking) wraps the L´ evy measure of µ . Therefore on L , it does the same with its free, Boolean, monotone L´ evy measures. Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  18. Relation to C´ ebron’s map II. Example. Let ν be the multiplicative free Gaussian measure. Of course e ❵ ♣ σ q ✏ ν for the semicircular distribution σ , with canonical pair ♣ 0 , δ 0 q . But σ ❘ L , and W ♣ σ q ✘ ν . Instead, W ♣ µ q ✏ ν for µ P L with canonical pair ✄ ➳ ☛ 1 1 ➳ 2 πk ♣ 1 � ♣ 2 πk q 2 q , 1 � ♣ 2 πk q 2 δ 2 πk . k ✘ 0 k P Z Corollary. W intertwines the restrictions of the Bercovici-Pata maps to L with their multiplicative counterparts. Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  19. Obvious properties of W . W sends atoms to atoms. If supp ♣ µ ac q ✏ R , then supp ♣♣ W ♣ µ qq ac q ✏ T . W sends infinitesimal triangular arrays t µ ni , 1 ↕ i ↕ k n ✉ n P N of measures in P ♣ R q to infinitesimal triangular arrays of measures in P ♣ T q . Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

  20. Converses. Theorem. For µ P L , W maps the atoms of µ bijectively onto the atoms of W ♣ µ q , and preserves the weights. If supp ♣♣ W ♣ µ qq ac q ✏ T , then supp ♣ µ ac q ✏ R . If t ν ni , 1 ↕ i ↕ k n ✉ n P N is an infinitesimal triangular arrays of ❨ measures in ID x ✝ , then ν ni ✏ W ♣ µ ni q for some infinitesimal triangular array of measures in L . For µ P L , F µ is injective if and only if η W ♣ µ q is. Michael Anshelevich Exponential homomorphism

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend