The Dynamics of Freight Car Cushioning
John F. Deppen Director, Engineering End‐of‐Car Systems Amsted Rail
1
The Dynamics of Freight Car Cushioning John F. Deppen Director, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Dynamics of Freight Car Cushioning John F. Deppen Director, Engineering End of Car Systems Amsted Rail 1 Abstract It is typical for railcars to be assembled into a train by coupling individual cars together in a marshalling yard.
1
It is typical for railcars to be assembled into a train by coupling individual cars together in a marshalling yard. These yards often use impact ramps or flat switching to accelerate the railcar to a velocity sufficient to roll through a series of switches and tracks to the designated
times impact velocities can be higher than desirable. Depending on the type of coupling system (i.e. draft gear or end‐of‐car cushion unit), damage to the railcar, lading or both can
Another source of damage can occur in‐train, where relative velocities between railcars can become large. Train length, gross rail load, terrain and the locomotive inputs are sources for these in‐train shocks along with automatic couplers and their inherent free‐slack. Coupling components must be designed to account for these various inputs to reduce in‐train shocks to acceptable levels. Computer simulations validated through over‐the‐road testing is one
As trains become longer and heavier, it’s critical that coupling component manufactures understand railcar dynamics and focus their efforts on products that can reduce in‐train
specifications will be instrumental to support global heavy haul operations.
2
3
4
lading protection from Yard Impacts lading protection from In‐Train Events “Slack is the Enemy”
5
40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 Coupler Force (klbs) 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Time (sec)
Con.#3 Con.#30 Con.#57 Con.#84 Con.#111 Con.#137
Fig.2
Shock Wave progresses through train with increasing force
6
7
Prevent high forces v. Managing high forces
8
9
10
11
12
12
~20% N.A. Fleet Equipped with End‐of‐Car Hydraulic Cushioning Lading Protection (automotive, paper, building materials)
13
14
with hydraulic fluid
fluid through specially designed valves
piston back to neutral after impact
14
15
Friction Elements compress and absorb energy. Mechanical or Elastomer Springs ‘return’ unit back to neutral position. Elastomer Elements compress and absorb energy
‘return spring’
15
16
Hydraulic Cushion Unit Standard Draft Gear
17
Hydraulic Cushion Unit Standard Draft Gear Movement @ impact: .75” Movement @ impact: 3.6”
162 lb. Steel Block Lading Damage Demonstration…
18
19
20
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Force (klb) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Travel (inches)
21
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Connection Forces (kN)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (sec)
1 - Tract. Force of the Front Locos 2 - Con. 2 (after the Front Locos) 3 - Con. 38 4 - Con.78 (before the Middle Locos) 5 - Con.80 (after the Middle Locos) 6 - Con. 116 7 - Con. 151 (the Last)
2 4
5
6 7 3 1
22
23
24
Connection Forces (kN)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (sec)
1 - Braking Force 2 - Con. 11 3 - Con. 31 4 - Con. 51 5 - Con. 71 6 - Con. 91 7 - Con. 111 8 - Con. 131 9 - Con. 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
25
26
27
27
B‐End 3‐Axis Accelerometer A‐End 3‐Axis Accelerometer
+Longitudinal to A‐End + Lateral to Right + Vertical Up
A‐End Dynamometer Coupler
28
29
Std Draft System Active Draft System
30
31
32
R2 = 0.9809 R2 = 0.7526 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00
Impact Speed (mph) Impact Force (kips)
Twinpack - 38 tests Steel friction gears - 44 tests
40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 Coupler Force (klbs) 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Time (sec)
Con.#3 Con.#30 Con.#57 Con.#84 Con.#111 Con.#137
Data used to improve A.A.R. specifications via. manufacturers committees (DGMEC, CUMEC) Lower Coupler Forces
33
34
35
36