The cosmological evolution of blazars and the cosmic gamma- ray - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the cosmological evolution of blazars and the cosmic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The cosmological evolution of blazars and the cosmic gamma- ray - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The cosmological evolution of blazars and the cosmic gamma- ray background in the Fermi era Yoshiyuki INOUE (Kyoto, JSPS fellow DC1) Collabolators Tomonori Totani, Susumu Inoue (Kyoto), Masakazu. A. R. Kobayashi (NAO), Jun Kataoka (Waseda),


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Yoshiyuki INOUE (Kyoto, JSPS fellow DC1)

Collabolators:Tomonori Totani, Susumu Inoue (Kyoto),

  • Masakazu. A. R. Kobayashi (NAO),

Jun Kataoka (Waseda), Rie Sato (JAXA)

Fermi Symposium

The cosmological evolution of blazars and the cosmic gamma- ray background in the Fermi era

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

keV

Sreekumar et al. 1998

GeV MeV

AGNs Energy (keV) E^2 dJ/dE (keV/cm^2/s/sr)

What’s the origin of the cosmic gamma-ray background?

2

  • 1. MeV Background

AGNs (Rogers & Field ’91; Field & Rogers ’93;

Stecker, Salamon, & Done ’01; YI, Totani, & Ueda’08)

Supernovae (Clayton & Ward ‘75; Zdziarski

‘96; Watanabe+‘99)

MeV Dark Matter annihilation (Ahn &

Komatsu ’06, Rasera+‘06; Lawson & Zhitnitsky ‘07 )

MeV Blazars (Ajello+’09)

  • 2. GeV Background

Blazars (Stecker & Salamon ’96; Chiang &

Mukherjee ’98; Mücke & Pohl 00; Narumoto & Totani ’06; Dermer ’07; YI & Totani ’09)

Galaxy Cluster Merger (Loeb & Waxman

‘00; Totani & Kitayama ’00)

GeV Dark Matter annihilation (e.g. Oda

et al. ’05)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

http://www.nasa.gov/

What is BLAZAR?

Inverse Compton

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

  • 5

5 10 Log10 L(erg s-1) Log10 E (eV)

GeV

Synchrotron

Log10 (Energy [eV]) Log10 (νLν [erg/s])

(Fossati+’97,’98; Kubo+’98; Donato +’01, but see also Padovani+’07)

SED Sequence

3

Blazar

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Basic assumptions for blazar GLF construction

  • Blazar SED sequence.
  • AGN X-ray Luminosity Function (Ueda+’03:hereafter U03).

Assuming “Ljet, bol ∝Ldisk, X “. Constraining GLFs from EGRET data.

Blazar Gamma-ray Luminosity Function

(YI & Totani ’09)

4

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 0.01 0.1 1 dN/d(log10 z) Redshift z U03(q) U03(q,γ1) H05(q) H05(q,γ1) EGRET blazars 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 dN/d(log10 Lγ) log10 (Lγ [erg s-1]) U03(q) U03(q,γ1) H05(q) H05(q,γ1) EGRET blazars

Redshift z log(Lγ [erg/s]) dN/log(Lγ) dN/log(z)

Redshift Distribution Luminosity Distribution

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106

E2 dN/dE (MeV2 cm-2 s-1 MeV-1 sr-1) Photon Energy (MeV)

EGRET (S98) EGRET (S04a) EGRET (S98+S08) Blazar: U03 (q, γ1) Non-blazar (Γ=3.5): ITU08 Non-blazar (Γ=3.8): ITU08 Blazar + Non-blazar (Γ=3.5) Blazar + Non-blazar (Γ=3.8) HEAO-1 Swift/BAT SMM COMPTEL

X-ray

non-blazar AGNs (YI+08)

YI & TT 09 arXiv:0810.3580

5

Cosmic X-ray and Gamma-ray Background before the Fermi era

Above GeV, our model does not reproduce

  • bservational data.

Blazars ( YI & TT 09)

GeV MeV

Energy (MeV) E2 dN/dE (MeV/cm2/s/sr)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

X-ray

non-blazar AGNs (YI+08) YI & TT 09 arXiv:0810.3580

6

Cosmic X-ray and Gamma-ray Background in the Fermi era

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106

E2 dN/dE (MeV2 cm-2 s-1 MeV-1 sr-1) Photon Energy (MeV)

Blazar: U03 (q, 1) Non-blazar (=3.5): ITU08 Non-blazar (=3.8): ITU08 Blazar + Non-blazar (=3.5) Blazar + Non-blazar (=3.8) EGRET (S98) EGRET (S04a) EGRET (S98+S08) Fermi

Our prediction matched very well with the Fermi data. Blazars ( YI&TT09)

MeV Fermi Data from TeV conf. on July

Energy (MeV) E2 dN/dE (MeV/cm2/s/sr)

GeV

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Non-blazar AGNs vs. Blazars

Ackermann+’09 at TeV. conf.

<~10 MeV:

  • smooth connection to

CXB

  • likely to be non-blazar

AGNs >~10 MeV:

  • distinct SED from CXB
  • likely to be blazars
  • MeV-blazar contribution at

<~10 MeV? (Ajello+09)

  • fine-tuning required for

SED

  • distinct blazar population

required between MeV and GeV.

Blazars

Non-blazar AGNs

Energy (MeV) E2 dN/dE (MeV/cm2/s/sr)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10

  • 1

10 10

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

7

10

8

10

9

10

  • 15

10

  • 14

10

  • 13

10

  • 12

10

  • 11

10

  • 10

10

  • 9

10

  • 8

10

  • 7

10

  • 6

10

  • 5

N (>Flux) [(4 π sr)-1] Flux (>100MeV) [photons cm

  • 2 s
  • 1]

EGRET Fermi

Blazar: U03(q,γ1) Non-blazar (Γ=3.5) Non-blazar (Γ=3.8) Blazar + Non-blazar (Γ=3.5) Blazar + Non-blazar (Γ=3.8)

Expected Number of Fermi AGNs

N(>Flux) [(4πsr)-1] Flux(>100MeV) [photons cm-2 s-1] EGRET

8

Blazar Fermi Non-blazar AGN

  • One-year survey
  • ~800 blazars
  • 1~10 non-blazar AGNs
  • Five-year survey
  • ~1200 blazars
  • 4~50 non-blazar AGNs
  • Nonthermal gamma-ray

flux from NGC 4151, the brightest Seyfert AGN

  • Flux(>100 MeV): ~1e-8 γ/cm/s
  • Photon Index: ~3.5
slide-9
SLIDE 9

10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-15 10-14 10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6

Fγ dN/d(log10 Fγ) [photons cm-2 s-1 sr-1] Flux (>100MeV) [photons cm-2 s-1]

EGRET Fermi

Blazar: U03 (q,γ1) Non-blazar (Γ=3.5) Non-blazar (Γ=3.8) Blazar + Non-blazar (Γ=3.5) Blazar + Non-blazar (Γ=3.8)

Will Fermi resolve the cosmic gamma-ray background?

FdN/d(log10 F) [photons cm-2 s-1 sr-1] Flux(>100MeV) [photons cm-2 s-1]

9

EGRET Fermi

Blazar Non-blazar AGN

  • Five year survey will

resolve

  • ~99% of the

background flux from blazars (>100 MeV).

  • ~0.01% of the

background flux from non-blazar AGNs (>100 MeV).

slide-10
SLIDE 10

~1 blazar @ z~7 with ~5-year Fermi survey (YI+in prep.). N(>z) z~7 ~5-years survey

0.1 1 10 100 1000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 z

Flim(>100MeV)=1×10-9 photons/cm2/s

U03(q) U03(q,1) U03(q,1): p2=3.5

Redshift z

10

YI&TT09 YI&TT09 +SDSS

Fermi blazar @ z~7

  • Predictions for z~7

blazar detectability

  • based on IT09
  • improved at

high-z based on SDSS quasar LF upto z~6.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

0.1 1 10 100 z=0.1

Optical Depth

z=0.3 z=1.0 z=3.0 0.1 1 10 100 1 10 100 z=5.0 Mitaka model Kneiske+04 S.Inoue+09 1 10 100 z=6.0

Energy (GeV)

1 10 100 z=7.0

z=0.1 z=0.3 z=1.0 z=3.0 z=5.0 z=6.0 z=7.0

11

Probing high-z universe through GeV gamma-ray attenuation

  • γ(>GeV)+γUV→e++e-.

GeV flux attenuated by high-z UV background (Oh ’01,

Gilmore+09, S.Inoue+09).

  • information of early

star/galaxy formation may be obtained.

  • Red model: consistent with

z<5 data (e.g. galaxy LF)

  • Blue model: consistent

with z>5 data (e.g. reionization data)

Optical Depth 1 1

(YI+in prep.)

Kneiske+04 Semi-analytical model S.Inoue+09

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summary 1

12

  • New blazar GLF (Y. Inoue & Totani ’09, arXiv:0810.3580)
  • Blazar SED sequence incorporated
  • Non-trivial prediction for the cosmic gamma-ray

background

  • Our prediction matched very well with the Fermi data.
  • AGNs are the primary sources as the origin of cosmic X-

ray/Gamma-ray background.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary 2

13

  • Fermi will find
  • ~800 blazars and 1~10 non-blazar AGNs in 1-year survey,
  • ~1200 blazars and 4~50 non-blazar AGNs in 5-year survey.
  • Fermi will resolve
  • ~99% of the gamma-ray background from blazars (>100

MeV),

  • ~0.01 % of the gamma-ray background from non-blazar

AGNs (>100 MeV).

  • ~1 blazar @ z~7 may be found by Fermi.
  • A new key to understanding the high-z cosmic evolution.