The case for a European Social Union. From muddling through to a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the case for a european social union
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The case for a European Social Union. From muddling through to a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The case for a European Social Union. From muddling through to a sense of common purpose. Frank Vandenbroucke EIB Institute Luxembourg, 5 March 2015 A European Social Union A Social Union would support national welfare states on a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The case for a European Social Union.

From muddling through to a sense of common purpose.

Frank Vandenbroucke EIB Institute Luxembourg, 5 March 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A European Social Union

A Social Union would

  • support national welfare states on a systemic level in some of their

key functions

  • guide the substantive development of national welfare states – via

general social standards and objectives, leaving ways and means of social policy to Member States – on the basis of an operational definition of ‘the European social model’.  European countries would cooperate in a union with an explicit social purpose

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A European Social Union

  • Why?

– Eurozone – EU28

  • Which solidarity?
  • Social investment as a common ambition
  • Conclusion
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The consequences of monetary unification

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Transfers might mitigate the symmetry/flexibility trade-off

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The EU’s way: more symmetry, more flexibility

Flexibility determines social order EMU’s fragility  No lender of last resort (=> Draghi)  Intensification of national booms and busts & divergence in competitiveness Institutional advantage of coordinated bargaining Competitiveness: symmetrical approach necessary => convergence

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Defining the EMU’s social objective is a necessity rather than a luxury

  • Basic consensus on social model is necessary for the long-term sustainability
  • f EMU

– short term: stabilisation – mid term: a symmetric guideline on wage cost competitiveness & institutions that can deliver – long term: sustainability of pensions

  • Symmetry => convergence w.r.t. fundamental parameters => shared objectives
  • Legitimacy => convergence in prosperity

‘excessive social imbalances’ associated with inadequate and disparate investment in human capital

  • Social investment
slide-8
SLIDE 8

The human capital asymmetry: employment and formal educational attainment

EU28 BE BG CZ DK DE EE IE GR ES FR CR IT CY LV LT LU HU MT NL AT PL PT RO SI SK FI SE UK

45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 .0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

Employment rate 15-64, 2012 % of population (15-64) with lower secondary education attainment, 2012

Many low-skilled Low employment rate Few low-skilled High employment rate Few low-skilled Low employment rate

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why a ‘European Social Union’?

  • an inevitability of European Monetary Union
  • integration and social regulation in EU28

– Social dumping? – Social sovereignty?

  • the very core of the European project.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why a ‘European Social Union’?

  • an inevitability of European Monetary Union;
  • integration and social regulation in EU28: ‘balancing’

– Social dumping => subsidiarity & proportionality (Viking, Laval) – Social sovereignty => horizontal social clause?

  • the very core of the European project.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why a ‘European Social Union’?

  • an inevitability of European Monetary Union
  • integration and social regulation in EU28: balancing

– Social dumping => subsidiarity & proportionality (Viking, Laval) – Social sovereignty => horizontal social clause?

  • a dual perspective on solidarity: pan-European and domestic
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Convergence in prosperity: the social investment imperative

  • A social investment agenda (cf. Europe 2020, SIP)

– Child-centred social investment strategy – Human capital investment push – Reconciling work and family life – Later and flexible retirement – Migration and integration through education and participation – Minimum income support and capacitating service provision

  • The political deal the EU needs is one wherein all governments pursue

budgetary discipline and social investment, and are supported therein in a tangible way by the EU.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Spending on education 2004-2008-2012

  • 40%
  • 30%
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Real public spending on education, 2012 vs. 2004-08 Spending % GDP, 2008, vs. average

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Spending on education 2004-2008-2012 and PISA results

  • 40%
  • 30%
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Real public spending on education, 2012 vs. 2004-08 PISA 2012 (Math, Science, Reading) vs. average Spending % GDP, 2008, vs. average

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Convergence in prosperity: the social investment imperative

  • A social investment agenda (cf. Europe 2020, SIP)

– Child-centred social investment strategy – Human capital investment push – Reconciling work and family life – Later and flexible retirement – Migration and integration through education and participation – Minimum income support and capacitating service provision

  • The political deal the EU needs is one wherein all governments pursue

budgetary discipline and social investment, and are supported therein in a tangible way by the EU.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The case for a European Social Union

  • support national welfare states on a systemic level in key functions

(e.g. stabilization)

  • guide the substantive development of national welfare states

– via general social standards and objectives symmetric w.r.t. to competiveness (wage policy & capacity to deliver) social investment minimum wages and minimum income protection solidarity in reform – leaving ways and means of social policy to Member States

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The case for a European Social Union

  • support national welfare states on a systemic level in key functions

(e.g. stabilization)

  • guide the substantive development of national welfare states

– via general social standards and objectives symmetric w.r.t. to competiveness (wage policy & capacity to deliver) social investment minimum wages and minimum income protection solidarity in reform – leaving ways and means of social policy to Member States

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The case for a European Social Union

  • support national welfare states on a systemic level in key functions

(e.g. stabilization)

  • guide the substantive development of national welfare states

– via general social standards and objectives symmetric w.r.t. to competiveness (wage policy & capacity to deliver) social investment minimum wages and minimum income protection solidarity in reform – leaving ways and means of social policy to Member States

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The case for a European Social Union

  • support national welfare states on a systemic level in key functions

(e.g. stabilization)

  • guide the substantive development of national welfare states

– via general social standards and objectives symmetric w.r.t. to competiveness (wage policy & capacity to deliver) social investment minimum wages and minimum income protection solidarity in reform – leaving ways and means of social policy to Member States

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank you!

1.

  • F. Vandenbroucke, The Case for a European Social Union. From

muddling through to a sense of common purpose, Euroforum Policy Paper, Sept. 2014 www.kuleuven.be/euroforum/papers 2.

  • F. Vandenbroucke, with B. Vanhercke, A European Social Union. 10

Tough nuts to crack, Friends of Europe, Spring 2014

http://www.friendsofeurope.org

3. Unequal Europe. Recommendations for a more caring EU. Final Report of the High-Level Group on Social Union, Friends of Europe, Spring 2015 http://www.friendsofeurope.org