the 1d kpz equation and its universality
play

The 1D KPZ equation and its universality T. Sasamoto 17 Aug 2015 @ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 1D KPZ equation and its universality T. Sasamoto 17 Aug 2015 @ Kyoto 1 Plan The KPZ equation Exact solutions Height distribution Stationary space-time two point correlation function A few recent developments Dualities


  1. The 1D KPZ equation and its universality T. Sasamoto 17 Aug 2015 @ Kyoto 1

  2. Plan • The KPZ equation • Exact solutions Height distribution Stationary space-time two point correlation function • A few recent developments Dualities Free-fermionic structures • Universality Brownian motions with oblique reflection KPZ in Hamiltonian dynamics 2

  3. 1. Basics of the KPZ equation: Surface growth • Paper combustion, bacteria colony, crystal growth, etc • Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics • Stochastic interacting particle systems • Connections to integrable systems, representation theory, etc 3

  4. Simulation models Ex: ballistic deposition Height fluctuation O ( t β ) , β = 1 / 3 A B ↓ ↓ ↓ 100 "ht10.dat" "ht50.dat" "ht100.dat" ↕ 80 60 A ′ 40 B ′ 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flat 4

  5. KPZ equation h ( x, t ) : height at position x ∈ R and at time t ≥ 0 1986 Kardar Parisi Zhang (not Knizhnik-Polyakov-Zamolodchikov) √ 2 λ ( ∂ x h ( x, t )) 2 + ν∂ 2 ∂ t h ( x, t ) = 1 x h ( x, t ) + Dη ( x, t ) where η is the Gaussian noise with mean 0 and covariance ⟨ η ( x, t ) η ( x ′ , t ′ ) ⟩ = δ ( x − x ′ ) δ ( t − t ′ ) • Dynamical RG analysis: → β = 1 / 3 (KPZ class) • A simplest nonequilibrium model with nonlinearity, noise and ∞ -degrees of freedom • By a simple scaling we can and will do set ν = 1 2 , λ = D = 1 . 5

  6. Most Famous(?) KPZ • MBT-70 / KPz 70 Tank developed in 1960s by US and West Germany. MBT(MAIN BATTLE TANK)-70 is the US name and KPz(KampfPanzer)-70 is the German name. 6

  7. New most famous KPZ in Japan(?) A sushi restaurant franchise with character ”kappa” (an imaginary creature) [address: kpz.jp] 7

  8. A discrete model: ASEP ASEP = asymmetric simple exclusion process q p q p q ⇒ ⇒ · · · ⇐ ⇐ ⇐ · · · -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 • TASEP(Totally ASEP, p = 0 or q = 0 ) • N ( x, t ) : Integrated current at ( x, x + 1) upto time t ⇔ height for surface growth • In a certain weakly asymmetric limit ASEP ⇒ KPZ equation 8

  9. 2. Exact solutions: Cole-Hopf transformation If we set Z ( x, t ) = exp ( h ( x, t )) this quantity (formally) satisfies ∂ 2 Z ( x, t ) ∂tZ ( x, t ) = 1 ∂ + η ( x, t ) Z ( x, t ) ∂x 2 2 This can be interpreted as a (random) partition function for a directed polymer in random environment η . h(x,t) 2 λ t/ δ x δ → 0 c δ e −| x | /δ The polymer from the origin: Z ( x, 0) = δ ( x ) = lim corresponds to narrow wedge for KPZ. 9

  10. Replica approach Dotsenko, Le Doussal, Calabrese Feynmann-Kac expression for the partition function, ∫ t ( ) 0 η ( b ( s ) ,t − s ) ds Z ( b ( t ) , 0) Z ( x, t ) = E x e Because η is a Gaussian variable, one can take the average over the noise η to see that the replica partition function can be written as (for narrow wedge case) ⟨ Z N ( x, t ) ⟩ = ⟨ x | e − H N t | 0 ⟩ where H N is the Hamiltonian of the (attractive) δ -Bose gas, N N ∂ 2 H N = − 1 − 1 ∑ ∑ δ ( x j − x k ) . ∂x 2 2 2 j j =1 j ̸ = k 10

  11. We are interested not only in the average ⟨ h ⟩ but the full distribution of h . We expand the quantity of our interest as − e − γ t s ) N ∞ ( γ 3 ⟨ e − e h (0 ,t )+ t 24 − γts ⟩ = t ∑ Z N (0 , t ) e N ⟨ ⟩ 12 N ! N =0 Using the integrability (Bethe ansatz) of the δ -Bose gas, one gets explicit expressions for the moment ⟨ Z N ⟩ and see that the generating function can be written as a Fredholm determinant. But for the KPZ, ⟨ Z N ⟩ ∼ e N 3 ! Note that the δ -Bose gas is exactly solvable but is in general not a free fermion model. 11

  12. Explicit determinantal formula Thm (2010 TS Spohn, Amir Corwin Quastel ) For the initial condition Z ( x, 0) = δ ( x ) (narrow wedge for KPZ) ⟨ e − e h (0 ,t )+ t 24 − γts ⟩ = det(1 − K s,t ) L 2 ( R + ) where γ t = ( t/ 2) 1 / 3 and K s,t is ∫ ∞ d λ Ai( x + λ )Ai( y + λ ) K s,t ( x, y ) = e γ t ( s − λ ) + 1 −∞ A determinant for non-free-fermion model? Why Fermi distribution? 12

  13. Explicit formula for the height distribution Thm h ( x, t ) = − x 2 / 2 t − 12 γ 3 1 t + γ t ξ t where γ t = ( t/ 2) 1 / 3 . The distribution function of ξ t is ∫ ∞ − e γ t ( s − u ) ] [ F t ( s ) = P [ ξ t ≤ s ] = 1 − exp −∞ ( ) × det(1 − P u ( B t − P Ai ) P u ) − det(1 − P u B t P u ) d u where P Ai ( x, y ) = Ai( x )Ai( y ) , P u is the projection onto [ u, ∞ ) and the kernel B t is ∫ ∞ d λ Ai( x + λ )Ai( y + λ ) B t ( x, y ) = e γ t λ − 1 −∞ 13

  14. Finite time KPZ distribution and TW 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 � 6 � 4 � 2 0 2 s : exact KPZ density F ′ t ( s ) at γ t = 0 . 94 −− : Tracy-Widom density • In the large t limit, F t tends to the GUE Tracy-Widom distribution F 2 from random matrix theory. 14

  15. Tracy-Widom distributions For GUE (Gaussian unitary ensemble) with density P ( H ) dH ∝ e − Tr H 2 dH for H : N × N hermitian matrix, the joint eigenvalue density is (with ∆( x ) Vandelmonde) 1 e − x 2 Z ∆( x ) 2 ∏ i i GUE Tracy-Widom distribution √ [ ] x max − 2 N = F 2 ( s ) = det(1 − P s K 2 P s ) lim 2 − 1 / 2 N − 1 / 6 < s N →∞ P where P s : projection onto [ s, ∞ ) and K 2 is the Airy kernel ∫ ∞ K 2 ( x, y ) = d λ Ai( x + λ )Ai( y + λ ) 0 There is also GOE TW ( F 1 ) for GOE (Gaussian orthogonal ensemble, real symmetric matrices, for flat surface) 15

  16. Probability densities of Tracy-Widom distributions F ′ 2 (GUE), F ′ 1 (GOE) 16

  17. Stationary 2pt correlation Not only the height/current distributions but correlation functions show universal behaviors. • For the KPZ equation, the Brownian motion is stationary. h ( x, 0) = B ( x ) where B ( x ) , x ∈ R is the two sided BM. • Two point correlation h t 2/3 t 1/3 ∂ x h ( x , t ) ∂ x h (0,0) x o 17

  18. Figure from the formula Imamura TS (2012) ⟨ ∂ x h ( x, t ) ∂ x h (0 , 0) ⟩ = 1 2(2 t ) − 2 / 3 g ′′ t ( x/ (2 t ) 2 / 3 ) The figure can be drawn from the exact formula (which is a bit involved though). 2.0 γ t = 1 γ t = ∞ 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 y 1 t ( y ) for γ t := ( t Stationary 2pt correlation function g ′′ 3 = 1 . 2 ) The solid curve is the scaling limit g ′′ ( y ) . 18

  19. 3.1 Dualities for asymmetric processes 2012-2015 Borodin-Corwin-TS Rigorous replica approach i q N ( x i ,t ) ⟩ satisfies • For ASEP the n -point function like ⟨ ∏ the n particle dynamics of the same process (Duality). This is a discrete generalization of δ -Bose gas for KPZ. One can apply the replica approach to get a Fredholm det expression for generating function for N ( x, t ) . • Rigorous replica: the one for KPZ (which is not rigorous) can be thought of as a shadow of the rigorous replica for ASEP. • Stationary case(Borodin Corwin Ferrari Veto (2014)), Flat case (Quastel et al (2014), Generalized models ( q -Hahn, six-vertex, ...), Plancherel theorem,... • For ASEP, the duality is related to U q ( sl 2 ) symmetry. 19

  20. More general formulation • Dualities have been an important tool in statistical mechanics (e.g. Kramers-Wannier duality for Ising model). • For symmetric processes, the duality has been used to study its various properties. For symmetric simple exclusion process (SSEP), the n -point function satisfies the n -body problem. This is related to the SU (2) symmetry. Another well-known example with duality is the Kipnis- Marchioro-Pressutti (KMP) model of stochastic energy transfer. Its duality is related to the SU (1 , 1) symmetry. 20

  21. • As explained, the duality for ASEP is useful to study its current distribution. Its duality is related to U q ( sl 2 ) . • Carinci Giardina Redig TS (2014,2015) presented a general scheme to construct a duality from a (deformed) symmetry of the process. As an application they have constructed a new process with U q ( su (1 , 1)) symmetry and an asymmetric version of the KMP process. 21

  22. 3.2 A determinantal structure for a finite temperature polymer 2001 O’Connell Yor Semi-discrete directed polymer in random media B i , 1 ≤ i ≤ N : independent Brownian motions Energy of the polymer π E [ π ] = B 1 ( s 1 ) + B 2 ( s 1 , s 2 ) + · · · + B N ( s N − 1 , t ) with B j ( s, t ) = B j ( t ) − B j ( s ) , j = 2 , · · · , N for s < t Partition function ( β = 1 /k B T : inverse temperature ) ∫ e βE [ π ] ds 1 · · · ds N − 1 Z N ( t ) = 0 <s 1 < ··· <s N − 1 <t In continuous limit, this becomes the polymer for KPZ equation. 22

  23. Zero-temperature limit In the T → 0 (or β → ∞ ) limit f N ( t ) := lim β →∞ F N ( t ) = 0 <s 1 < ··· <s N − 1 <t E [ π ] max 2001 Baryshnikov Connection to random matrix theory N ∫ ∏ Prob ( f N (1) ≤ s ) = dx j · P GUE ( x 1 , · · · , x N ) , ( −∞ ,s ] N j =1 e − x 2 N j / 2 ∏ ∏ ( x k − x j ) 2 P GUE ( x 1 , · · · , x N ) = √ · j ! 2 π j =1 1 ≤ j<k ≤ N where P GUE ( x 1 , · · · , x N ) is the probability density function of the eigenvalues in the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend