TFAWS August 21-25, 2017 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center MSFC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tfaws
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TFAWS August 21-25, 2017 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center MSFC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TFAWS Active Thermal Paper Session Acoustic Actuation of Vapor-Liquid Interfaces in Boiling and Condensation Processes Thomas R. Boziuk, Marc K. Smith, and Ari Glezer School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TFAWS

MSFC ∙ 2017

Presented By

Marc K. Smith Acoustic Actuation of Vapor-Liquid Interfaces in Boiling and Condensation Processes

Thomas R. Boziuk, Marc K. Smith, and Ari Glezer School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA

Thermal & Fluids Analysis Workshop TFAWS 2017 August 21-25, 2017 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL

TFAWS Active Thermal Paper Session

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

2

Two-Phase Power Dissipation Applications

Server Farm Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistor Radar Electric Vehicle Drivetrains Chemical / Process Engineering

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

3

Control of Phase Change Heat Transfer

Boiling heat transfer for high-power, dense electronic systems

Heat transfer is limited by two primary processes

» Vapor formation and removal rates (critical heat flux) » Condensation rate

Boiling and condensation present different design challenges

» Boiling: increase CHF, decrease surface superheat » Condensation: enhance in bulk fluid for efficient thermal packaging

Acoustic control of 2-phase boiling processes

» At heater surface control of vapor growth, spreading, and advection

 Surface force engendered by high-frequency ultrasound  Used in conjunction with complex boiling geometries

» In bulk fluid control of condensation

 Acoustic actuation couples to surface Faraday waves

  • r via radiation pressure force and droplet ejection

 Pool boiling and nozzle condensation geometries

Boiling Condensation 1 mm

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

4

Acoustic Actuation of Liquid/Gas Interface

Interfacial coupling varies substantially with actuation wavelength

Ultrasonic [O(1 MHz)] liquid/gas interfacial actuation

» Short actuation wavelength [O(1 mm)]

 Exploits acoustic surface force to effect interfacial deformations and injection of a liquid jet and droplets

» lacoust = 0.9 mm; Dres = 2 mm; lcapillary = O(mm) » Impedance mismatch

 Zvapor/Zwater=1.8x10-4

» High acoustic absorption coefficient

 aH2Ovapor  1,000 aH2Oliquid

» Amplitude = 6.82∙103 kPa peak-to-peak » Forcing affects vapor bubbles larger than Dres

O(1 kHz) liquid/gas interfacial actuation

» Long actuation wavelength [O(1 m)]

 Much larger than the characteristic length scale of the vapor bubbles [O(5-10 mm)]  Forces capillary surface waves to enhance mixing of the interfacial thermal boundary layer

» lacoust = 1.5 m; Dres = 5.5 mm; lcapillary = O(mm)

 Significant disturbances

» Amplitude = 5 kPa peak-to-peak » Bjerknes body forces affect bubble’s path

Video Presented Here Video Presented Here

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

5

152 mm

Controlled bulk temperature Articulated acoustic transducer

Variation of Critical Heat Flux with Bulk Temperature

Acoustically Controlled Boiling: Experimental Setup

Heated surface design

» Cartridge heater and thermocouples » Exchangeable heater surfaces

 Plain  Plain, instrumented with surface-soldered thermocouples  Microchannel grid

8 16 4 12 60 100 140 180 CHF (W/cm2) Tsubcool(oC) Distilled water 1 atm 93oC bulk temperature

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

6 100 200 10 20 30 q’’ (W/cm2) Ts - Tsat (oC) 100 50 8 4 q’’ (W/cm2) DTs (oC)

Ultrasonic Control of Vapor at Surface

High-frequency acoustic actuation

» Increases surface temperature (7 oC)

 Detaches small scale vapor bubbles  Suppresses vaporization process at most nucleation sites

» Increases CHF by 65%

 Agreement with wire experiments of Isakoff (1956)

Surface Temperature

110 183

Vapor removal at surface 50 W/cm2

Video Presented Here

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

7 No Actuation Acoustic Actuation (1.7 MHz)

1 mm q’’ = 100 W/cm2

100 10 20 30 q’’ (W/cm2) Ts - Tsat (oC) 200

110 183 190

Ultrasonic Control of the Boiling Curve

Video Presented Here Video Presented Here

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

8

Effect of Actuator Incidence Angle

DT (oC)

5 10

f

q

30 60 90 5 10 7 9 8 6

DT f

DT as function of Actuator Position

q’’base = 100 W/cm2, Tbase = 110oC, Tbulk = 93oC

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

9

microChannel Design: More than Surface Area

Dimpled 200 400 1000 Smooth microChannels

200 400 10 20 30 q’’ (W/cm2) Ts - Tsat (oC) 10 20 30

Normalized by projected area Normalized by wetted area

CHF (W/cm2) w/D 0.1 0.3 100 200 300

(plain) (400 mm) (200 mm) (1000 mm)

0.2

  • approx. same wetted area
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

10 250 500 10 20 30

Surface mChannels with Ultrasonic Actuation

mChannel Actuated (1.7 MHz)

100 200 300

110

350

183

1 mm

460

q’’ (W/cm2)

Ts - Tsat (oC) Smooth

Small-scale acoustic actuation within mChannels

» Decreases surface temperature (~ 7 oC). » Increased power dissipation DP  200 W/cm2 at Ts - Tsat =17 oC » Increases CHF by 31% » Decreases surface temperature fluctuations. » Increase CHF by 318% relative to smooth, unactuated case

200 W/cm2 200 W/cm2 300 W/cm2 300 W/cm2 100 W/cm2 100 W/cm2

DTs (oC)

  • 5

5

Smooth mChannel

100 200 300 q’’ (W/cm2)

400 mm

800 mm 1000 mm mChannel: actuated mChannel: unactuated Smooth: unactuated Smooth: actuated

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

11

O(1 kHz) Acoustic Enhancement of Boiling

Marginal increase in CHF (16%)

Decrease in surface superheat of ~1 oC

Appearance of vapor is markedly different due to surface capillary waves

» Increased condensation has minimal effect

  • n boiling process

a b c d e f g h i j

20 40 60 80 100 q’’ (W/cm2)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

12

Acoustic Control of Vapor Condensation

 Pool boiling and condensers both

require enhanced condensation

» Pool boiling used in heat sink applications

 Vapor boils and condenses in close proximity

» Condensers used in power cycles

 Vapor is injected; boiling occurs in separate boiler component  Nozzle geometry interacts with vapor formation and acoustic enhancement

 Condensation is limited by interface

area

» Thermal boundary layer surrounds vapor

Boiling Condensation 1 mm Condensation Nozzle Ejection 1 mm

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

13

Acoustically Controlled Condensation Experimental Setup

 Vacuum pump sets the

ambient pressure in test cell

 Middle plate separates

boiling from condensation

» Nozzle geometry can be varied » Bulk temperature of upper tank controlled with coil heat exchanger (not shown) » Immersion heater creates vapor in lower tank

 Acoustic actuators:

» 1 kHz, placed to sides of nozzle » 1.7 MHz, oriented either above or to side of nozzle

Tank steam reservoir d vacuum pump

nozzle steam reservoir nozzle steam reservoir nozzle steam reservoir

10.8 cm

Distilled water 0.15 – 1 atm

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

14

nozzle steam reservoir

Acoustically Enhanced Bubble Condensation Low Frequency (1 kHz)

Actuated

25 oC subcool 225 W Continuous Actuation (Atmospheric Pressure) To: acoustic actuation period  1 msec

2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

Volume (25 degrees subcool, kHz continuous)

V/Vo t/T

  • 1

5 10

Increased thermal interfacial mixing leads to rapid collapse.

A∗ = Vapor Area Average Baseline Vapor Area

200 t/T0 100 0.19 1 Base Flow Video Presented Here Video Presented Here

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

15

Boundary Layer Growth - kHz Condensation

Image processing of Schlieren images yields quantitative information on boundary layer growth

Thermal boundary layer in baseline flow does not undergo appreciable growth

» Heat transfer occurs primarily through lower (and subsequently, inner) interface

Acoustic actuation leads to nearly linear growth of boundary layer thickness

» No significant temporal dependence on acoustic actuation

Thermal boundary layer in presence of acoustic actuation is on average 6.7 times thicker

» Up to 17 times thicker

5 10 t/To (ms) dt (mm) 1 2

All Instantaneous Thickness Average Instantaneous Thickness

dt dt

1

  • 1

x (mm) 1

  • 1

x (mm) 10

  • 10

x (mm) 20 10

  • 10

x (mm) 20 {[I’(x, yi, ti)]2} {[I’(x, yi, ti)]2 } I(x, yi, ti) 2 4 2 4 80 160 dt dt

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

16

Natural Deformation-Induced Vapor Collapse

nozzle steam reservoir

Surface tension pinch-off drives a liquid “spear” through the center of the vapor bubble to form a vapor torus that leads to rapid condensation.

Schlieren imaging shows insignificant thermal gradients in fluid surrounding bubble.

» Inner “spear” enhances heat transfer

This natural mechanism indicates that inducing such a liquid “spear” early in the bubble formation process can lead to accelerated condensation.

Video Presented Here

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

17

Ultrasonic Liquid-Gas Interfacial Actuation

 f = 1.7 MHz  lacoust = 0.9 mm; Dres = 2 mm  lcapillary = O(mm) » “Mist” droplets ejected, visible in video  Cavitation and subsequent

collapse generates additional droplets

» Larger-scale; not uniformly sized  Acoustic impedance mismatch » Zvapor/Zwater=1.8x10-4 » Surface deforms from acoustic pressure  Deformed surface self-focuses acoustic intensity 1 cm

Video Presented Here

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

18

nozzle steam reservoir

Condensation Enhancement: Pulsed Ultrasound

6 oC subcool 20 W 20 ms pulse White Light Schlieren Imaging

Phototransistor Laser Diode

h

Pulsed actuation.

» Saves power » Minimizes interference with vapor ejection » Vapor ejection pressure remains unchanged

Pulse actuation is synchronized to “natural” bubble formation.

» Bubble phase reference is obtained using a trigger laser beam at given height above nozzle » Actuation wavefronts are monitored using Schlieren imaging

trigger

Significant savings in actuation power

Video Presented Here

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

19 A* t/Tb

Triggering laser diode 5 mm above nozzle Q = 225 W Tb = 50 ms Subcooling = 25 oC

Axially-Aligned Pulsed Ultrasound Actuation

1 0.27 2 4

Base Vapor Ultrasonic Vapor

nozzle steam reservoir

High-speed video image processing yields an estimate of total vapor domain as function of time.

» Subcooling and heater dissipation are invariant, leading to the relation between vapor domain and heat transfer coefficient.

𝑟𝑐𝑏𝑡𝑓 = 𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑡𝑓,𝑓𝑔𝑔𝐵𝑐𝑏𝑡𝑓,𝑓𝑔𝑔 𝑈

𝑡𝑏𝑢 − 𝑈 𝑡 =

𝑉𝐵𝑏𝑑𝑢,𝑓𝑔𝑔 𝑈𝑡𝑏𝑢 − 𝑈

𝑡 = 𝑟𝑏𝑑𝑢 𝑧𝑗𝑓𝑚𝑒𝑡 𝑉𝑏𝑑𝑢,𝑓𝑔𝑔

𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑡𝑓,𝑓𝑔𝑔 = 𝐵𝑐𝑏𝑡𝑓,𝑓𝑔𝑔 𝐵𝑏𝑑𝑢,𝑓𝑔𝑔

Vapor domain reduced by up to 73% using 20 ms actuation pulses.

» HTC increased by 270%

Actuation “regularizes” time-periodic bubble formation.

» The base flow a new bubble is ejected while the earlier bubble collapses » In the presence of actuation, bubble collapse is completed prior to ejection of the subsequent bubble

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

20

1 t/Tb 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.2 1 t/Tb 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.2

Bubble Volume Tracking

8 oC subcool 20 W 20 ms pulse Tb = 80 ms Y = 0.822 cc

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

21

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 40 80 2∙104 4∙104 U (W/m2K) ሶ q (W) t/Tb

Temporal Variation: Heat Transfer Coefficient and Heat Rate

Peak heat transfer coefficient occurs during toroidal breakup in the absence and presence of actuation.

» Acoustic actuation leads to near-immediate doubling of HTC

Peak heat rate occurs during pinch-off, torus formation, and toroidal breakup

Non-spherical effects

» Lower peaks and higher troughs

120 6∙104

Tactuation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

22

High-resolution Schlieren imaging reveals formation of ultrasonically induced droplet ejection from spear.

Required mass for complete phase change: mdroplets = E/(cp∙DT) = [(Vo/vg)∙hfg]/(cp∙DT)

mdroplets per pulse: 0.0207 gram/pulse.

» Can contribute up to 60% at low subcooling (8 oC), small bubbles or 45% at high subcooling (25 oC), large bubbles

nozzle steam reservoir h

trigger

Interfacial Disturbances by Secondary Droplet Ejection

Pulsed Ultrasound Actuation Base Flow

Video Presented Here Video Presented Here

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

23

Cylindrical Lens Spherical Lens Laser Test Section

Bubble extent inferred from masked vectors along centerline

x

y elevation for interpreting wake after bubble collapse

y

Particle Image Velocimetry

Fluorescent Particles and optical filter to reduce laser reflections

Algorithmic masking to remove interface/ non-particle-laden flow

Post processing: 10,000 fps flow fields temporally averaged over 0.5 ms (5 frames)

» Rightward of bubble is masked to remove interior and bubble shadow 8 oC subcool, 20 W, 20 ms pulse

Top View Side View

Optical Filter, Camera Cylindrical Lens Spherical Lens Laser Test Section Low-Power Laser

trigger

Low-Power Laser

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

24

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

x/do

4 8

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

x/do

4 8 4 8

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

x/do y/do

Naturally Condensing Vapor Bubbles

Vorticity Tb/s

1 Vt

Plotting Threshold: 0.55 Vt

0Tb 0.25Tb 0.30Tb 0.25Tb 0.56Tb 0.70Tb 0.80Tb 0.85Tb 0.90Tb

Vt = 0.55, Tb = 80 msec, do = 2.3 mm

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

25

y/do

Acoustically Actuated Vapor Bubbles

Vorticity Tb/s

1 Vt

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

x/do

4 8

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

x/do

4 8 4 8

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

x/do

Plotting Threshold: 0.2 Vt

0Tb 0.05Tb 0.15Tb 0.25Tb 0.30Tb 0.40Tb 0.45Tb 0.50Tb 0.60Tb

Vt = 0.55, Tb = 80 ms, do = 2.3 mm

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

26

Centerline Velocity

v/Vt 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.8 1

  • 2

2 t/Tb

  • 1

1 y/do 2 4 6 8 10 t/Tb 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.8 1

Tb = 80 ms, Vt = 0.55 m/s, do = 2.3 mm

Base Flow Actuated Flow

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

27

High-Subcooling, High-Mass Flow Rate Vapor

v/Vt

  • 2

2 1

  • 1

y/do 2 4 t/Tb 0.8 0.4 1.2 1.6 t/Tb 0.8 0.4 1.2 1.6 Tb = 50 ms, Vt = 0.70 m/s, do = 5.3 mm

Base Flow Actuated Flow

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

28

 Acoustic actuation is an effective method for

controlling two-phase flows with heat transfer.

» Interfacial coupling varies with actuation wavelength

 Low frequency, O(1 kHz); long wavelength = 1 m  High frequency, O(1 MHz); short wavelength = O(1 mm)

» The acoustic coupling forces liquid-vapor interfacial motion that affects vapor formation, advection, and condensation. » Strongly enhances pool boiling heat transfer. » Accelerates direct-contact vapor condensation.

General Conclusions

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

29

Conclusions: Boiling

 Ultrasonic actuation (short wavelength).

» Couples to vapor bubbles by a surface force. » Vapor bubble nucleation, growth, and detachment are modified. » CHF increases by 65%; surface temp. increases by 7 °C. » Condensation increases above the boiling surface. » Actuation may be turned on and off as needed without a drop in performance.

 Textured surfaces with ultrasonic actuation.

» Microchannels alone increase CHF to 350 W/cm2.

 Ultrasound increases CHF to 460 W/cm2.

» Ultrasound reduces surface superheat by 7 °C (in contrast to smooth heater).

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory

30

Conclusions: Condensation

 O(1 kHz) acoustic actuation (long wavelength). » Interfacial Faraday waves increase condensation in the bulk liquid. » Interface motion induces a temporally-growing thermal boundary layer. » Condensation rate is increased both during growth and after advection, with increases of up to 425% in the time-averaged

  • verall heat transfer coefficient.

» Importance of motion in inducing mixing implies effectiveness scales with surface displacement.

 Lower frequencies (1 kHz or below).  Prior work used either extremely low (50 Hz) or high (20 kHz) frequencies, with smaller improvements in HTC.

 Ultrasonic acoustic actuation (short wavelength). » Subcooled liquid jet protrudes into vapor bubble, significantly increasing vapor surface area and heat transfer coefficient. » Formation of toroidal volume leads to rapid bubble collapse. » Pulsed actuation causes up to a 73% reduction in vapor extent.