Testing Email Invitations in Testing Email Invitations in a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

testing email invitations in testing email invitations in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Testing Email Invitations in Testing Email Invitations in a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Testing Email Invitations in Testing Email Invitations in a Nonprobability Panel p y Elizabeth Nichols, Ryan King and Elizabeth Nichols, Ryan King and Jennifer Childs U S C U.S. Census Bureau B This presentation is released to inform


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Testing Email Invitations in Testing Email Invitations in a Nonprobability Panel p y

Elizabeth Nichols, Ryan King and Elizabeth Nichols, Ryan King and Jennifer Childs U S C B U.S. Census Bureau

This presentation is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U S Census Bureau The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why is the U.S. Census Bureau interested in researching email notifications?

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Motivation for nonprobability split-panel testing

  • Quantitative data:

Quantitative data:

  • Too many choices to test in large mandatory tests
  • Qualitative data:
  • Does opinion data match real response data?

p p

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Previous research Previous research

S bj li

  • Subject line
  • Response deadline (Henderson, 2011 AAPOR)
  • Topic or no topic (Couper, 2008)
  • Avoid “survey” (Porter & Whitcomb, 2005)
  • Shorter the better & Avoid “Help” & “Reminder”

(Genroe – Marketing)

  • Email content (Klofstad, Boulianne, Basson, 2008)
  • Informing about reminders
  • Longer email content
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Six studies in 2014 Six studies in 2014

h Jan. March May Aug. Oct. Dec. Subject line

x x x

line Email format

x x

Email content

x x

Survey Survey link type

x

Due date

x

Sent time

x x

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Nonprobability sample Nonprobability sample

  • Highly

educated 35

  • >35 yrs
  • ld
  • White
  • White
  • Employed
  • Census
  • Census
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Response rate (RR2) Response rate (RR2)

21% 20% 25% 14% 13% 15% 20% ( ) 13% 10% January (n=1000) March (n=1500) May (n=1500) 5% y ( ) 0% Overall

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Subject lines Subject lines

J

  • January
  • Confidential 2014 Census Study
  • Respond to the 2014 Census Study

Respond to the 2014 Census Study

  • March
  • Confidential 2014 Census Study

y

  • Help us make the U.S. Census better, answer our survey
  • A message from the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
  • May
  • Confidential 2014 Census Survey
  • 10 min te U S Cens s S r e to Help o r Comm nit
  • 10-minute U.S. Census Survey to Help your Community
  • U.S. Census Survey to Help your Community
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Motivation for January Research team decision

  • Confidential 2014 Census Study
  • Short
  • Emphasizes confidentiality

R d t th 2014 C St d

  • Respond to the 2014 Census Study
  • Short
  • Call to action
slide-15
SLIDE 15

January open rate January open rate

40% 30% 35% 40% 20% 25% 30% fid i l 10% 15% 0% Confidential Respond 0% 5%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau January Small-scale Nonprobability Panel Research y p y

slide-16
SLIDE 16

January response rate January response rate

21% 20% 20% 25% 15% 10% 5% 0% Confidential Respond

Source: U.S. Census Bureau January Small-scale Nonprobability Panel Research

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Survey feedback from January Survey feedback from January

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results of opinion question Results of opinion question

38.4% Help us make the U.S. Census better, answer our survey 32.0% 10 minutes to improve the U.S. Census and help your community 31.6% Answer the U.S. Census– Help your community 30.1% Important Census Study 26 7% Improve the U S Census Study 26.7% Improve the U.S. Census Study 13.6% Mandatory Census Study 13.1% Your Civic Duty – Answer the U.S. Census! 6.8% A message from John Thompson, Director of the U.S. Census Bureau 6.3% A message from the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Motivation for March Motivation for March

  • Confidential 2014 Census Study
  • Kept January “winner”

p y

  • Help us make the U.S. Census better, answer
  • ur survey
  • ur survey
  • Winner of January opinion question
  • A message from the Director of the U.S.

Census Bureau Census Bureau

  • Loser of January opinion question
slide-20
SLIDE 20

March open rate March open rate

45% 35% 40% 45% 20% 25% 30% Confidential 10% 15% 20% Help A message 0% 5%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau March Small-scale Nonprobability Panel Research Source: U.S. Census Bureau March Small scale Nonprobability Panel Research

slide-21
SLIDE 21

March response rate March response rate

20% 25% 17% 11% 15% 15% 11% 10% 0% 5% 0% Confidential Help A message

Source: U.S. Census Bureau March Small-scale Nonprobability Panel Research

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Motivation for May Motivation for May

f d l

  • Confidential 2014 Census Survey
  • Kept with the March winner
  • 10-minute U.S. Census Survey to Help your

Community

  • Email provider suggestion that numbers do well
  • Emphasize U S Census
  • Emphasize U.S. Census
  • Data use: Helping a community

U S C S t H l C it

  • U.S. Census Survey to Help your Community
  • Like previous panel, but no number
slide-23
SLIDE 23

May open rate May open rate

35% 40% 45% 25% 30% 35% Confidential 10% 15% 20% Confidential 10-min Help 0% 5% 10% 12-May 13-May 14-May 15-May 16-May 17-May 18-May 19-May 20-May 21-May 22-May 23-May 24-May 25-May 26-May 27-May

Source: U.S. Census Bureau May Small-scale Nonprobability Panel Research

slide-24
SLIDE 24

May response rate May response rate

20% 25% 12% 15% 15% 12% 11% 10% 5% 0% Confidential 10-minute Help

Source: U.S. Census Bureau May Small-scale Nonprobability Panel Research

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Take aways Take aways

  • Subject lines
  • Numbers resonate
  • Confidential seems to do okay
  • Opinion data does not match actual response data
  • Opinion data does not match actual response data
  • “Help” might not help response when it is the first

d word

  • We did not see evidence that shorter is better, but

the first words seem to matter

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Future plans Future plans

  • Replicate with probability frames
  • Administrative record frame of emails
  • Replicate with other nonprobability frames
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Contact Contact

Elizabeth Nichols elizabeth.may.nichols@census.gov elizabeth.may.nichols@census.gov