New Energy Oasis (NEO)
Testing and evaluation program in NEO
Overview of Current and Future Projects
- Dr. Raed A. Bkayrat,
Manager Technology Application and Advancement Group (TAAG) Economic Development, KAUST
Testing and evaluation program in NEO Overview of Current and Future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
New Energy Oasis (NEO) Testing and evaluation program in NEO Overview of Current and Future Projects Dr. Raed A. Bkayrat, Manager Technology Application and Advancement Group (TAAG) Economic Development, KAUST Technology Application and
Manager Technology Application and Advancement Group (TAAG) Economic Development, KAUST
2
New Energy Oasis (NEO) Advance Science and Technology Training Pilot Projects + Prototyping Technical and Business consultation
3
concept market
4
New Energy Oasis (NEO) Technology Application and Advancement Group (TAAG)
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 6
Background Current Condition Goal Root Cause Analysis Proposed Solutionss Effect Confirmation Follow-up Actions
Current Condition
panels)
rates (SR/kWh)
Background
annually) without a sustainable energy solution
Project Developer: Hashim Al-Zain Team Sponsor: Raed Bkayrat Updated: 24 March 2012 Version 0.2
Goals 1st to understand & quantify the impact of soling on the performance of solar systems. 2nd to develop a number of dust mitigation products & technologies and measure their efficacy through reproducible test procedures. 3rd to evaluate different mature dust mitigation technologies and solutions. This is to validate the ability of achieving 100% dry-type cleaning solutions & to recommend cleaning frequency based on field testing of technologies and site-specific cleaning method. Cause-Effect Diagram Proposed Solutions Preliminary Results
three months of no cleaning
metals, hydrocarbons, and biological content Moving Forward
AlMasri, Maen AlAmad
technology developers
1. What is the level of maternity of each proposed technology? 2. What are the predicted results for each Proposed Solutions? What is the impact on glass surfaces? 3. Are the Proposed Solutions focused on the right areas? How easy are they to implement? 4. Is the implementation order clear? How will the effects of the Proposed Solutions be verified? 5. What is the impact on the bottom-line LCOE? What is the cost of the proposed solution? 6. Are the results reproducible? 1. How does the system actually behave with the Proposed Solutions that are being proposed for implementation in place? (passive vs. active) 2. How will you measure the effectiveness of the Proposed Solutions? 3. What have we learned that does or does not improve the situation? 4. In light of learning, what should be done? 5. How should the way we work or our standards be adjusted to reflect what we learned?
Reduced Solar Efficiency Infrastructure Utilities O&M Weather Connection to gird Mounting structure arrangement Proximity to service center No Proven reliable solution Access to Water Dust Composition Cost of cleaning Wind O&M subsidies Dust Mitigation R&D Endorsements High Temperature Lack of Rain High Humidity Dust deposition Clay presence Organic material presence Aerosol Dust Mitigation Dry Passive Coatings Sputtering Coating Super- Hydrophobic Ultrafine TiO2 PCO Active Cleaning EDS Clean Fizz Rotary Brush Wet
1. What do we need to learn next? 2. What remains to be accomplished? 3. What other parts of the organization need to be informed of this result? 4. How will this be standardized and communicated?
Coating Performance Solar Panel Efficiency Technology Maturity Environmental Durability Field Evaluation Economics Reliability O&M
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 8
versus the reduced solar energy normal to the surface)
(done by comparing different test locations)
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 14
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 27-Jan 6-Feb 16-Feb 26-Feb 8-Mar 18-Mar 28-Mar 7-Apr 17-Apr 27-Apr 7-May Temperature (0C) Specific Yield (Kwh/Kwp) Time
Kwh/Kwp Performance
System 1 System 2 Temperature
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 15
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% 50 100 150 200 250 Maximum daily temperature (oC) Efficiency (%) Day
Efficiency String 2 Efficiency String 1 Max of Ambient Temp
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 16
0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 String Efficiency (%) Day
String1 Eff String2 Eff String3 Eff String4 Eff String5 Eff
the effect of dust
accumulation
further tests will also include the diffused, scattered, reflected and absorbed light
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Relative Glass Transmission Wavelength (nm)
Effect of Dust on Glass Transmission
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
(Versus Time) Duration of exposure to dust: 60 days
10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Energy Conversion Efficiency Daily Maximum Module Temperature oC Eu = Generated Energy / Incident Irradiation Energy (%)
Linear Eu
TAAG - King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Dust accumulation on the surface of PV panels in New Energy Oasis (NEO)/KAUST
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 24
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 25
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 26
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 27
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 28
KAUST King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 29