TEM EM (TRA RAJECT JECTOR ORY Y EQ EQUIF IFINA INALIT LITY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TEM EM (TRA RAJECT JECTOR ORY Y EQ EQUIF IFINA INALIT LITY MOD ODEL EL)

Tomoya a IKEZAWA Ka Kans nsai ai Un University sity

Wh What at is is T TEM EM(T (Traject rajector

• ry

y Eq Equi uifin inal alit ity Mod

• del

el) ?

■ One e of qualit itati tive e res esea earch h met ethod.

• d.

■ The e conc ncep ept t of equi equifin inal alit ity was as in introduce duced d in into the e fie ield d of ps psychology hology by Jaan Valsin iner er. ■ It is is a a res esea earch h meth ethod

• d ai

aimed ed at at dr drawin ing g pe persona nal lif ife e an and d expe perie ience ce wit ith ir irrever ersib ible le tim ime( e(Sato

• 2009

09).

Da Data ta nu numb mber er of

• f in

inter ervie view

Data a number er of inter ervie iew Merit it 1 It is possible ible to search h the depths s

• f personal
• nal experiences

eriences 4±1 It is possible ible to resear earch h the diversity ity of experien erience 9±2 It is possible ible to grasp sp the type of the route

(Arakawa, Yasuda Sato 2012)

TE TEM M Bas asic ic ter erm

■ Equifinality inality Point．EFP EFP The points of diversified experiences converging. ■ Bifur furcation cation Point．BFP BFP The point where a certain selection diversely divides each action. ■ Ob Obligat atory y Pa Passage Point．OPP OPP The point where logical, institutional and customary that almost all people must experience. ■ Irreversib sible Time ■ Social al effect

Ho How w to

• cr

creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph

Fi First of al all, expo port t al all the e expe perie ience ce from the e da data an and d conn nnec ect t wit ith a l a lin ine. e.

EFP BPF

Ho How w to

• cr

creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph

Next, , Connec ect actual expe perie ience ces s wit ith solid id lin ines es.

EFP BFP

Ho How w to

• cr

creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph

Writ ite e bip ipolariz ized ed equi equifin inalit ity and d socia ial ef effec ects ts.

Social Effect EFP EFP Time

Ho How w to

• cr

creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph

Writ ite e Multi-fin inali lity ty.

EFP BFP

Multifinality Points

Ex Exam ample ple Res esear earch ch

■ Target: t: 3 athletes es 1. 1. To belong

• ng same team

2. 2. To cont ntinu nue ps psycho chologica logical suppor pport 3. 3. To pa partici cipan pant t Olympi pic c twice ■ Comm mmon

• n point

At the first st Ol Olympic c appearance, ance, they got

• t the expec

ected d resul ult.

• t. However

er, , at the e second

• nd Olympic

ic appearance, ance, they y could uld not

• t get

et the expec ected d resu sult. t.

Posit itiv ive e Men ental al Posit ition ion Neg egat ativ ive e Men ental al Posit ition ion

Time Line Social Effect

Hap appe pen n Ev Even ent

Select cted ed Internat ernationa

• nal

team Select cted ed Interna ernationa tional team Impor mporta tant nt Interna ernationa tional conven enti tion

• n

Olympi pic c prelimi minar ary rounds Det etermi mina nati tion

• n
• f
• f

Olymp mpic ic appearan arance ce Adjustm ustmen ent for Olymp mpic ic Final selecti ection

• f
• f

Internat ernationa

• nal

team Decide ided Internat ernationa

• nal

team Pa Participat cipated ed Olympic pic Did not

• t select

cted ed interna nati tiona

• nal team

sense se of responsibility

• nsibility

as Internat ernationa

• nal

team response

• nse

for result Relieved ed to get et right

• f particip

ipat ating ng Olympi pic. c. Decline ne of mot

• tiv

ivat ation

• n

Conf nfidence dence and response nse

Confl flict ict of human n relations

• ns

Transf sfer ers s

• verseas

seas team Li Linked ed up interna nati tiona

• nal team

Confl flict ict of not

• t

being ng able to move Un Uncomf

• mfor
• rta

table e appoin intme tment nt for the players Confl flict ict of injury Confl flict ict of human n relations

• ns

Could d not

• t get

et Satisf sfact actor

• ry results

ts Social Effect

Impor porta tant nt Poi

• int

nt

■ Qualit itati tive e res esea earch h ten ends ds to be a e an ar arbit itrary y res esult of res esea earche chers. Ther eref efore,

• re, the

e met ethod d is is bet better er to ver erif ify res esults ts wit ith multi tipl ple e res esea earche hers. s.

THA THANK NK YOU OU FOR OR LI LISTE TENING NING