Telluride Affordable Housing INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKSESSION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

telluride affordable housing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Telluride Affordable Housing INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKSESSION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Telluride Affordable Housing INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKSESSION November 12, 2018 Telluride regions commitment to deed -restricted housing began in the late 1970s and 1980s with specific requirements on large - scale developments and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Telluride Affordable Housing

INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKSESSION November 12, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Telluride region’s commitment to deed-restricted housing began

in the late 1970’s and 1980’s with specific requirements on large- scale developments and incentives by the Town of Telluride and San Miguel County

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Telluride region’s commitment to deed-restricted housing began

in the late 1970’s and 1980’s with specific requirements on large- scale developments and incentives by the Town of Telluride and San Miguel County

 In 1994 Town of Telluride approved comprehensive, affordable

housing mitigation requirements on new development concurrent with a ½ cent affordable housing sales tax approved by voters

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Telluride region’s commitment to deed-restricted housing began

in the late 1970’s and 1980’s with specific requirements on large scale developments and incentives by the Town of Telluride and San Miguel County

 In 1994 Town of Telluride approved comprehensive, affordable

housing mitigation requirements on new development concurrent with a ½ cent affordable housing sales tax approved by voters

  • Mitigation requirements have been refined over time, most recently an

increase in affordable housing mitigation fees in Feb. 2018

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Telluride region’s commitment to deed-restricted housing began

in the late 1970’s and 1980’s with specific requirements on large- scale developments and incentives by the Town of Telluride and San Miguel County

 In 1994 Town of Telluride approved comprehensive, affordable

housing mitigation requirements on new development concurrent with a ½ cent affordable housing sales tax approved by voters

  • Mitigation requirements have been refined over time, most recently an

increase in affordable housing mitigation fees in Feb. 2018

  • New 2-Mill Affordable Housing Property Tax Ballot Measure

November 2018

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Current Mitigation and Incentive Programs produce about

approximately 4 units/yr., and an estimated $300-400,000 in mitigation fees

 ½ Sales Tax produces approximately $761,000 /yr.  2-Mil Property Tax would produce approximately $554,000/yr.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Unit Production

 Mitigation/Incentive programs (104 units)  Town-Constructed/Financed (247 units + 46 boarding house rooms)

 variety of unit types (single family, multi-family, apartment, boardinghouse,

tiny homes)

 rental and ownership  most units price and/or rent- capped  variety of financing approaches and and partnerships (public/private,

public/public)

 Public/Private Partnerships

 Under Review

 Public/Public Partnerships

 Sunnyside Lot (MOU Town/County Partnership)

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Current/Recently Completed Projects

 Entrada Project

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Gold Run with SMC

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Spruce House

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recently Completed

 Virginia Placer Project (completed May 2018)

 19 Rental Apartments, 3 Rental Tiny Houses, 46-Bed Boarding House

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Under Construction

 SMPA/Four Corners Project

 10 Owner-Occupied Condominium Units + Parking + Art School

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Under Construction

 Lot B North Project

 16 Owner-Occupied Condominium Units

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Policy

 Where we are:  Approximately 32% of County population reside in deed restricted

housing

 Approximately 47% of the Telluride Region’s population reside in

deed restricted housing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Town Master Plan Goals

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Town Master Plan Goals

 The Town uses a Goal of housing 60%-70% of

the region’s employees within the Telluride region (Telluride, Mountain Village, nearby portions of San Miguel County).

 Having employees reside close to places

employment underpins several important public policy objectives such as Preservation of Community, Stable Employment Base, Reduction in Transit Demands/Reduced Carbon Footprint, etc.)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 Master Plan envisions the Town building approximately 20

units/year, and continuing land banking and mitigation/ incentive programs, over a 20-year planning horizon to achieve the targets and goals in the Master Plan.

 For modeling purposes, Town forecast assumes continued

growth in job rate, new units will be developed through mitigation/incentives programs and on vacant sites reserved or required for deed restricted housing, continued occupancy of some free market units by local employees, and reductions in the supply of free market housing in Telluride due to “gentrification”

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2018 Housing Needs Assessment

 Recent Housing Needs Assessment estimated the current shortfall

  • f 441 units, with an additional 324 Units required over the next 10

years.

 Housing Needs Assessment indicated approximately 288 units

(existing shortfall + new job generation) are a result of needs related to the Town of Telluride.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Existing Housing Need by Employment Distribution, 2018

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Future Housing Need by Employment Distribution, 2016-2026

slide-24
SLIDE 24

 Telluride generally uses the Telluride Affordable Housing

Strategy Plan Site Evaluation Matrix to guide decisions regarding sites for future housing development

 Town can potentially achieve approximately 200-300 additional

housing units within the Town, without substantially comprising

  • ther Town needs.
slide-25
SLIDE 25 5/8/2017 Application of Criteria Comment Key Telluride Regional Housing Strategy Row color corresponds to MAP DRAFT: 5/8/17 Net Gain in Population [1] (3X) Site suitability for range of targeted unit types [2] (2X) Potential for
  • ther
community needs/ amenities Quality of Development/L ivability Location Disperses housing Complexity of Securing Site [3] Estimated Land Cost ($$ per unit) (2X) Estimated Land Value (2X) Estimated Cost of Construction (2X) Total Status/Comments Sites added after 2004 Map Ref. # Common Name of Parcel Potentially Available Sites - Town Owned NEW Lot B, Pearl Subdivision "RV Lot" 9 7 4 10 10 2.5 10 10 10 10 137.5 Lot created with Pearl Property resolution J Carhenge Lot (Lots 34/34B, BVS) 10 7 5 10 10 5 10 10 10 5 134 Carhenge Lot/Encumbered with FTA Grant, Obligations to Telski NEW Virginia Placer - Phase 2 7 10 10 10 10 5 10 10 10 5 136 Zoned Public Purpose K Shandoka Parking Lot (Lot L, BVS) 6 5 5 10 10 1 7 10 10 5 111 Shandoka Parking Lot I East Telluride (Lots 1-7, Block 21) 4 7 10 10 10 1 10 10 1 10 109 Vacant NEW Sunset Ridge 1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 109 Duplex lot deeded to Town through Sunset Ridge Annexation - restricted to housing uses G East Telluride (Lots 1-3, Block 10 ) 2 7 10 10 10 5 10 10 1 10 107 Vacant; size increased through Primrose Street realignment E East Gregory Ave. Lot (Lot 10, Block 33, TOT) 1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 97 Vacant, pro. to move historic shed to site for housing not favorable per HARC/n-hood L West Columbia Ave. Lot (Lot 16, Block 10, WTA) 1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 97 Vacant N Curtis Drive Lots (Lots 33-40, Block 18, WTA) 3 7 3 10 10 10 10 10 1 1 90 Vacant hillside property H East Telluride Hillside Lots (Block 7 and 8, ETA) 1 1 1 10 10 10 10 10 1 1 70 Vacant, access improved through Primrose Street realignment Potentially Available Sites - SMC Owned SMC-A Sunnyside 5 10 10 7 7 10 10 10 10 5 129 Site west of Eider Creek Condominiums - restricted to housing uses Potentially Available Sites - Privately Owned SMC-D Ilium (Lower Lawson PUD) 6 5 10 1 1 10 5 8 8 10 107 Industrial property rezoned to housing SMC-B Hub Lots Lawson Hill 7 5 5 5 5 1 5 8 8 10 104 Upper Lawson Hill Site; conversion of industrial uses to housing T Lot 3, CLS 4 5 5 10 10 5 5 6 6 5 91 Vacant Zoned Accommodations 2 W East Telluride Hillide Lots (Blocks 2-6, ETA) 9 1 1 10 10 10 1 5 5 1 83 Vacant, access improved through Primrose Street realignment Not Presently Available - Town Owned M School Lots/Taylor Street 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 1 113 Site experienced a rockfall event shortly after housing study C Voo Doo Lounge 5 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 110 Eastern half of the "TSRC" Site/Subject to Agreement to Lease B Old Library 1 5 1 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 94 Subject to COP and TSRC Agreement to Lease A Rebekah Hall 1 5 1 10 10 10 10 10 1 5 86 Subject to COP D North Oak St. Lot (Lot 31, Block HA) 1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 1 79 Lot may not exist Not Presently Available - Private V Commercial - E Colo. Ave. 9 5 5 10 10 10 1 5 5 5 103 Currently the Ajax Hotel Proposal F SW Corner Spruce and Pacific 3 5 5 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 89 Currently the Ware's House PUD (SW corner of intersection) U Commercial - S. Fir Street 4 5 5 10 10 10 1 5 5 5 88 Mindling Property Housing Sites Built or Under Development NEW Virginia Placer - Phase 1 8 10 10 10 10 7.5 10 10 10 5 141.5 Under development as rental housing- THA lease on Town Land SMC-C Gold Run 5 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 7 5 124 Developed as Gold Run Project, initial site not created (Idarado Annexation) P Mendota 4 5 10 10 10 5 10 10 10 5 117 Developed as Mendota Residence NEW SMPA Lot 3 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 114 Under development (design phase) - part of a mixed use project R Whitehouse 2 1 10 10 10 5 5 10 10 10 108 Deed Restricted as Affordable Housing (pri. developed as the Whitehouse Project) through payment by Town O Entrada 5 5 5 10 10 1 5 10 10 5 106 West half of Developed as Entrada Residences, east half incorporated into Lot B Pearl Subdivision Q Family Housing 3 5 10 10 10 1 10 10 1 10 102 Unit expanded and updated, sold as Telluride Family Housing Project NEW Spruce House 2 5 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 7.5 101 Developed as Spruce House Project, land acquired in 2007 Assumptions: [1] [2] Range of unit types considered: boardinghouse/dorm, apartment, multi-family, triplex, duplex, single-family [3] Assumes development would occur under by right zoning as the base case To do: .add further assumptions as necessary .redo map numbering system Net Gain in Population estimates derived from 1.58p/hh for 1 bedroom/studio units, 1.99 p/hh for two-bedroom units, and 3.5 p/hh for three-bedroom units. Preliminary data in 2017 indicates the following pp/h for in-town DR units: 1.13 p/hh for 1 bedroom/studio units, 2.46 p/hh for two-bedroom units, 3.24 p/hh for three-bedroom units, 3.83 p/hh for four-bedroom units.
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Telluride Affordable Housing

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS