Jobs/housing balance Affordable housing Jobs/housing balance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Jobs/housing balance Affordable housing Jobs/housing balance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Fiscal sustainability Affordable housing Jobs/housing balance Affordable housing Jobs/housing balance Financial feasibility Fiscal sustainability Short-term measure Long-term measure Can we afford the Does
- Fiscal sustainability
- Affordable housing
- Jobs/housing balance
Affordable housing Jobs/housing balance
Financial feasibility
- Short-term measure
- Can we afford the
infrastructure to accommodate growth
Fiscal sustainability
- Long-term measure
- Does development generate
enough revenue to provide and maintain facilities and services
- Budget is balanced
Revenues Expenditures
- Are we deferring maintenance?
Narcoossee East (developing comm.) Central (mixed use) West (mature comm.)
Fiscal Impact Analysis
West (mature community) East (developing community) Central (future development)
East (developing community) Central (mixed use area) West (mature community)
$37,600 $48,600 $77,100 $33,600 $21,200 $22,700 $43,700 $33,100 $16,400 $25,900 $33,400 $500
10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000
East Central 25-year Central buildout West
Revenue per acre Expenditure per acre Net fiscal impact per acre
Cumulative Results per Acre, Osceola County Fiscal Impact Analysis
Without connection With connection
Taxable Value 2005
$5.2 M
Office: 75,000 square feet Residential: 300 units Retail/Restaurants: 370,000 square feet
Shopping center renovation
Property assembly and redevelopment Redevelopment New townhomes
Taxable Value 2005
$5.2 M
Taxable Value 2010
$42 M
Taxable Value 2016
$71 M
Redevelopment
Opened 2001 Closed 2012
Fiscal sustainability Jobs/housing balance
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
None One Two Three or more
Cars per Household
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Florida: $20.68 30% of income Two- bedroom
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
$50,000 or more $35,000 to $50,000 $20,000 to $35,000 Less than $20,000
Less than 30% 30% to 49% 50% or more
Households by Income Level – How Much They Pay for Housing
27,000 households
ELDERLY YOUNGER AND 1-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS SINGLE PARENTS HOSPITALITY WORKERS PEOPLE LIVING IN MOTELS
21% of Osceola’s workforce Average annual wage: $22,405 50% have hh incomes under $35,000 34% live alone 77% are homeowners 11% of Osceola’s households 68% have incomes below $35,000 20% of households have 1 person 38% have 1 worker Median per capita wage is $19,950 ??? Tourist workers Single parent households $1,200/month
Shop
Shop
House Size
Zero- and 1- bedroom units:
8%
52% 18% 16% 14%
Household Size One or two Three Four Five +
$44,254 $25,488 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 All hhs: 1-person hhs:
Median Income
$815 $948 $1,192 $1,465 $1,754
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2,000 1 2 3 4 5+
Median Rent by Number of Bedrooms
Complex Name # units Bedrooms
Madison Crossing I
86 1-2 bedrooms
Madison Crossing II
88 1-2 bedrooms
Osceola Pointe
176 1-4 bedrooms
Heritage Park
238 1-4 bedrooms
The Loop Apartments
152 1-4 bedrooms
San Juan Apartments
112 1-2 bedrooms
Total Units
852
Affordable Housing Developments, Last Five Years
$50,000
$45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000
Decrease housing costs
- - or--
Increase income/ability to pay
Narrow the gap
$50,000
$45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 Narrow the gap
- Diversify housing product
- Provide for a mix of uses
- Allow many housing types by right
- Offer incentives
- Education, training, job placement
- Diversify job base
- Reduce other household costs
- Encourage house-sharing options
Decrease housing costs Increase income/ability to pay
3- or 4- bedroom, single family home
$35,000/ year $156,000 $111,000 $65,400
Cottage Homes 12 units/acre
0.15 acres Last sold: 2010 $1.1 million
HOUSING NEEDS
Tourist sector workers Elderly households (>65) Younger households (<25) One-person households One-worker households Single-parent households People living in motels
Rank Metropolitan Area Percent of Jobs Reachable in 90 Minutes by Transit 1 Honolulu HI 59.8% 2 Salt Lake City UT 58.9% 3 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara CA 58.4% 4 Madison WI 58.2% 5 Tucson AZ 57.2% 6 Fresno CA 57.0% 7 Albuquerque NM 52.9% 8 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis WI 48.6% 9 Provo-Orem UT 48.3% 10 Denver-Aurora CO 47.5% 91 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission TX 16.6% 92 Augusta-Richmond County GA-SC 16.4% 93 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater FL 16.3% 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach FL 16.2% 95 Orlando-Kissimmee FL 15.8% 96 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News VA-NC 15.4% 97 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman OH-PA 14.2% 98 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown NY 8.2% 99 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario CA 7.9% 100 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville FL 7.4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Osceola Co Montgomery Co New York City Austin Portland Housing and Transportation Costs as a Percent of Income Housing as % of Income Transportation as % of Income
How
Fiscal sustainability Affordable housing
Jobs per Household
0.5 1 1.5
Current Recommended Goal