Tax Reform and Transfer Pricing July 18, 2019 July 30, 2019 Alex - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tax reform and transfer pricing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tax Reform and Transfer Pricing July 18, 2019 July 30, 2019 Alex - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tax Reform and Transfer Pricing July 18, 2019 July 30, 2019 Alex Martin Productive Pricing LLC www.productivepricing.com alex.martin@productivepricing.com 1 Personalized Service, Practical Solutions Introduction Alex Martin is a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tax Reform and Transfer Pricing

July 18, 2019 July 30, 2019

Alex Martin Productive Pricing LLC www.productivepricing.com alex.martin@productivepricing.com

Personalized Service, Practical Solutions 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.productivepricing.com 2

Introduction

  • Alex Martin is a transfer pricing

economist based in Plymouth, Michigan

  • He has been a full-time transfer pricing

specialist for 22 years, including 4 years working overseas.

  • Alex worked at a Big-4 firm for 12 years, 6

years at a top middle-market CPA firm and 4 years as an independent consultancy.

  • Alex’s transfer pricing team was selected

as one of the world’s leading transfer pricing consultancies by International Tax Review for the past three years.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview

  • Transfer pricing from a practical perspective
  • Assessing common transfer pricing issues
  • Tax Reform = new incentives for multinationals
  • FDII export incentive @ 13.125%
  • GILTI, BEAT and OECD Developments

www.productivepricing.com 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why is Transfer Pricing Important?

$Y transfer price drives taxes payable by country

  • Inventory, royalties, service charges, loans all impact taxes

www.productivepricing.com 4

German taxes 30% of $X German manufacturer $X profit U.S. distribution subsidiary $Z profit Auto parts $Y charge Retailers U.S. taxes 35% of $Z now 21% of $Z (2018)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Is Your Company Paying its Fair Share?

“Why does Starbucks manipulate its accounts to avoid tax?”

  • UK Member of Parliament Margaret Hodge
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Big Picture

Goal – companies pay their fair share of tax

  • “Arm’s-Length Standard”
  • Principles broadly similar globally

(OECD Guidelines)

www.productivepricing.com 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Transfer Pricing – Why Now?

High return on investment for tax auditors globally Prior to TCJA, companies minimized US tax footprint

  • 35% federal rate and worldwide taxation
  • Lower rates elsewhere

Tax Reform changes the dynamic, e.g.

  • 21% tax rate on C-Corps encourages investments
  • Possible lower rate for export income – 13.125%

www.productivepricing.com 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

When is Transfer Pricing an Issue?

Every time a company has a cross-border transaction with related companies

  • Supply chain changes
  • Company cashflow
  • Global effective tax rates
  • Tax audits

www.productivepricing.com 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

How Do Some Companies Approach Transfer Pricing?

  • Company has one cost plus policy
  • Company operates as one “borderless” business
  • Can the plant manager earn a higher bonus?

www.productivepricing.com 9

Specialty Vehicle Part Parent US Specialty Vehicle Part Subsidiary France Parts Royalty Charge France U.S.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

IRS Issues a Transfer Pricing Adjustment

Assume a total taxable income adjustment of $10m Additional income tax owed: $10m x 35%* = $3.5m Plus non-deductible penalties of 20% $700,000 $4.2M + interest + US state taxes + potential double tax 20% penalties start at $5m, penalties increase to 40% at $20m NO automatic refund of double tax – 2 Tax Authorities need to agree * Open tax years at pre-tax reform 35% rate

www.productivepricing.com 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Transfer Pricing Documentation

Auditors request documentation to evaluate TP

  • Analysis of how business operates globally
  • Industry analysis
  • Financial analysis
  • Economic analysis demonstrates why transfer

pricing is arm’s-length Explain to a tax auditor how the business operates and why the transfer pricing is correct.

www.productivepricing.com 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Information Typically Included in a Study

Narrations prepared through interviews – e.g.

  • Which country developed the product and how?
  • What cross-border R&D assistance is provided?
  • Who bears risk of R&D failure?
  • What process IP is utilized by related companies?

Similar interviews with sales, marketing, finance,

  • thers on both sides of the border

www.productivepricing.com 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

IRS Issues Adjustments with Documentation

Assume a total taxable income adjustment of $10m Additional income tax owed: $10m x 35%* = $3.5m Plus non-deductible penalties of 20% $700,000 $3.5M + interest + US state taxes + potential double tax US Report prepared by tax return filing date to be ‘contemporaneous’ Reports do not guarantee tax authority agreement with your position

www.productivepricing.com 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

No IRS Transfer Pricing Adjustment?

No TP adjustment during an IRS Audit

  • No adjustment = no additional tax or penalties

Possibly a problem from a foreign perspective

  • Some tax authorities (e.g. Mexico) require

annual documentation at a very low threshold

  • Thresholds vary by country

www.productivepricing.com 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Best Practices for Managing Transfer Pricing? Over 100 countries have transfer pricing rules

  • One study applicable for multiple jurisdictions
  • Update report annually to be contemporaneous
  • If a report is not clear to you, it will not make

sense to an auditor

www.productivepricing.com 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Starting Points – What to Review

  • Country-by-Country financials- past 3 years
  • US Tax Return for most recent year –

Form 5471, 5472, 8858 and/or 8865

  • US TP documentation – old reports still useful
  • Foreign TP documentation reports

www.productivepricing.com 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

How to Assess Transfer Pricing

Review annual profit margins of each subsidiary

  • Subsidiary losses/NOLs = Subsidiary tax risk
  • Large profits in subsidiaries = Parent tax risk
  • All open tax years

EBIT as a percentage of sales for each subsidiary

  • Often used in TP analyses

www.productivepricing.com 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How Would the IRS Audit This Situation?

German parent with USCo subsidiary reseller

  • ~$70m US Revenue, Purchases in Euros
  • Long sales cycle, facing market downturn
  • Minimal profits or losses past 3 years

www.productivepricing.com 18

USCo 2016 2017 2018 Total Sales $75.2m $70.3m $65.2m $210.7m EBIT $0.9m $0 ($2.5m) ($1.6m) EBIT Margin 1.1% 0% (3.8%) (0.7%)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Assessing Subsidiary Transfer Pricing Risk

Does it make sense – a subsidiary incurs losses?

  • What happens if outbound TP is lowered?
  • What would happen by utilizing tax NOLs?

IRS has a TP audit campaign for subsidiaries

  • Middle-market specifically mentioned

www.productivepricing.com 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Assessing Transfer Pricing – US Companies

How would a foreign auditor react to losses?

  • Can you reduce outbound TP to utilize losses?

Foreign subsidiaries earn large profits

  • Potential to increase FDII benefit?
  • Does the GILTI tax apply?

www.productivepricing.com 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

It’s the Real Thing

  • The IRS and Coca-Cola continue to litigate a

$3.3 billion transfer pricing case

  • Years covered – 2007 through 2009
  • IRS argues that foreign licensees earned over

$11 billion in operating profits, US only $800m

  • IRS thought process – foreign subsidiaries

should not earn an excessive return

www.productivepricing.com 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Practical Observations

IRS requests reports with a 30-day deadline

  • Not too late if the deadline is missed
  • No TP adjustment = no additional tax due

Most TP studies include multiple years of data

  • e.g. 2016-2018 or 2014-2018

Large companies (≥€750m Euros) required to have OECD BEPS Master File/Local Files

www.productivepricing.com 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

“Best Method” or “Most Appropriate Method” Hold off on assessing methods at this stage

  • CUP – Comparable Uncontrolled Price
  • Resale Price Method
  • Cost Plus Method
  • Profit Split Method
  • CPM – (Comparable Profits Method) or TNMM
  • Other Methods

www.productivepricing.com 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Potential Alternative – Benchmarking Study

Benchmarking study

  • Lower-risk situations
  • Profit margin target for

subsidiaries Adjust TP to reach EBIT margin between 5.0% to 8.2% for subsidiary

  • CPM/TNMM Approach

Benchmark Company for Subsidiary EBIT/Sales

Company A 16.3% Company B 12.8% Company C 8.2% Company D 6.3% Company E 5.5% Company F 5.0% Company G 0.3% Company H (3.2%)

www.productivepricing.com 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

“They couldn’t hit an elephant at this distance.”

—John Sedgwick, U.S. Civil War General – May 9, 1864

  • “We will prepare something when the IRS requests it.”
  • “We did a study a few years ago.”
  • “Our subsidiaries negotiate over transfer prices already.”
  • “We have a transfer pricing policy in place.”
  • “Our Canadian controller said they have a study.”

“It’s due to business conditions and FX issues.”

Famous Last Words

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

TAX REFORM STRATEGIES

www.productivepricing.com 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Transfer Pricing and US Tax Reform

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) changes incentives for multinationals: e.g., for C-Corps

  • Tax rate reduced to 21%
  • Some export income may be taxed at 13.125%
  • Holding IP offshore less beneficial

www.productivepricing.com 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Observations

Tax Reform designed to:

  • Incentivize US investments in value chain
  • Incentivize US exports

State tax, VAT, withholding, foreign tax credits, customs duty all important considerations

www.productivepricing.com 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What Happens If Transfer Prices Are Increased? Base Case (no FDII)

What if USCo increases the royalty by $1m?

  • Increase goods prices, service charges – same effect

www.productivepricing.com 29

US taxes payable at 21% $2,100,000 USCo Parent $10,000,000 Taxable income Forco Subsidiary $5,000,000 Taxable income Software Charge $2m Royalty Forco customers Forco taxes payable at 30% $1,500,000

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Increase Royalties Charged to Subsidiary Base Case (no FDII)

www.productivepricing.com 30

USCo Parent Forco Subsidiary

Vs

USCo Parent Forco Subsidiary

Royalty Charge $2m $3m Taxable Income $10m $5m $11m $4m Tax Rate 21% 30% 21% 30% Taxes Payable $2.1m $1.5m $2.31m $1.20m Taxes Payable $3.60 million $3.51 million Savings

excludes Foreign Derived Intangible Income (FDII) deductions

$90,000/annually

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What Should Multinationals Consider Now? Outbound Lower tax rates incentivize US investments

  • New US R&D activities = higher royalty rates
  • New/Upgraded US plant = higher goods prices

Tax benefit – additional US tax, lower foreign tax

  • Larger deductions at subsidiaries

www.productivepricing.com 31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Carrots and Sticks Overview

Special rules for “deemed intangible income”

  • Foreign Derived Intangible Income (“FDII”) incentive

(13.125% rate)

  • Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (“GILTI”) is Mirror

Deemed Intangible income =

  • Income minus 10% of Qualified Business Asset

Investment (“QBAI”) and interest expense

  • The TCJA assigns a “routine” return of 10% on assets,

and residual profits are “deemed intangible income”

www.productivepricing.com 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FDII Export Incentive

Deemed ‘Intangible income’ defined as income greater than 10% of QBAI (business assets)

  • What share of 'intangible’ income is foreign?

(Foreign derived deduction income/ Total deduction income) x Deemed Intangible Income= FDII Income

FDII income taxed at 13.125%

  • Increase transfer prices= increase FDII

www.productivepricing.com 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Same Numerical Example Higher Royalty = Increased FDII Income

USCo IT Parent Forco Subsidiary

Vs

USCo IT Parent Forco Subsidiary

FDII Royalty Income $2m $3m Taxable Income

(After FDII Calc)

$2m FDII $8m domestic

($10m total)

$5m $3m FDII $8m domestic

($11m total)

$4m Tax Rate 13.125% FDII 21% domestic 30% 13.125% FDII 21% domestic 30% Taxes Payable $262,500 $1.68m $1.5m $393,750 $1.68m $1.2m Total Taxes $3,442,500 $3,273,750 Tax Savings

$168,750/annually

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FDII Observations

Opportunity is more income at 13.125% rate

  • Potential to improve ETR and cashflow
  • Must have evidence of foreign use
  • Must be substance behind TP changes

TP documentation for audit defense overseas

www.productivepricing.com 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

What Should Multinationals Consider Now? Inbound Consider reducing inventory prices and royalties

  • More US activities = lower transfer prices
  • New US plant = lower component prices

Result- More US income/ Less overseas income

  • Customs duty savings?

www.productivepricing.com 36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

GILTI and BEAT Sticks

Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”)

  • Tax excess income from lower tax countries
  • Also applies to some individuals

Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (“BEAT”)

  • Minimum tax for significant royalties and

service fees paid to related companies

www.productivepricing.com 37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

GILTI Mirrors FDII

Charged on the ‘excess’ income of US CFCs

  • Net “tested income” of CFC minus 10% of

QBAI, minus interest expense

  • Reduces rate differential between the US and

low-tax jurisdictions

www.productivepricing.com 38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

GILTI Calculation without Interest Expense

CFC with 10% tax rate, $1.5M income and $8M in QBAI

www.productivepricing.com 39

CFC Taxable Income $1.5m Foreign Taxes Payable @ 10% $150k Foreign Net Income $1.35m minus Return of 10% on $8m in QBAI and int. exp. $800k Equals GILTI “Deemed Intangible Income” $550k plus Sec. 78 gross-up = (150k/1.35m) x 150k $61.1k Equals GILTI Inclusion $611.1k 50% Deduction on GILTI Inclusion for C-Corps $305.5k Additional GILTI Tax at 21% of GILTI Deduction $64.1k minus Deemed paid foreign tax credit $48.9k Equals Incremental US Tax $15.5k Total Taxes Payable on CFC Income

$165.5k

Deemed paid FTC 80% x Sec. 78 gross-up 80% x $61.1k = $48.9k Assume $8m in CFC Qualified Business Asset Investment Effective Tax Rate on CFC Income $165.5k/$1.5m = 11.02%

slide-40
SLIDE 40

GILTI Observations

GILTI tax applies to excess CFC profit

  • Removes “routine” return based upon QBAI
  • Higher assets (QBAI) = less GILTI tax
  • CFC with few assets more likely have GILTI tax
  • GILTI Tax can be offset by foreign tax credits

www.productivepricing.com 40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

BEAT Stick

Base Erosion and Anti-abuse Tax >$500m revenue

  • Adds back payments to related companies
  • New modified taxable income
  • BEAT is 10% of modified taxable income less

regular tax liability (5% in 2018)

  • Royalties and service payments are greater than

3% of company deductions.

  • Inventory purchases not part of calculation

www.productivepricing.com 41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Transfer Pricing Tax Reform Takeaways

Transfer pricing is an integral part of tax reform

  • FDII - incentive to increase outbound TP
  • Lower inbound TP may be beneficial

Documentation to support changes in TP

www.productivepricing.com 42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Storms on the Horizon

  • Tax rate competition
  • ‘Nexus’ standards for taxing internet sales
  • BEPS Master File/ Local File and CbC Reporting
  • More transparency = more aggressive audits
  • Can governments resolve double tax disputes?

www.productivepricing.com 43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Alex Martin Productive Pricing LLC 390 N Harvey Street Plymouth, MI 48170 alex.martin@productivepricing.com www.productivepricing.com +1 248 752-1190

44

Contact Details