Task Sharing on Environmental Product Declaration Setup in Business - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
task sharing on environmental product declaration setup
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Task Sharing on Environmental Product Declaration Setup in Business - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 21, 2023 189 likes •424 views

LCM-2 0 0 7 Task Sharing on Environmental Product Declaration Setup in Business to Business Relations Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Department of Technology

slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

LCM-2 0 0 7

2007-08-27/29 Zürich

Task Sharing on Environmental Product Declaration Setup in Business to Business Relations

Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Department of Technology Induced Material Flows

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Planners as designers of buildings

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Planners as designers of buildings – buildings as products Designers

  • decide on use-cases and performances of products
  • select appropriate components and materials for that
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Construction Processes Use Processes

Designer‘s Working Area

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Sophisticated Designer’s Additional Tasks Designers

  • decide on use-cases and performances of products
  • select appropiate components and materials for that
  • would transfer performances into functional units
  • would optimize environmental performances using LCA

Sophisticated Designers

  • would look to their design from a life cycle perspective
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Construction Phase

Designer‘s LCA Competence

Use Phase Demolition Phase Maintenance and Modernisation Phase Production Trade EOL- Processes Construction Processes Use Processes

designer‘s working area

Total LC-Inventory Σ Construction Processes Σ Use Processes Σ Production Σ Trade Σ EOL- Processes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Designer‘s LCA Competence

Construction Processes Use Processes

designer‘s working area

P1: Resources

P2 P3

A ir W a te r S

  • il

P4: Environmen T1: Production

  • f Material

T2: Transport + Storage T3: Transport + Installation

  • f Material

Construction Phase of Pitched Roof Use Phase (e.g. Heating) Final Building Demolition Phase Maintenance Phase (after pitched roof lifetime)

P9

T5: Transport+ Recycling/ Disposal

T6 P5: Recycling P6 P7 T7 T9 P11 T10 T11 T12 T 13 T15 P12 P13 P15 T16 T17 T 18 T19 P16 P17 P18 P19: Recy cl ing P20:Recycli ng P21:Recycling P8: Pitched Roof P8: Pitched Roof P8: Pitched Roof P8: Pitched Roof

Process Models

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

EPDs in Support of Designers

service provider

building planner Building Principle

Imaging a Building Principle who asks for a „Building EPD“

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Example

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Choice of Reference Scenario

P1: Resources

P2 P3

A ir W a te r S

  • il

P4: Environmen T1: Production

  • f Material

T2: Transport + Storage T3: Transport + Installation

  • f Material

Production Trade Construction Phase of Pitched Roof Use Phase (e.g. Heating) Final Building Demolition Phase Maintenance Phase (after pitched roof lifetime) construc tion process use process Pitched Roof

P9

T5: Transport+ Recycling/ Disposal End of Life

T6 P5: Recycling P6 P7 T7 T9 P11 T10 T11 T12 T 13 T15 P12 P13 P15 T16 T17 T 18 T19 P16 P17 P18 P19: Recy cl ing P20:Recycli ng P21:Recycling P8: Pitched Roof P8: Pitched Roof P8: Pitched Roof P8: Pitched Roof

Example: Additional insulation of a pitched roof in an existing building

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Choice of Reference Scenario

Example: Additional Insulation of a Pitched Roof

  • Cumulated Energy Demand (CED),

Saved Energy

  • Global Warming Potential (GWP),

Saved Climate Change Impact

  • Costs, Saved Costs

Indicators

  • n demand of building principle

in an existing building

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Choice of Reference Scenario

Example: Additional Insulation of a Pitched Roof

  • a building with a certain number of floors

and loft and

  • a specific roof construction
  • specific thermal properties
  • with insulation installed between rafters,

and no cuts of the inserted panels parallel to the rafters. Functional Unit is one m² of additionally insulated pitched roof area of

in an existing building

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

business

manufacturer X manufacturer Y trade

EPD EPDs in Support of Designers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Look to Designer‘s Support in Different Countries EPD – Programmes to Support Designers

  • Germany
  • France
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Mineral Insulation

EPD Coverage

Use Phase Demolition Phase Maintenance and Modernisation Phase LC-Inventory Σ Production Σ Transport Σ Construction Processes Σ Use Processes Σ EOL- Processes Construction Phase

: Resources

P2 P3

A ir W a te r S

  • il

P4: Environment

P9

p

P5: Recycling P8: Pitched Roof P15 T16 T17 T 18 T19 P16 P17 P18 P21:Recycling P8: Pitched Roof T9 P8: Pitched Roof

Functional Unit, [MJ/a*m²]

Example: AFNOR-EPD, France

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

EPD Coverage

Use Phase Demolition Phase Maintenance and Modernisation Phase Total LC-Inventory Σ Production Σ Trade Σ Construction Processes Σ Use Processes Σ EOL- Processes Construction Phase

Mineral Insulation

: Resources

Declared Unit, [MJ/kg]

Example: AUB-EPD, Germany

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total CED Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [MJ/(min²)]

72,80 6,66 1,27

  • 0,21

80,94

CED Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Lifetime RW Klemmrock [MJ/(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 80,94

  • 84,99

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total GWP Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(min²)]

6,50 0,46 0,09

  • 0,02

7,06

GWP Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Life Time RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 7,06

  • 7,41

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total Additional Insulation Material Costs per min² RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(min²)]

10,00

  • 0,83*
  • 3,04

13,87

*only direct installation labour costs

Declared Unit CED [MJ/kg] rho [kg/m³] d=[m] Rockwool Germany 2003 (product without lamination) EPD-Value: CED = 13 MJ/kg bau-umwelt.com RW Klemmrock AUB-EPD: Pitched Roof, 040 RW Klemmrock 040 3 m², d=0,2 m rho = 28 kg/m³

28-37 kg/m³ ?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total CED Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [MJ/(min²)]

72,80 6,66 1,27

  • 0,21

80,94

CED Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Lifetime RW Klemmrock [MJ/(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 80,94

  • 84,99

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total GWP Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(min²)]

6,50 0,46 0,09

  • 0,02

7,06

GWP Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Life Time RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 7,06

  • 7,41

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total Additional Insulation Material Costs per min² RW Klemmrock [€ /(min²)]

10,00

  • 0,83**
  • 3,04*

13,87

*only direct installation labour costs

Declared Unit CED [MJ/kg] rho = 28 kg/m³ d=0,2 m Rockwool Germany 2003 (product without lamination) CED = 13 MJ/kg RW Klemmrock AUB-EPD: for Pitched Roof, 040 MJ/kg -> MJ/min² Transport- Models

Lorry Type ? Loads ? Distances ?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total CED Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [MJ/(min²)]

72,80 6,66 1,27

  • 0,21

80,94

CED Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Lifetime RW Klemmrock [MJ/(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 80,94

  • 84,99

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total GWP Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(min²)]

6,50 0,46 0,09

  • 0,02

7,06

GWP Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Life Time RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 7,06

  • 7,41

Germany Production Trade Installation Use EoL Total Additional Insulation Material Costs per min² RW Klemmrock [€ /(min²)]

10,00

  • 0,83**
  • 3,04*

13,87

*only direct installation labour costs

Declared Unit CED [MJ/kg] rho = 28 kg/m³ d=0,2 m Rockwool Germany (product without lamination) CED = 13 MJ/kg RW Klemmrock AUB-EPD 2005 : for Pitched Roof, 040

  • Area between rafters + compression surcharge +

cuttings due to functional equivalent, roof geometry and material dimensions

Delivered Insulation Material Area Pitched Roof Area Pitched Roof and Installation Model

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

French EPD Systematic Production Trans port Installation Use EoL Total CED Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [MJ/(min²)]

72,80 7,93

  • 0,21

80,94

CED Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Lifetime RW Klemmrock [MJ/(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 80,94

  • 84,99

French EPD- Systematik Production Trans port Installation Use EoL Total GWP Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(min²)]

6,50 0,55

  • 0,02

7,06

GWP Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Life Time RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 7,06

  • 7,41

Functional Unit CED [MJ/a*min²] RW Klemmrock: for Pitched Roof, 040

/tLCin

[MJ/a*min²]

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

French EPD Systematic Production Trans port Installation Use EoL Total CED Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [MJ/(min²)]

72,80 7,93

  • 0,21

80,94

CED Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Lifetime RW Klemmrock [MJ/(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 80,94

  • 84,99

French EPD- Systematik Production Trans port Installation Use EoL Total GWP Insulation Material per min² RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(min²)]

6,50 0,55

  • 0,02

7,06

GWP Total Material in Pitched Roof per mpr² and Life Time RW Klemmrock [kg CO2- Eq./(mpr²)]

  • 126,0/120

* 7,06

  • 7,41

Functional Unit CED [MJ/a*m²] RW Klemmrock: for Pitched Roof, 040

  • Area between rafters + compression surcharge +

cuttings due to functional equivalent, roof geometry and material dimensions

Delivered Insulation Material Area Pitched Roof Area Pitched Roof and Installation Model

/tLCin /tLCin

[MJ/a*min²] [MJ/a*mpr²]

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22 | Jens Buchgeister, Udo Jeske, Martina Klingele ITC-ZTS | B2B-EPD | 2007-08-27

KIT –The Collaboration of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and University Karlsruhe (TU)

Conclusions Task sharing in German EPD-Programme: Insulation material

  • „Cradle to Gate“ data for production stage only leaves some

additional work for designers, with a gap in transport data. Future work to foster EPD use in building sector

  • Declared unit CED [MJ/kg] seems not to be well adjusted to

designer‘s functional units

  • Extension of EPD information (values, equations) to needs of

consecutive life cycle stages or design steps

  • Development of appropriate construction process models

together with sophisticated product designers