T he y re no t little a dults, b ut Pe a rls fo r yo ur ne xt pe - - PDF document
T he y re no t little a dults, b ut Pe a rls fo r yo ur ne xt pe - - PDF document
3/7/2018 T he y re no t little a dults, b ut Pe a rls fo r yo ur ne xt pe dia tric the y a re little huma ns tra uma pa tie nt Alisa Mc Que e n MD, F AAP, F ACE P Alisa Mc Que e n MD, F AAP, F ACE P Asso c ia te Pro fe sso r o
3/7/2018 2
Ob je c tive s
I de ntify a na to mic diffe re nc e s b e twe e n the a dult a nd pe dia tric a irwa y a nd a pply yo ur kno wle dg e to the ma na g e me nt o f the pe dia tric a irwa y in tra uma .
Ob je c tive s
De sc rib e the physio lo g ic diffe re nc e s b e twe e n a dult a nd pe dia tric c irc ula tio n a nd a pply this kno wle dg e to the ma na g e me nt o f hypo vo le mic sho c k in pe dia tric tra uma .
Ca se
6 mo nth o ld fo und unre spo nsive a t ho me . Apne ic , pulse le ss Asysto le o n mo nito r HR 0 R 0 BP 0 CPR initia te d
“At a c a rdia c a rre st, the first pro c e dure is to ta ke yo ur
- wn pulse .”
L a w # 3 T he Ho use o f Go d
Pre dic to rs o f Diffic ult Airwa y
- F
a c ia l ha ir
- Re stric te d ne c k mo b ility
- Re stric te d mo uth o pe ning
- Ob e sity
- Pre g na nc y
3/7/2018 3
T he se a re a dult pro b le ms Yo u a re e xpe rts in the e me rg e nt ma na g e me nt o f the diffic ult a irwa y Ho w do yo u mo dify yo ur a ppro a c h in the pe dia tric pa tie nt?
Tongue Vocal cords Cricoid ring Epiglottis
Ne o na ta l Airwa y Ana to my
Large tongue Airway is anterior Narrowest portion is below the cords Epiglottis is floppy More prominent occiput
Ne o na ta l Airwa y Diffe re nc e s
Large tongue #1 blade Epiglottis is floppy Straight blade Airway is anterior Look up Narrowest portion is below the cords Make sure your cuff is down
Ne o na ta l Airwa y Mo dific a tio ns
3/7/2018 4
More prominent occiput
Ne o na ta l Airwa y Mo dific a tio ns
Towel roll beneath the shoulders
Ne o na ta l Airwa y Mo dific a tio ns
Size matters Infants are small
3/7/2018 5
But they are not that small!
Atro pine ?
Atro pine fo r pro te c tio n a g a inst b ra dyc a rdia
I nfa nts ha ve e xa g g e ra te d pa ra sympa the tic to ne L a ryng o sc o py c a n ma ke the m b ra dyc a rdic Suc c inylc ho line c a n ma ke the m b ra dyc a rdic
3/7/2018 6
Hypo xia ma ke s the m b ra dyc a rdic T he tre a tme nt fo r hypo xia is no t a tro pine Ba c k to o ur c a se
Suc c e ssfully intub a te d Vita ls re ma in 0-0-0 I O e sta b lishe d E pi g ive n
A wo rd o n se c uring tha t I O
Source: http://mdnxs.com/topics‐2/procedures/intraosseous‐vascular‐access/
3/7/2018 7
So urc e : https:/ / www.a lie m.c o m/ 2016/ tric k-se c uring -intra o sse o us-ne e dle /
Suc c e ssfully intub a te d Vita ls re ma in 0-0-0 I O e sta b lishe d E pi g ive n ROSC HR 160 BP 50/ 20
Childre n a re hig hly re spo nsive to e pine phrine Childre n a re hig hly re spo nsive to vo lume e xpa nsio n “Push – Pull” me tho d to b o lus I V fluids
3/7/2018 8
Ba c k to o ur c a se
AAP Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse. Pediatrics 2014;133:e477‐ e489.
T wo mo nths a g o … E D visit fo r “c rying ” No rma l vita ls No rma l e xa m e xc e pt fo r a fe w b ruise s o n the le g s
3/7/2018 9
T E N – 4 Rule
- Pilo t study o f c hildre n a g e 3 a nd unde r
a dmitte d to PI CU fo r injury
- Me c ha nism (a b use vs a c c ide nta l)
de te rmine d b y e xpe rt c hild a b use re vie w
- Cha ra c te ristic s o f a b use d vs a c c ide nta lly
injure d c hildre n c o mpa re d
- I
de ntifie d hig h risk fe a ture s: b ruising o n to rso , e a rs, ne c k, o r a ny b ruise in infa nt < 4 mo nths
Pierce MC et al. Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics 2010;125:67‐74. Pierce MC et al. Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics 2010;125:67‐74.
T E N – 4 Rule
- T
- rso , e a rs, ne c k in a c hild le ss tha n
fo ur ye a rs o ld
- Any b ruise in a c hild le ss tha n fo ur
mo nths o ld
Pierce MC et al. Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics 2010;125:67‐74.
Co nside r c hild a b use
F ra c ture s in Child Ab use Avo id the tra p o f thinking c e rta in fra c ture s a re pa tho g no mo nic fo r no n a c c ide nta l tra uma .
3/7/2018 10
Spira l fra c ture
Murphy R e t a l. T ra nsve rse fra c ture s o f the fe mo ra l sha ft a re a b e tte r pre dic to r o f no na c c ide nta l tra uma in yo ung c hildre n tha n spira l fra c ture s a re . J Bo ne a nd Jo int Surg e ry 2015;97:106-11.
Pa rie ta l skull fra c ture Pa rie ta l skull fra c ture Co rne r fra c ture “b uc ke t ha ndle ” fra c ture Cla ssic me ta physe a l le sio n Co rne r fra c ture “b uc ke t ha ndle ” fra c ture Cla ssic me ta physe a l le sio n
Ba c k to o ur c a se
3/7/2018 11
I nfa nt ha s a 2 ye a r o ld sib ling a t ho me
Sib ling study
- Ho use ho ld c o nta c ts o f a b use d
c hildre n e va lua te d
– I f a g e < 5: physic a l e xa m – I f a g e < 2: physic a l e xa m + ske le ta l surve y – I f a g e < 6 mo nths: physic a l e xa m + ske le ta l surve y + ne uro ima g ing
- 479 ho use ho ld c o nta c ts
Lindberg D et al. Prevalence of abusive injuries in siblings and household contacts of physically abused children. Pediatrics 2012;130:193‐201. Lindberg D et al. Prevalence of abusive injuries in siblings and household contacts of physically abused children. Pediatrics 2012;130:193‐201.
12% with fra c ture s 25% with fra c ture s
A twin is 20 time s mo re like ly to ha ve a fra c ture
No ne o f the se fra c ture s ha d a sso c ia te d physic a l e xa m finding s
T a ke ho me po ints
Avoid the tiny blades
Optimize oxygenation to prevent bradycardia
3/7/2018 12 Don’t rely on atropine Se c ure yo ur I O with the ma sk fro m a n a mb u b a g Use the “Push–Pull” me tho d to b o lus I V fluids
Bruising o n the to rso , e a r, o r ne c k
- r a nywhe re <4 mo nths