systems with off diagonal disorder on a lattice
play

Systems with offdiagonal disorder on a lattice Karol Zyczkowski - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Systems with offdiagonal disorder on a lattice Karol Zyczkowski in collaboration with Tomasz Tkocz, Marek Ku s (Warsaw) Marek Smaczy nski, Wojciech Roga (Cracow) Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Cracow and Center


  1. Systems with off–diagonal disorder on a lattice Karol ˙ Zyczkowski in collaboration with Tomasz Tkocz, Marek Ku´ s (Warsaw) Marek Smaczy´ nski, Wojciech Roga (Cracow) Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Cracow and Center for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw Quantum Chaos , Luchon , March 17, 2015 K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Off–diagonal disorder March 17, 2015 1 / 28

  2. Some spectral properties of quantum systems Karol ˙ Zyczkowski in collaboration with Tomasz Tkocz, Marek Ku´ s (Warsaw) Marek Smaczy´ nski, Wojciech Roga (Cracow) Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Cracow and Center for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw Quantum Chaos , Luchon , March 17, 2015 K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 2 / 28

  3. Random matrices: applications in quantum & classical physics A) Quantum Chaos and Unitary Dynamics : ’Quantum chaology’ Quantum analogues of classically chaotic dynamical systems can be described by random matrices a) autonomous systems – Hamiltonians: Gaussian ensembles of random Hermitian matrices, (GOE, GUE, GSE) b) periodic systems – evolution operators: Dyson circular ensembles of random unitary matrices, (COE, CUE, CSE) K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 3 / 28

  4. Random Matrices & Universality Universality classes Depending on the symmetry properties of the system one uses ensembles form orthogonal ( β = 1); unitary ( β = 2) and symplectic ( β = 4) ensembles. The exponent β determines the level repulsion, P ( s ) ∼ s β for s → 0 where s stands for the (normalised) level spacing, s i = φ i +1 − φ i . see e.g. F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 4 / 28

  5. Wigner Semicircle Law Spectral density P ( x ) for random hermitian matrices can be obtained by integrating out all eigenvalues but one from jpd. For all three Gaussian ensembles of Hermitian random matrices one obtains (asymptotically, for N → ∞ ) the Wigner Semicircle Law (1955) P ( x ) = 1 � 2 − x 2 2 π √ where x denotes a normalized eigenvalue , x i = λ i / N K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 5 / 28

  6. Extremal eigenvalues & Tracy–Widom Law Statistics of extremal cases - the largest eigenvalue x max The normalized largest eigenvalue (” s ” of Tracy–Widom) √ N ) N − 1 / 6 s := ( x max − 2 of a GUE random matrix is (asymptotically) distributed according to the Tracy-Widom law (1994) F 2 ( s ) = det (1 − K ) , where K is the integral operator with the Airy kernel K ( x , y ) = Ai ( x ) Ai ′ ( y ) − Ai ′ ( x ) Ai ( y ) . x − y The scaling behaviour of the finite size effect (as N − 1 / 6 ) is due to Bowick & Brezin (1991) and Forrester (1991). K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 6 / 28

  7. Tracy–Widom distributions Tracy–Widom distributions F β ( s ) Distributions F β ( s ) and the largest eigenvalue of random GUE matrices (image by A. Edelman) K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 7 / 28

  8. Level spacing distribution P ( s ) Nearest neighbour spacing s s i = x i +1 − x i (” s ” of Wigner), where ∆ is the mean spacing ∆ a) Gaussian ensembles for N = 2 ⇒ Wigner surmise β = 1 GOE (orthogonal) P 1 ( s ) = π 2 s exp( − π 4 s 2 ) π 2 s 2 exp( − 4 β = 2 GUE (unitary) P 2 ( s ) = 32 π s 2 ) 3 6 π 3 s 4 exp( − 64 2 18 9 π s 2 ) β = 4 GSE (symplectic) P 4 ( s ) = These distributions derived for N = 2 work well also for Gaussian ensembles in the asymptotic case, N → ∞ . Random unitary matrices & Circular ensembles of Dyson Uniform density of phases along the unit circle, P ( φ ) = 1 / 2 π . Phase spacing , s i = N 2 π [ φ i +1 − φ i ] since ∆ = 2 π/ N . For large matrices the level spacing distributions for Gaussian ensembles (Hermitian matrices) and circular ensembles (unitary matrices) coincide. K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 8 / 28

  9. K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 9 / 28

  10. Extremal spacings for random unitary matrices . Consider a) Minimal spacing s min = min j { s j } N ( how close to degeneracy? ) j =1 b) Maximal spacing s max = max j { s j } N and j =1 Minimal spacing distribution for N = 4 random unitary matrices Two qubits & random local gates Analytical results P 2 ⊗ 2 ( t ) for CUE(2) ⊗ CUE (2) case, where t = s min P 2 ⊗ 2 ( t ) = 1 4 − cos( π t − 3 sin( π t 2 )+8 sin( π t ) − 3 sin(3 π t � � � � 2 π (1 − t ) 2 ) 2 ) 4 π CUE(4), P (2) CUE , β = 2, 4 ( t ) = ... explicit result to long to reproduce it here... P (0) 4 ( t ) = 3(1 − t ) 2 . Poisson ensemble , β = 0, CPE(4), K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 10 / 28

  11. Minimal spacing P ( s min ) for N = 4 unitary matrices Comparison of spacing distribution P ( s min ) for a) Poisson CPE(4), b) CUE (2) ⊗ CUE (2), c) CUE(4). 3 P CPE 4 CUE 2 ⊗ 2 2 CUE 4 1 0 0 0.5 1 S min mean values: � s min � CPE 4 = 1 / 4, � s min � CUE 2 ⊗ CUE 2 ≈ 0 . 4, � s min � CUE 4 ≈ 0 . 54 s, ˙ Smaczy´ nski, Tkocz, Ku´ Zyczkowski Phys. Rev. E (2013) K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 11 / 28

  12. Minimal spacing P ( s min ) for large unitary matrices (here N = 100) Minimal spacing distribution P ( s min ) for 0) Poisson CPE( N ), P 0 ( s min ) = A 0 Ne − Ns min 1 Ns min e − A 2 1 Ns 2 P 1 ( s min ) = 2 A 2 1) COE ( N ), min min e − A 3 2 Ns 3 P 2 ( s min ) = 3 A 3 2 Ns 2 2) CUE( N ), min . K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 12 / 28

  13. Average minimal spacing � s min � for large unitary matrices Approximation of independent spacings Assume spacings s j described by the distribution P β ( s ) are independent. Minimal spacing Since for small spacings P β ( s ) ∼ s β so the integrated distribution � s 0 P ( s ′ ) ds ′ behaves as I β ( s ) ∼ s 1+ β I ( s ) = Matrix of order N yields N spacings s j . The minimal spacing s min occurs for such an argument that I β ( s min ) ≈ 1 / N . 1 Thus ( s min ) 1+ β ≈ 1 / N = ⇒ s min ≈ N − β +1 K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 13 / 28

  14. Average maximal spacing � s max � Approximation of independent spacings Assume spacings s j described by the distribution P β ( s ) are independent. Mean maximal spacing for COE Since for large spacings P β ( s ) ∼ s 1 exp( − s 2 ) so the integrated distribution � s 0 P ( s ′ ) ds ′ behaves as I 1 ( s ) ∼ − exp( − s 2 ) I 1 ( s ) = Matrix of order N yields N spacings s j . The maximal spacing s max occurs for such an argument that 1 − I 1 ( s max ) ≈ 1 / N . √ Thus exp[ − ( s max ) 2 ] ≈ 1 / N = ⇒ s max ≈ ln N s, ˙ Smaczy´ nski, Tkocz, Ku´ Zyczkowski Phys. Rev. E (2013) Some of these results ( and some other ) appeared in a preprint arXiv:1010.1294 ”Extreme gaps between eigenvalues of random matrices” by Ben Arous and Bourgade . K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 14 / 28

  15. K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 15 / 28

  16. Classical probabilistic dynamics & Markov chains Stochastic matrices Classical states : N -point probability distribution, p = { p 1 , . . . p N } , where p i ≥ 0 and � N i =1 p i = 1 Discrete dynamics : p ′ i = S ij p j , where S is a stochastic matrix of size N and maps the simplex of classical states into itself, S : ∆ N − 1 → ∆ N − 1 . Frobenius–Perron theorem Let S be a stochastic matrix : a) S ij ≥ 0 for i , j = 1 , . . . , N , b) � N i =1 S ij = 1 for all j = 1 , . . . , N . Then i) the spectrum { z i } N i =1 of S belongs to the unit disk, ii) the leading eigenvalue equals unity, z 1 = 1, iii) the corresponding eigenstate p inv is invariant, S p inv = p inv . K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 16 / 28

  17. B) Quantum Chaos & Nonunitary Dynamics Quantum operation: linear, completely positive trace preserving map positivity : Φ( ρ ) ≥ 0, ∀ ρ ∈ M N 1 K ]( σ ) ≥ 0, complete positivity : [Φ ⊗ ∀ σ ∈ M KN and K = 2 , 3 , ... Enviromental form (interacting quantum system !) ρ ′ = Φ( ρ ) = Tr E [ U ( ρ ⊗ ω E ) U † ] . where ω E is an initial state of the environment while UU † = 1 . Kraus form ρ ′ = Φ( ρ ) = � i A i ρ A † i , where the Kraus operators satisfy i A † � 1 , which implies that the trace is preserved. i A i = K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 17 / 28

  18. Quantum stochastic maps (trace preserving, CP) Superoperator Φ : M N → M N A quantum operation can be described by a matrix Φ of size N 2 , ρ ′ = Φ ρ ′ or ρ m µ = Φ m µ n ν ρ n ν . The superoperator Φ can be expressed in terms of the Kraus operators A i , i A i ⊗ ¯ Φ = � A i . Dynamical Matrix D : Sudarshan et al. (1961) obtained by reshuffling of a 4–index matrix Φ is Hermitian, Φ =: Φ R . D Φ = D † D mn µν := Φ m µ n ν , so that Theorem of Choi (1975). A map Φ is completely positive (CP) if and only if the dynamical matrix D Φ is positive , D ≥ 0. K ˙ Z (IF UJ/CFT PAN ) Spectral properties March 17, 2015 18 / 28

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend