System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables? Falko - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

system lcoe what are the costs of variable renewables
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables? Falko - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables? Falko Ueckerdt, Lion Hirth, Gunnar Luderer, Ottmar Edenhofer Working paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2200572 Paris, June 20, 2013 32th International


slide-1
SLIDE 1

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

1

Paris, June 20, 2013 32th International Energy Workshop

System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables?

Falko Ueckerdt, Lion Hirth, Gunnar Luderer, Ottmar Edenhofer Working paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2200572

slide-2
SLIDE 2

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

2

What are the costs of variable renewables?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

3

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 (DOE/EIA)

Levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) are the full life-cycle costs (fixed and variable) of a technology per generation unit

Projected LCOE for the US in cents per kWh

slide-4
SLIDE 4

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

4

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity (IEA, 2010) LCOE for plants commissioned in 2015 at 5% discount rate

Levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) are the full life-cycle costs (fixed and variable) of a technology per generation unit

slide-5
SLIDE 5

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

6

When will wind power be competitive? (investor)

Average electricity price LCOE of wind

 „As soon as wind LCOE will be fallen below those of conventional plants!“

  • r equivalently

 „When LCOE are equal to the average electricity price!“ What is the optimal amount of wind? (modeler/policy maker)

However, this is all wrong!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

7

When will wind power be competitive? (investor)

Average electricity price LCOE of wind

 „As soon as wind LCOE will be fallen below those of conventional plants!“  Don‘t compare LCOE of different technologies!

  • r equivalently

 „When LCOE are equal to the average electricity price!“  Don‘t compare generation costs with the average price! What is the optimal amount of wind? (modeler/policy maker)

However, this is all wrong!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

8

Electricity is a unique commodity

Demand is variable, storage is costly Demand is uncertain. Ramping of plants is costly Transmission is costly The value (price) of electricity varies over time Short-term balancing is costly The value of electricity varies between locations  Generation of different technologies is no perfect substitute, e.g. „nuclear power“ is not „wind power“  Do not compare LCOE Electricity is a heterogeneous good

  • ver time

Heterogeneous w.r.t. lead-time between contract and delivery Heterogeneous across space

slide-8
SLIDE 8

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

9

Variable renewables make electricity even more unique

Output is fluctuating Output is uncertain Bound to certain locations

  • Wind speeds and

solar radiation vary

  • ver time
  • Thus its value

depends on when it is produced

  • Winds and radiation

is uncertain day- ahead

  • Forecast errors are

costly

  • Resource quality

varies geographically

  • Thus its value

depends on where it is generated „Profile costs“ „Balancing costs“ „Grid-related costs“

Integration costs

(are neglected in LCOE comparison)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

10

System LCOE are defined as the sum of generation and integration costs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

11

Profile costs: Residual load duration curve shows challenges

Load (GW) Hours of one year (sorted)

Reduced full-load hours Low capacity credit Overproduction

Load duration curve Residual load duration curve

slide-11
SLIDE 11

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

12

Profile costs: Residual load duration curve shows challenges

  • 100
  • 50

50 100 hours of a year (sorted) Residual load (% of peak load) 0% Solar PV 10% Solar PV 20% Solar PV 30% Solar PV 40% Solar PV 50% Solar PV

  • 100
  • 50

50 100 hours of a year (sorted) Residual load (% of peak load) 0% Wind 10% Wind 20% Wind 30% Wind 40% Wind 50% Wind

Wind Solar German data

slide-12
SLIDE 12

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

13

System LCOE are defined as the sum of generation and integration costs

Static Dynamic

slide-13
SLIDE 13

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

14

When will wind power be competitive? (investor)

Average price LCOE of wind

What is the optimal amount of wind? (modeler/policy maker)

System LCOE of wind

slide-14
SLIDE 14

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

15

When will wind power be competitive? (investor)

Average price = margin inal l value o e of „power er“ LCOE of wind = margin inal costs ts o

  • f „win

ind“

What is the optimal amount of wind? (modeler/policy maker)

System LCOE of wind = marginal cos costs of

  • f „powe

wer“ when produced from wind plant

Interpretation

  • There are two goods “wind” and “power”
  • „Power“ is perfectly matching load
  • Additional costs needed to transform „wind“ into „power“  integration costs
  • The total costs to cover load with „wind“ are System LCOE
slide-15
SLIDE 15

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

16 €/MWh Average electricity price Profile Costs Balancing Costs Grid- related Costs Wind Market Value

Integration costs

€/MWh Wind’s LCOE Profile Costs Balancing Costs Grid- related Costs Wind’s System LCOE

Market Value Perspective System LCOE Perspective

Two perspectives, one framework: System LCOE and market value

marg rginal v l value

  • f „

„powe wer“ marg rginal c l costs

  • f „

„wi wind“ marg rginal l costs s

  • f „

„powe wer“ marg rginal v l value

  • f „

„wi wind“

slide-16
SLIDE 16

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

17

Profile Costs: The “Cannibalization” Effect

slide-17
SLIDE 17

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

18

Market value of wind decreases with increasing share

Integration costs increase

slide-18
SLIDE 18

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

19

Average price = margin inal l value o e of „power er“ LCOE of wind = margin inal costs ts o

  • f „win

ind“ System LCOE of wind = marginal cos costs of

  • f „powe

wer“ when produced from wind plant

Two perspectives, one framework: System LCOE and market value

Market value = marg rginal l value o e of „wi wind“

Integration costs

slide-19
SLIDE 19

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

20

System LCOE – magnitude and shape

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Final electricity share of Wind (%) System LCOE Short-term System LCOE LCOE Long-term capacity adjustment Grid costs Balancing costs Profile costs Generation costs

Integration costs Generation costs

Wind: System LCOE

Final elecitricity share of wind (%)

  • Integration costs of wind power can be in the same range as generation costs at moderate

shares (~20%)

  • A significant driver of integration costs are profile costs, especially the reduced utilization of

capital-intensive thermal plants.  Integration costs can become an economic barrier to deploying VRE at high shares.  An economic evaluation of wind and solar power must not neglect integration costs.

  • From literature: Grid and balancing costs

(Holttinen et al. 2011; Gross et al. 2006; Hirth 2012a, dena 2010)

  • From a simple model: profile costs.
  • Parameterized from German data,

representative for thermal systems in Europe

  • Caveats that increase integration costs
  • No import/export
  • No demand elasticity
  • No storage
  • Power sector only
slide-20
SLIDE 20

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

21

The market value (here value factor) reduces: Market Data, Model Results, Literature Review

At 30% penetration, the value factor of wind falls to 0.5 – 0.8 of the base price. In Germany, it has already fallen from 1.02 to 0.89 as penetration increased from 2% to 8%.

1. 2. 3.

Hirth, Lion (2013): "The Market Value of Variable Renewables", Energy Economics 38, 218-236.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

falko.ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de

22

Conclusions

  • 1. We show that LCOE are a flawed indicator to evaluate power technologies
  • 2. We propose a better metric ‘System LCOE’
  • 3. We present a framework of System LCOE and market value and link it to welfare

theory

  • 4. Integration costs of wind power can be in the same range as generation costs at

moderate shares (~20%)

  • 5. A significant driver of integration costs are profile costs, especially the reduced

utilization of capital-intensive thermal plants.

  • 6. Integration costs can become an economic barrier to deploying VRE at high

shares.

  • 7. An economic evaluation of wind and solar power must not neglect integration

costs.