Synthetic triangular antiferromagnets with ultracold fermions in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

synthetic triangular
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Synthetic triangular antiferromagnets with ultracold fermions in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec. 5, 2018 Tensor Network States: Algorithms and Applications (TNSAA) 2018-2019 Synthetic triangular antiferromagnets with ultracold fermions in optical lattices Daisuke Yamamoto Aoyama-Gakuin Univ. Introduction - Revival Interest in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tensor Network States: Algorithms and Applications (TNSAA) 2018-2019

Synthetic triangular antiferromagnets with ultracold fermions in optical lattices

Daisuke Yamamoto Aoyama-Gakuin Univ.

  • Dec. 5, 2018
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Revival Interest in triangular-lattice

antiferromagnets (TLAFs)

  • Optical-lattice quantum simulations
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Recent “revival” of interest in TLAF

  • Fractional excitations
  • Properties and mechanism of

“spin-liquid (like)” behavior

  • Exotic magnetic orders

ET, dmit, CAT, YbMgGaO4, Cs2CuCl4, ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2,…

Magnon (S=1)? or spinon (S=1/2)? Bosonic? or Fermionic? Multiple-Q orders Multipolar orders Continuous (S=1/2)? S=1 S=1/2? S=1/2?

Ito et al. Nat. Commun. (2017) Paddison et al. Nat. Phys. (2016)

Ba3CoSb2O9 YbMgGaO4

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“Long-range” Neel order on square lattice was realized.

Two hyperfine states of 6Li Greiner Lab. (Harvard Univ.) ⇒The Hubbard model

⇒ Frustrated magnetism (artificial TLAFs) must be a next target!

  • ptical lattice

☑ Quantum gas microscope (QGM)

Becker et al., New J. Phys. (2010)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

“Long-range” Neel order on square lattice was realized.

Two hyperfine states of 6Li Greiner Lab. (Harvard Univ.) ⇒The Hubbard model

⇒ Frustrated magnetism (artificial TLAFs) must be a next target!

  • ptical lattice

☑ Quantum gas microscope (QGM)

Becker et al., New J. Phys. (2010)

The correlation length is much longer than the system size.

Notice: No TRUE long-range order in 2D with SU(2). (Even BKT phase is absent.)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Model considered here

  • Relevance to real and “artificial” materials
  • Motivation and problem formulation
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Triangular XXZ model w/o U(1)

(S=1/2) AF interactions: J, Jz>0, transverse magnetic field: H

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Triangular XXZ model w/o U(1)

(S=1/2) ☑ J=Jz — The Heisenberg model with magnetic fields AF interactions: J, Jz>0, transverse magnetic field: H ⇒ Quantum stabilization of 1/3 magnetization plateau

Chubokov and Golosov, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. (1991)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Triangular XXZ model w/o U(1)

(S=1/2) ☑ J=Jz — The Heisenberg model with magnetic fields AF interactions: J, Jz>0, transverse magnetic field: H

□ J≠Jz — No U(1) spin-rotational symmetry in the presence

  • f transverse field H

⇒ Magnetization is no longer good quantum number. ⇒ Quantum stabilization of 1/3 magnetization plateau

Chubokov and Golosov, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. (1991)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Triangular XXZ model w/o U(1)

(S=1/2) ☑ J=Jz — The Heisenberg model with magnetic fields AF interactions: J, Jz>0, transverse magnetic field: H

□ J≠Jz — No U(1) spin-rotational symmetry in the presence

  • f transverse field H

⇒ Magnetization is no longer good quantum number. ⇒ Quantum stabilization of 1/3 magnetization plateau ☑ J=0 — The transverse Ising model on triangular lattice ⇒ Studied by QMC

Chubokov and Golosov, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. (1991) Isakov and Moessner, PRB 68, 104409 (2003).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Co-based layered TLAF material

Ba3CoSb2O9

  • Small (~ 5%) interlayer

antiferromagnetic coupling (⋍2D)

  • The structure is very simple.

(well-separated layers of equilateral triangular lattice)

  • No DM interaction
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Co-based layered TLAF material

Ba3CoSb2O9

  • Small (~ 5%) interlayer

antiferromagnetic coupling (⋍2D)

  • The structure is very simple.

(well-separated layers of equilateral triangular lattice)

  • No DM interaction

Heisenberg interaction uniaxial crystal field spin-orbit interaction Zeeman term

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Co-based layered TLAF material

Ba3CoSb2O9

  • Small (~ 5%) interlayer

antiferromagnetic coupling (⋍2D)

  • The structure is very simple.

(well-separated layers of equilateral triangular lattice)

  • No DM interaction

Heisenberg interaction uniaxial crystal field spin-orbit interaction Zeeman term ⇒ Only the lowest Kramers doublet is essential.

*Anisotropy of “easy-plane” type

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Single-crystal magnetization curves

  • T. Susuki et al, PRL 110 (2013).
  • A. Sera et al, PRB 94 (2016).

Ba3CoSb2O9

* We have successfully explained the jump in the curve for H//c:

☑ The magnetization curve for transverse field ||ab had basically not changed by easy-plane anisotropy

DY, G. Marmorini, I. Danshita, PRL 112, 127203 (2014).

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposal for quantum simulations

“Easy-axis” anisotropy

DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916

  • State-dependent

triangular optical lattices

  • Raman laser beams
  • Rf field by atom chip

Goldman et al., PRL (2010)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Classical ground state of the model

⇒ Classical approximation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Classical ground state of the model

⇒ Classical approximation

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

saturation

three sublattices ←easy-axis easy-plane→

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Classical ground state of the model

⇒ Classical approximation

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

saturation

three sublattices ←easy-axis easy-plane→ etc.

Sheng-Henley, J. Phys. (1992) Miyashita-Kawamura, JPSJ (1985)

・coplanar ・nontrivial U(1) remains in the relative angles

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Problems

Classical

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Quantum fluctuations Order-by-disorder?

□ Spin-wave - Only can guess the selected orders □ No U(1) symmetry ⇒ The Hilbert space cannot be divided. □ Frustration ⇒ Suffer from the minus-sign problem □ 2D ⇒ Conventional DMRG is not efficient.

How can we obtain a “sufficiently quantitative” ground-state phase diagram (w/ full quantum effects)?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Calculations and Results

  • Combine DMRG with mean-field for T=0
  • Monte-Carlo simulations for T≠0
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Combine DMRG with mean-field

DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916

(i) Approximate the Hamiltonian by an effective cluster Hamiltonian with mean-field boundary conditions (ii) Solve the cluster Hamiltonian with DMRG:

Sublattice mean fields

(efficient for 1D) (infinite dimensions)

(iii) Self-consistently determine the mean fields:

“Large-size cluster mean-field (CMF) with DMRG solver”

Equivalent 1D problem

Iterate (i-iii) till convergence of mean fields (typically, within 10-8)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated Classical

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated

Extrapolate the results with scaling parameter: → 1 (NC →∞)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cluster-size dependence

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

Classical phase diagram

←easy-axis easy-plane→

Saturated “CMF+S” H

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Quantum phase diagram

Classical

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

CMF+S

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Quantum phase diagram

Classical CMF+S

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

S =1/2

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Quantum phase diagram

Classical CMF+S

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

S =1/2

Easy-plane side

Not sensitive to the anisotropy

  • T. Susuki et al,

PRL 110 (2013).

Ba3CoSb2O9 Consistent to the experiment Rescaled by Hs

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Quantum phase diagram

Classical CMF+S

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

S =1/2 Significant quantum fluctuation effects!

Ising limit

The extrapolated Hs/Jz⋍ 0.85, which is consistent to QMC: 0.825±0.025

Isakov-Moessner, PRB (2003).

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Quantum phase diagram

Classical CMF+S

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar) Ψ

Inverted-Y

S =1/2 Significant quantum fluctuation effects!

Easy-axis side

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Easy-axis quantum ground state

[ ] 1st-order, [ ] 2nd-order

DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Easy-axis quantum ground state

[ ] 1st-order, [ ] 2nd-order

DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916

Extrapolation of the phase boundary

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Low-field region

[ ] 1st-order, [ ] 2nd-order

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Low-field region

[ ] 1st-order, [ ] 2nd-order ・coplanar ・nontrivial U(1) remains in the relative angles

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Low-field region

[ ] 1st-order, [ ] 2nd-order ・coplanar ・nontrivial U(1) remains in the relative angles

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Spin reorientation driven by fluctuations

☑ At H=Hr, an emergent Ising transition takes place from an intermediate (reorienting) state to the classical inverted-Y state.

Low-field region

Selected by quantum fluctuations

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Thermal phase transitions

Inverted-Y (=Ψ) breaks discrete symmetry. The Hamiltonian has no U(1) symmetry. ⇒“Standard” second-order phase transition?

No! DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Thermal phase transitions

Inverted-Y (=Ψ) breaks discrete symmetry. The Hamiltonian has no U(1) symmetry. ⇒“Standard” second-order phase transition?

Classical Monte Carlo

No! DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916.

L×L rhombic clusters (L=24,48,72,96)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

BKT in Sz-Sz correlation

correlation length

A finite critical range Tc1 <T < Tc2 for Sz Berezinskii-Kosterlitz- Thouless (BKT) behavior

Sx Sz Szcomponent:

(+m, 0, -m) ⇒ 3! = 6 elements

Correlation function exponent

T=Tc1 ⇒ η⋍1/9 T=Tc2 ⇒ η⋍1/4

consistent with the ℤ6 clock model

Jose et al., PRB 16 (1977)

H

slide-44
SLIDE 44

LRO in Sx-Sx correlation

correlation length

Isolated critical points T=Tc1 for κ and T=Tc2 for Sx, respectively Long-range order (LRO) ・Vector chirality ( y component )

Sx Sz H

Berezinskii-Kosterlitz- Thouless (BKT) behavior

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Possible new universality class?

cf.

DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916.

* The transition at Tc2 shows a similar behavior with almost identical exponents Critical exponents at Tc1

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Why?: Coexistence of BKT and LRO

correlation length

・Cyclic group: ℤ6

  • ne generator g

(g0=g6=e)

・Symmetric group: S3

(the present case)

two generators

  • cycles of {A,B,C}
  • transpositions

A→B→C→A A ⇔ B B ⇔ C C ⇔ A A→C→B→A *Further investigation is required.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Summary

☑ The CMF+S scheme with the use of DMRG solver significantly expands the scope of its applications to broader areas of quantum frustrated systems. ☑ The extension of the tractable cluster size NC enables us to construct a good extrapolation series.

Continuous degeneracy (coplanar)

☑ Using this scheme, one can get a quantitative phase diagram for quantum frustrated systems.

□ Unconventional criticality

related to symmetric group?

DY et al., arXiv:1808.08916.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Collaborators in the related works

  • Magnetism (Theory)
  • Giacomo Marmorini (Keio Univ.) - Hiroshi Ueda (RIKEN-AICS)
  • Tsutomu Momoi (RIKEN) - Tokuro Shimokawa (OIST)
  • Magnetism (experiment)
  • Hidekazu Tanaka, Nobuyuki Kurita (Tokyo Tech.)
  • Oleksandr Prokhnenko (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin)
  • Cold atoms (theory)
  • Ippei Danshita (Kindai Univ.) - Carlos Sá de Melo (Georgia Tech.)
  • Cold atoms (experiment)
  • Yoshiro Takahashi (Kyoto Univ.) - Takeshi Fukuhara (RIKEN)