Sylv lvania ia I Int nter ercha hange S e Study dy City ty - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
sylv lvania ia i int nter ercha hange s e study dy city
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sylv lvania ia I Int nter ercha hange S e Study dy City ty - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 11, 2023 266 likes •510 views

Sylv lvania ia I Int nter ercha hange S e Study dy City ty Council P Presen enta tati tion June 1 18, , 2018 PID 1 105889 05889 LUC-US2 S23-11 11.75 .75 Agenda 1. Project Team 2. Study Area 3. ODOT Process 4. Project

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sylv lvania ia I Int nter ercha hange S e Study dy City ty Council P Presen enta tati tion June 1 18, , 2018

PID 1 105889 05889 LUC-US2 S23-11 11.75 .75

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

1. Project Team 2. Study Area 3. ODOT Process 4. Project Challenges 5. Project Purpose and Need 6. Environmental Issues 7. Study Process and Schedule 8. Public involvement 9. Interchange Alternatives (Eliminated and Feasible)

  • 10. Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Team

MSG Principal in Charge Mike Smith, PE MSG Project Manager Jean Hartline, PE, PTOE Interchange Specialist, Geometrics Brian Toombs, PE Planning, Funding Strategies, Public Involvement Pat Etchie, AICP Roadway, MOT Ray Luk, PE Roadway, Utilities, Lighting Chris Beaulieu, PE Geotechnical Engineering Greg Buhoveckey, PE NEPA, Cultural Resources Chris Owen Bridge Structure Type Study Chris Homan, PE

The Mannik & Smith Group, Inc. (MSG) Burgess & Niple, Inc. (B&N) Burton Planning Services (BPS)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Study Area: Interchange and Monroe Corridor

Includes:

  • Interchange
  • US 23 North and South of

Monroe

  • Monroe from Haroun Road

to Tireman/Rite Aid/5/3 Bank Signal

  • Alexis Road from Monroe to

Acres

Monroe St

N

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Following the ODOT Process

  • Better for future federal and/or state funding
  • Engages ODOT as a partner in the process
  • Ultimately a cost savings
  • Requires:
  • Public Involvement
  • Environmental Compliance
  • Design Standards
  • Ultimately required for the FHWA Interchange Modification

Process

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project Challenges

Local S Stre reet S Syst stem

  • Monroe Street Congestion
  • Crashes (Safety)
  • Monroe Street Close Signal Spacing (east and west of US 23)
  • Complex Signalized Intersections
  • Glasgow Road – isolated dead end road
  • Interchange is “Gateway” to the City
  • Need for non-motorized facilities and connectivity
  • Access Management
  • Stakeholders (Property owners)

Interst rstate S Syst stem

  • Non-Conventional Interchange Configuration
  • Tight Ramp Curves
  • Ramp Congestion at Monroe Street Signals
  • Adjacent ODOT Programmed Projects

Fu Funding

  • Federal State Funding is a Process
  • Project Phasing may benefit funding process
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Adjacent Projects

US 23 23 Noise W Walls (OD (ODOT PID 10364 03647)

  • Currently in design
  • $6Million
  • 2020 Construction

Monr nroe Street ( (SR 5 51) B Bridge (PID D 96010)

  • Currently in Design
  • $3Million
  • 2021 Construction

US 23 N NB Off R Ramp (ODOT P PID 101333) 1333)

  • Bridge Rating 5/10
  • ODOT: “Replace and Re-align”

Ramp/Bridge

  • Not in Design
  • $6.1Million (budgetary estimate)
  • 2024 Construction (estimate)

Timel ely d dec ecision

  • ns w

will ben benef efit thes ese e projec ects a and save t e taxpayer er money. y.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project Purpose and Need

  • Safety concerns on Ramps and Intersections
  • Congestion at Signalized Intersections
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Some crashes not reported

Google Earth recent view: Recently painted barrier Photo February: Several barrier strikes

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Environmental Issues

  • Wetland Impact Potential
  • Flood Plan in Vicinity
  • Areas of Poor Geological Conditions (poor soils, slope failures)
  • Gas Stations
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Kick-Off City / ODOT

Certified Traffic Data Mapping LIDAR Other Data Collection

Update to City

Environmental Services Interchange Concepts

Meet with City Identify Feasible Alternatives

Alternative Analyses

(inc Cost Comparison)

Stakeholder Meetings

Meet with City & ODOT

Concurrence Point

Preliminary Report Public Meeting Final Report Identify Funding Sources Identify Preferred Alternative

Study Approach:

We are here

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Study Schedule

Task

Month

Nov 2017 Jan 2018 Feb 2018 Mar 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 Aug 2018 Sept 2018 Oct 2018 Nov 2018

Project Scoping Project Kick Off Certified Traffic Mapping Data Collection Update City/ ODOT Coordination Environmental Screening Meet with the City Identify Feasible Alternatives

Meet with City and ODOT

Meet with City Council

Alternative Analysis Identify Preferred Alternative Draft Report Public Meeting (inc 30 day comment period) Final Report Funding Sources

We are here

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Public Involvement

Stakeholder er I Involvem ement Identify Key Stakeholders

  • Ciao! Restaurant
  • Glasgow Road Residents
  • Toledo Memorial Park Cemetery
  • Dave White Auto-Dealership
  • BP Barneys
  • Kroger
  • Flower Hospital
  • City Services (Fire/EMS, Police, Parks)
  • Corridor Restaurants/Businesses
  • Others
  • Consider Stakeholder Workshop
  • Identify their short term and long range plans
  • Understand their key needs

Public Meeting

  • Required for the NEPA Process
  • Documentation/Comments is vital
  • October 2018 Date for this project
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Interchange Concepts: Eliminated and Feasible

Minimum Alternatives:

  • No Build
  • Retain existing folded diamond with reconstructed loops

and lane additions Reconfigurations

  • Diamond or Tight Diamond (with/without roundabouts) TUDI
  • Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI Central Avenue)
  • Diverging Diamond Interchange
  • Hybrid Configurations

DDI Columbus - B&N TUDI Defiance - MSG SPUI Central - MSG/B&N

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What Eliminates an Interchange Alternative?

  • Primarily: Does not meet Purpose and Need
  • Does not improve capacity operations (measured in terms of

level of service)

  • Does not address crash patterns
  • Geometric Deficiencies (i.e.ramp curvatures)
  • Signal Spacing
  • Right-of-way Impacts
  • Cost
  • Environmental Impacts
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Eliminated -Diverging Diamond Interchange

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Eliminated -Tight Urban Diamond Interchange

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Eliminated -Roundabout Bow Tie Interchange

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Eliminated -Roundabouts Interchange (Wide)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Eliminated -Single Point Urban Interchange

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Feasible Alternative –Alt 5 -Hybrid

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Feasible Alternative –Alt 7 Hybrid

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Next Steps

  • Completion of the Feasibility Study:
  • Public Meeting (September)
  • Completion of the Feasibility Study and ODOTs Approval
  • Identify project phasing
  • Identification of Funding Sources
  • Safety (Federal/ODOT)
  • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) (TMACOG)
  • TRAC Program (ODOT)
  • ODOT District Pavement & Bridge Preservation
  • ODOT Local Bridge Maintenance
  • ODOT Urban Paving Program
  • ODOT State Infrastructure Program
  • TMACOG Transportation Alternatives (TAP)
  • OPWC Grants
  • Lucas County TID
  • TMACOG TIP Programming
  • ODOT Programming