Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustainable utility master planning projects 15 m savings
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the Village of Huntley Presented By: Timothy P. Farrell, P.E. Village of Huntley Village Engineer Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E., CFM, LEED AP Engineering Enterprises, Inc. March 24,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the Village of Huntley

Presented By: Timothy P. Farrell, P.E. Village of Huntley Village Engineer Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E., CFM, LEED AP Engineering Enterprises, Inc.

March 24, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Overview

Background Information Existing Water Works & Wastewater Systems Overview Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows Regulatory Review Water Supply, Treatment & Storage Evaluation Sustainable Source Water Assessment Wastewater System Evaluation Financial Review & Summary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background Information

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background Information

 Village of Huntley Study Area

 Boundary Agreements With Seven Neighboring Communities  Acreage Summary

 Total Study Area: 21,900 Ac  Facility Planning Area: 13,330 Ac  Corporate Limits: 9,040 Ac  Large Lot Res. Area: 6,350 Ac

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background Information

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background Information

Deferred Capacity Increases Due To Water Use Reduction

5 10 Peak Demand/Capacity (MGD) Year 2010 2030 2020 2040

Baseline Demand After Conservation Existing Capacity Required Capacity Before Conservation Delay Downsizing

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems

Supply Treatment Storage

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Supply: Five (5) Active Deep Sandstone Water Wells [Nos. 7 – 11]

 Four (4) Ironton Galesville & One (1) St. Peter (Ancell) & Ironton Galesville  Flowrate: 800 – 1,000 gpm  Exceed Radium & Barium Standards

 Treatment: Five (5) WTPs

 All Plants Institute Cation Exchange Treatment  One Plant Includes Force Draft Areation

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  Storage:

 Five (5) Elevated Water Storage Tanks (EWST) [300,000 gallon – 1,000,000 gallon]  Two (2) Detention Tanks [57,000 & 61,000 gallons]

 Distribution:

 4” – 16” Water Main  One Pressure Zone  Emergency Connect With LITH

 Controls: SCADA System

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  Wastewater Collection/Conveyance:

 Sanitary Sewer Network  Fourteen (14) Lift Stations

 Wastewater Treatment:

 East WWTF  West WWTF

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems

 East WWTF

 Current Flow 1.1 MGD  Rated Capacity

Design Average Flow: 1.8 MGD Design Maximum Flow: 4.5 MGD

 Wastewater Treatment Trains

 Screening  Secondary Biological Treatment  UV Disinfection

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems

 West WWTF

 Current Flow 1.0 MGD  Rated Capacity

Design Average Flow: 2.6 MGD Design Maximum Flow: 6.5 MGD

 Wastewater Treatment Trains

 Screening  Secondary Biological Treatment  Filtration  UV Disinfection

 Extra Capacity Within Most Unit Processes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Existing Water & Wastewater Systems

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows  Historical Water Use Summary (2009 – 2013)

 Current Trends (CT) = 90 gpcd  MDD:ADD = 2.16  MHD:MDD = 2.00

 2040 CT Water Use Projection

 ADD = 5.31 MGD  MDD = 11.68 MGD  MHD = 23.36 MGD

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows

 Historical Wastewater Flows (2009 – 2013)

 Total Flow = 89.3 gpcd  Baseflow = 60.9 gpcd  I/I = 28.4 gpcd

 2040 CT Wastewater Flow Projection

 DAF = 4.69 MGD  DMF = 11.72 MGD

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Water Saved % Of Total (MGD) (%) All Customers 0.295 5.6% New Landscape 0.029 0.6% 0.316 6.0% High Efficiency Toilets (HET) 0.038 0.7% High Efficiency Washing Machines (HEWM) 0.014 0.3% Retrofits 0.025 0.5% 0.041 0.8% 0.759 14% Utility Water - System Losses Indoor Residential Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Customers Total Estimated Savings =

Potential Estimated Water Savings From Water Conservation and Efficiency

Village of Huntley, McHenry & Kane Cos., IL

Category Outdoor

Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Regulatory Review

Regulation Year Enacted In Compliance? Compliance Status Yes No Surface Water Treatment Rule 1989 N/A Only applies to surface water and GWUDI systems Total Coliform Rule (TCR) 1989  System is routinely monitored as required Lead and Copper Rule 1991  System is routinely monitored as required Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 1998  System is routinely monitored as required Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule 1998 N/A Only applies to surface water and GWUDI systems Stage 1 Disinfectant / Disinfection Byproducts Rule 1998  System is routinely monitored as required Radionuclides Rule 2000  System is routinely monitored as required Arsenic Rule 2001  System is routinely monitored as required Filter Backwash Recycling Rule 2001  System is routinely monitored as required Long Term 1 Surface Water Treatment Rule 2002 N/A Only applies to surface water and GWUDI systems with fewer than 10,000 customers Long Term 2 Surface Water Treatment Rule 2005 N/A Only applies to surface water and GWUDI systems Stage 2 Disinfectant / Disinfection Byproducts Rule 2005  IDSE Completed; Compliance Monitoring Plan submitted to IEPA Ground Water Rule 2006  System is routinely monitored as required Total Coliform Rule (TCR 2010) 2010  System is routinely monitored as required Radium Treatment Residuals Rule 2011  IEMA registration required for WTP‘s and the WWTF sludge disposal; Monitoring and reporting required for WWTF biosolids disposal Radon Rule Proposed N/A Proposed rule would set MCL at 300 pCi/L or 4,000 pCi/L with a multimedia mitigation program to address radon in indoor air

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Regulatory Review

 Existing Near Future Wastewater Treatment Regulations

 Typical Parameters  Barium  Total P

 Receiving Streams On 303(d) List

 East WWTF: Huntley Ditch - Barium, Chloride, Copper Hexachlorobenzene, Zinc & Total P  West WWTF: South Branch Kishwaukee River (East Fork) - Chloride, Copper, D.O. & Total P

East WWTF West WWTF

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Supply, Treatment & Storage Evaluation

 Water Supply & Treatment Needs Assessment Calculations

 Ultimate Source Capacity  Reliable Source Capacity

  • 3,675 gpm
  • 7,508 gpm
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Supply, Treatment & Storage Evaluation

 Water Storage Needs Assessment Calculations

 Peak Hour Storage  Fire Flow  Emergency Supply

  • 2.02 MG
  • 4.47 MG
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

Shallow Sand & Gravel Aquifer

Deep Sandstone Aquifer

Lake Michigan

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

Bedrock Hydrogeology

Source: ISWS

HU Wells

  • Mt. Simon

Ironton- Galesville Ancell (St. Peter)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

 Mapped Wells From ISWS Database

 Shallow S&G  Shallow Bedrock  Deep Sandstone

 Mapped Ashmore Formation Thickness

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

Ancell (St. Peter) Ironton- Galesville Ancell (St. Peter)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

 Deep Sandstone Regional Modeling

 2040 CT Model Run – With Existing 5 Wells  Alternative 1 – CT With 8 New I/G Wells

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

 Deep Sandstone Regional Modeling

 2040 CT Model Run – With Existing 5 Wells  Alternative 1 – CT With 8 New I/G Wells  Alternative 2 – LRI With 4 New I/G Wells

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

 Deep Sandstone Regional Modeling

 2040 CT Model Run – With Existing 5 Wells  Alternative 1 – CT With 8 New I/G Wells  Alternative 2 – LRI With 4 New I/G Wells  Alternative 3 – CT With 4 New I/G Wells (Assumes Remaining Supply Provided By Shallow Resources

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

slide-31
SLIDE 31

 Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency (NSMJAWA) Background

 Purchase Water Through City of Chicago  Firm System Capacity = 95 MGD  Current Peak Demand = 63 MGD  Seven Charter Northwest Suburbs Own System Capacity

 Huntley Connection Considerations

 Possible Upgrades To NSMJAWA Transmission Network  Approximately 14 Mi of Large Diameter Transmission Main To Get To I-90 & Rt. 47 Intersection  Huntley Transmission Network Upgrades  Additional Storage To Meet Minimum 2 Days Storage  Connection/Capacity Purchase Fees

Sustainable Source Water Assessment

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Wastewater System Evaluation

 East WWTF

 O&M Improvements

 Replace Valves & Gates  Modify Flow Splitter Box for NW Ox Ditch  Upgrade Non-Potable Water Skid  Upgrade UV System  Add 2nd Gravity Belt Thickener

 Regulatory/Capacity Upgrades

 New Chemical Feed Building For Ba & P Removal  Tertiary Filtration  Ox. Ditch Motor Upgrades, D.O. Monitoring & Internal Recycle  Effluent Flume Upgrade  Increase Raw Sewage Pump Capacity

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Wastewater System Evaluation

 West WWTF

 O&M Improvements

 Ox. Ditch Drainage System Upgrade  Upgrades To RSPS No. 2  Add Belt Filter Press  Automate Controls For Aerobic Digesters  Replace Existing Comminutors/Screens  New Admin/Lab/Garage Building

 Regulatory/Capacity Upgrades

 Ox. Ditch Motor Upgrades & Internal Recycle  Add 2nd Filter in Sand Filter Building B  Increase Raw Sewage Pump Capacity

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Financial Review & Summary

Supply Treatment Storage

Existing Proposed

Water Works System Master Plan ‐ CT

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Financial Review & Summary

 Water & Wastewater System Phasing & Implementation Plans For Three (3) Time Periods:

 Immediate (0 – 5 Years)  Near Future (6 – 15 Years)  Long Term (16 – 26 Years)

Immediate 0 - 5,000 Population Equivalents Addition Water Works System 0 - 5 Years Component Description Cost Well No. 12 & Well No. 12 WTP $ 6,892,000 Well No. 13 & Well No. 13 WTP $ 6,942,000 Supply & Treatment Subtotal: $ 13,834,000 Storage EWST No. 6 (1.5 MG) $ 4,640,000 Storage Subtotal: $ 4,640,000

TOTAL: $ 18,474,000

Supply & Treatment Immediate 0 - 5,000 Population Equivalents Addition Water Works System 0 - 5 Years Component Description Cost Supply & Treatment Subtotal: $ - Storage Storage Subtotal: $ -

TOTAL: $ -

Supply & Treatment

WWS Phasing & Implementation Plan - CT WWS Phasing & Implementation Plan - LRI

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Financial Review & Summary

Capital Cost Savings With LRI Water Use Commitment

Village of Huntley, McHenry & Kane Cos., IL Present Worth Capital Cost Water Works System Component Current Trends (CT) Less Resource Intensive (LRI) Savings Supply & Treatment $ 52,753,000 $ 27,457,000 ($25,296,000) Storage $ 14,301,000 $ 8,096,000 ($6,205,000)

TOTAL: $67,054,000 $35,553,000 ($31,501,000)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Q&A

Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E., CFM, LEED AP Vice President jfreeman@eeiweb.com 630-466-6700 Timothy P. Farrell, P.E. Village Engineer tfarrell@huntley.il.us 847-515-5285