Sustainable Treatment of Perchlorate Contaminated Soil and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustainable treatment of perchlorate contaminated soil
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustainable Treatment of Perchlorate Contaminated Soil and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainable Treatment of Perchlorate Contaminated Soil and Groundwater Using Local Resources Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Remediation Montreal, Quebec 26 April 2016 Presented by: Kevin Morris 5 June 2013


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Sustainable Treatment of Perchlorate Contaminated Soil and Groundwater Using Local Resources

26 April 2016

Presented by: Kevin Morris 5 June 2013

Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Remediation – Montreal, Quebec

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Introduction

■ Site Overview ■ Problem ■ Green and Sustainable Remediation ■ Solution ■ Data ■ Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Site Overview

Site located in Indiana within a mile of a large river system. Site has operated as a signal flare manufacturing facility since the late 1940’s. Manufacturing process includes handling and mixing

  • f ammonium perchlorate.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Problem

■ Perchlorate releases over a 30 to 40 year period from a mixing building had impacted shallow soils and groundwater. ■ Perchlorate concentrations in soil beneath process building at 28,000 µg/kg. ■ Perchlorate in groundwater at 19,000 µg/L with a plume approaching the property boundary. ■ State agency requiring treatment of source area as well as mitigating migration of impacted groundwater. ■ Area is rural farmland, therefore remediation has to consider potential impacts to local community

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Remediation Assessment

■ Remediation assessment included reviewing technologies based on effectiveness, implementability, cost and sustainability criteria. ■ Technologies considered included excavation, pump and treat and in situ bioremediation. ■ Stakeholders engaged during assessment included liability owner, regulatory agency and adjacent property owners. ■ In situ bioremediation determined to be the most effective, implementable and sustainable remedy agreed upon by all stakeholders assuming risk-based remedial goals and use of locally sourced materials.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Solution

■ Develop risk-based remedial goals that are protective of human health and the environment ■ Install injection biobarrier immediately downgradient of mixing building ■ Decontaminate and remove building and slab ■ Source area bioremediation beneath building via in situ bioreactor ■ Monitoring of soil and groundwater

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Remedy Selection Via the 3 Pillars

7

■ Consider potential impacts to all stakeholders (including local community) ■ Consider economic impact to client ■ Consider environmental impact of the remedy while achieving risk-based remedial goals

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Bioreactors as Green & Sustainable Remediation

■ Relatively low energy usage for installations ■ Carbon/electron donor sourc was obtained locally on site ■ No O&M ■ Low carbon footprint compared to other more energy intensive remediation strategies such as excavation and pump and treat

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Primary Components of Mulch

Cellulose Lignin Hemicellulose

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Perchlorate Reduction

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Mixing Building

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Building Demolition

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Demolition Continued

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Remediation

■ Installed injection biobarrier in September 2010 (15 injection points downgradient of mixing building) ■ Building decontaminated and demolished early October 2010 ■ Soils beneath former mixing building mixed with composted landscaping waste generated onsite down to a depth of 5 feet bgs ■ Drip feed system saturates vadose soils with 10,000 gallons of water

  • ver 24 hours

■ Area covered to prevent infiltration of oxygenated precipitation and maintain anoxic conditions.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

In Situ Bioreactor

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Treatment Completed

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Perchlorate (µg/kg ) in Soil 1 - 2 feet bgs

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Perchlorate (µg/kg ) in Soil 5 – 6 feet bgs

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 1-Sep-09 1-Oct-09 1-Nov-09 1-Dec-09 1-Jan-10 1-Feb-10 1-Mar-10 1-Apr-10 1-May-10 1-Jun-10 1-Jul-10 1-Aug-10 1-Sep-10 1-Oct-10 1-Nov-10 1-Dec-10 1-Jan-11 1-Feb-11 1-Mar-11 1-Apr-11 1-May-11 1-Jun-11 1-Jul-11 1-Aug-11 1-Sep-11 1-Oct-11 1-Nov-11 1-Dec-11 1-Jan-12 1-Feb-12 1-Mar-12

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Observations

■ Perchlorate in groundwater has been reduced by 90% ■ Perchlorate in soils were reduced by >90% within 2 years of remediation with no rebound ■ IDEM has agreed to no further action with covenant not to sue based

  • n positive results

■ Redox conditions in groundwater continues to be reducing and are expected to allow for ongoing degradation of perchlorate

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Conclusions

■ Remediation successful at achieving risk based concentrations in soils ■ Remediation effort also successfully mitigated migration of perchlorate from the site ■ Remediation effort consumed little energy (3 days of heavy equipment for demolition and soil mixing) ■ Remediation effort had no negative impact on local community

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Questions?