Sustainability Assessment of Two Alternative Bio-energy Forest Wood - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustainability assessment of two alternative bio energy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustainability Assessment of Two Alternative Bio-energy Forest Wood - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainability Assessment of Two Alternative Bio-energy Forest Wood Chains with ToSIA by Wendelin Werhahn-Mees M. Lindner, J. Garcia, T. Suominen, T. Palosuo 07.04.2008 The story and methodology equation of the presentation: 1. The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sustainability Assessment of Two Alternative Bio-energy Forest Wood Chains with ToSIA

by Wendelin Werhahn-Mees

  • M. Lindner, J. Garcia, T. Suominen, T. Palosuo

07.04.2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

= > <

  • 1. The story and methodology
  • 2. Results of comparison
  • 3. Discussion of results

The story and methodology

  • equation of the presentation:

Pellet Chain (P Chain) Pellet & Chipping Chain (P&C Chain)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Age 0 Age 30 Age > 85

The story and methodology

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Bioenergy thinning Clearing by lumberjack

Difference between the chains

The story and methodology

P&C Chain P Chain

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Research objective

a) effects of additional extraction of forest biomass for energy purposes on sustainability b) greenhouse gas balance c) social and economic aspects d) potential environmental trade-offs

The story and methodology

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Indicator set

tons

  • 11. Average carbon storage in cut biomass

MJ 10.4 generation from renewables MJ 10.3 electricity from the grid use MJ 10.2 non renewable energy use MJ 10.1 renewable energy use

  • 10. Energy

tons 9.2 freight volume tkm 9.1 transport distance road

  • 9. Transport (road)

kg

  • 8. Maintenance of soil quality

tons CO2 eqv.

  • 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

accidents 6.1 Occupational accidents fatal accidents 6.1 Occupational accidents non-fatal

  • 6. Safety and Health

euro 5.2 female euro 5.1 male

  • 5. Wages and Salaries

person a 4.2 female person a 4.1 male

  • 4. Employment

MJ

  • 3. Total heat consumption

m3

  • 2. Resource / Material use

euro

  • 1. Production costs

Units Indicators

The story and methodology

slide-7
SLIDE 7

a) effects of additional extraction of forest biomass on sustainability

Based on:

  • ne reference year (2007)

a certain land area (1803 ha)

Results of the comparison

P Chain P&C Chain

increase in %

318 737 595 078

87

5 604 318 1 6491 609

194

0,99 2,18

120

63 126

101

5 382

n.a.

9.1 transport distance 272 416 363 846

34

9.2 freight transported 1 679 2 822

68

10.1 energy use 1 942 126 2 348 295

21

10.2 heat generation 6 404 935 20 725 555

224

  • 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • 9. Transport
  • 10. Energy
  • 8. Maintenance of soil quality

Indicator

  • 1. Production costs
  • 3. Total heat consumption
  • 4. Employment

Unit euro MJ person a tons CO2 eqv. kg tkm tons MJ MJ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

a) effects of additional extraction of forest biomass on sustainability

Total production costs 0,00 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,04 0,05 0,06 Pellet and Chipping Chain Pellet Chain in EUR/MJ

Less costs per unit heat consumed in P&C Chain

Results of the comparison

Total production costs 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 P&C Chain P Chain in thousand EUR Total heat consumption 5 10 15 20 P&C Chain P Chain TJ

+10,8 +276

slide-9
SLIDE 9

a) effects of additional extraction of forest biomass on sustainability

Results of the comparison

Similar energy use in both chains Pellet Chain more efficient, (0,80 vs. 0,88) Chipping strongly increases the heat generation, > 3 times Energy generation, use and consumption by chain

5 10 15 20 25 P&C Chain P Chain in TJ Total energy use Total energy generation Total heat consumption

10,8 TJ 0,4 TJ

slide-10
SLIDE 10

a), b) & c) greenhouse gas balance and social aspects

Results of the comparison

Total transport distan 10 20 30 40 50 60 P&C Chain P Chain in thousand tkm/TJ Total freight volume transpo 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 P&C Chain P Chain in t/TJ

Total greenhouse gas emissions 2 4 6 8 10 12 P&C Chain P Chain tons of CO2 eqv./TJ

Total employment

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 P&C Chain P Chain

person year

> + 3 + 1,2 > 25 + 130

slide-11
SLIDE 11

d) The potential trade-offs

Results of the comparison

Total nutrients extrac 1 2 3 4 5 6 P&C Chain P Chain tons Average carbon storage in cut bio 10 20 30 40 50 60 P&C Chain P Chain tons

5,3 44

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Constraints of the pellet production

– High energy use – High transport distance, freight volume – Greenhouse gas emissions balance

Discussion of results

3 X 2 X

9 vs. 6

pellets high energy density

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Soil maint.
  • Costs
  • Energy bal.
  • Employment
  • GHG bal.

P Chain P & C Chain Indicator

Discussion of results

Summary of results

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion & achievements

  • Chipping adds socio-economic

advantages on sustainability

  • Nutrient extraction possible constraint
  • Basis for evaluation methods e.g.

MCA

  • Proved unique energy efficiency ratio
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you for your attention