Survey Debbie Malone, DeSales University Cindy Kilgo & Jennifer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

survey
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Survey Debbie Malone, DeSales University Cindy Kilgo & Jennifer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Profile of Information Literacy Programs in the First Year of College: Initial Findings from a National Survey Debbie Malone, DeSales University Cindy Kilgo & Jennifer Keup, University of South Carolina Ryan Padgett, Northern Kentucky


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Profile of Information Literacy Programs in the First Year of College: Initial Findings from a National Survey

Debbie Malone, DeSales University Cindy Kilgo & Jennifer Keup, University of South Carolina Ryan Padgett, Northern Kentucky University Colleen Boff, Bowling Green State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Many years ago I once heard the former president of the Urban League, Vernon Jordan, say in a speech in Columbia, S.C. “if you ain’t in the room, you ain’t part of the action”! Ladies and gentlemen, it is my thesis that you aren’t as much in this larger room I am calling the “first-year experience reform movement” as I think you should be and this concerns me greatly. John Gardner in a keynote address at the 2003 ACRL National Conference in Charlotte

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Results of that challenge

  • Hardesty, L. (2007). The role of the library in the first

college year (Monograph No. 45). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

  • Boff & Johnson. (2002). The library and first-year

experience courses. Reference Services Review, 30(4). 277-287.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“The more we teach information literacy the more our faculty want us to teach it to first year students because they see the positive impact it has upon preparing students for advanced work-

  • thus, the reason it has become the key learning
  • utcome for our FYE course”

Quote from survey participant

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Literature Context

  • Assessment
  • Collaboration
  • Pedagogy
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Assessment

  • Conducted mostly in English courses, first-year seminars, and
  • rientation programs
  • Variety of instruments used:

– The Information Literacy Test http://www.madisonassessment.com/assessment-testing/ information-literacy-test/ – The Library Anxiety Scale – iSkills – Institution specific pre/post tests

  • Assessing/grading student bibliographies etc.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Collaborating with FYS

  • Information literacy is not always a required

component

  • Library tours
  • Some librarians teach seminars
  • Librarians participate in design of assignments
  • Librarians may provide one or multiple instruction

sessions

  • Often includes a combination of online modules and

face-to-face sessions

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Librarians Collaborating with English Composition Instructors

  • Librarians act as consultants on assignment design
  • Librarians team teach the course
  • Librarians train teaching assistants
  • Librarians grade assignments
  • Librarians teach one-shot information literacy sessions
  • Librarians teach multiple information literacy sessions in

each course section

  • Librarians provide one-one-one research help
slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Academic learning centers
  • First year science laboratory courses
  • Student Services
  • First-Year Engineering courses
  • Computer Science departments
  • High risk student programs
  • School librarians

Collaboration beyond FYS & Eng. Comp

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A wide variety of Pedagogies are in use

  • Interactive Online tutorials
  • Problem based learning
  • Multiple active learning strategies
  • Librarians embedded in courses (online & f to f)
  • Clickers (audience response systems)
  • Gaming
slide-11
SLIDE 11

National Survey of Information Literacy Programs in the First Year

  • Methodology for administration

– Administration: Sept. 14 – Nov. 4, 2011 – Invitation sent to 3,684 instructional librarians in 4 waves

  • Instructional section of ACRL member database

– 510 responses (13.8% response rate)

  • 91.2% of respondents (n = 465) reported

integrating information literacy in the first year

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Survey Characteristics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Percentage of First-Year Students who Participate in Some Form of Formalized IL

5 10 15 20 25 30 Percentage Percent of FY Students

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Required?

Is the information literacy course/module/ component required for all first-year students? Yes – 47.5% No – 50.5% Don’t know – 2.0 %

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Discrete Information Literacy Course, Module, or Component Number Percentage One-on-one appointments with librarians outside of class 352 75.7 Within an English course 336 72.3 Orientation session 314 67.5 Tutorials 278 59.8 Within a first-year seminar 276 59.4 Course management systems 209 44.9 Drop-in workshops sponsored by the library 176 37.8 Videos 152 32.7 Within another type of first-year course 138 29.7 Workshops as part of other campus units 108 23.2 Learning Community 92 19.8 Within an independent information literacy course 87 18.7 Other 52 11.2 Podcasts 20 4.3 Freshmen Interest Groups (FIGS) 19 4.1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Primary Information Literacy Course, Module, or Component Number Percentage Within an English course 143 32.1 Within a first-year seminar 136 30.6 Within another type of first-year course 52 11.7 Orientation session 41 9.2 Other 24 5.4 Within an independent information literacy course 16 3.6 Tutorials 13 2.9 Course management systems 6 1.4 Workshops as part of other campus units 6 1.4 Freshmen Interest Groups (FIGS) 2 0.5 Learning Community 2 0.5 Videos 2 0.5 Drop-in workshops sponsored by the library 1 0.2 One-on-one appointments with librarians outside of class 1 0.2 Podcasts 0.0

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Instruction and Pedagogy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Primary Person(s) Responsible for Development of IL

Librarian(s) - 88.4% Non-librarian faculty - 10.5% Program/course coordinator - 9.2% Other - 3.7% Academic affairs professional - 1.9% Graduate student - 0.9% Student affairs professional - 0.0% Undergraduate student - 0.0%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Primary Person(s) who Instructs/Delivers IL

Librarian(s) - 88.0% Non-librarian faculty - 9.9% Other - 5.6% Graduate student - 4.1% Program/course coordinator - 2.8% Academic affairs professional - 1.1% Undergraduate peer leaders - 0.4% Student affairs professional - 0.2% Undergraduate student - 0.2%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How the IL Component is Taught

10 20 30 40 50 60 Face-to-face,

  • ne-shot

session Within a formal classroom setting Librarian designed assignment Blended (part classroom, part online) Series of face- to-face sessions Other Online only Blogs Wikis Percentage Information Literacy Course/Module/Component Taught

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Primary Instructional Methods

Instructional Methods Percentage Active learning exercises 61.7 Lecture 45.2 Orientation session(s) 31.6 Library designed research assignment 28.6 Tutorials 18.3 Small group work 17.8

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Course Content and Outcomes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Most Important Skills and Topics

Important Skills and Topics Percentage Article searching 55.7 Evaluating sources 44.3 Search strategies (Boolean operators, key words, etc.) 34.4 Differences between scholarly and popular sources 31.2 Catalog searching 30.3 Topic exploration 15.9 Critical thinking 14.6 Citing sources 13.5

slide-24
SLIDE 24

How do students demonstrate to their instructor their knowledge of IL competencies?

56.6 40.4 34.2 22.8 22.6 21.9 4.7 10 20 30 40 50 60 Research paper Annotated bibliography Student presentation Pre-test/post-test Other Quizzes None Percentage Demonstrate Knowledge of IL

slide-25
SLIDE 25

How do students demonstrate to their instructor their knowledge of IL competencies?

56.6 40.4 34.2 22.8 22.6 21.9 4.7 10 20 30 40 50 60 Research paper Annotated bibliography Student presentation Pre-test/post-test Other Quizzes None Percentage Demonstrate Knowledge of IL

slide-26
SLIDE 26

How do students demonstrate to their instructor their knowledge of IL competencies - OTHER

  • Multiple responses across items
  • Faculty determine competencies
  • Worksheets and game
  • In class assignment
  • Reflective essay
  • Clicker quiz
  • Passing a tutorial
  • Website evaluation exercise
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Primary Learning Outcomes

59.8 50.8 31.6 29.2 26.5 15.3 14.0 7.1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Efficiently access information Evaluate information and sources critically Demonstrate familiarity with library services and the layout

  • f the library

Differentiate between scholarly, popular, primary, and secondary sources Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose Use information ethically and legally Determine the extent of the information need We do not have established learning

  • utcomes in

place Percentages Primary Learning Outcomes

slide-28
SLIDE 28

How is the IL Evaluated and Assessed

Student evaluations of library session(s) 37.4 Observation of student behavior or track anecdotal observations 32.9 Librarian analysis of assignments and/or bibliographies 28.2 Librarian survey of participating faculty members at the end of the course 24.3 Pretest/posttest design 20.0 Quiz/test 19.6 Student reflection on his/her own learning 18.9 End of course evaluations 18.5 Rubric 17.4 Other 14.8 Student evaluations of instructor 14.6 No evaluation or assessment is conducted 11.2 Standardized test (such as SAILS or iSkills) 6.7

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Implications and Discussion

slide-30
SLIDE 30

If 91.2 % of our participants integrate information literacy into some portion of their 1st year curriculum, what are the other 7.7% (39 institutions) doing? This merits further investigation.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Primary Information Literacy Course, Module, or Component Number Percentage Within an English course 143 32.1 Within a first-year seminar 136 30.6 Within another type of first-year course 52 11.7 Orientation session 41 9.2 Other 24 5.4 Within an independent information literacy course 16 3.6 Tutorials 13 2.9 Course management systems 6 1.4 Workshops as part of other campus units 6 1.4 Freshmen Interest Groups (FIGS) 2 0.5 Learning Community 2 0.5 Videos 2 0.5 Drop-in workshops sponsored by the library 1 0.2 One-on-one appointments with librarians outside of class 1 0.2 Podcasts 0.0

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Primary Instructional Methods

Instructional Methods Percentage Active learning exercises 61.7 Lecture 45.2 Orientation session(s) 31.6 Library designed research assignment 28.6 Tutorials 18.3 Small group work 17.8

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Most Important Skills and Topics

Important Skills and Topics Percentage Article searching 55.7 Evaluating sources 44.3 Search strategies (Boolean operators, key words, etc.) 34.4 Differences between scholarly and popular sources 31.2 Catalog searching 30.3 Topic exploration 15.9 Critical thinking 14.6 Citing sources 13.5

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Encouraging findings

  • Librarians are planning (88%) and delivering

(88.4%) IL component

  • Face to face delivery most often (55%)
  • Active learning exercises are being used most

frequently (61.7%)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Encouraging findings cont.

  • Evaluating sources is taught frequently (44.3%)

and is also a frequently stated learning

  • utcome (50.8%).
  • Accessing and Evaluating most frequent

Learning Outcomes addressed

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Findings that make us pause

  • The IL component is required of all first-year

students at only 47.5% of the institutions

  • Topic exploration (15.9%)
  • Citing sources (13.5%)
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Questions? Comments?

Primary presentation contact:

Debbie Malone Library Director DeSales University Debbie.malone@desales.edu