Supporting Distributed Relationships: A study of relations and media - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

supporting distributed relationships
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Supporting Distributed Relationships: A study of relations and media - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Supporting Distributed Relationships: A study of relations and media use over time Caroline Haythornthwaite Graduate School of Library and Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign haythorn@uiuc.edu IBICT , June 2009


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Supporting Distributed Relationships:

A study of relations and media use over time Caroline Haythornthwaite

Graduate School of Library and Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign haythorn@uiuc.edu IBICT, June 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Social Informatics of Elearning

In-Depth Study of Two Distributed E-Learning Classes

 Who talks to whom, about what, and via which

media?

 How does the configuration of work requirements and

media use affect who talks to whom, about what, and via which media?

 How does this configuration affect interactions among

members of such groups?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Distributed Environment

 Distance Program

 Master’s program for online learners  Initial face-to-face 2-week “boot camp”  All other courses completed at a distance  Students at a distance from campus and each other

 Internet-based instruction and interaction

 Lectures: Real-Audio and Chat  Homework & Assignments: Discussion Boards, Web

Pages, Email

 Group-wide communication: Discussion Boards, Chat  Person-to-person communication: Chat whispers,

Email, Phone

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Data Collection

Each month for three months, members of two classes were asked:

How often, over the last month, did you

1.

Collaborate on class work

2.

Exchange information or advice about class work

3.

Socialize

4.

Exchange emotional support

With each other member of the class and via each of the available media

Chat, Webboard, Email, Phone

At end of semester, also collected data on friendship

Friend (Close Friend, Friend) or Non-Friend (someone they worked with only, or just another member of the class)

Data were collected by phone. A student research assistant called each person and asked them the questions.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Different Class Structures

 Class F97

 Live lecture with Chat weekly  Bulletin board postings required weekly  Grading based on Group projects  14 members (13 participants)

 Class F98

 Live lecture with Chat weekly  Bulletin board -- used early but abandoned  Weekly exercises with different pairs of students

responsible for discussion each week

 Grading based on Individual projects  19 members (15 participants)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Social Networks Basics

Actors

 Nodes in the network  Interact and maintain

relations with each other

Relations

 Lines in the network  Connect actors in specific

kinds of interaction

Ties

 Lines between actors  Ties exist between actors

who are connected by one

  • r more relations

Networks

 Whole configuration of ties

and actors

Configurations of discussion board conversations in two online classes 2001 and 2002

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Analysis

 Social network analysis used to examine:

 The size of the personal networks in these classes

 How many people a class member reports

interacting with overall, and about each kind of relation

 How media were used to maintain social network ties  How friendship affected media use  Changes over time

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Friendship effects

 Friends talk to each other more frequently, about more

types of things (relations), and via more media

 Regression analysis shows frequency of communication

(log) is positively associated with the number of relations maintained and the number of media used in both classes. N Frequency Relations Media F97 Non-Friends 95 41.1 3.03 2.36 Friends 49 77.1 3.45 2.82

  • F98

Non-Friends 184 20.0 3.27 1.59 Friends 19 92.2 3.95 2.95 (N is the number of pairs) (Frequency of 60 is approximately once a day over the semester)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Average number of people students report talking to (their personal network size) and Mean frequency of communication by relation. Note: Friends communicate more about everything.

1 3 7 6 4 4 7 7 2 4 6 8 1 1 2 C W E I S O E S C W E I S O E S F 9 7 F 9 8 5 1 1 5 2 2 5 3 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 2 1 3

Yellow & Diamond=Non-Friends; White & Square=Friends

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Social Informatics of Elearning Average personal network size and Mean frequency of communication by medium Note: High email use by friends

6 7 3 1 2 9 1 9 2 4 6 8 1 1 2 1 4 I R C W e b b r d E m a i l P h

  • n

e I R C W e b b r d E m a i l P h

  • n

e F 9 7 F 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 4 2 1 1 1 1 1

Bottom & Diamond=Non-Friends; Top & Square=Friends

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Differentiation between Weak and Strong Ties

 Number of relations maintained and number of media

used increases with increasing frequency of communication

 “Media multiplexity”

 Media use conforms to a unidimensional scale

(Guttman scaling)

 (1) Chat + (2) Discussion + (3) Email + (4) Phone  Weaker ties (low frequency of communication)

 Use only the media required for class: Chat and

Discussion Boards

 Stronger ties (high frequencey of communication)

 Use class media + optional media: Email, Phone

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Changes Over Time: Relations

 In the first month, those who work together are those

who socialize together

This suggests socializing as pre-requisite or co-requisite for work relations

 From the first to the second month, network sizes and

range of relations increased

 From the second to the third month, network sizes and

range of relations decreased

This suggests a wider circulation of ideas, information, etc. during the second month

 Over time, individuals engaged with fewer people

with whom they maintained more relations, i.e., with stronger ties

F97: narrow to strong work relations

F98: narrow to those with whom they socialize

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Dual Pattern of Media Use

 Unidimensional scale showed that

 Required media connect weak ties  Optional media were added by those with stronger

work or social ties

 This shows

 (1) the type of medium selected by the instructor as

the required class medium has an effect on who talks to whom via which media

 (2) the type of tasks selected by the instructor as the

required class tasks has an effect on who maintains strong ties with whom, and thus also who talks to whom via which media

 Let’s look at some pictures …

slide-14
SLIDE 14

F97: Collaborative work via IRC and Email by Time

Chat Email

Group projects; Webboard also used for discussion, connected all to all.

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

F98: All communications, IRC and Email by Time

Chat Email

No group project; Rotating pairs for presentations; Webboard use started but abandoned in this class; it connected very few after abandonment

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Differences due to Class Structures

 Class F97

Semester-long projects created a focus on work-oriented relationships and thus increased the importance of work ties

Interactions, including socializing, became highly organized around project team members

 Class F98

Changing pairs of presenters did not provide an enduring basis for work-oriented relationships and individuals fell back on social ties

Relationships become those associated with socializing, built on non-work ties

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Conclusions

 Different organizational mandates lead to the formation of

Different bases for relationships (e.g., work or social)

Different social structures

Different media use

 Two patterns of interaction for groups …

Class-wide exchange of information

Task-focused work completion

 And two patterns of media use

Low frequency, group-wide exchanges with the class as a whole, supported through group-mandated media

Higher frequency, close-tie exchanges with team members and friends, supported through group media plus optional media

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Social Informatics of Elearning

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Recommendations

 Awareness of dual demands for support of weak and

strong tie exchanges

weak tie contact for exposure to new information, and new

  • thers with whom stronger relationships may be built

strong tie contact for completion of tasks, help in a crisis, interpersonal support

 Recognition of the impact of group-mandated means of

communication on group structures

creates a latent tie infrastructure through which weak ties can be initiated

forms group media use structures

 Recognition of the impact of group-mandated forms of

interaction on group structures

  • rganizational decisions also lay the groundwork for latent

and weak tie formation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The Social Informatics of Elearning

Recommendations

 Provide

 a variety of means and opportunities for

communication, including means for

 group-wide, public communication  person-to-person, private communication

 technical, social and organizational interventions

that promote

 group-wide sharing of information and resources  the growth of weak ties into stronger, self-

sustaining ties

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Social Informatics of Elearning

References

 Haythornthwaite, C. (2003). Supporting distributed

relationships: Social networks of relations and media use over time. Electronic Journal of Communication, 13(1). http://www.cios.org/getfile/haythorn_v13n1

 Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Exploring multiplexity:

Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17(3), 211-226.

 Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal

networks: Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media and Society, 2(2), 195-226.