Supplemental Watershed Plan for the Lower Gunnison Project Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

supplemental watershed plan for the lower gunnison
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Supplemental Watershed Plan for the Lower Gunnison Project Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Supplemental Watershed Plan for the Lower Gunnison Project Area Public Scoping Meeting Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver Durango Hotchkiss Idaho www.eroresources.com Introduction This project is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Supplemental Watershed Plan for the Lower Gunnison Project Area

Public Scoping Meeting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Introduction

This project is intended to streamline the NEPA disclosure, planning and project implementation for future federally-funded (e.g., NRCS, USBR) irrigation infrastructure improvements. The Environmental Assessment will disclose environmental benefits and potential impacts, and ensure all regulations are adhered to. The original Lower Gunnison Watershed Plan was completed in June, 2017. Additional projects seeking funding will be covered collectively in this Supplemental Plan-EA.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Funding Programs, Projects and the Colorado River District

Federal funds for irrigation infrastructure improvements: 1) Salinity control funds (US Bureau of Reclamation) 2) US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). For example, Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) funds, Watershed Flood Protection (PL-566), EQIP.

Different funding can be ‘leveraged’ For example – outside funding (state funding, ag funding, and NRCS/RCPP) can be used to assist a salinity piping project, where salinity content in the soil is not great enough to receive funding.

The Colorado River District coordinates different funding for the Lower Gunnison Basin, and has contracted with ERO Resources to conduct the analysis for this Supplemental Watershed Plan. This EA will build on robust analysis in the Watershed Plan-EA, completed in 2017.

The scoping period will identify projects throughout the project area, and include them in the Environmental Assessment, depending

  • n their

fundability/feasibility. The scoping period is also the time you can comment on issues of concern to the natural

  • r human environment.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Presentation Overview

1. Review the Supplemental Watershed Plan purpose, project areas, scoping and public involvement 2. Review examples of irrigation infrastructure improvements 3. Review potential issues and environmental effects 4. Discuss strategies for minimizing/avoiding impacts 5. Solicit irrigation infrastructure improvement projects 6. Public engagement, involvement and comments

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Supplemental Watershed Plan Purpose and Need

The purpose of improving and modernizing our agricultural infrastructure is to improve the way water is diverted, stored and delivered to crops. Comprehensively, water use efficiency projects can have a watershed level improvement on water quantity and quality, as well to enable increased crop productivity, soil health and better wildlife and fish habitat.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Map of Project Area

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Placeholder for Crawford map

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Placeholder for Bostwick Park map

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Public Scoping: June 15-July 14

Two purposes:

  • 1. Your input will aid our

understanding of issues that may result from the projects, so we can understand how to avoid or minimize the project impacts.

  • 2. We are using this scoping process

to “call for projects” within the watershed area to be included in the NEPA analysis.

Under NEPA, federal agencies must consider and disclose effects to both the human and natural environment during the Environmental Assessment (EA) process.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Process Overview and Discussion

1. Multiple interrelated processes 2. Different federal funding programs for irrigation infrastructure improvements 3. Addressing potential issues with environmental and cultural effects 4. Supplemental Watershed Plan Project timeline 5. We need you for plans, projects and comments

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Supplemental Watershed Plan: A programmatic approach to NEPA compliance

Working to “streamline” project clearance, we are exploring this approach (subject to agency coordination): 1. The Watershed Plan EA/Supplemental EA functions to disclose environmental effects at a “watershed level” 2. The NRCS could “Tier” their funding decision to the EA for smaller/minor projects or project changes; a memo to the NRCS file would document the project decision 3. Future specific projects within the watershed, would still undergo environmental planning and review as required by federal law, but a new EA would not be required. Additional clearance surveys may be needed for specific projects, depending on their location and design, to ensure compliance with federal laws including the Endangered Species Act, and the National Historic Preservation Act.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Typical project types

Collectively, these projects form a network of systems within each sub- watershed. Future projects (5 to 10 years out) can be included in this supplemental watershed plan. Reservoir storage improvements. Water storage can regulate pressure and capture water supplies, to optimize water delivery. Gate/diversion structure upgrades. Water flows can be accurately measured, and new control systems can be added, to assist with regulating flows remotely. Piping projects. Conversion of open, unlined, earthen water delivery systems (laterals, canals and ditches) to closed, pressurized pipe, with the addition of monitoring and control systems. SCADA Upgrades. Adding “smart” monitoring and control systems can benefit off-farm, near- farm and on-farm irrigation systems. For example, water delivery in pipes, can be driven by on-farm water demand.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

C4 Water Storage Project

Completed in 2020

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Effects from small water storage projects

  • Impacts within reservoir

footprint; inundation

  • Transition from upland to

wetland fringe vegetation

  • Visual changes to landscape,

and to historical features and cultural resources

  • Construction

disturbance/weed infestations

  • Changes to water flows
  • Water Conservation benefits
  • ther?

Example water storage facility on Oak Mesa

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Needlerock Diversion Gate Improvement

East of Crawford, completed in 2019

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Effects from gate/diversion structure improvements

  • Construction impacts within the

vicinity of the structure; timing to avoid impacts to nesting birds and other wildlife

  • Change to a historical resource
  • Weed infestation
  • Potential to change/impact

flows

  • Benefits to stream flows
  • Updates can provide fish

passage

  • Other?

Leroux Creek Diversion northwest of Hotchkiss

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Fire Mountain Canal Salinity Control Piping Project

Completed in 2020

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Effects from Lining/Piping projects

  • Construction impacts, noise,

access and staging (scale- dependent)

  • Visual changes to landscape

and to alterations to historical features/ cultural resources

  • Fringe wetland vegetation

transition to upland vegetation; shrub and tree loss

  • Effects to wildlife and birds
  • Changes to water flows
  • Weed infestations
  • Decreased loss due to seepage
  • Beneficial effects;
  • Other?

Open, unlined earthen ditch near Crawford

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Future SCADA sites

Crawford Water Conservancy District

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

SCADA Projects/effects

Environmental issues (construction disturbances) are expected to be very minor for these projects.

  • Effects to historic resources
  • Potential to affect wildlife
  • Water conservation; labor savings; other?
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Examples of Minimization/Avoidance Measures

Water flows and utility

  • Groundwater levels and wastewater

return flows may be affected by infrastructure improvements; related issues can be avoided or managed with engineering solutions; setting expectations for change among shareholders is important.

Soil and Vegetation Disturbance; Weeds

  • Disturbed areas can be limited to those

necessary to safely implement the proposed action

  • After construction, disturbed areas can

be recontoured and revegetated; weed control can be implemented

Public Safety, Access and Transportation

  • Ideally, staging areas close to the project

can be available in order to contain construction traffic

  • Access points, staging and schedule can

be coordinated with local towns and counties

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Examples of Minimization/Avoidance Measures

Wildlife, Including Raptors and Migratory Birds

  • Timing (winter construction) can prevent

impacts to migratory birds and raptors during the nesting season

  • Pre-construction surveys and buffers can

be used to minimize effects to wildlife

Cultural Resources

  • Conduct a survey and document

historical features present

  • Avoid sensitive sites during access and

construction

  • Irrigation features that carry cultural

value due to their history, can be preserved through public interpretation

Other issues include: Air and water quality, visual resources, and socioeconomic effects. Beneficial effects are expected.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Cultural Resource Impacts

Legacy of the west

  • The State Historic Preservation

Office (SHPO) would like to coordinate with the public, to consider how best to preserve history as the features change.

  • Mitigation measures will need to

be agreed upon with SHPO; measures that are meaningful to the community would be best! Photos and stories can be captured, and put on a website, for example.

  • Let us know if you would like to

be included in the meeting with SHPO.

Photo courtesy of Orval Cotton

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Tentative Project List (Partial) for Lower Gunnison Basin

Area Project name Crawford Grand View Canal lining project (440 feet, + 1.5 mile) Crawford Potential water storage project on the Grand View Canal Crawford Crawford reservoir feeder canal, SCADA measurement and controls North Fork Fire Mountain regulating reservoir, piping and SCADA Bostwick Park Fish Creek Reservoir outlet improvements Bostwick Park Cerro/Montrose Reservoir improvements & regulating use All 3 Areas SCADA Installations throughout

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Planning Phase

Lower Gunnison Supplemental Watershed Plan EA

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Call for scoping comments, projects

  • Your input regarding projects in each sub-watershed,

will ensure we have described the proposed action. Do we have all the projects included? Do you have a project you’d like to see covered?

  • Do you have concerns or issues we should consider

analyzing in the EA?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment Denver • Durango • Hotchkiss • Idaho www.eroresources.com

Comments, additional discussion, questions?

Scoping period ends July 14, 2020 Call for Projects: Shana Harness, Colorado River District, 970 381-0168 shanaharness1920@outlook.com Environmental Comments:

Cassandra Shenk, ERO, 970 872-3020, cshenk@eroresources.com

Thank you for participating!