supernova burst trigger studies in dune fd single phase
play

Supernova Burst Trigger Studies in DUNE FD Single Phase TPC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Supernova Burst Trigger Studies in DUNE FD Single Phase TPC Alexander Booth Collaboration Monthly Meeting. April 20, 2018 1 Overview Supernova burst time and energy profiles. Finding individual neutrino interactions - clustering


  1. Supernova Burst Trigger Studies in DUNE FD Single Phase TPC Alexander Booth Collaboration Monthly Meeting. April 20, 2018 1

  2. Overview • Supernova burst time and energy profiles. • Finding individual neutrino interactions - clustering algorithm. • Performance of a simple SN burst trigger - galactic coverage and fake rate. • DAQ requirements - time to record. 2

  3. Strategy & Assumptions 3 Fast ‘back of the envelope’ approach to establish broad features of DUNE’s ability and DAQ requirements to capture neutrinos from a SN. Many questions and assumptions still to be addressed. DESIGNED TO BE MODULAR: Background and Hit finder/ Burst trigger Astronomical SN models. noise models. hit clustering. design. models. • 1 specific supernova • 8 radiological backgrounds. • Number of events expected. model used. -Are there more? • Distribution of SN candidates - Hudepohl model. -Correct rates? in the galactic neighbourhood. - 11.2 solar mass • White noise. -Simple minded addition of progenitor. -Coherent noise? LMC to the distribution. • E ff ect of oscillations? • Not considered cosmics.

  4. Distribution of Supernovae 4 SN Probability Distribution Mirizzi, Raffelt & Serpico, astro-ph/0604300 0.06 Milky Way 0.05 Large Magellanic 0.04 Cloud 0.03 0.02 Empty space until 20 events Andromeda! (780 kpcs) 0.01 0 10000 events 800 events 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance, (kpc) Define ‘galactic neighbourhood’ as Milky Way + LMC We can reasonably consider issuing a burst trigger for SN in this region.

  5. Supernova Event Generator - MARLEY 5 Marley Time Profile, Event Normalised. First 50ms Marley Time Profile, Event Normalised. First 50ms 3 − 10 × 0.2 Events Events 0.09 Oscillations will suppress 0.18 the number of events in the 0.08 0.16 first 10 ms. 0.07 0.14 0.06 Events out to ~10 s in 0.12 current simulation. 0.05 0.1 0.04 0.08 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.02 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Time, (s) Energy, (MeV) Only nue-CC on Ar nucleus, Time, (tick) 220 7 individual 260 (~75% of total). events drawn on 200 240 1 event display 180 220 160 True primary lepton energy peaks 200 140 ~ 10 MeV. 180 120 100 160 80 1 channel ~ 0.5 cm, 1 tick ~ 0.08 cm 140 60 120 40 ‘Typical event’: 5 cm x 5 cm 100 20 80 0 9440 9450 9460 9470 9480 9490 9500 Charge Channel, (Channel No)

  6. Radiological Backgrounds 6 Simulation contains white noise and radiological backgrounds. In current simulations, backgrounds are dominated by radiologicals, not noise. Require a better understanding of these backgrounds. Source Notes Ar39 Intrinsic to LAr Ar42 Intrinsic to LAr Co60 APA frame Ur-238 in concrete Neutrons Po Simulates Rn daughters on PDs K40 CPA frame Kr85 LAr Rn222 LAr (contamination) Dominant background of burst trigger. https://www.overleaf.com/13924050chkrxfmktthr#/53974837/

  7. Clustering Individual SN Neutrinos 7

  8. Clustering Algorithm 8 Takes channel ordered hits from a hit finder (currently Gauss hit). CLUSTER IN CHANNEL AND TIME SPACE • Hits ordered sequentially by channel. Walk along the wires looking for hits on adjacent channels. • Within these channel cluster, group hits close in time. • Cut on total ADC sum of the hits in the cluster, minimum number of channels in a cluster or cluster width . • Finally require a certain number of hits in a cluster. Channel 1 7 2 3 4 8 9 10 5 6 Require > 3 1 X X X 2 hits. Time X X 3 4 X X CLUSTER 5 6 X NO CLUSTER 7 X 8 X 9 It’s fast: Given the assumptions e.g. an ordered list of hits was provided, the clustering for 10kt could be run on a single CPU. https://indico.fnal.gov/event/16859/contribution/1/material/slides/0.pdf

  9. E ffi ciency & Background Rates 9 Efficiency 1 Smaller clusters More background 0.8 Larger clusters Less 0.6 background Efficiency & 10kt Background Rate Eff: 0.91, Bkgd: 19.11Hz 0.4 Eff: 0.88, Bkgd: 5.81Hz Eff: 0.86, Bkgd: 3.87Hz Eff: 0.81, Bkgd: 1.66Hz 0.2 Eff: 0.70, Bkgd: 0.43Hz Eff: 0.58, Bkgd: 0.10Hz 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 True Neutrino Energy, (MeV) Input to burst trigger: Di ff erent clustering algorithms allow the trade o ff between lower e ffi ciency and background rate to be explored.

  10. Supernova Burst Trigger Clustering e ffi ciency & SN / radiological / Burst background acceptance Hit-clustering trigger noise simulations di ff erent clustering configurations 10

  11. SN Burst Trigger 11 Unique signatures of SN burst: • Events spread out over a long time (exponential cooling of SN with 2-3 second decay time). • Events typically higher energy than background. Strategy: keep it very simple for now. • Count the number of hit-clusters in a 10 second window. • Trigger above a threshold number of hit-clusters. Fake triggers: • Use background rate from clustering algorithm, assume it fluctuates in Gaussian way. • Can map out burst-trigger rate as a function of threshold number of hit- clusters.

  12. Result: Galactic Neighbourhood Coverage 12 Assuming a fake burst trigger rate of 1/month, what is our SN sensitivity vs. distance? Galactic Neighbourhood Coverage, Fake Trigger Rate 1/Month Galactic Neighbourhood Coverage, Fake Trigger Rate 1/Month Efficiency x SN Probability 1 − 10 Milky Way 2 − 10 Galaxy edge, harder Close SN, easy to trigger 3 − to trigger 10 4 − LMC 10 − 5 10 Require larger 6 Individual Marley Efficiency & 10kt Background Rate − 10 clusters to Eff: 0.91, Bkgd: 19.11Hz Eff: 0.88, Bkgd: 5.81Hz increase Eff: 0.86, Bkgd: 3.87Hz Eff: 0.81, Bkgd: 1.66Hz sensitivity 7 − 10 Eff: 0.70, Bkgd: 0.43Hz Eff: 0.58, Bkgd: 0.10Hz SN Probability 8 − 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 SN Distance, (kpc) Conclusion: can trigger on nearby SN easily. However, capturing the 1/5 of SN coming from LMC requires more work and is more dependent on our assumptions (e.g. hard to model neutron bkg).

  13. Result: Fake Trigger Rate vs. Galactic 13 Previous slide required 1/month fake trigger rate. This slide shows trade o ff between e ffi ciency and this rate. 10 Fake Trigger Rate, (Hz) Individual Marley Efficiency & 10kt Background Rate 1 Eff: 0.91, Bkgd: 19.11Hz Eff: 0.88, Bkgd: 5.81Hz 1 − 10 Eff: 0.86, Bkgd: 3.87Hz Eff: 0.81, Bkgd: 1.66Hz 2 − 10 Eff: 0.70, Bkgd: 0.43Hz Eff: 0.58, Bkgd: 0.10Hz 3 − 10 4 − 10 − 5 10 1/Month 6 − 10 7 − 10 8 − 10 − 9 10 10 − 10 11 − 10 12 − 10 13 − 10 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 Galactic Neighbourhood Coverage Trigger on 98% of SN in the neighbourhood, issuing 1 fake trigger per month. In 10 kT

  14. Time Profile Studies 14

  15. Time Profile Studies 15 Time Since First Neutrino Passed Through Detector, (s) High data rate: 1.5 TB / s / 10kt module Closer SN, longer time. 10 Extract maximal information. < 1.00 Events Remaining 1 < 0.50 Events Remaining Further SN, < 0.20 Events Remaining 1 Coverage less time. < 1.00 Events Remaining < 0.05 Events Remaining < 0.50 Events Remaining 2 1 10 10 0.8 Supernova Distance, (kpc) < 0.20 Events Remaining Record all < 0.05 Events Remaining but 1 event 0.6 in ~ 28 s, any GNSN. 0.4 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Recording Length, (s) Establish DAQ requirements: Non-volatile bu ff er (read-out time). Time profile studies potentially very sensitive to SN model.

  16. Summary 16 Applied a fast ‘back of the envelope’ approach to establish broad features of DUNE’s ability and DAQ requirements to capture neutrinos from a SN. BURST TRIGGER: • Reasonable to consider issuing a burst trigger for SN in the region of the Milky Way and LMC . • In simulation shown that radiologicals are the dominant background . • Demonstrated a simple burst trigger capable of catching 98% of supernovae in the galactic neighbourhood , issuing on average 1 fake trigger 1/month . TIME PROFILE STUDIES • Shape of profile is model dependent , e.g. with/without oscillations. • Studies influence DAQ requirements. • Record all but 1 event of any galactic neighbourhood SN in ~28s . Many questions and assumptions still to be ironed out.

  17. Backup Slides 17

  18. Analysis Details 18 GOAL: Understand supernova triggering e ffi ciencies and corresponding background rates for di ff erent levels of trigger. • Using an amended version of the DAQSimAna (M. Baird, K. Warburton) module in dunetpc (DAQSimAna/SNAnaClustering/SNAna_module.cc). • Running on files produced at Christmas, SN+radiologicals+white noise. • Non-compressed, ~ 750000 events each of 1 drift window and containing 1 MARLEY neutrino per event. Include Ar42. 1x6x2 geometry . /pnfs/dune/scratch/dunepro/MCC10-Production/SuperNovaSamples/v06_60_00/reco/ snb_timedep_radio_dune10kt_1x2x6 • Gauss hit finder to pick out hits. All collection plane. Save hit primitives such as hit time, ADC sum of hit, hit RMS etc. • Backtrack each of these hits to a generator - was it radiological/noise/ supernova. Cluster hits in channel and time space, make geometric cuts, trigger on number of hits in the cluster.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend