superbubble feedback
play

Superbubble Feedback in Galaxy Formation Ben Keller (McMaster - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Superbubble Feedback in Galaxy Formation Ben Keller (McMaster University) James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman Paper: astro-ph/1405.2625 (Accepted MNRAS) Keller, Wadsley, Benincasa & Couchman 2014 Background Image:


  1. Superbubble Feedback in Galaxy Formation Ben Keller (McMaster University) James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman Paper: astro-ph/1405.2625 (Accepted MNRAS) Keller, Wadsley, Benincasa & Couchman 2014 Background Image: High-resolution simulation of Milky Way like galaxy using superbubble feedback. Outflows with entrained cold clouds can be observed.

  2. Stellar Feedback: Motivation • Feedback from Massive stars: metals, energy, momentum through Winds, UV, SN II • FB regulates star formation, ISM structure FB-driven Galactic winds: • Remove gas from disk, enrich IGM with metals • Set final stellar mass M82 Image: HST, NASA/ESA

  3. Superbubble Feedback: Motivation • Massive star formation highly correlated in time and space • Typical star cluster ~ 10,000 M ʘ forms in ~10 pc over < 1 Myr  Stellar Feedback highly correlated  Natural unit of feedback is a superbubble combining feedback of 100+ massive stars N70 Superbubble LMC Image: ESO D 100 pc Age: 5 Myr v ~ 70 km/s Driver: OB assoc. 1000+ stars

  4. Super bubble features Classic model: • Stellar winds + supernovae shock and thermalize in bubble • Negligible Sedov-phase • Mechanical Luminosity L=10 34 erg/s/M ʘ • Much more efficient than individual SN (e.g. Stinson 2006 Blastwave feedback model ) MacLow & McCray 1988, Weaver+ 1977, Silich+ 1996

  5. Super bubble features Limiting factor: Radiative Cooling of bubble determined by bubble temperature ~ E th /M b and density M b /R 3 Hot bubble mass (M b ) set by thermal conduction rate into bubble MacLow & McCray 1988, Weaver+ 1977, Silich+ 1996

  6. Modeling Superbubbles 1. Key physics: Thermal Conduction Without conduction bubble mass = ejecta mass 2. Evaporation resulting from conduction – hard to resolve directly 3. Low resolution, early bubble stages: M b < M particle – need to avoid overcooling

  7. 1. Thermal Conductivity  E 7 T  5 / 2        ( T ) 6 10 (cgs) Cond Cond  t • Self regulating Energy flux ~ T 7/2 /R (T > 10 5 K) • Flux limited by electron speeds (Cowie & McKee 1977) • Note: κ reduced by 3-5 by Magnetic Fields • For sharp temperature contrast, drives evaporative mass flux from cold into hot gas

  8. 2. Evaporation • Evaporation front width < 0.1 pc ! Subgrid model: • Based on MacLow & McCray 1988 rate estimate   M 16 5 / 2   b • SPH implemention: T 0  Stochastically evaporate t 25 k particles into hot bubble from b cold shell • Applied for T > 10 5 K particles • Regulates bubble temperature

  9. 3. Low Resolution : Subgrid Hot Phase • For a poorly resolved bubble, M b < M particle for the early stages • Temporary 2-phase particle while injection/conduction grows mass of bubble phase • No numerical/resolution related overcooling • Feedback-heated particles briefly contain 2 phases in pressure equilibrium, with separate densities and temperatures – Each cools independently.

  10. Implementation : Gasoline • N-body Solver (Tree Method) and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics • Physics: Gravity, Hydrodynamics, Atomic Chemistry (Radiative Heating, Cooling), Radiative Transfer (Woods et al, in prep) • Subgrid Physics: Star Formation, Turbulent Diffusion Wadsley+ 2004

  11. High Resolution Superbubble Simulation

  12. Mass loading • Bubble mass, temperature regulated: Match Silich+ 1996 Mass loading For 3x10 38 erg/s Feedback

  13. Test 30,000 M ʘ cluster: 3 cases Keller+ 2014 Direct Injection : Resolved stellar ejecta mass, no subgrid required (M particle =760 M ʘ at 128 3 ), conduction + evaporation Superbubble : conduction, evaporation + subgrid Simple Feedback : A non-cooling phase with conversion time 5 Myr to cooling form (cf. Agertz+ 2013)

  14. Bubble Momentum + Hot Mass Bubble Momentum Hot Bubble Mass Keller+ 2014 Time (Myr) • Simple Model resolution sensitive • Superbubble Model still works with a 1 particle bubble (32 3 case)

  15. Galaxy Tests Similar to Dalla Vecchia & Schaye (2012) -- MW analogue (M gas ~ 10 9 M ʘ N gas = 10 5 ) & Dwarf Keller+ 2014

  16. MW Analogue: Temperature & Column Density

  17. MW & Dwarf Star Formation • Star formation rates regulated. Bursty as expected in dwarf • Higher mass loading • Outflow evolution similar to Dalla Vecchia & Schaye 2012 • Note: dwarf has low surface density • Kennicutt-Schmidt law Keller+ 2014 matched

  18. Galaxies: SFR & Outflows Outflow Rate & SFR Outflow Velocity Milky Way Time (Myr) Time (Myr) Dwarf Keller+ 2014

  19. Temperature-Density Phase space No gas in short cooling time region Keller+ 2014 Particles split into cold dense + hot rarefied phases Rapidly become hot, single phase – evolve adiabatically

  20. Summary • Superbubble is relevant scale for stellar feedback in galaxies • Thermal conduction is dominant physical process in superbubble evolution • Taking this into account gives you a powerful model for feedback: – Separating Cold & Hot phases in unresolved superbubble prevents overcooling – Feedback can be continuous, multi-source – Feedback gas doesn’t persist in unphysical phases – Star formation is strongly regulated, winds are driven with realistic mass loadings • Read the Paper: – astro-ph/1405.2625 (Accepted MNRAS) – Keller, Wadsley, Benincasa & Couchman 2014

  21. Stellar Feedback Budget • UV & Radiation Starburst ‘99 Erg per M ʘ Energy Injection Rate (log10 erg/s/M ʘ ) pressure disrupt dense clouds Bolometric Luminosity – Denser gas (>10 4 H/cc) Winds dispersed, star formation cut off Supernovae Type II • SN II and stellar winds UV Steady 10 34 erg/s/M ʘ Time (years) for ~ 40 Myr

  22. Super bubbles: Vishniac Instabilities Nirvana simulations Theory: Vishniac 1983 3 star bubble Sims: McLeod & Whitworth 2013, Krause et al 2013 Nayakshin+ 2012 (AGN)

  23. Super bubbles: X-Ray Observations • X-Ray luminosity highly Chu 2008 variable over space, time • Very few observations, large scatter in observed L X • Leaking of interior, B- field amplification in shell may explain some reduced luminosities (see Rosen+ 2014) Krause+ 2014

  24. Clumpy medium

  25. Clumpy Medium • Some changes in bubble mass/momentum • Agreement with direct model still good

  26. Reduced Conduction & Magnetic Fields • Conduction suppressed across magnetic field lines • 100x reduction in conduction rate κ 0 results in only factor of ~2 reduction in M b

  27. Multiphase Properties • Median time as mixed-phase particle < 5 Myr

  28. Cosmological Galaxy (now z=2) Coming Soon… • ~ 10 11 Msun halo • So far on track for reasonable M *

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend