OK GLASS HOW NERVOUS AM I? REAL-TIME FEEDBACK IN ROWING EXAMPLE : - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ok glass
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

OK GLASS HOW NERVOUS AM I? REAL-TIME FEEDBACK IN ROWING EXAMPLE : - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OK GLASS HOW NERVOUS AM I? REAL-TIME FEEDBACK IN ROWING EXAMPLE : FEEDBACK ON POWER LOSS DUE TO VELOCITY FLUCTUATIONS Lotte Lintmeijer CONTENT Project: the bigger picture Background Aim Feedback Power


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HOW NERVOUS AM I?

“OK GLASS”

slide-2
SLIDE 2

EXAMPLE : FEEDBACK ON POWER LOSS DUE TO VELOCITY FLUCTUATIONS

REAL-TIME FEEDBACK IN ROWING

Lotte Lintmeijer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

CONTENT

3

Ø Project: “the bigger picture”

Ø Background Ø Aim Ø Feedback Ø Power equation

Ø Example: “feedback on power loss”

Ø Aim of the study Ø Methods Ø Results Ø Conclusions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“THE BIGGER PICTURE

PROJECT

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

BACKGROUND

5

Previous research on influence of feedback on performance

Ø Motor learning

Ø In lab Ø Simple tasks Ø Novices

Ø Biomechanics

Ø New feedback technologies Ø Quantifying movement patterns

Ø Multi-disciplinary focus is required

(Bron: Philips et al.,2013)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

AIM OF THE PROJECT

Main Goal:

Ø Support coaches and rowers with

effective feedback in order to

  • ptimize performance

Ø Insight in the power equation Ø Development of effective feedback tools

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK

7

Criteria for effective feedback (tools)

Ø A key to improve performance Ø Able to be adapted by the athlete Ø Measured valid and reliable

(Bron: Philips et al.,2013)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK PARAMETERS IN ROWING:

8

Kinematics as key variable: Is there a golden standard?

(Bron: Kleshnev, 2004)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK PARAMETERS:

9

Force curves as key variable: is there an optimum?

Bron: M. Hofmijster

A B C

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK PARAMETERS:

10

Dutch National Champion A ‘random’ Amateur A World Champion

Bron: M. Hofmijster

A B C

Force curves as key variable: is there an optimum?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK PARAMETERS:

11

Force

Force should be related to velocity

Force x velocity = Power (Watt)

Pathlete= key variable for performance

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK PARAMETERS: POWER EQUATION

12

Pathlete = - (Pdrag + Pblade+ P ∆V )

Effective Waste

Velocity fluctuations in rowing

Ø Large moving mass Ø No constant propulsion Ø More fluctuations is a need of more

power input for the same average speed

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK PARAMETERS: POWER EQUATION

13

Advantages

Ø Force and velocity combined Ø Effect of the technique of rower visible Ø Search for Optimal trade-off

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

FEEDBACK PARAMETERS: POWER EQUATION

14

Key parameter (criteria 1) Adjustable (criteria 2) Measurable (criteria 3)

Pathlete

√ √

Pdrag

√ ?

Pblade

? ?

P∆V

? √

slide-15
SLIDE 15

“THE EFFECT OF FEEDBACK ON POWER LOSSES DUE TO VELOCITY FLUCTUATIONS”

EXAMPLE STUDY

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

EXAMPLE STUDY: AIM OF THE STUDY

Ø Aim:

Ø Examining whether rowers could adjust

their behavior due to feedback on P∆V

Ø Main Question:

Ø Is real-time feedback on velocity

fluctuations as effective in minimizing power losses as traditional coaching?

Ø Performance parameter: P∆V Ø Feedback parameter: P∆V

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

EXAMPLE STUDY: REAL-TIME FEEDBACK

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

EXAMPLE STUDY: METHODS

Ø Feedback and outcome parameter:

Ø P∆V : Power loss due to velocity fluctuations

1 week 1 week

PP

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

EXAMPLE STUDY: RESULTS

5 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,8 6 6,2 6,4 6,6 6,8 7 pretest posttest Power loss

Power loss during pretest and posttest with real-time feedback

Responders (3 pp) Non-responders (4 pp) Counter-Responders (2 pp)

  • 1. Visual FB was rated

with a 7

  • 2. Auditive FB was

rated with a 5.1

  • 3. No change in P∆V
  • 4. No difference

between effect of coach and effect of real-time feedback

  • 5. Descriptives show

individual differences

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

EXAMPLE STUDY: CONCLUSIONS

20

Criteria

Ø P∆v as a key parameter Ø Adjustable for rowers? Ø Measurable?

Controlled field study

Ø Required Ø But time consuming Ø Noise

Next steps

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences

QUESTIONS?

21

More information: www.rowingscience.nl