Super-Kamiokande Roger Wendell, Duke University NNN 2010 Toyama, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Super-Kamiokande Roger Wendell, Duke University NNN 2010 Toyama, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Super-Kamiokande Roger Wendell, Duke University NNN 2010 Toyama, Japan The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration 1 Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan 19 Niigata University, Japan From PRD81, 2 RCCN,
1 Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan 2 RCCN, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan 3 IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan 4 Boston University, USA 5 Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA 6 University of California, Irvine, USA 7 California State University, Dominguez Hills, USA 8 Chonnam National University, Korea 9 Duke University, USA 10 Gifu University, Japan 11 University of Hawaii, USA 12 Kanagawa, University, Japan 13 KEK, Japan 14 Kobe University, Japan 15 Kyoto University, Japan 16 Miyagi University of Education, Japan 17 STE, Nagoya University, Japan 18 SUNY, Stony Brook, USA 19 Niigata University, Japan 20 Okayama University, Japan 21 Osaka University, Japan 22 Seoul National University, Korea 23 Shizuoka University, Japan 24 Shizuoka University of Welfare, Japan 25 Sungkyunkwan University, Korea 26 Tokai University, Japan 27 University of Tokyo, Japan 28 Tsinghua University, China 29 Warsaw University, Poland 30 University of Washington, USA
From PRD81, 092004 (2010)
~120 collaborators 31 institutions, 6 countries
Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain (Nov.2008~)
The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration
Inner detector (ID) ~11,146 50 cm PMTs ~ 2ns timing resolution Outer detector (OD) 1,885 20 cm PMTs 50 kton water Cherenkov detector 22.5 kton fiducial volume Depth of 2700 m.w.e cosmic ray background ~3 Hz Roughly ~10 Solar ν events ~10 Atmospheric ν per day Multi-purpose detector: (this talk) Solar neutrinos Supernova neutrinos ( Relic SN's ) Atmospheric neutrinos Nucleon decay Beam neutrinos: K2K, T2K ( R. Wilson, today) Exotic particles
Super-Kamiokande Super-Kamiokande
Super-K : Generations
SK-1/3/4 SK-2
Analyses Analyses Data Update
SK-IV Upgraded DAQ system SK-IV Upgraded DAQ system
New
Electronics
(QBEE) Readout (Ethernet) Periodic trigger
(17µ sec x 60kHz)
Clock Event build with variable time windows
SK-I,II,III: partial data above threshold were read (1.3µ sec window x3kHz) SK-IV: All hits are read, then apply complex triggers by software.
Collect all hits every 17µ sec .
PMT
signals
Typical event time windows: Super-Low-Energy (SLE) events (<~6.5MeV): -0.5/+1.0µ sec Normal events(>~6.5MeV): -5/+35µ sec Supernova Relic ν (SRN) candidates(>~10MeV, No OD): -5/+535µ sec T2K events: -512/+512µ sec at T2K beam spill timing
high rate (~3kHz) decay electrons neutrons
Wider dynamic range for charge measurement of each channel (>2000pC) No dead time up to ~6MHz/10sec for Supernova burst neutrinos Apply precise event reconstruction to remove more low-e BG events in real-time Precise analysis in parallel in real-time
x5 x100 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 (2010) 428
T2K GPS from J-PARC
Solar Neutrinos
Introduction to Recent Solar and SN Introduction to Recent Solar and SN ν ν Developments Developments
SK-IV solar ν data, new 8B flux measurement SK-I + II + III Oscillation Fits 2- and 3-Flavor Updated Supernova Relic Neutrino analysis
This talk
Neutron Tagging in SK-IV , Poster by H. Zhang Supernova burst DAQ system, Poster by T. Yokozawa Status of SK Gadolinium R&D project, Poster by A. Kibayashi Search for GUT Monopoles, Poster by K.Ueno
Ee = 9.1MeV cosθ sun = 0.95
Energy: 14% Vertex: 87cm Direction: 26o SK-I Energy: 14% Vertex: 55cm Direction: 23o SK-III
- Timing information
vertex position
- Ring pattern
direction
- Number of hit PMTs
energy ~6hit / MeV (SK-I, III, IV)
OD ID (color: time) (software improvement)
Typical Low Energy Event Typical Low Energy Event
Resolutions:
SK-IV Flux 2.28±0.04 (106/cm2/s)
SK-III official:1 2.32±0.04±0.05 (106/cm2/s)
Preliminary
SK-IV SK-IV 8
8B Flux
B Flux 567 days
BLACK: SK3 RED : SK4
Events/day/kton/bin
Fluxes in SK-IV are consistent with those from SK-III
- SK-IV data looks good so analysis under way
- Following oscillation analyses are for SK-I+II+III
SK SK-I 1496 days, spectrum 5.0-20MeV + D/N : E ≥ 5.0MeV SK-II 791 days, spectrum 7.0-20MeV + D/N : E ≥ 7.5MeV SK-III 548 days, spectrum 5.0-20.0MeV + D/N : E ≥ 5.0MeV SNO CC flux (Phase-I & II & III) NC flux (Phase-III & LETA combined) ( = 5.14±0.2 × 106cm-2s-1) Day/Night asymmetry (Phase-I & II) Radiochemical : Cl, Ga Ga rate: 66.1+/-3.1 SNU (All Ga global) , PRC80, 015807(2009) Cl rate: 2.56+/-0.23 , Astrophys. J. 496 (1998) 505 Borexino
7Be rate: 48 +/- 4 cpd/100tons, PRL101, 091302(2008)
KamLAND : 2008
8B spectrum : Winter(2006)
Oscillation Analysis Data Set and Inputs Oscillation Analysis Data Set and Inputs
Items in red are updates since the analysis presented in PRD78 , 032002 (2008)
Global Data
Two-Flavor analysis of SK-I+II+III w/ Flux Constraint Two-Flavor analysis of SK-I+II+III w/ Flux Constraint
Min χ2 = 48.8 ∆m2 = 6.1×10-5 eV2 tan2θ = 0.48 ΦB8 = 0.89× ΦB8,SSM
95% C.L.
* 8B rate is constrained by the SNO (NCD + LETA) Neutral Current Flux LMA
- nly
Add in global and KamLAND Solar global Solar+KamLAND
Min χ2 = 57.7 ∆m2 = 7.6×10-5 eV2 tan2θ = 0.44 ΦB8 = 0.89× ΦB8,SSM
Solar Global + KamLAND Preliminary
Solar global KamLAND Solar+KamLAND
Three-Flavor Analysis ( including SK-I+II+III ) Three-Flavor Analysis ( including SK-I+II+III )
68, 95, 99.7% C.L. Sin2θ 13=0.025+0.18
- 0.16 ( < 0.059 at 95%C.L.)
Solar Global + KamLAND
sin2θ 13=0.06 @95%C.L.
Solar Global
In both fits best θ13 is small but consistent with 0
- arXiv:1010.0118
Preliminary
Supernova Relic Neutrinos
Supernova Relic Neutrino Search Supernova Relic Neutrino Search
Look for these Ando , NJP 6 (2004) 170
Supernova explosions occurred commonly throughout the history of the universe
- Expect a diffuse ν flux
Measurement of diffuse flux ⇒ galactic evolution, matter distribution in the universe
- Current limit , 1.2 / cm2 / s at 90% C.L. SK-I Malek et al. PRL 90, 061101 (2003)
Solar neutrinos are a considerable background at low energies
Large background from solar Neutrinos Spallation, Atmosheric ν , also background
Search for inverse beta decay interactions 16 < Ee+ < 80 MeV
Improved SN Relic Search in Improved SN Relic Search in SK-I+II+III
ν
e
e +
p n
(invisible)
Signal Events
42 o
μ, π Low angle events
25-45o
Isotropic Events
ν N ν
reconstructed angle near 90o
Update of the Inverse-beta decay cross-section (overall decrease)
- Strumia-Vissani PLB 564 (2003) 42
Use Poisson probability based likelihoods during fitting Improvements to data selection
- Change in Cherenkov angle cut (next slide)
- Spallation and solar angle cuts
Neutral current Elastic Scattering
Each of these categories has a different Cherenkov angle distribution
Efficiency was 58% in SK-I now: 78% (SK-I ) 69% (SK-II) 77% (SK-III)
After the event selection there are 3 Types of events remaining
Preliminary
Cherenkov Angle ° low region (μ / π) signal region
isotropic region (NC)
Cherenkov Angle °
MC
- ATM. νe CC
μ/π NC elastic
SN Relic Fitting in SN Relic Fitting in SK-I+II+III
Remaining events populate different regions of the distribution
- Previous analysis selected 37° < θc < 50°
- Fit the backgrounds outside of the signal region simultaneously to better
constrain their contribution in the overlap (Three regions)
20-38 degrees (low region) 38-50 degrees 78-90 degrees (NC ES region) E (MeV)
data Relic* all BG νμ CC νe CC NC elastic μ/π > C. thr.
Supernova Relic Neutrino Fit , Supernova Relic Neutrino Fit , SK-I+II+III
E (MeV) E (MeV)
Combined fit shows good agreement in both the signal and non-signal regions
* Ando , NJP 6 (2004) 170 Preliminary
combined 90% c.l.: < 5.1 ev / yr / 22.5 ktons interacting < 2.7 /cm2/s (>16 MeV) < 1.9 /cm2/s (scaled to >18 MeV)
combined 90% c.l. ev/yr in 22.5 ktons l
- g
L i k e l i h
- d
SK-I+II+III combined likelihood
Supernova Relic Neutrino Fit Supernova Relic Neutrino Fit
SK-I SK-II SK-III combined
ev/yr in 22.5 ktons
SK-I alone fit prefers almost no signal SK-II and SK-III Fits allow more relic ν Slightly larger than published limit
Preliminary
/cm2/s >18 MeV
Published limit 1.2 cross section update to Strumia-Vissani 1.2 → 1.4 Gaussian statistics → Poissonian statistics in fit 1.4 → 1.9 New SK-I Analysis: ETHRESH 18 → 16 MeV ε = 52% →78 % (small statistical correlation in samples) improved fitting method takes into account NC 1.9→1.6 New SK-I/II/III combined fit 1.6 → 1.9
Comparison With Published Limit , Comparison With Published Limit , SK-I Analysis Change
Preliminary
Atmospheric ν
Roughly νe : νµ ~ 1:2
Introduction to Recent Atmospheric Neutrino Updates Introduction to Recent Atmospheric Neutrino Updates
» SK-IV Data » Oscillation Analyses Using SK-I+II+III » Update to the search oscillation induced τ-neutrinos » Searches for Rare particles and processes (nucleon decay)
SK-IV Atmospheric Neutrino Data SK-IV Atmospheric Neutrino Data
Sub-GeV e-like Multi-GeV e-like Multi-GeV µ-like Partially Contained
» SK-IV Data look good, consistent with SK-III » No oscillation result yet, but analyses are
coming
- Oscillations already appearing
Remainder of the Talk will concentrate on SK-I+II+III unless otherwise noted
Unoscillated SK-IV MC
Preliminary
Zenith angle & lepton momentum distributions : SK-I+II+III Zenith angle & lepton momentum distributions : SK-I+II+III
M-like samples show large deficits in the upward- going bins that are well described by oscillations Live time: SK-I 1489d (FCPC) 1646d (Upmu) SK-II 799d (FCPC) 827d (Upmu) SK-III 518d (FCPC) 636d (Upmu) µ -like e-like momentum ν µ–ν τ oscillation (best fit) null oscillation
Global Picture of Oscillations Agrees Global Picture of Oscillations Agrees
Experiments are in good agreement about these oscillations SK Data disfavor other types of disappearance strongly, sterile ν ~7σ We should look for oscillation induced ντ appearance!
SK Zenith Analysis (1σ) ∆m23
2 = 2.11 +0.11 -0.19 ×10-3 eV2
sin2 2θ23 > 0.96 ( 90% C.L.) SK L/E Analysis (1σ) ∆m23
2 = 2.19 +0.14 -0.13 ×10-3 eV2
sin2 2θ23 > 0.96 ( 90% C.L.)
Induced by θ13 + solar terms Induced by θ13
P( νµ → νe )
Three-Flavor Oscillations in Matter Three-Flavor Oscillations in Matter
Solar Terms Matter Driven Interference term sensitive to δ cp
» Presence of electrons in the Earth
alter the neutrino ineraction potential and induce additional νµ → νe
- scillations
» Higher energy , 2-10 GeV, (anti-)
neutrinos experience resonant enhanced transitions, for normal (inverted) hierarchy
» Lower energy oscillations, < 1GeV ,
are moderated by octant of θ23
Simultaneously considering all of these effects gives sensitivity to many of the remaining questions on oscillation physics...
Full Three-Flavor Oscillation Analysis, Full Three-Flavor Oscillation Analysis, Normal Hierarchy
SK-I+II+III 99% SK-I+II+III 90% SK-I+II+III 68%
» No Strong preference for either hierarchy (∆χ2 = 1.6) » θ13 is consistent with zero and the Chooz limit » No preference for θ23 octant or δcp
Chooz Exclusion region
Poster by M. Lee
Preliminary
e
- r
- r
h a d r
- n
s
Energy Threshold: 3.5 GeV
Hadron
SK-I MC
ντ Events at Super-K
» Complicated event topology
complicate identification of the leading lepton
- Use a Neural Network procedure
» Many light producing
particles
» Most events are deep
inelastic scattering interactions GOAL : Observe ντ events in the atmospheric data How inconsistent is the “no appearance” hypothesis?
» Many light producing
particles
» Most events are deep
inelastic scattering interactions
» Negligible primary flux
- Observed tau events would be
- scillation induced
Update Fitting Technique
» Use an un-binned two-dimensional likelihood fit to extract the most from the data » Previous analysis ( PRD 2006 ) fit only in one dimension
- Events with NN output > 0.5 in this plot
» Tau and Background events appear in dramatically different regions of the plot
- The signal appears exclusively in the upward-going direction
BKG
τ-like BKG-like
θ13 BKG would be here
Neural Network and Fitting
NN
» 7 variables in NN : Fraction of energy in leading ring, number of decay electrons ,
number of ring fragments, visible energy, leading ring's PID, distance to decay-e
» Neural Network is good at separating signal from background » DIS events appear τ-like because of their many out-going particles
- To account for this we fit for the fraction of DIS events constrained to an
uncertainty of 10%
Signal Check output with downward-going data
downward-going
τ-like events (NN > 0.5) SK-I+II+II SK-I+II+II
Fit Results
Background Signal Result α β SK-I 0.96 SK-II 0.96 SK-III 0.94 SK-I+II+III 1.5 ± 0.48 1.67 ± 0.62 2.36 ± 0.77 0.94 ± 0.02 1.63 ± 0.35 DIS γ 1.10 ± 0.05
Fitting Error only
» Tau signal clearly appears in upward-
going region
» DIS fits to +1 σ » τ normalization fit is 1.63 × expectation
Fitted τ Excess Atm ν BKG MC
If no τ appearance , β = 0 Preliminary
Systematic Errors
E x p e c t ν ντ Observed ντ
» Flux : Up/down Ratio , Horizontal/Vertical
Ratio, K/p ratio
» X-Sec: NC / CC Ratio » Detector: Up/Down Energy Calib. Asymm » Oscillation Paramaters: Atm. 1σ region
0 < θ13 < Chooz
» Atmospheric oscillation ν analysis
sytematics ( 27 errors )
» Tau neutrino cross-section
.+6.1% .-5.0% .+1.5% .-0.5% .+0.0% .-13.0% .+12.5% .-14.2% .±25%
These affect the significance (next page)
Leading Systematic
This corresponds to 213.6 τ Events
Preliminary
SK data are inconsistent with no τ appearance at 3.8σ
Significance Calculation
» Prepare an asymmetric gaussian
centered about the best fit from the data with widths corresponding to the systematic errors (previous page)
» The integral of the PDF below
zero (corresponding to no τ appearance) is a measure of the significance
SK I+II+III : Integral below zero = 5.8 × 10-5 corresponds to 3.8 σ The Expected signficance : 2.6σ ( 2.9σ without systematics )
Central value of SK-I+II+III Fit Preliminary
Rare Particles and Proton Decay
EXAMPLE: illustration of 5.6 GeV WIMP annihila1tion signal in SK signal is before FIT Monoenergetic Eν = Mχ Isotropic assume 100% BR
» Search in atmospheric neutrino
data from SK-I, -II & –III
livetime: FC/PC 2806 days, UPMU 3109 days
» FIT: for each tested WIMP mass,
find the best configuration of ATM MC + DM signal that would match DATA the best
» Simulate signal in NUMU, NUE
and NUTAU
» Distinctive signatures: » using all SK samples:
e-like + mu-like FC+PC+UPMU (wide energy range)
Momentum [GeV/c]
cosθ
Mχ = 5.6 GeV Mχ = 5.6 GeV
Search for Diffuse Dark Matter Annihilation Search for Diffuse Dark Matter Annihilation
DM signal shape
enhanced for illustration
DATA
SK1,2,3
ATM MC with oscillations
SK two-flavor best fit
χ + χ → ν + ν
» Conservative upper limit on WIMP total
self-annihilation cross section <σV>
» No allowed excess of DM-induced ν’s
for Mχ in range 3GeV – 3 TeV
» FIT based on Evis & cosθ distr., systematics
included (120 sys. terms fitted) Limit on <σv>
J∆ Ω integrated intensity over all sky related
to DM halo density profile; includes information about DM density cusp in GC
Fit Results Fit Results
excluded above
M W H a l
- A
v e r a g e ( * )
» Focus on signal arising from Milky Way
halo (diffuse flux)
(*) H.Yuksel et al., Phys. Rev. D76, 123506 (2007), arxiv: 0707.0196 [astro-ph]
Nucleon Decay Limits, 2010
This talk
Super-K
7.5 × 1033 protons 6.0 × 1033 neutrons » Proton is predicted to be
stable in the standard model
» GUT model, Super-
Symetric Models predict various types (and lifetimes!) of proton decay
Search for p Search for p → → e e+
+ +
+ π π0
0 ,
, SK-I+II+III+IV
τ / B > 1.21 × 1034 yr (205.7 kton yr )
τ / B > 1.9 × 1033 yr (32.9 kton yr )
SK-IV Only SK-I-IV combined
Still no Candidates! Signal MC Background MC Data
SK4 MC Data Cut efficiency (%) 535.2d 2 or 3 Rings 73.6 1193 1117 All e-like 65.5 708.5 674 63.5 590.7 575 0 Decay electron 62.5 409.6 386 Total Mass Cut 45.0 ± 19.0 0.05 p → e+ + π0 85 < π0
m ass < 185 MeV
Into the next decade!
Preliminary
Summary Summary
SK-IV is underway , Solar and Atmospheric data look good New Solar results including global fits with SK-I+II+III
- Supernova Relic Neutrino Analysis has been updated ~ 1.9 ev/cm2/s
New Atmospheric results including oscillations and nucleon decay
- No oscillation induced tau events disfavored at 3.8σ
Tour of Kamioka Observatory will include Super-K, so come have a look!