Study of the Implementation of the ESEA Title I, Part C Migrant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

study of the implementation of the esea title i part c
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Study of the Implementation of the ESEA Title I, Part C Migrant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Study of the Implementation of the ESEA Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program Presentation and Discussion with the Interstate Migrant Education Council October 17, 2019 STUDY QUESTIONS How do state MEP grantees and local/regional


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Study of the Implementation of the ESEA Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program

Presentation and Discussion with the Interstate Migrant Education Council October 17, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

STUDY QUESTIONS

  • How do state MEP grantees and local/regional subgrantees

identify, recruit, and prioritize migratory children for services?

  • How does the Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX)

system facilitate the transfer of educational and health information to support enrollment, placement, and accrual

  • f credits for migratory children?
  • What services do state MEP grantees and local/regional

subgrantees provide to migratory children?

  • How do state MEP grantees and local/regional subgrantees

collaborate with other programs and organizations to deliver services to migratory children?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MOST STATE MEP GRANTEES RELIED ON THEIR LOCAL/REGIONAL MEP SUBGRANTEES AND OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS TO MANAGE THE ID&R PROCESS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RECRUITERS MOST COMMONLY IDENTIFIED MIGRATORY CHILDREN USING THEIR CONTACTS IN THE SCHOOLS, COMMUNITIES, AND BUSINESSES THAT MIGRATORY FAMILIES FREQUENT

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MOST STATE MEP DIRECTORS AND LOCAL/REGIONAL MEP COORDINATORS REPORTED THAT MSIX FACILITATED INTERSTATE STUDENT RECORDS TRANSERS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE MAJORITY OF LOCAL/REGIONAL MEP COORDINATORS AND ABOUT HALF THE STATE DIRECTORS REPORTED THAT MSIX HAD MODERATELY OR SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED OTHER PRACTICES INTENDED TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF EDUCATIONAL DISRUPTIONS FOR MIGRATORY CHILDREN

slide-7
SLIDE 7

STATE MEP DIRECTORS CONSIDERED A VARIETY OF FACTORS IN DETERMINING SPECIFIC SERVICES TO PROVIDE OR FUND FOR MIGRATORY CHILDREN

slide-8
SLIDE 8

STATE MEP GRANTEES AND LOCAL/REGIONAL SUBGRANTEES PROVIDED A VARIETY OF INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SCHOOL SUPPLIES, LANGUAGE SUPPORT AND INDIVIDUAL ADVOCACY SERVICES WERE THE MOST COMMONLY OFFERED SUPPORT SERVICE OFFERED BY LOCAL/REGIONAL GRANTEES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

THE MAJORITY OF STATE AND LOCAL MEP GRANTEES AND SUBGRANTEES COLLABORATED WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES AND OTHER ACADEMIC SUPPORTS TO MIGRATORY CHILDREN

slide-11
SLIDE 11

THE MAJORITY OF STATE AND LOCAL MEP GRANTEES AND SUBGRANTEES COLLABORATED WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES TO MIGRATORY CHILDREN

slide-12
SLIDE 12

JOANNE BOGART

OFFICE OF PLANNING, EVALUATION AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT

HTTPS://WWW2.ED.GOV/ABOUT/OFFICES/LIST/OPEPD/PPSS/REPORTS.HTML#MIGRANT

JOANNE.BOGART@ED.GOV 202-205-7855