STU TUDY Y AI AIM To assess multilevel factors influencing a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stu tudy y ai aim
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

STU TUDY Y AI AIM To assess multilevel factors influencing a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STU TUDY Y AI AIM To assess multilevel factors influencing a rural countys capacity to develop an effective youth substance use prevention program using a community participatory and ethnographic approach. BACK CKGR GROUND OUND Rural


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

STU TUDY Y AI AIM

To assess multilevel factors influencing a rural county’s capacity to develop an effective youth substance use prevention program using a community participatory and ethnographic approach.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BACK CKGR GROUND OUND

Rural communities have high rates of smoking and smokeless tobacco use and tobacco use is correlated with alcohol and other drug use. Healthy People 2020 points to long-term health threats of youth substance use and the need to increase the proportion

  • f youth who remain substance free (DHHS, 2010).

Yet many rural counties have little knowledge of effective strategies to prevent substance use.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

COM OMMUNIT MUNITY Y PART RTICIP ICIPATOR ORY Y ETHN HNOG OGRA RAPHIC PHIC MOD ODEL

Builds on community-based participatory research (CBPR)

  • Engages community members and leaders in action steps from problem

identification to project evaluation and dissemination (Israel et al., 2005).

Ethnographic approach to substance use prevention

  • Local community knowledge of substance nonuse and use provides a rich

understanding of health assets and community needs;

  • The environment surrounding substance-related health and illness; and,
  • Attitudes, beliefs, and traditions related to substance nonuse- and use

(Agar, 1986; Karim, 1997; Trotter, 1993).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Teen/P n/Pare rent nt Phot

  • tovoice

ce Teen/P n/Parent rent Gro roup p Dis iscussi cussion

  • ns

Et Ethnograph graphicall cally In Inform rmed ed Commun unity ty Assessment essment and Mapping ng Commu mmunity ty Leader er In Inter ervie views Commun unity ty Pa Partn tner ership p Approac roach h (CPRT) PRT) Commun unity ty Drug g Prevention ention and Pro rogr gram am Manual al for Rural l Yout uths hs and Pa Parent ents Commun unity ty Core e and His istor

  • ry

Physi sica cal En Environm nment ent Id Idea Syst stem ems Social cial systems ems Behavi vioral

  • ral Pa

Patt tter erns ns (Adapted from Aronson and colleagues, 2007)

Figur ure 1.

  • 1. A Communit

unity y Pa Participation icipation and Ethnogr graph aphic Model

(Kulbo lbok k , That atche her, , Park, k, & & Mesza zaros,

  • s, 2012)

2)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

METHODS

  • Enables the community to identify important places for youth,

from multiple voices, where an intervention program might be most effective.

  • Emphasizes local knowledge in the design of data gathering and

in the actual data.

  • Increases sustainability of an intervention based on important

places and depending on the congruence of “place” with experiences and perceptions of stakeholders including youth, parents, and community leaders.

Ethnographic study design

  • Can layer many types of data: Location of services, demographics,

qualitative.

  • Used in collecting, assessing, and displaying data.

GIS mapping

slide-8
SLIDE 8

METHO THODS DS (CON’T)

Spatial data gathered from:

  • Monthly meetings of community participatory

research team (CPRT), i.e., 4 community leaders (CLs), 7 parents, 18 youth (during 4- year study);

  • Interviews with 15 CLs, 39 youths, and 7

parents conducted by teams of investigators and CPRT members.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

METHO THODS DS (CON’T)

Places grouped and compared among and between group members

Meanings and roles of places were interpreted.

Transcripts analysis using constant comparative methods

Important places for youth substance nonuse and use were identified.

Individual and group interviews (CLs, youth, and parents in the community)

Audiotaped interviews conducted by teams of researchers and CPRT members.

Interview question development

Developed with CPRT by nominal group process used to finalize interview guide.

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Schools Home / Family Church Sports Recreation / Fitness Tobacco farms Rural County Jobs Health facilities Police Unsupervised youth gatherings Transportation Advertisement (Illegal) Markets

RES ESUL ULTS S FROM ROM IN INTER ERVIEW VIEWS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Spa patia ial l Da Data fro from m In Intervi views

slide-13
SLIDE 13

School

  • ol
  • Pride in school, preparing

for future, social network, limited resources

Home me/ / Fami mily ly

  • Importance of family

connections, positive or negative influences, keeping problems quiet, boredom

RESULTS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Spo ports ts/ / Rec ecreation reation

  • Community event, multiple local

sports activities, coach as role model, few alternatives to team sports, no recreation center.

Chur urch ch

  • “Bible belt,” active youth

groups, adult role models, social support

RESULTS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 Tobac

  • bacco

co field elds

  • Perceived influence
  • n use, tradition

 Law

w en enforcemen cement

  • Visibility, personal

connections with community

RESULTS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Jo Job

  • Lack of jobs for youth and

adults

Hea ealth lth facilities cilities

  • Local, role models

Transpor ansportation tation

  • Distance, car dependent

Rur ural al area ea

  • Lack vision for future of

youth, wish for more

  • pportunities for youth,

safety through slower pace and social connections

RESULTS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Un Unsuper supervised vised gatheri ering ng

  • Fields, houses, roads, lots

 Adver ertis tisemen ment

  • Near schools, noticed by youth

 Ill llega egal l mark rkets ts

  • ID enforcement, older buyers,

informal sellers

RESULTS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

DISCUSSION

Place and environment are important factors in adolescent behavioral risk reduction. Through interviews with diverse groups, we found that a place can have different meanings and roles for youth, parents, and community leaders. There are few places for youth that are universally experienced as either protective or motivating factors for substance use.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

REFERENCES

Agar, M.H. (1986). Speaking of Ethnography. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Aronson, R.E., Wallis, A.B., O’Campo, P.J., Whitehead, T.L., & Schafer, P. (2007). Ethnographically informed community evaluation: A framework and approach for evaluating community-based initiatives. Matern Child Health J, 11, 97-109. Israel, B.A. Eng, E., Schulz, A.J. & Parker, E.A. (Eds.). (2005) Methods in community- based participatory research for health, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Karim, G. (1997). In living context: An interdisciplinary approach to rethinking rural

  • prevention. In E.B. Robertson, Z. Sloboda, G.M. Boyd. L. Beatty & N.J. Kozel, eds.

Rural substance abuse: State of knowledge and issues (National Institute of Drug Abuse, Monograph 168). Rockville MD: US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Kulbok, P.A., Thatcher, E., Park, E., Meszaros, P.S. (May 31, 2012). Evolving public health nursing roles: focus on community participatory health promotion and

  • prevention. OJIN: the online journal of issues in nursing vol. 17, no. 2, manuscript 1.

Trotter, R. (1993). Ethnographic methods and inhalant use among three ethnic

  • populations. Paper presented at the Inhalant Conference, Fort Collins, CO, August

1993.