structural and rural transformation in thailand
play

Structural and Rural Transformation in Thailand: A Regression - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revisiting the Returns to Education during the Rapid Structural and Rural Transformation in Thailand: A Regression Discontinuity Approach Upalat Korwatanasakul, PhD Programme Manager, Research and Policy Analysis Cluster ASEAN-Japan Centre 1


  1. Revisiting the Returns to Education during the Rapid Structural and Rural Transformation in Thailand: A Regression Discontinuity Approach Upalat Korwatanasakul, PhD Programme Manager, Research and Policy Analysis Cluster ASEAN-Japan Centre 1

  2. Outline 1. Introduction, Research Motivation, and Contributions 2. Mincer Model 3. Empirical Methodology and Data 3.1 Empirical Methodology 3.2 Data 3.3 Econometric Specification 4. Empirical Results 5. Conclusion 6. References 2

  3. 1. Introduction, Research Motivation, and Contributions 3

  4. 1. Introduction, Research Motivation, and Contributions • The fundamental importance of human capital formation in the process of economic development is well understood. • However, quantitative magnitudes of the causal effects of education on earnings are still intensely debated in both the developed and developing country contexts. • Recent studies from developed countries have shown that endogeneity bias in the conventional OLS estimates is quite substantial, and that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in returns to education within population. • In developing countries, however, similar studies remain relatively scarce. 4

  5. 1. Introduction, Research Motivation, and Contributions • This paper applies an IV estimation approach to the incidence of the change in the compulsory schooling law in 1978 in Thailand – A methodology with an increasing number of applications in developed countries but rarely found in developing countries. • Our findings are in contrast with most of the recent studies exploiting similar institutional changes from developed countries. – OLS estimates > IV estimates • It is possible that some of explanations for the empirical findings from developed countries may not apply in developing country contexts. – Positive ability bias rather than negative ability bias • It is this lacuna in the literature that this paper intends to address. 5

  6. 1. Introduction, Research Motivation, and Contributions • Research contributions • Providing a better understanding regarding the relative magnitudes of the estimates from OLS and IV estimation – How and when the conventional “ability bias” matters in estimating returns to schooling – The impact of compulsory schooling in different settings • Providing a better understanding on the process of Thai economic development and the interplay between the rates of return to schooling and the economic development process. – Implications to other developing countries 6

  7. 2. Mincer Model 7

  8. 2. Mincer Model 8

  9. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data 9

  10. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data 3.1 Empirical Methodology • This paper applies IV estimation approach using the incidence of change in compulsory schooling law as an instrumental variable for estimating the returns to schooling (e.g., Oreopoulos, 2006). • The incidence of the 1978 Primary Education Act in Thailand. • The Government expanded compulsory education from 4 years to 6 years of primary education. • The first cohorts that got affected by the law change are cohorts born in 1966-1972 (with a 5-years adjustment period). 10

  11. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data 3.1 Empirical Methodology • One additional complication: 5 Years adjustment period (1978-1982) – Some schools are ready but some schools are not. – By 1982, every student and every school must comply to the 1978 Compulsory Education Act. – Therefore, 1966-1972 cohorts are excluded from the analysis. 11

  12. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data Fraction Graduating at Most Four and Six Years of Education, 1986 - 2012 Cohorts complied with the new law Cohorts complied with the old law Note: The lower line shows the proportion of adults aged 15 to 60 from 1986 to 2012 LFSs who report the highest attained level of education is at most four years. The upper line shows the proportion of adult aged 15 to 60 who report the highest attained level of education is at most six years. The 1966 – 1972 cohorts were the first cohorts affected by the 1978 compulsory education law and in the 5-year adjustment period. The sharp drop of the fraction graduated at most four years of education from 40 per cent to 10 per cent is observed. 12 Source: Author’s compilation based on LFS (1986-2012).

  13. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data 3.1 Empirical Methodology • The 1978 compulsory law change in Thailand affected a large proportion of the population, covering almost half the population of the fourth grade of primary education to stay in school for two more years (until grade six, the final grade of primary education). • As a result, similar to the application by Oreopoulos (2006), the estimated LATE in this paper could arguably be closer to the population ATE than that of similar studies that affect only relatively small fractions of the population. 13

  14. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data 3.2 Data • Pooled 27 consecutive annual Thai Labor Force Survey (LFS), 1986-2012 conducted by the National Statistical Office (NSO) • Only the data from the third quarter of the LFS is used in this study to control for the seasonal migration of agricultural labor. • This study limits the sample to 1,307,988 wage workers aged 15 – 60 in the year of interview. – Minimum legal working age and usual retirement age • The analysis is limited to individuals born between 1955 and 1985 • The set of variables: age, birth cohort, years of schooling, region of residence, area of residence, industrial sector, and estimated monthly wages. 14

  15. 3. The Empirical Methodology and Data 60 4 1 + 𝜌 3 𝐷 𝑗 2 + 𝜌 4 𝐷 𝑗 3 + 𝜌 5 𝐷 𝑗 4 + 𝜌 6k A ki 𝑇 𝑗 = 𝜌 0 + 𝜌 1 𝐺 𝑗 + 𝜌 2 𝐷 𝑗 + 𝜌 7l R li + 𝜁 𝑗 k=16 l=1 60 4 2 + 𝛽 4 𝐷 𝑗 3 + 𝛽 5 𝐷 𝑗 4 + 𝛽 6k A ki log 𝑧 𝑗 = 𝛽 0 + 𝛽 1 𝐺 𝑗 + 𝛽 2 𝐷 𝑗 + 𝛽 3 𝐷 𝑗 + 𝛽 7l R li + 𝜄 𝑗 k=16 l=1 60 4 1 + 𝛿 3 𝐷 𝑗 2 + 𝛿 4 𝐷 𝑗 3 + 𝛿 5 𝐷 𝑗 4 + 𝛿 6k A ki + 𝛿 2 𝐷 𝑗 log 𝑧 𝑗 = 𝛿 0 + 𝛿 1 𝑇 𝑗 + 𝛿 7l R li + 𝜘 𝑗 k=16 l=1 60 4 1 + 𝛾 3 𝐷 𝑗 2 + 𝛾 4 𝐷 𝑗 3 + 𝛾 5 𝐷 𝑗 4 + 𝛾 6k A ki log 𝑧 𝑗 = 𝛾 0 + 𝛾 1 𝑇 𝑗 + 𝛾 2 𝐷 𝑗 + 𝛾 7l R li + 𝑓 𝑗 k=16 l=1 15

  16. 4. Empirical Results 16

  17. 4 Empirical Results and Discussions • Empirical results: First stage (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) First Stage Dependent Variable: Number of Years of Schooling Compulsory 4.356*** 4.294*** 4.259*** 4.270*** 4.046*** Education (0.392) (0.391) (0.365) (0.364) (0.313) Fixed Effects: Regional No Yes Yes Yes Yes Controls Birth Cohort Quartic Quartic Quartic Quartic Quartic Additional None None Age Age Age Interpretation: Controls: Dummy Dummy Dummy • The compulsory education variable is statistically Gender Gender significant and robust across Urban different specifications. Initial sample 1,308,519 1,308,519 1,308,519 1,308,519 1,308,519 • The compulsory education size leads to 4 additional years R-squared 0.091 0.104 0.128 0.129 0.184 of schooling. • Some existing studies from Note: The dependent variables are number of years of schooling. Each regression includes controls developed countries have for a birth cohort quartic polynomial, regional dummies (except for the models with explicit region also found that the impact variables), and an indicator whether a cohort faced a new compulsory education law (six years of of compulsory schooling law compulsory education). Column (3) to (5) also include age dummy variables. Each regression change went beyond the includes the sample of 15 to 60 years old from the 1986 through 2012 LFSs. Data are first additional years of schooling aggregated into cell means and weighted by cell size. Regressions are clustered by birth cohort, regions, and industrial sectors of employment. Robust standard errors in parentheses. ***, **, and imposed by the law change * indicate p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.1, respectively. (e. g., Oreoupolos, 2003). Source: Author’s compilation based on LFS (1986 – 2012). 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend