Stroop Effect Alyssa Delp, Kaitlin Fagan, Sam Ladavich, Erin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stroop effect
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stroop Effect Alyssa Delp, Kaitlin Fagan, Sam Ladavich, Erin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

+ Stroop Effect Alyssa Delp, Kaitlin Fagan, Sam Ladavich, Erin Lafferty, Hali Strickler + Hypothesis Reaction time of the desired target will increase when the color of the typography does not match the orthographic representation of that


slide-1
SLIDE 1

+

Stroop Effect

Alyssa Delp, Kaitlin Fagan, Sam Ladavich, Erin Lafferty, Hali Strickler

slide-2
SLIDE 2

+Hypothesis

Reaction time of the desired target will increase when the color of the typography does not match the

  • rthographic representation of

that color as they do not prime for the same target.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

+Methodology

n Identical directions were read before each test to all participants n Presented on a Power Point on a lap top n Pretest consisting of blocks of colors and words

n Tested for color blindness and dyslexia/reading ability n 20 slides (10 color blocks, 10 words)

n Name the color test

n 20 slides (10 experiment, 10 control)

n Name the word test

n 20 slides (10 experiment, 10 control)

n Stopwatch on IPhone

n Had participants hit the lap button to record time and space bar to

change the slide

slide-4
SLIDE 4

+

YELLOW

slide-5
SLIDE 5

+

YELLOW

slide-6
SLIDE 6

+Consent Form

slide-7
SLIDE 7

+Subjects

n 25 subjects between the ages of 17-51

n 14 Females n 11 Males

n Quiet environment with limited distractions

slide-8
SLIDE 8

+Analysis

n Hypothesis was supported n Name the color n Experimental group n Mean = 1.0216 n Standard deviation = .

31899

n Control group n Mean = .9977 n Standard deviation = .

33572

n Read the word n Experimental group n Mean = .7298 n Standard deviation = .

26912

n Control group n Mean = .7237 n Standard deviation = .

25478

slide-9
SLIDE 9

+SPSS Outputs

n Naming the color was statistically significant

n Reaction time of naming the color within the experimental groups

was higher in comparison to reading the word

slide-10
SLIDE 10

+Discussion of Results

n Control slides (when the color matched the word) in both

tests took less time

n Naming the color proved to be statistically more difficult than

reading the word when comparing experimental groups (when the color did not match the word) from both tests

n Elicited higher reaction times

slide-11
SLIDE 11

+Limitations

n Technological delay n Human error n Misinterpretation of directions n Visual processing error

n Participants commented on closeness between red and orange

n Coordination

n Older participants had more trouble tapping the lap button on the

IPhone while looking at the computer screen

slide-12
SLIDE 12

+Interesting…

n During the pretest, the word “giraffe” was interpreted as

“graffiti” by three different participants

n When the first word written in yellow appeared in the name

the color test, some participant's reaction times were high