strong lexicalization of tree adjoining grammars
play

Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars Andreas Maletti 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars Andreas Maletti 1 and Joost Engelfriet 2 1 IMS, Universitt Stuttgart, Germany 2 LIACS, Leiden University, The Netherlands maletti@ims.uni-stuttgart.de Stuttgart May 2, 2012 Strong


  1. Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars Andreas Maletti 1 and Joost Engelfriet 2 1 IMS, Universität Stuttgart, Germany 2 LIACS, Leiden University, The Netherlands maletti@ims.uni-stuttgart.de Stuttgart — May 2, 2012 Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 1 ·

  2. Motivation Tree-Adjoining Grammars Motivation mildly context-sensitive formalism productions express local dependencies but can realize global dependencies Applications TAG for English [XTAG R ESEARCH G ROUP 2001] lexicalized TAG for German [K ALLMEYER et al. 2010] Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 2 ·

  3. Motivation Tree-Adjoining Grammars Motivation mildly context-sensitive formalism productions express local dependencies but can realize global dependencies Applications TAG for English [XTAG R ESEARCH G ROUP 2001] lexicalized TAG for German [K ALLMEYER et al. 2010] Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 2 ·

  4. Motivation Tree-Adjoining Grammars Motivation mildly context-sensitive formalism productions express local dependencies but can realize global dependencies Applications TAG for English [XTAG R ESEARCH G ROUP 2001] lexicalized TAG for German [K ALLMEYER et al. 2010] Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 2 ·

  5. Motivation TAG — Syntax Definition (J OSHI et al. 1969) G = ( N , Σ , S , R ) tree-adjoining grammar (TAG) with finite set R substitution rules adjunction rules Example (Substitution rule) NP Σ NP of NP Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 3 ·

  6. Motivation TAG — Syntax Definition (J OSHI et al. 1969) G = ( N , Σ , S , R ) tree-adjoining grammar (TAG) with finite set R substitution rules adjunction rules Example (Substitution rule) Example (Adjunction rule) N NP Σ Σ N ⋆ NP of NP ADJ Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 3 ·

  7. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation S Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  8. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used substitution rule S S NP VP NP VP Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  9. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used substitution rule S VP NP 1 VP V NP NP 2 V Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  10. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used substitution rule S V NP 1 VP likes NP 2 V likes Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  11. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used substitution rule S NP NP VP N V NP likes N Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  12. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used substitution rule S N NP VP candies V NP likes N candies Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  13. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used adjunction rule S N NP VP N ⋆ ADJ V NP likes N ADJ N candies Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  14. Motivation TAG — Example Derivation Used substitution rule S ADJ NP VP red V NP likes N ADJ N red candies Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 4 ·

  15. Motivation TAG — Semantics Definition (Generated language) L ( G ) = { t ∈ T Σ | S ⇒ ∗ G t } Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 5 ·

  16. Motivation TAG — More Than CFG Example (Productions) S S S T T S ⋆ c c S S a S b S S ⋆ a S ⋆ b Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 6 ·

  17. Motivation TAG — More Than CFG Example (Productions) S S a S S T S ⋆ a S c T S S c a S b S S ⋆ a S ⋆ b Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 6 ·

  18. Motivation TAG — More Than CFG Example (Productions) S S a S S T S ⋆ b S c S b S S a S a S b S T S ⋆ a S ⋆ b c Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 6 ·

  19. Motivation TAG — More Than CFG Example (Productions) S S a S S T S ⋆ b S c S b S S a S a S b S T S ⋆ a S ⋆ b c String language { wcw | w ∈ Σ ∗ } Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 6 ·

  20. Motivation TAG — Lexicalization Definition A TAG is lexicalized if each production contains a lexical item Theorem (S CHABES 1990) TAG can stronly lexicalize CFG and themselves Widespread myth J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars. Tree Automata and Languages. North-Holland 1992 J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars. Handbook of Formal Languages. vol. 3, Springer 1997 Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 7 ·

  21. Motivation TAG — Lexicalization Definition A TAG is lexicalized if each production contains a lexical item Theorem (S CHABES 1990) TAG can stronly lexicalize CFG and themselves Widespread myth J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars. Tree Automata and Languages. North-Holland 1992 J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars. Handbook of Formal Languages. vol. 3, Springer 1997 Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 7 ·

  22. Motivation TAG — Lexicalization Definition A TAG is lexicalized if each production contains a lexical item Theorem (S CHABES 1990 and K UHLMANN , S ATTA 2012) TAG can stronly lexicalize CFG and themselves but not themselves Widespread myth J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars. Tree Automata and Languages. North-Holland 1992 J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars. Handbook of Formal Languages. vol. 3, Springer 1997 Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 7 ·

  23. Motivation TAG — Lexicalization Definition A TAG is lexicalized if each production contains a lexical item Theorem (S CHABES 1990 and K UHLMANN , S ATTA 2012) TAG can stronly lexicalize CFG and themselves but not themselves Widespread myth J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars. Tree Automata and Languages. North-Holland 1992 J OSHI , S CHABES : Tree-adjoining grammars. Handbook of Formal Languages. vol. 3, Springer 1997 Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 7 ·

  24. Context-free tree grammar Overview Motivation 1 Context-free tree grammar 2 Normal forms 3 Lexicalization 4 Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 8 ·

  25. Context-free tree grammar Context-free Tree Grammar Definition (R OUNDS 1969) ( N , Σ , S , P ) context-free tree grammar (CFTG) ranked alphabet N nonterminals ranked alphabet Σ terminals S ∈ N 0 start nonterminal P is a finite set of A ( x 1 , . . . , x k ) → r productions A ∈ N k r ∈ C N ∪ Σ ( { x 1 , . . . , x k } ) Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 9 ·

  26. Context-free tree grammar CFTG — Example Example Productions CFTG ( N , Σ , S , P ) S → A ( α, α ) | A ( β, β ) | σ ( α, β ) N = { S ( 0 ) , A ( 2 ) } A ( x 1 , x 2 ) → A ( σ ( x 1 , S ) , σ ( x 2 , S )) Σ = { α ( 0 ) , β ( 0 ) , σ ( 2 ) } A ( x 1 , x 2 ) → σ ( x 1 , x 2 ) Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 10 ·

  27. Context-free tree grammar CFTG — Example Example Productions CFTG ( N , Σ , S , P ) S → A ( α, α ) | A ( β, β ) | σ ( α, β ) N = { S ( 0 ) , A ( 2 ) } A ( x 1 , x 2 ) → A ( σ ( x 1 , S ) , σ ( x 2 , S )) Σ = { α ( 0 ) , β ( 0 ) , σ ( 2 ) } A ( x 1 , x 2 ) → σ ( x 1 , x 2 ) A σ � A � � σ A A � � � → σ σ S → � � � � � � x 1 x 2 α β α α x 1 x 2 β β � � � x 1 x 2 S S Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 10 ·

  28. Context-free tree grammar CFTG — Example Example Productions CFTG ( N , Σ , S , P ) S → A ( α, α ) | A ( β, β ) | σ ( α, β ) N = { S ( 0 ) , A ( 2 ) } A ( x 1 , x 2 ) → A ( σ ( x 1 , S ) , σ ( x 2 , S )) Σ = { α ( 0 ) , β ( 0 ) , σ ( 2 ) } A ( x 1 , x 2 ) → σ ( x 1 , x 2 ) A σ � A � � σ A A � � � → σ σ S → � � � � � � x 1 x 2 α β α α x 1 x 2 β β � � � x 1 x 2 S S Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 10 ·

  29. Context-free tree grammar CFTG — Derivation Example Example A σ � � � σ A A A � � � → σ σ S → � � � � � α β � x 1 x 2 x 1 x 2 α α β β � � � x 1 x 2 S S A A σ A σ σ σ σ σ σ A σ σ ⇒ G ⇒ G ⇒ G ⇒ G ⇒ ∗ S G α σ α σ α α A S α α σ α α A α α S S β β α β β β β β α β Strong Lexicalization of Tree-Adjoining Grammars A. Maletti and J. Engelfriet 11 ·

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend