straw tube detector performance for the panda and cosy
play

Straw tube detector performance for the PANDA and COSY-TOF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I NTERNATI ONAL PHD PROJECTS I N APPLI ED NUCLEAR PHYSI CS AND I NNOVATI VE TECHNOLOGI ES This project is supported by the Foundation for Polish Science M PD program, co-financed by the European Union within the European Regional Development


  1. I NTERNATI ONAL PHD PROJECTS I N APPLI ED NUCLEAR PHYSI CS AND I NNOVATI VE TECHNOLOGI ES This project is supported by the Foundation for Polish Science – M PD program, co-financed by the European Union within the European Regional Development Fund Straw tube detector performance for the PANDA and COSY-TOF experiments Sedigheh Jowzaee November 25, 2014 Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

  2. Outline • PANDA experiment • Straw tube tracker • Simulation of straw tube performance • PID with straw tube • COSY-TOF experiment • Analysis of p p→pK + Λ reaction with STT data • Summary November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 2

  3. 1. PANDA Experiment PANDA (antiProton Annihilation at Darmstdat) Program • PANDA is an experiment in the FAIR facility at Darmstadt ,Germany • Interaction of antiproton with momentum range (1.5-15 GeV/c) • Hydrogen Target ( Charmonium spectroscopy, Exotic hadrons , …) • Nuclear Target ( Hadron properties in the nuclear medium, spectroscopy of hypernuclei) November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 3

  4. 1. PANDA Experiment PANDA Detector • Full angular acceptance Particle identification (p, π , K, e, µ) in the range up to ~ 8 GeV/c • Target spectrometer Forward spectrometer November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 4

  5. 2. Straw Tube Tracker • The straw tube is a proportional counter, gas-filled cylindrical tube as a cathode and a thin wire stretched along the tube axis as an anode reconstruction of particle trajectory measure: t Drift  x November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 5

  6. 2. Straw Tube Tracker • Straw tube structure • Al-mylar tube, Ø=10 mm • Gold-plated anode, Ø=20 µm • End plug, crimp pin and spring • Gas pipe (PVC med) • 2.5 g weight per tube • Advantages of straws • Modules (easy to exchange, high flexibility) • Low mass (self supporting by gas overpressure ) • High rates (1 MHz/wire) • Low aging • Fast readout (pulse shaping and digitization) November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 6

  7. 3. Simulation of Straw Tube Performance • Garfield 7.40: program for the detailed simulation of gas detectors • Simulation of transport properties of electrons and ions with Magboltz 7, 8.9.5 • Gas mixture 90% Ar, 10% CO 2 • Excellent for high-rate experiments (low aging) • Temperature 300 K, absolute pressure 2 atm Drift velocity Townsend Pure Ar 10% Argon+ 30% CO 2 20% 20% 10% 50% 2% 1% Ar+75% CO 2 Pure Argon November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 7

  8. 3. Simulation of Straw Tube Performance Gas Gain Simulation Full Penning transfer Agreement with 34% Penning transfer rate No Penning transfer The gain curve with 0%, 20%, 34%, Comparison the measured gain with 40%, 60% and 100% Penning rate Diethorn’s formula November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 8

  9. 3. Simulation of Straw Tube Performance Front-end Electronics of Straw • The first prototype new front-end chip • Preamplifier with variable gain CR-RC 2 with variable T peak • • Tail-cancelation with 2 variable time constants • Baseline stabilizer • Leading edge discriminator for timing • Buffered analog output November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 9

  10. 3. Simulation of Straw Tube Performance TOT spectra measured with 55 Fe source show good agreement with simulation for HV 1750 V and threshold based on 10% primary ionization November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 10

  11. 4. PID with Straw Tubes PID based on dE/dx: TOT ? Q • • Response of 24 single straws to 400 tracks • Set the low threshold for high position resolution • Correction to distance dependence • Truncated average for 24 straw layers Straw Tracks November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 11

  12. 4. PID with Straw Tubes Single straws response for 0.7 GeV/c particles before distance correction After distance correction After truncated average by removing 30% of the highest numbers Reasonable for PID November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 12

  13. 4. PID with Straw Tubes Separation power for p- π , p-K and π -K pairs based on TOT ( ■ ) and charge ( ▲ ) measurement. The threshold level was set based on 10% primary ionization  ( ) ( ) Mean A Mean B  ( , ) Separation A B    ( ) / 2 A B November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 13

  14. 5. COSY-TOF Experiment COSY-TOF Program • Strangeness physics study Λ -hyperon study in p p→ pK + Λ reaction • • Strange quark does not exist in nucleon as a constituent • How they create and how they interact • Theoretical description of the reaction by strange and non strange meson exchange Λ N N N π K Λ N N N N* K K • Analysis different physical effects involved to the reaction • N*-resonances • YN interaction N Σ cusp effect (N Σ –p Λ couple channel effect) • November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 14

  15. 5. COSY-TOF Experiment COSY-TOF Detector • COSY-TOF detector is Excellent for strangeness study • Upgraded with STT for tracking • Large acceptance p p • High statistics measurement Λ • Beam momentum= 2.95 GeV/c • Polarization (87.5 ± 2.0)% π - • Reconstruction of events with STT K + • 140 µm spatial resolution • 130000 reconstructed events November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 15

  16. 5. COSY-TOF Experiment STT Calibration • Reconstruction of pK + Λ events with STT→ precise calibration • Calibration steps • TDC correction • Multiple hits removal , Signal width cut, Electronics offset correction • Estimation of correlation between drift time and radius • Straw double layers geometrical position correction • Spatial resolution determination November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 16

  17. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction pK + Λ event selection criteria • • 20 % reconstruction efficiency with Χ 2 /ndf of kinematic fit < 5 MC simulation • z- component of Ʌ decay vertex > 3 cm • Invariant mass resolution 1 MeV/c 2 • angle between Ʌ and its decay proton with STT → 3 times better than the old • > 2° setup without STT E miss =E init -(E p +E K +E Λ ) November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 17

  18. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction Dalitz Plot Analysis • The experiment covers kinematically complete phase space • Strong deviations from homogenous distribution over phase space • Strong enhancements seen on the left and center MC Exp November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 18

  19. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction Dalitz Plot Analysis • Interference between physical effects in K Λ and p Λ subsystems • Nucleon excited states (N*-resonances) • N Λ interaction (p Λ -FSI ) • N Σ -p Λ coupled channel effect (N Σ cusp) November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 19

  20. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction • Dividing the Dalitz plot into three equal phase space volume regions in p Λ channel with Helicity angle cos θ pK in p Λ rest frame • m 2 p Λ distribution at upper region of Dalitz plot is significantly less than other regions - Interference with other physical effects including N* resonances November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 20

  21. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction p Λ Invariant Mass Analysis • Cusp effect is stronger at lower parts of the Dalitz plot • p Λ -FSI effect seems to be same in three parts in the low enough range of the m p Λ • Cusp effect fitted with two Breit-Wigner functions • Shape of the cusp is different in three sections • No theoretical description of cusp in p Λ channel November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 21

  22. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction Cusp Effect Angular Distribution • The cusp angular distribution is obtained by subtraction the background from the cusp effect • The cusp effect study is limited to the range of 2.11 to 2.18 MeV/c 2 in pΛ subsystem • The distributions are fitted with Legendre polynomial functions NΣ cusp angular distribution is • symmetric and has a dominant S-  d 2 wave contribution      cusp 2 5 a P (cos ) a P (cos )  0 0 2 2 cms d cos K      2 4 cos cos p p p 0 1 2 November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 22

  23. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction Particles Angular Distribution in Helicity Frame In 1 + 2 → a + b + c reaction the Helicity • angle is the angle between particle (a) and b or c in the {bc} rest frame • Physical effects in the Dalitz plot can be seen in Helicity angle distributions • The N * (1650) and N * (1720) resonances introduces an asymmetry with enhancement at cos θ Rp Λ Kp = -1 The p Λ -FSI enhances the distributions • towards cos θ RK Λ pK = -1 and cos θ RpK Λ p = 1 • No structure for cusp due to its dominant S-wave contribution November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 23

  24. 6. Data analysis of pp→pK + Λ reaction Particles Angular Distribution in CMS • The angular distributions in the CMS are symmetric due to the identical particles in the entrance channel • Some asymmetries are seen in the forward and backward regions • Incomplete MC description of the detector at small angles • Angular distributions described by Legendre polynomials 2  d      2 1 ( l ) a P (cos )  l l d  0 l       2 4 cos cos ... C C C 0 1 2 November 25, 2014 Sedigheh Jowzaee 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend